切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (1) : 56 -60. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2015.01.014

所属专题: 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

超声弹性成像不同切面应变比值法诊断甲状腺结节的价值比较
郑海宁, 罗渝昆, 张雁, 温泉, 樊亚红, 冯蕾, 李振彩   
  1. 100048 北京,解放军总医院第一附属医院超声科
    100048 北京,解放军总医院超声科
    100048 北京,解放军总医院第一附属医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2014-07-12 出版日期:2015-01-01
  • 通信作者: 罗渝昆
  • 基金资助:
    北京市自然科学基金面上项目(7152137);国家自然科学基金面上项目(81471681)
  • Received:2014-07-12 Published:2015-01-01
引用本文:

郑海宁, 罗渝昆, 张雁, 温泉, 樊亚红, 冯蕾, 李振彩. 超声弹性成像不同切面应变比值法诊断甲状腺结节的价值比较[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2015, 12(1): 56-60.

目的

探讨不同切面超声弹性成像应变比值法在诊断甲状腺结节良恶性方面的价值区别。

方法

选取2012年11月至2013年5月因甲状腺结节疾病在解放军总医院超声科就诊的患者118例,共有153个结节,患者术前均行弹性成像检查,从纵切和横切面分别获得弹性应变率面积比值,采用ROC曲线评价其诊断价值,将结节分为临近峡部组、非临近峡部组两组,并将诊断结果与病理结果对照。

结果

纵切面与横切面面积应变比值法在鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.906、0.844,二者无显著性差异(Z=1.54,P>0.05);最佳诊断界点分别为:3.65、3.58;纵切面、横切面应变比值法的敏感度、特异度、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为:81.2%、80.8%、81.0%、87.2%、71.2%;77.2%、76.9%、77.1%、84.4%、63.4%。临近峡部组纵切面与横切面面积应变比值法在鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.903、0.830,二者无显著性差异(Z=1.125,P>0.05);最佳诊断点分别为:3.30、3.28;纵切面、横切面应变比值法的敏感度、特异度、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为:86.2%、68.8%、80.0%、83.3%、73.3%;78.6%、58.8%、71.1%、75.9%、62.5%。非临近峡部组纵切面与横切面面积应变比值法在鉴别甲状腺良恶性结节的AUC分别为0.906、0.852,二者无显著性差异(Z=0.936,P>0.05);最佳诊断界点分别为:3.33、3.71;纵切面、横切面应变比值法的敏感度、特异度、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为:90.1%、75.7%、85.2%、87.7%、80.0%;84.7%、70.3%、80.6%、83.6%、72.2%。

结论

超声弹性成像有助于甲状腺结节的鉴别诊断,但横切面与纵切面的诊断效果无统计学差异。

Objective

To study the value of strain ratio from longitudinal section and cross section in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules using ultrasonic elastography.

Methods

A total of 118 patients with 153 thyroid nodules underwent examinations with real-time ultrasonic elastography to obtain the strain ratio from longitudinal section and cross section. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the value of elastography. The nodules are divided into two groups, group one included nodules which were near the isthmus and group two included other nodules. Diagnostic results were compared with pathological results.

Results

The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the strain ratios for differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules were 0.906 and 0.844. There was no statistical difference (Z=1.542, P>0.05). The best diagnostic cut-off points of the strain ratios were 3.65 and 3.58. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of the strain ratio from longitudinal section for differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules were 81.2%, 80.8%, 81.0%, 87.2% and 71.2% and those of strain ratio from cross section were 77.2%, 76.9%, 77.1%, 84.4% and 63.4%. In group one, the AUC were 0.903 and 0.830. There was no statistical difference (Z=1.125, P>0.05). The best diagnostic cut-off points were 3.30 and 3.28. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of the strain ratio from longitudinal section for differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules were 86.2%, 68.8%, 80.0%, 83.3% and 73.3% and those of strain ratio from cross section were 78.6%, 58.8%, 71.1%, 75.9% and 62.5%. In group two, the AUC were 0.906 and 0.852. There was no statistical difference (Z=0.936, P>0.05). The best diagnostic cut-off points were 3.33 and 3.71. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, negative predictive value of the strain ratio from longitudinal section for differentiating benign and malignant thyroid nodules were 90.1%, 75.7%, 85.2%, 87.7% and 80.0% and those of strain ratio from cross section were 84.7%, 70.3%, 80.6%, 83.6% and 72.2%.

Conclusion

Real-time ultrasonic elastography is helpful to the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules, but there is no statistical difference between the strain ratio from longitudinal section and cross section.

图1 甲状腺乳头状癌超声弹性成像图。图a为纵切;图b为横切面
图2 结节性甲状腺肿超声弹性成像图。图a为纵切;图b为横切面
图3 不同切面应变比值法诊断甲状腺良恶性结节的ROC曲线
表1 不同切面超声弹性成像应变比值法诊断甲状腺良性结节的配对比较(个)
表2 不同切面超声弹性成像应变比值法诊断甲状腺恶性结节的配对比较(个)
1 Cantisani V, D′Andrea V, Biancari F, et al. Prospective evaluation of multiparametric ultrasound and quantitative elastosonography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: preliminary experience[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 8l(10): 2678-2683.
2 Ning CP, Jiang SQ, Zhang T, et al. The value of strain ratio in differential diagnosis of thyroid solid nodules[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(2): 286-291.
URL    
3 何兴. 无射频信号上的快速弹性成像位移估计方法[J]. 重庆医学, 2011, 40(27): 271l-2713.
4 Rago T, Santini F, Scutari M, et al. E1astography: new developments in ultrasound for predicting malignancy in thyroid nodules[J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2007, 92(8): 2917-2922.
5 Cantisani V, D′Andrea V, Biancri F, et al. Prospective evaluation of multiparametric u1trsoluld and quantitative elastosonography in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: preliminary experience[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 8l(10): 2678-2683.
6 李银燕,王学梅,张义侠, 等. 超声弹性成像定量分析脂肪肝的初步探讨[J]. 中国医科大学学报, 2009, 38(8): 62-64.
7 丛淑珍,冯占武,甘科红, 等. 甲状腺良、恶性结节超声弹性成像特征分析[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 20l0, 26(9): 1682-1684.
8 Ning CP, Jiang SQ, zhang T, et al. The value of strain ratio in differential diagnosis of thyroid solid nodules[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(2): 286-291.
URL    
9 Xing P, Wu L, Zhang C, et al. Differentiation of benign from malignant thyroid lesions: calculation of the strain ratio on thyroid sonoelastography[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2011, 30(5): 663-669.
10 俞清,王文平,李超伦, 等. 实时超声弹性成像定量参数分析在甲状腺结节诊断中的初步应用[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2010, 19(5): 408-410.
11 安秀艳,丛淑珍,钱隽, 等. 超声弹性成像应变率中的ROI A值与弹性评分诊断甲状腺结节的价值比较[J]. 南方医科大学学报, 2013, 33(3): 454-457.
12 Kagoya R, Monobe H, Tojima H, et al. Utility of elastography for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules[J]. Otolargol Head Neck Surg, 20l0, 143(2): 230-234.
[1] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[2] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[3] 丁雷, 罗文, 杨晓, 庞丽娜, 张佩蒂, 刘海静, 袁佳妮, 刘瑾. 高帧频超声造影在评价C-TIRADS 4-5类甲状腺结节成像特征中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 887-894.
[4] 张茜, 陈佳慧, 高雪萌, 赵傲雪, 黄瑛. 基于高帧频超声造影的影像组学特征鉴别诊断甲状腺结节良恶性的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 895-903.
[5] 朱连华, 费翔, 韩鹏, 姜波, 李楠, 罗渝昆. 高帧频超声造影在胆囊息肉样病变中的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 904-910.
[6] 高建松, 陈晓晓, 冯婷, 包剑锋, 魏淑芳, 潘林. 基于超声瞬时弹性成像的多参数决策树模型评估慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化等级[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 923-929.
[7] 张梅芳, 谭莹, 朱巧珍, 温昕, 袁鹰, 秦越, 郭洪波, 侯伶秀, 黄文兰, 彭桂艳, 李胜利. 早孕期胎儿头臀长正中矢状切面超声图像的人工智能质控研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 945-950.
[8] 陈舜, 薛恩生, 叶琴. PDCA在持续改进超声危急值管理制度中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 974-978.
[9] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[10] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[11] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[12] 张丽丽, 陈莉, 余美琴, 聂小艳, 王婧玲, 刘婷. PDCA循环法在超声浅表器官亚专科建设中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 717-721.
[13] 李卫民, 陈军民, 黄艳丽, 范晓芳, 韩文, 贾磊, 张俊超, 瞿辰. 基于中国甲状腺超声报告与数据系统分析超声在不同大小甲状腺结节中的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 743-748.
[14] 罗刚, 泮思林, 陈涛涛, 许茜, 纪志娴, 王思宝, 孙玲玉. 超声心动图在胎儿心脏介入治疗室间隔完整的肺动脉闭锁中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 605-609.
[15] 赵文毅, 邹冰子, 蔡冠晖, 刘永志, 温红. 超声应变力弹性成像联合MRI-DWI靶向引导穿刺在前列腺病变诊断中的应用[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(9): 988-994.
阅读次数
全文


摘要