Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) ›› 2015, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (07): 526-530. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2015.07.006

Special Issue:

• Abdominal Ultrasound • Previous Articles     Next Articles

The value of double contrast-enhanced unltrasonography in the diagnosis of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Li Wang1, Xiaoming Fan1, Chengzhong Peng2,(), Shiliang Tu3, Ruizhong Ye1, Shuangxi Chen1, Yuan Cheng4   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasonography, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou 310014, China
    2. Department of Ultrasonography, Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou 310007, China
    3. Department of Anus-intestines, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou 310014, China
    4. Department of Pathology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Hangzhou 310014, China
  • Received:2015-05-27 Online:2015-07-01 Published:2015-07-01
  • Contact: Chengzhong Peng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Peng Chengzhong, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the role of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCUS) in the diagnosis of rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).

Methods

In eleven patients with rectal GISTs before surgery, gastrointestinal ultrasound contrast agent were injected into rectal lumen and tumor’s two dimensional ultrasound features were analyzed. Microbubbles were injected into the vein to investigate the feature of lesion microcirculation perfusion. After the surgery, according to the tumor diameter and mitotic count, rectal GISTs were classified as very low-risk, low-risk, intermediated-risk and high-risk tumors. The very low-risk and low-risk tumors were grouped together as one group while the intermediated-risk and high-risk tumors were grouped together as another group. According to ultrasound performance and pathological type, ultrasonic features of rectal GISTs with different risk levels were estimated.

Results

Among all rectal GISTs cases, 63.6% (7/11) were low-risk. Under DCUS, the tumor diameter was less than 5 cm, with regular round, hypoechogenicity, uniform low enhancement and less internal liquefaction necrosis. For the 36.4% (4/11) high-risk cases, under DCUS, the tumor diameter was ≥5 cm, with irregular round or lobulation, mixed hyperechogenicity and hypoechogenicity, nonuniform high enhancement, large blood vessel and common liquefied necrosis region. The biological behavior of rectal GISTs was relevant to lesion size, liquefaction necrosis and enhancement mode of ultrasound contrast and irrelevant to the bound and shape of lesion. The accuracy of DCUS and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography were 90.9% (10/11) and 72.7% (8/11) respectively.

Conclusions

DCUS is considered as an effective tool in diagnosing rectal GISTs and can get useful information of the biological characteristics. It has great value for the diagnosis and treatment of rectal GISTs

Key words: Ultrasonography, Microbubbles, Rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd