Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (04): 361-367. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2021.04.004

Special Issue:

• Cardiovascular Ultrasound • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of left ventricular energy loss by vector flow mapping in patients with chronic kidney disease with diastolic dysfunction

Wei Wang1, Yueheng Wang1,(), Hui Bai1, Jinling Zhou1, Qing Chang1   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiac Ultrasound, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
  • Received:2020-06-12 Online:2021-04-01 Published:2021-05-08
  • Contact: Yueheng Wang

Abstract:

Objective

To analyze the characteristics of changes in left ventricular energy loss(EL) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with diastolic dysfunction by vector flow mapping (VFM) technique and explore the clinical value of EL in evaluating left ventricular diastolic function in patients with CKD.

Methods

Fifty-eight CKD patients were divided into two groups according to diastolic dysfunction:patients with GradeⅠ diastolic dysfunction with normal left atrial pressure (DD1 group) and those with GradeⅡor Ⅲ diastolic dysfunction with increased left atrial pressure (DD2 group). Thirty-eight healthy adults were enrolled as a control group. VFM analysis was executed to calculate the average left ventricular EL during the early filling phase (E-EL-ave), atrial filling phase (A-EL-ave), diastole phase (D-EL-ave), and systolic phase (S-EL-ave). The rate of average EL during early filling and atrial filling is expressed as E/A-EL, and the difference among the three groups were compared.

Results

A-EL-ave and S-EL-ave in the DD1 group were significantly higher than those of the control group (P<0.01for both).Average energy loss in different phases in the DD2 group were all higher than those in the control group (P<0.05 for all). E/A-EL had excellent diagnostic efficacy for CKD patients with normal left atrial pressure with a cut-off value of <1.27 (area under the curve[AUC]=0.900,P<0.01); the combination of E/A-EL and E/ e' had excellent diagnostic efficacy for CKD patients with increased left atrial pressure with a cut-off value of 1.28 (AUC=0.945, P<0.01). E wave,A wave,E/e',LAVImax, and cardiac index were independently correlated with E-EL-ave and A-EL-ave (adjusted R2=0.546, 0.613, P<0.01 for both), respectively.

Conclusion

VFM technology can reflect the impaired left ventricular diastolic function in CKD patients from the perspective of hemodynamics, and the energy loss is related to the indicators for evaluating left ventricular diastolic function.

Key words: Ventricular function, Left, Chronic kidney disease, Energy loss, Vector flow mapping

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd