| 1 |
Mensah GA, Fuster V, Murray CJL, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risks, 1990-2022 [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2023, 82(25): 2350-2473.
|
| 2 |
张兆毓, 杨时佳, 李小攀, 等. 1990年至2019年我国心血管疾病负担变化及趋势分析 [J]. 心脑血管病防治, 2024, 24(2): 5-9, 65.
|
| 3 |
陈伟伟, 隋辉, 马丽媛. 中国心脑血管病流行现况及防治进展 [J]. 心脑血管病防治, 2016, 16(2): 79-83.
|
| 4 |
Ye Q, Zou B, Yeo YH, et al. Global prevalence, incidence, and outcomes of non-obese or lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2020, 5(8): 739-752.
|
| 5 |
Tang X, Wu M, Wu S, et al. Continuous metabolic syndrome severity score and the risk of CVD and all-cause mortality [J]. Eur J Clin Invest, 2022, 52(9): e13817.
|
| 6 |
Falk E. Pathogenesis of atherosclerosis [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006, 47(8 Suppl): C7- C12.
|
| 7 |
Postley JE, Perez A, Wong ND, et al. Prevalence and distribution of sub-clinical atherosclerosis by screening vascular ultrasound in low and intermediate risk adults: the New York physicians study [J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2009, 22(10): 1145-1151.
|
| 8 |
Stein JH, Korcarz CE, Hurst RT, et al. Use of carotid ultrasound to identify subclinical vascular disease and evaluate cardiovascular disease risk: a consensus statement from the American Society of Echocardiography Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Task Force. Endorsed by the Society for Vascular Medicine [J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2008, 21(2): 93-111; quiz 189-190.
|
| 9 |
del Sol AI, Moons KG, Hollander M, et al. Is carotid intima-media thickness useful in cardiovascular disease risk assessment? The Rotterdam Study [J]. Stroke, 2001, 32(7): 1532-1538.
|
| 10 |
Johri AM, Nambi V, Naqvi TZ, et al. Recommendations for the assessment of carotid arterial plaque by ultrasound for the characterization of atherosclerosis and evaluation of cardiovascular risk: From the American Society of Echocardiography [J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2020, 33(8): 917-933.
|
| 11 |
中国心血管病风险评估和管理指南编写联合委员会. 中国心血管病风险评估和管理指南 [J]. 中国循环杂志, 2019, 34(1): 4-28.
|
| 12 |
Saba L, Antignani PL, Gupta A, et al. International Union of Angiology (IUA) consensus paper on imaging strategies in atherosclerotic carotid artery imaging: From basic strategies to advanced approaches [J]. Atherosclerosis, 2022, 354: 23-40.
|
| 13 |
Aktaa S, Gencer B, Arbelo E, et al. European Society of Cardiology Quality Indicators for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention: developed by the Working Group for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Quality Indicators in collaboration with the European Association for Preventive Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology [J]. Eur J Prev Cardiol, 2022, 29(7): 1060-1071.
|
| 14 |
Poredoš P, Cífková R, Marie Maier JA, et al. Preclinical atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events: Do we have a consensus about the role of preclinical atherosclerosis in the prediction of cardiovascular events? [J]. Atherosclerosis, 2022, 348: 25-35.
|
| 15 |
Roman MJ, Naqvi TZ, Gardin JM, et al. American society of echocardiography report. Clinical application of noninvasive vascular ultrasound in cardiovascular risk stratification: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society for Vascular Medicine and Biology [J]. Vasc Med, 2006, 11(3): 201-211.
|
| 16 |
Sidhu PS, Cantisani V, Dietrich CF, et al. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations for the clinical practice of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in non-hepatic applications: Update 2017 (Long Version) [J]. Ultraschall Med, 2018, 39(2): e2-e44.
|
| 17 |
华扬, 惠品晶, 邢瑛琦. 中国脑卒中血管超声检查指导规范 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2015, 12(8): 599-610.
|
| 18 |
Xue W, Tian Y, Jing L, et al. Sex-specific prediction value of common carotid artery diameter for stroke risk in a hypertensive population: a cross-sectional study [J]. Quant Imaging Med Surg, 2022, 12(2): 1428-1437.
|
| 19 |
Xue W, Tian Y, Jing L, et al. Sex difference in the correlation between carotid artery diameter and prevalence of stroke: Insights from a Chinese population [J]. Int J Cardiol, 2022, 353: 103-108.
|
| 20 |
Yin Z, Guo J, Li R, et al. Common carotid artery diameter and the risk of cardiovascular disease mortality: a prospective cohort study in Northeast China [J]. BMC Public Health, 2024, 24(1): 251.
|
| 21 |
van Dijk RA, Nijpels G, Twisk JW, et al. Change in common carotid artery diameter, distensibility and compliance in subjects with a recent history of impaired glucose tolerance: a 3-year follow-up study [J]. J Hypertens, 2000, 18(3): 293-300.
|
| 22 |
Eigenbrodt ML, Evans GW, Rose KM, et al. Bilateral common carotid artery ultrasound for prediction of incident strokes using intima-media thickness and external diameter: an observational study [J]. Cardiovasc Ultrasound, 2013, 11: 22.
|
| 23 |
Eigenbrodt ML, Bursac Z, Rose KM, et al. Common carotid arterial interadventitial distance (diameter) as an indicator of the damaging effects of age and atherosclerosis, a cross-sectional study of the Atherosclerosis Risk in Community Cohort Limited Access Data (ARICLAD), 1987-89 [J]. Cardiovasc Ultrasound, 2006, 4: 1.
|
| 24 |
Polak JF, Kronmal RA, Tell GS, et al. Compensatory increase in common carotid artery diameter. Relation to blood pressure and artery intima-media thickness in older adults. Cardiovascular Health Study [J]. Stroke, 1996, 27(11): 2012-2015.
|
| 25 |
Polak JF, Sacco RL, Post WS, et al. Incident stroke is associated with common carotid artery diameter and not common carotid artery intima-media thickness [J]. Stroke, 2014, 45(5): 1442-1446.
|
| 26 |
Touboul PJ, Hennerici MG, Meairs S, et al. Mannheim carotid intima-media thickness and plaque consensus (2004-2006-2011). An update on behalf of the advisory board of the 3rd, 4th and 5th watching the risk symposia, at the 13th, 15th and 20th European Stroke Conferences, Mannheim, Germany, 2004, Brussels, Belgium, 2006, and Hamburg, Germany, 2011 [J]. Cerebrovasc Dis, 2012, 34(4): 290-296.
|
| 27 |
AbuRahma AF, Avgerinos ED, Chang RW, et al. Society for vascular surgery clinical practice guidelines for management of extracranial cerebrovascular disease [J]. J Vasc Surg, 2022, 75(1s): 4s-22s.
|
| 28 |
Piepoli MF, Hoes AW, Agewall S, et al. 2016 European Guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: The Sixth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and Other Societies on Cardiovascular Disease Prevention in Clinical Practice (constituted by representatives of 10 societies and by invited experts) Developed with the special contribution of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR) [J]. Atherosclerosis, 2016, 252: 207-274.
|
| 29 |
Arnold JA, Modaresi KB, Thomas N, et al. Carotid plaque characterization by duplex scanning: observer error may undermine current clinical trials [J]. Stroke, 1999, 30(1): 61-65.
|
| 30 |
华扬. 脑卒中血管超声 [M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2021.
|
| 31 |
王陇德. 中国脑卒中防治指导规范(合订本) [M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2018.
|
| 32 |
中国医师协会超声医师分会. 超声评价颈动脉易损斑块中国专家共识(2023版) [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2023, 32(8): 645-655.
|
| 33 |
国家卫生健康委员会脑卒中防治专家委员会血管超声专业委员会,中国超声医学工程学会浅表器官及外周血管超声专业委员会,中国超声医学工程学会颅脑及颈部血管超声专业委员会. 头颈部血管超声若干问题的专家共识(颈动脉部分) [J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2020, 17(6): 346-353.
|
| 34 |
Dósa E, Hirschberg K, Apor A, et al. Echolucent or predominantly echolucent femoral plaques predict early restenosis after eversion carotid endarterectomy [J]. J Vasc Surg, 2010, 51(2): 345-350.
|
| 35 |
Li Q, Liu B, Zhao Y, et al. Echolucent carotid plaque is associated with restenosis after carotid endarterectomy [J]. J Neurosurg, 2021, 134(3): 1203-1209.
|
| 36 |
Insull W Jr. The pathology of atherosclerosis: plaque development and plaque responses to medical treatment [J]. Am J Med, 2009, 122(1 Suppl): S3-S14.
|
| 37 |
Ferguson GG, Eliasziw M, Barr HW, et al. The North American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial : surgical results in 1415 patients [J]. Stroke, 1999, 30(9): 1751-1758.
|
| 38 |
Randomised trial of endarterectomy for recently symptomatic carotid stenosis: final results of the MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST) [J]. Lancet, 1998, 351(9113): 1379-1387.
|
| 39 |
Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis--Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference [J]. Radiology, 2003, 229(2): 340-346.
|
| 40 |
Spagnoli LG, Mauriello A, Sangiorgi G, et al. Extracranial thrombotically active carotid plaque as a risk factor for ischemic stroke [J]. JAMA, 2004, 292(15): 1845-1852.
|
| 41 |
叶明, 华扬, 凌晨, 等. 颈动脉病变血管造影不同方法测量与超声检测一致性的比较[C].长沙: 第八届全国超声医学学术会议, 2004.
|
| 42 |
陈忠, 杨耀国. 颈动脉狭窄诊治指南 [J/CD]. 中国血管外科杂志(电子版), 2017, 9(3): 169-175.
|
| 43 |
Wang Y, Wang T, Luo Y, et al. Identification markers of carotid vulnerable plaques: an update [J]. Biomolecules, 2022, 12(9): 1192.
|
| 44 |
Johri AM, Herr JE, Li TY, et al. Novel ultrasound methods to investigate carotid artery plaque vulnerability [J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2017, 30(2): 139-148.
|
| 45 |
Brinjikji W, Huston J 3rd, Rabinstein AA, et al. Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability [J]. J Neurosurg, 2016, 124(1): 27-42.
|
| 46 |
Saba L, Saam T, Jäger HR, et al. Imaging biomarkers of vulnerable carotid plaques for stroke risk prediction and their potential clinical implications [J]. Lancet Neurol, 2019, 18(6): 559-572.
|
| 47 |
Muller JE, Abela GS, Nesto RW, et al. Triggers, acute risk factors and vulnerable plaques: the lexicon of a new frontier [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 1994, 23(3): 809-813.
|
| 48 |
Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, et al. From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part II [J]. Circulation, 2003, 108(15): 1772-1778.
|
| 49 |
Schaar JA, Muller JE, Falk E, et al. Terminology for high-risk and vulnerable coronary artery plaques. Report of a meeting on the vulnerable plaque, June 17 and 18, 2003, Santorini, Greece [J]. Eur Heart J, 2004, 25(12): 1077-1082.
|
| 50 |
Sidhu PS, Cantisani V, Dietrich CF, et al. The EFSUMB guidelines and recommendations for the clinical practice of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in non-hepatic applications: Update 2017 (Short Version) [J]. Ultraschall Med, 2018, 39(2): 154-180.
|
| 51 |
Forsberg F, Machado P, Stanczak M, et al. Assessing carotid plaque neovascularity and calcifications in patients prior to endarterectomy [J]. J Vasc Surg, 2019, 70(4): 1137-1144.
|
| 52 |
Yang F, Wang C. Consistency of superb microvascular imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in detection of intraplaque neovascularization: A meta-analysis [J]. PLoS One, 2020, 15(7): e0230937.
|
| 53 |
Wang Q, Huang Y, Zhang Y, et al. Carotid artery vulnerable plaque model for cerebrovascular events by conventional ultrasound & contrast-enhanced ultrasound: A preliminary study [J]. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2022, 80(2): 197-209.
|
| 54 |
Huang Y, Liu Q, Xu J, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound perfusion patterns and serum lipid signatures of vulnerable carotid artery plaque in predicting stroke: A cohort study of carotid stenosis in Chinese patients [J]. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2020, 75(3): 349-359.
|
| 55 |
Camps-Renom P, Prats-Sánchez L, Casoni F, et al. Plaque neovascularization detected with contrast-enhanced ultrasound predicts ischaemic stroke recurrence in patients with carotid atherosclerosis [J]. Eur J Neurol, 2020, 27(5): 809-816.
|
| 56 |
Saba L, Cau R, Murgia A, et al. Carotid Plaque-RADS: A novel stroke risk classification system [J]. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging, 2024, 17(1): 62-75.
|