Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) ›› 2019, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (11): 810-814. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2019.11.003

Special Issue:

• Musculoskeletal Ultrasound • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Value of visualizing ultrasound in treatment and evaluation of frozen shoulder

Li Yin1, Xiaoning Liang1, Xiuqing Ma2, Shijun Mi2, Mei Han2, Ruijun Guo1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
    2. Department of Musculoskeletal and Interventional Ultrasound, Tangshan Fengrun People′s, Tangshan 064000, China
  • Received:2019-07-03 Online:2019-11-01 Published:2019-11-01
  • Contact: Ruijun Guo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Guo Ruijun, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the value of ultrasound in the treatment and evaluation of frozen shoulder.

Methods

Seventy frozen shoulders of 70 patients (case group) and 58 normal shoulders of 29 healthy volunteers (control group) were included in the study. The interior capsule thickness was compared between the two groups. Sixty-eight shoulders of the case group underwent ultrasound-guided glenohumeral joint injection combined with hydraulic dilatation. Interior capsule thickness, Visual Analogy Scale (VAS) score, and Constant-Murley score were assessed before each treatment and 2 weeks after the second treatment.

Results

The interior capsule was significantly thicker in the case group than in the control group [(3.88±1.34) mm vs (1.68±0.59) mm, t=12.339, P<0.001]. The interior capsule thickness had a diagnostic sensitivity of 87%, specificity of 95%, and area under the curve of 0.953. After the first treatment, VAS score and active range of motion (AROM) were significantly improved compared with pretreatment values, but the interior capsule thickness was not significantly changed (P>0.05). After the second treatment, the interior capsule thickness was significantly decreased compared with pre-treatment values and the values after the first treatment (t=2.606 and 2.148, respectively, P<0.05). VAS score and AROM after the first and second treatment were significantly improved (t=2.711 and 2.867, respectively, P<0.05) compared with pre-treatment values. The interior capsule thickness after the second treatment was significantly decreased compared with the first treatment (t=3175, 3.466, P<0.05), and the pain was significantly improved (t=2.591, P<0.05), but AROM was not significantly improved (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Ultrasound is a useful tool of diagnosis and evaluation of frozen shoulder. It is safe, simple, and effective to use ultrasound-guided genohumeral joint injection combined with hydraulic dilatation for the treatment of frozen shoulder.

Key words: Ultrasound, Visualization technology, Frozen shoulder, Adhesive capsulitis

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd