Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (06): 521-526. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.06.006

• Cardiovascular Ultrasound • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Assessment of myocardial work in high normal blood pressure and hypertension patients by echocardiographic left ventricular pressure-strain loop

Xueyan Ding1, Yidan Li1, Lanlan Sun1, Xiaoguang Ye1, Qizhe Cai1, Yunyun Qin1, Yuanzhi Li1, Jiangtao Wang2, Xiuzhang Lyu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Echocardiography, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100020, China
    2. Department of Clinical Research, General Electrics Cardiovascular Ultrasound, Beijing 100176, China
  • Received:2020-10-20 Online:2022-06-01 Published:2022-06-16
  • Contact: Xiuzhang Lyu

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate myocardial work by echocardiographic left ventricular pressure-strain loop (PSL) in patients with high normal blood pressure and hypertension.

Methods

Forty-five patients with hypertension (hypertension group) who underwent echocardiography at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University from August 2019 to March 2020 were selected retrospectively. Forty patients with high normal blood pressure (high normal blood pressure group) and 30 subjects with normal blood pressure (normal blood pressure group) were included in the same period and received echocardiography. The parameters of conventional echocardiography were measured, and the left ventricular global longitudinal strain (GLS) and mechanical dispersion (MD) were assessed by speckle tracking echocardiography. The left ventricular PSL was used to evaluate myocardial work parameters, including global work index (GWI), global constructive work (GCW), global waste work (GWW), and global work efficiency (GWE). Echocardiographic parameters, myocardial strain parameters, and myocardial work parameters were compared among the three groups, and the correlation of myocardial work parameters with conventional echocardiographic parameters and myocardial strain parameters was analyzed.

Results

GLS decreased successively in the normal blood pressure group, high normal blood pressure group, and hypertension group, but there was no significant difference among the three groups (P>0.05). MD was significantly higher in the hypertension group than in the normal blood pressure group and high normal blood pressure group (P<0.05). Compared with normal blood pressure group, GWI and GCW were increased (P<0.05) in the high normal blood pressure group. GWI, GCW, and GWW were increased, while GWE was decreased in the hypertension group (P<0.05) compared with the normal blood pressure group. GCW and GWW were increased and GWE was decreased in the high normal blood pressure group (P<0.05) compared with the high normal blood pressure group. In the hypertension group, GWI and GCW were positively correlated with GLS (r=0.695 and r=0.691, P<0.001) and LVEF (r=0.409 and r=0.406, P=0.001). GWW was negatively correlated with GLS (r=-0.306, P<0.05), and positively correlated with MD (r=0.384, P=0.002). GWE was positively correlated with GLS (r=0.519, P<0.001), and negatively correlated with MD (r=-0.482, P<0.001).

Conclusion

The myocardial work efficiency of patients with high normal blood pressure is still normal, while that of patients with hypertension is damaged and the energy loss is increased. Quantitative evaluation of myocardial work by left ventricular PSL may provide more valuable information for the evaluation of cardiac function in patients with high normal blood pressure and hypertension.

Key words: Echocardiography, Pressure-strain loop, Myocardial work, Hypertension

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd