Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (03): 200-205. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.03.003

• Abdominal Ultrasound • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Contrast-enhanced ultrasound versus contrast-enhanced MRI for diagnosis of well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma and precancerous lesions

Peili Fan1, Feng Mao1, Zhengbiao Ji1, Jiaying Cao1, Ruofan Sheng2, Wenping Wang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai 200032, China; Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and Engineering, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
    2. Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai 200032, China; Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
  • Received:2020-06-08 Online:2022-03-01 Published:2022-04-15
  • Contact: Wenping Wang

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced MRI for well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and dysplastic nodules (DNs).

Methods

Thirty-nine patients with 39 well-differentiated HCC and seven patients with eight DNs pathologically confirmed who underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and enhanced MRI at Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University from January 2012 to December 2018 were enrolled. Imaging features and diagnostic efficacy of the two imaging methods were analyzed. Chi-square test and Kappa value were used to compare the consistency of the two imaging methods. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to calculate the diagnostic efficiency of the two imaging methods.

Results

For the two imaging methods, the consistency of arterial phase enhancement patterns of well-differentiated HCC was 69.2% (27/39) and Kappa value was 0.482. The consistency of late phase enhancement patterns of well-differentiated HCC was 53.8% (21/39) and Kappa value was 0.168. The major enhancement pattern of DNs was "iso-enhancement~iso-enhancement" on CEUS, and "hyperintensity~hypointensity" on contrast-enhanced MRI. No DNs exhibited washout in the late phase on CEUS. Among the four examination methods, CEUS, enhanced MRI, and CEUS combined with enhanced MRI (detected by both or by either), the sensitivity (66.7%) and accuracy (61.7%) of CEUS combined with enhanced MRI (detected by either) were highest for the diagnosis of well-differentiated HCC, while CEUS had the highest specificity (100%) and area under the ROC curve (0.658, 95%CI: 0.482-0.834).

Conclusion

CEUS combined with enhanced MRI is helpful for differential diagnosis of well-differentiated HCC and DNs, while CEUS has a higher specificity.

Key words: Hepatocellular carcinoma, Dysplastic nodule, Ultrasound, Magnetic resonance imaging

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd