Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (12): 1168-1172. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.12.004

Special Issue:

• Superficial Parts Ultrasound • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Value of combination of percutaneous and transvenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound in diagnosis of sentinel lymph nodes in patients with breast cancer

Yiyun Wu1,(), Ting Cai1, Huaning Xu1, Ye Qiang1, Chun. Zhao1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, Nanjing 210029, China
  • Received:2020-06-30 Online:2020-12-01 Published:2020-12-01
  • Contact: Yiyun Wu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wu Yiyun, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To assess the value of combined percutaneous and transvenous contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in the diagnosis of sentinel lymph nodes (SLN) in patients with breast cancer.

Methods

One hundred and seventy-four patients with breast cancer who underwent surgical treatment at Department of Breast Surgery of the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine from November 2016 to June 2018 were selected. All patients underwent percutaneous CEUS for SLN localization, conventional ultrasound, and transvenous CEUS. Using the methylene blue staining method and pathological results as the standard, the effectiveness of conventional ultrasound and combined percutaneous and transvenous CEUS in diagnosing SLN was compared and analyzed.

Results

The rates of methylene blue staining and percutaneous CEUS for locating SLN were 99.4% and 96.0%, respectively, and there was no significant difference between them (P=0.067). Pathological results showed that 56 out of 175 SLN had metastasis. The specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of conventional ultrasound in diagnosing SLN were 71.4%, 64.3%, and 69.1%, respectively. The specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of combined percutaneous and transvenous CEUS in diagnosing SLN were 84.0%, 76.8%, and 81.7%, respectively. The accuracy of combined percutaneous and transvenous CEUS in diagnosing SLN was significantly higher than that of conventional ultrasonography (Chi-square value=7.46, P<0.05). According to the surgical and pathological characteristics, 175 SLN were divided into macrometastasis (n=38), micrometastasis (n=18), and non-metastasis groups (n=119). The accuracy of routine ultrasound in the diagnosis of SLN in the macrometastasis group, micrometastasis group, and non-metastatic group was 71.1%, 50.0%, and 71.4%, separately. The accuracy of combined percutaneous and transvenous CEUS in the diagnosis of SLN in these three groups was 86.8%, 55.6%, and 84.0%, separately.

Conclusion

Percutaneous CEUS is an important technique for localization of SLN before surgery. The combination of percutaneous and transvenous CEUS has good qualitative diagnostic value for SLN metastasis of breast cancer.

Key words: Contrast-enhanced ultrasound, Breast neoplasms, Sentinel lymph node biopsy

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd