Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) ›› 2018, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (07): 506-510. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2018.07.007

Special Issue:

• Cardiovascular Ultrasound • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Clinical study of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography for quantitatively assessing left ventricular outflow tract geometry and stroke volume

Heping Deng1, Min Pu2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasonography, the Third Hospital of Hebei Medical Universitiy, Shijiazhuang 050051, China
    2. Department of Cardiology, Medical Center of Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem 27127, USA
  • Received:2018-04-17 Online:2018-07-01 Published:2018-07-01
  • Contact: Min Pu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Pu Min, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To assess left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) geometry using three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (3D TEE), in order to provide a theoretical basis for underestimation of aortic valve area by continuity equation.

Methods

Fifty patients who underwent two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2D TTE) and 3D TEE of 50 patients from May 2010 to February 2011 were assessed retrospectively. LVOT diameters were measured at distal (aortic annulus, A1), middle (5 mm from the annulus) and proximal (10 mm from the annulus) level, and cross-sectional areas (CSA) were calculated respectively. CSA and stroke volume (SV) calculated from 2D TTE circular area formula (2D TTEcircular), 3D TEE elliptical area formula (3D TEEelliptical) and 3D TEE planimetry (3D TEEplanimetry) were compared.

Results

3D TEE revealed that LVOT was funnel-shaped in most of the patients (76%). CSA was circular at A1 with the smallest area, and was elliptic at A2 and A3 with larger areas. There was no significant difference among CSAcircular [(3.7±0.9) cm2] , CSAelliptical [(3.9±0.8) cm2] and CSAplanimetry [(3.9±1.0) cm2] at A1 level (F=1.025, P=0.45). CSAcircular was (3.4±0.8) cm2 at A2 and (3.5±0.9) cm2 at A3, and CSAplanimetry was (4.0±1.0) cm2 at A2 and (5.0±1.4) cm2 at A3. CSAcircular was significantly smaller than CSAplanimetry at both A2 and A3 leves (F=8.055, 22.098; P=0.001,<0.001). There was no significant difference among SVcircular, SVelliptical, and SVplanimetry at A1 level (F=0.579, P=0.56). SVcircular was (64±18) ml at A2 and (67±19) ml at A3, and SVplanimetry was (76±23) ml at A2 and (95±33) ml at A3. SVcircular was significantly smaller than SVplanimetry at both A2 and A3 level (F=5.168, 15.638; P=0.004,<0.001).

Conclusions

LVOT is uniformly funnel-shaped with the smallest CSA at the annulus. Using of 3D measurement of LVOT diameters or area may improve the accuracy of calculating SV, reduce the risk for underestimation of aortic valve area and improve accuracy of diagnosing aortic stenosis.

Key words: Echocardiography, Three-dimensional, Left ventricular outflow tract, Geometry

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd