切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (06) : 472 -477. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2015.06.011

所属专题: 文献

腹部超声影像学

超声检查对不同病理类型阑尾炎的诊断价值
余俊丽1, 刘广健1,(), 文艳玲1, 刘小银1, 程文捷1, 陈瑶1, 覃斯1, 王韦力1   
  1. 1. 510655 广州,中山大学附属第六医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2014-09-30 出版日期:2015-06-01
  • 通信作者: 刘广健

The value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and pathological classification of appendicitis

Junli Yu1, Guangjian Liu1,(), Yanling Wen1, Xiaoyin Liu1, Wenjie Cheng1, Yao Chen1, Si Qin1, Weili Wang1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasonography, the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510655, China
  • Received:2014-09-30 Published:2015-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Guangjian Liu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Liu Guangjian, Email:
引用本文:

余俊丽, 刘广健, 文艳玲, 刘小银, 程文捷, 陈瑶, 覃斯, 王韦力. 超声检查对不同病理类型阑尾炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2015, 12(06): 472-477.

Junli Yu, Guangjian Liu, Yanling Wen, Xiaoyin Liu, Wenjie Cheng, Yao Chen, Si Qin, Weili Wang. The value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and pathological classification of appendicitis[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2015, 12(06): 472-477.

目的

探讨超声检查对不同病理类型阑尾炎的诊断价值。

方法

分析2012年6月至2013年12月中山大学附属第六医院经手术病理证实为阑尾炎且术前行超声检查的111例患者的超声表现。其中急性单纯性阑尾炎6例,急性化脓性阑尾炎45例,急性坏疽性阑尾炎15,慢性阑尾炎33例,慢性阑尾炎急性发作12例。采用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较不同病理类型阑尾炎患者术前超声测量的阑尾长度、宽度、管壁厚度,进一步组间两两比较采用Kruskal-Wallis检验;采用Fisher确切概率法比较不同病理类型阑尾炎患者超声表现差异,进一步组间两两比较采用Fisher确切概率法。

结果

111例手术病理证实为阑尾炎的患者中,90例患者术前超声检查提示阑尾炎,超声诊断准确率为81.08%(90/111)。急性单纯性阑尾炎、急性化脓性阑尾炎、急性坏疽性阑尾炎、慢性阑尾炎、慢性阑尾炎急性发作患者术前超声诊断准确率分别为83.33%(5/6)、91.11%(41/45)、93.33%(14/15)、60.61%(20/33)、83.33%(10/12)。不同病理类型阑尾炎患者术前超声测量的阑尾长度差异无统计学意义,但急性坏疽性阑尾炎患者术前超声测量的阑尾宽度均大于急性单纯性阑尾炎、慢性阑尾炎患者,且差异均有统计学意义[(13.79 ± 4.48) mm vs(7.60 ± 1.52) mm,χ2=4.211,P=0.024;(13.79 ± 4.48) mm vs(9.35 ± 5.01) mm,χ2=4.071,P=0.033];急性化脓性阑尾炎、急性坏疽性阑尾炎患者管壁厚度均大于慢性阑尾炎患者,且差异均有统计学意义[(4.39 ± 1.42) mm vs(3.37 ± 0.93) mm,χ2=3.931,P=0.043;(4.81 ± 1.57) mm vs(3.37 ± 0.93) mm,χ2=4.274,P=0.021]。不同病理类型阑尾炎患者的超声表现在管腔内粪石、淋巴结肿大和合并包块方面差异均无统计学意义。在管壁层次不清及管腔扩张两方面,急性化脓性阑尾炎、急性坏疽性阑尾炎与慢性阑尾炎患者的超声表现差异均有统计学意义[管壁层次不清:91.11%(41/45) vs 54.55%(18/33),P=0.003;93.33%(14/15) vs 54.55%(18/33),P=0.045。管腔扩张:64.44%(29/45) vs 27.27%(9/33),P=0.007;80.00%(12/15) vs 27.27%(9/33),P=0.007];在合并阑尾区积液方面,急性坏疽性阑尾炎与慢性阑尾炎患者的超声表现差异有统计学意义[53.33%(8/15)vs 6.06%(2/33),P=0.006]。

结论

超声检查对阑尾炎尤其是急性化脓性和急性坏疽性阑尾炎有较高的诊断价值。超声测量阑尾宽度、管壁厚度及对管壁层次、管腔扩张程度及阑尾区有无积液等特征的观察对鉴别诊断慢性阑尾炎与急性化脓性阑尾炎、急性坏疽性阑尾炎有一定的价值;阑尾宽度对鉴别诊断急性坏疽性阑尾炎与急性单纯性阑尾炎有意义。超声检查对鉴别诊断急性化脓性与急性坏疽性阑尾炎、急性单纯性阑尾炎与慢性阑尾炎及慢性阑尾炎急性发作的价值有限。

Objective

To assess the diagnostic value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis and pathological classification of appendicitis with pathological results.

Methods

The study included 111 cases confirmed by surgery and pathology in the Six Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University from June 2012 to December 2013. The image characteristics of ultrasonic images performed before surgery were analyzed retrospectively. The cases were divided into five groups based on the pathology: 6 acute simple appendicitis, 45 acute suppurative appendicitis, 15 acute gangrenous appendicitis, 33 chronic appendicitis, and 12 acute attack of chronic appendicitis. The length, width and wall thickness of the appendicitis measured by preoperative ultrasound between various pathological type were compared with Kruskal-Wallis statistical method, and also used the same method to compared the one which had statistically significance between the five groups. As in the above case, Fisher exact test was used to compare the characters of ultrasonography included gradations of the appendix, the tube cavity expansion, stercorolith, the appendiceal abscess, mergering lymph node enlargement and the appendix around effusion, if there was statistically significance, the same method was used to compare between the five groups.

Results

Totally 90 of 111 cases were reminded appendicitis by preoperative ultrasound, the diagnostic accuracy rate was 81.08%, including acute suppurative appendicitis 91.11% (41/45), acute gangrenous appendicitis 93.33% (14/15), acute simple appendicitis 83.33% (5/6), chronic appendicitis 60.61% (20/33), chronic appendicitis onset acute 83.33% (10/12). There were no statistical differences of preoperative ultrasound measured between various pathological type of appendicitis in length, while the appendix width measured by preoperative ultrasound of acute gangrenous appendicitis was wider than the acute simple group and chronic group, and there were statistically significance between them (P<0.05), in the aspect of wall thickness, the acute suppurative appendicitis and the acute gangrenous appendicitis groups were thicker than the chronic group, and these differences had statistically significance (P<0.05). The stercorolith, lymph node enlargement and the appendiceal abscess in different types of appendicitis had no statistical difference. There were statistically differences (P<0.05) between the acute suppurative goup, acute gangrenous group and the chronic group respectively, both in gradations of the appendix and the tube cavity expansion. Also there were statistically difference (P<0.05) between the acute gangrenous appendicitis group and the chronic group in the aspect of the appendix around effusion.

Conclusions

Ultrasound is valuable in the diagnosis of appendicitis, especially for acute gangrenous appendicitis and acute purulent appendicitis. The measurement of appendix with wide diameter, wall thickness by ultrasond preoperatively, and the characteristics of the wall layers, lumen expansion degree and the appendix around effusion are valuable in identifying chronic appendicitis, acute suppurative appendicitis, and acute gangrene appendicitis. The ultrasonic measurement of appendix wide diameter could identify acute gangrenous appendicitis and acute simple appendicitis. Ultrasound had limited value in identifying acute suppurative, acute gangrenous appendicitis, acute simple appendicitis, chronic appendicitis, and chronic appendicitis onset acute.

图6 急性化脓性阑尾炎合并阑尾周围脓肿超声声像图。示管壁明显肿胀,管腔扩张积脓、合并粪石(箭头所示)
表1 不同病理类型阑尾炎患者术前超声测量的阑尾长度、宽度、管壁厚度比较(mm,±s
表2 不同病理类型阑尾炎患者超声表现比较[%(例)]
1
Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the millennium [J]. Radiology, 2002, 215(2):337-348.
2
Papandria D, Goldstein SD, Rhee D, et al. Risk of perforation increases with delay in recognition and surgery for acute appendicitis [J]. Surg Res, 2013, 184(2):723-729.
3
Leeuwenburgh MM, Wiarda BM, Jensch S, et al. Accuracy and interobserver agreement between MR-non-expert radiologists and MR-experts in reading MRI for suspected appendicitis [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2013, 83(1):103-110.
4
Kouamé N, N'goan-Domoua AM, N'dri KJ. The diagnostic value of indirect ultrasound signs during acute adult appendicitis [J]. Diagn Interv Imaging, 2012, 93(3):e24-e28.
5
Koo HS, Kim HC, Yang DM. Does computed tomography have any additional value after sonography in patients with suspected acute appendicitis? [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2013, 32(8):1397-1403.
6
Burford JM, Dassinger MS, Smith SD. Surgeon-performed ultrasound as a diagnostic tool in appendicitis [J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2011, 46(6):1115-1120.
7
Adibe OO, Amin SR, Hansen EN, et al. An evidence-based clinical protocol for diagnosis of acute appendicitis decreased the use of computed tomography in children [J]. J Pediatr Surg, 2011, 46(1):192-196.
8
Unlü C, de Castro SM, Tuynman JB, et al. Evaluating routine diagnostic imaging in acute appendicitis [J]. Int J Surg, 2009, 7(5):451-455.
9
Papandria D, Goldstein SD, Rhee D, et al. Risk of perforation increases with delay in recognition and surgery for acute appendicitis [J]. J Surg Res, 2013, 184(2):723-729.
10
Cheong LH, Emil S. Outcomes of pediatric appendicitis: an international comparison of the United States and Canada [J]. JAMA Surg, 2014, 149(1):50-55.
11
丁杰,夏宇. B超及CT在非典型急性阑尾炎诊断中的价值 [J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2010, 21(12):891-893.
12
Moteki T, Horikoshi H. New CT criterion for acute appendicitis maximum depth of inraluminal appendiceal fluid [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2007, 188(5):1313-1319.
13
董梁,陈洁,方煊. 生理状态下承认直肠阑尾超声声像变化特征 [J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2010, 21(5):372-374.
14
赵威武,孙厚坦,徐晓燕, 等. 阑尾炎的超声诊断及漏误诊原因分析 [J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2009, 25(S):108-110.
15
Piyarom P, Kaewlai R. False-negative appendicitis at ultrasound: nature and association [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2014, 40(7):1483-1489.
[1] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[2] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[3] 朱连华, 费翔, 韩鹏, 姜波, 李楠, 罗渝昆. 高帧频超声造影在胆囊息肉样病变中的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 904-910.
[4] 张梅芳, 谭莹, 朱巧珍, 温昕, 袁鹰, 秦越, 郭洪波, 侯伶秀, 黄文兰, 彭桂艳, 李胜利. 早孕期胎儿头臀长正中矢状切面超声图像的人工智能质控研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 945-950.
[5] 陈舜, 薛恩生, 叶琴. PDCA在持续改进超声危急值管理制度中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 974-978.
[6] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[7] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[8] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[9] 张丽丽, 陈莉, 余美琴, 聂小艳, 王婧玲, 刘婷. PDCA循环法在超声浅表器官亚专科建设中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 717-721.
[10] 罗刚, 泮思林, 陈涛涛, 许茜, 纪志娴, 王思宝, 孙玲玉. 超声心动图在胎儿心脏介入治疗室间隔完整的肺动脉闭锁中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 605-609.
[11] 黄佳, 石华, 张玉国, 胡佳琪, 陈茜. 胎儿左头臂静脉正常与异常超声图像特征及其临床意义[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 610-617.
[12] 袁泽, 庄丽. 超声检测胎儿脐动脉和大脑中动脉血流对胎儿宫内窘迫的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 618-621.
[13] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[14] 杨天池, 韩威, 邱枫, 祁佳慧. 术中胰腺超声弹性成像在胰腺质地评估中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 646-650.
[15] 徐军, 姬园园, 陈君平, 王健. 伴菊形团结构的脑膜瘤合并颅骨侵犯一例并文献复习[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(08): 916-919.
阅读次数
全文


摘要