Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (07): 643-646. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2021.07.005

Special Issue:

• Ultrasound Quality Control • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of ultrasound quality control between tertiary hospitals of traditional Chinese medicine and other tertiary general hospitals in Anhui Province, China in 2019

Jiajia Wang1, Jinping Wang2(), Fan Jiang3, Baoqi Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasonography, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hefei 230031, China
    2. Department of Ultrasonography, the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hefei 230031, China; Anhui Ultrasound Medical Quality Control Center, Hefei 230601, China
    3. Anhui Ultrasound Medical Quality Control Center, Hefei 230601, China; The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medicine University, Hefei 230601, China
  • Received:2020-05-01 Online:2021-07-01 Published:2021-07-16
  • Contact: Jinping Wang

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate and analyze the present situation and possible problems of ultrasonic quality control in tertiary hospitals of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) in Anhui Province, China.

Methods

Anhui Ultrasonic Medical Quality Control Center issued the 2019 quality questionnaire to 48 public tertiary hospitals in Anhui Province, China, including 10 TCM hospitals and 38 general hospitals. Seven ultrasonic quality control indicators from the 2018 Ultrasonic Medical Professional Quality Management Control Target Expert Consensus, and the development of ultrasonic subgroups in the hospital were compared between the two groups.

Results

The average numbers of daily ultrasound examinations and annual critical value report cases in TCM hospitals were less than those in the same level general hospitals (210.9 person-time/day vs 482.5 person-time/day; 12 cases vs 44 cases). In terms of the development of ultrasonic subgroups including interventional ultrasound subgroup and musculoskeletal subgroup, there was also a significant difference between TCM hospitals and general hospitals (30.0% vs 89.4%; 10.0% vs 63.2%).

Conclusion

There is a difference in the development of ultrasonic subgroups groups and ultrasound new technology between TCM hospitals and general hospitals in Anhui Province, China. Developing suitable new ultrasound technology and improving the ultrasound medical education in TCM universities may promote the improvement of ultrasound quality control in TCM hospitals.

Key words: Ultrasonic medicine, Quality control, Medical education, Ultrasound doctor

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd