Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (05): 482-486. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2021.05.008

Special Issue:

• Cardiovascular Ultrasound • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical value of contrast echocardiography in diagnosing complications and assessing cardiac function in patients with coronary heart disease

Daorina Bao1, Siying Liang1, Tiangang Zhu1()   

  1. 1. Cardiac Center, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing 100044, China
  • Received:2019-10-10 Online:2021-05-01 Published:2021-06-10
  • Contact: Tiangang Zhu

Abstract:

Objective

To observe wall motion, left ventricle volume, and complications in coronary heart disease (CHD) patients by left ventricular opacification (LVO) and assess the value of LVO examination in the diagnosis and treatment of CHD.

Methods

The differences of TTE and LVO were compared by the results of ESV, EDV, and LVEF, which were measured through biplane Simpson's method in 65 patients with CHD at Peking University People's Hospital from May 2016 to December 2018, using paired-samples t test and Chi-square test. We also observed the left ventricular structure and wall motion and analyzed the relationship between wall motion score index (WMSI) and LVEF through linear regression.

Results

Left ventricular EDV and ESV measured by TTE were (90.77±35.17) ml and (49.20±29.56) ml, respectively; the corresponding values measured by LVO were (126.86±41.74) ml and (68.89±36.25) ml. There were significant differences in the values measured by TTE and LVO (t=-14.589, -8.780; P<0.001). LVEF measured by TTE and LVO was classified into different groups, respectively (LVEF≥50%; LVEF=40%-49%; LVEF<40%), and there was a significant difference in the composition of groups between them (χ2=28.685, P<0.001). TTE suggested 11 cases of suspected left ventricular mural thrombosis, of which eight were confirmed by LVO, and another five cases were diagnosed by LVO. Twenty cases of left ventricular aneurysm were diagnosed by LVO, of which 11 were confirmed and 9 were missed by TTE. There was a significant difference between LVO and TTE in the diagnosis of CHD complications, apical thrombosis, and ventricular aneurysm (χ2=19.211, 22.234; P<0.001). WMSI calculated by LVO and TTE was (1.68±0.43) and (1.50±0.24), respectively, and they both had a negative correlation with LVEF results [(48.50±13.49)% and (48.94±13.27)%; r=-0.630, -0.625; P<0.01).

Conclusion

LVO allows to observe ventricular wall segment clearly, assessing left ventricular systolic function more accurately, and diagnose apical thrombosis and ventricular aneurysm more sensitively by visualizing left ventricular endocardial boundary in CHD patients.

Key words: Left ventricular opacification, Coronary heart disease, Cardiac function assessment, Thrombosis, Ventricular aneurysm

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd