切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (07) : 568 -573. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2015.07.015

所属专题: 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

声辐射力脉冲弹性成像技术对浅表肿大淋巴结良恶性的鉴别诊断
郑宝群1,(), 覃业志1, 陈晓霞1, 姚怀齐1   
  1. 1. 515000 汕头大学医学院第一附属医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2014-10-08 出版日期:2015-07-01
  • 通信作者: 郑宝群

Value of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in the differential diagnosis of the superficial lymphadenopathy

Baoqun Zheng1,(), Yezhi Qin1, Xiaoxia Chen1, Huaiqi Yao1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasonography, the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou 515041, China
  • Received:2014-10-08 Published:2015-07-01
  • Corresponding author: Baoqun Zheng
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Zheng Baoqun, Email:
引用本文:

郑宝群, 覃业志, 陈晓霞, 姚怀齐. 声辐射力脉冲弹性成像技术对浅表肿大淋巴结良恶性的鉴别诊断[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2015, 12(07): 568-573.

Baoqun Zheng, Yezhi Qin, Xiaoxia Chen, Huaiqi Yao. Value of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in the differential diagnosis of the superficial lymphadenopathy[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2015, 12(07): 568-573.

目的

探讨声辐射力脉冲弹性成像技术声触诊组织成像(VTI)技术和声触诊组织定量(VTQ)技术在鉴别诊断浅表肿大淋巴结良恶性中的应用价值。

方法

收集2013年10月至2014年3月于汕头大学医学院第一附属医院就诊的全身浅表淋巴结肿大患者41例,共50个淋巴结。其中非特异性炎症性淋巴结23个,结核性淋巴结2个,淋巴瘤5个,转移性淋巴结20个。所有淋巴结均经活检病理或抗炎治疗后随访证实。所有淋巴结于术前或治疗前均行常规超声、VTI及VTQ检查。绘制常规超声、VTI技术、VTQ技术鉴别诊断浅表肿大淋巴结良恶性的操作者工作特征(ROC)曲线,确定常规超声、VTI技术、VTQ技术鉴别诊断浅表肿大淋巴结良恶性的最佳界值,计算相应的敏感度、特异度、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值。以最终诊断结果作为金标准,计算联合应用常规超声、VTI、VTQ技术鉴别诊断浅表肿大淋巴结良恶性的敏感度、特异度、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值。

结果

ROC曲线显示,以淋巴结二维灰阶超声结合彩色多普勒评分=9分为最佳界值,常规超声鉴别诊断浅表肿大淋巴结良恶性的敏感度、特异度、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为76.0%、84.0%、80.0%、82.6%、77.8%;以VTI分级=3级为最佳界值,VTI技术鉴别诊断浅表肿大淋巴结良恶性的敏感度、特异度、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为88.0%、64.0%、76.0%、71.0%、84.2%;以SWV值=2.755 m/s为最佳界值,VTQ技术鉴别诊断浅表肿大淋巴结良恶性的敏感度、特异度、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为80.0%、92.0%、86.0%、90.9%、82.1%。定义常规超声+VTI+VTQ串联法为常规超声、VTI技术、VTQ技术同时诊断为恶性浅表淋巴结才能确诊为恶性,否则为良性;定义常规超声+VTI+VTQ并联法为常规超声、VTI技术、VTQ技术中的一种方法诊断为恶性浅表淋巴结即确诊为恶性,否则为良性;常规超声+VTI+VTQ串联法鉴别诊断浅表肿大淋巴结良恶性的特异度与VTQ技术一致,达到92.0%,而敏感度、准确性较单纯应用常规超声、VTI技术、VTQ技术均明显下降,分别为64.0%、78.0%;常规超声+VTI+VTQ并联法鉴别诊断浅表肿大淋巴结良恶性的敏感度及阴性预测值均较单纯应用常规超声、VTI技术、VTQ技术明显提高,达到100%,但特异度、准确性则均较单纯应用常规超声、VTI技术、VTQ技术有所下降,分别为64.0%、82.0%。

结论

常规超声、VTI技术及VTQ技术对鉴别诊断浅表肿大淋巴结的良恶性均有一定的临床价值。联合应用常规超声、VTI技术及VTQ技术能有效提高浅表肿大淋巴结良恶性鉴别诊断的准确性。

Objective

To investigate the application value of virtual touch tissue image technology (VTI) and virtual touch tissue quantification technique (VTQ) in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant superficial lymph nodes.

Methods

Fifty superficial lymph nodes were obtained, including 23 for nonspecific inflammatory, 2 for tuberculosis, 5 for lymphoma and 20 for metastasis. All lymph nodes were confirmed by biopsy pathology or follow-up after anti-inflammatory treatments and scanned by traditional ultrasound, VTI and VTQ before resections or treatments. Receiver operating characteristic curve of traditional ultrasound, VTI and VTQ was made to determine the optional cut-off point in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant superficial lymph nodes and calculate the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Final diagnosis was defined as the golden standard. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated by the combined application of traditional ultrasound with VTI and VTQ technology.

Results

Nine (evaluation value) was taken as the critical value which was scanned by both two-dimensional ultrasound and color Doppler. The ROC curve indicated that the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of conventional two-dimensional ultrasound of benign and malignant lymph nodes were 76.0%, 84.0%, 80.0%, 82.6%, and 77.8%. Taking three (critical value) as the cut-off point, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of VTI in the diagnosis of benign and malignant lymph nodes were 88.0%, 64.0%, 76.0%, 71.0% and 84.2%. Taking 2.755 m/s (shear wave velocity) as the cut-off value, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of VTQ in the differentiation of benign and malignant superficial lymph nodes were 80%, 92.0%, 86.0%, 90.9% and 82.1%. Defined "traditional ultrasound +VTI+VTQ series method" as using conventional ultrasound, VTI, VTQ simultaneously, superficial lymph nodes could be diagnosed with malignant or benign if each method confirmed the same diagnosis. Defined "traditional ultrasound +VTI+VTQ parallel method" as using conventional ultrasound, VTI, VTQ simultaneously, superficial lymph nodes could be diagnosed with malignant if any one method indicated malignancy, otherwise benign. Specificity of 'traditional ultrasound +VTI+VTQ series method’ was consistent with VTQ, which was 92.0%, while the sensitivity and accuracy decreased significantly, which was 64.0% and 78.0%, respectively; the sensitivity and negative predictive value increased significantly by using "traditional ultrasound +VTI+VTQ parallel method" when compared with traditional ultrasound, VTI or VTQ, almost near 100%, but declined significantly in specificity and accuracy, which was 64.0% and 82.0%, respectively.

Conclusions

Traditional ultrasound, VTI and VTQ have certain clinical value for differential diagnosis of benign and malignant superficial lymph nodes. Combined application of traditional ultrasound, VTI and VTQ can improve the accuracy in the diagnosis of benign and malignant lymph nodes effectively.

图1~5 浅表肿大淋巴结声触诊组织成像分级声像图。图1为1级,诊断为良性;图2 为2级,诊断为良性。图3 为3级,诊断为恶性。图4 为4级,诊断为恶性。图5 为5级,诊断为恶性
图6,7 浅表肿大淋巴结声触诊组织定量声像图。图6示声触诊组织定量技术测得浅表肿大淋巴结剪切波速度为2.37 m/s,诊断为良性。图7示声触诊组织定量技术测不出浅表肿大淋巴结剪切波速度,记为9 m/s,诊断为恶性
图10 声触诊组织定量技术鉴别诊断浅表肿大淋巴结良恶性的操作者工作特征曲线。剪切波速度值=2.755 m/s为声触诊组织定量技术鉴别诊断浅表肿大淋巴结良恶性的最佳界值,其敏感度、特异度、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为80.0%、92.0%、86.0%、90.9%、82.1%
表1 联合应用常规超声、VTI、VTQ技术鉴别诊断浅表肿大淋巴结良恶性的价值(个)
1
谌金兰. 浅表淋巴结的超声诊断 [J]. 现代医药卫生, 2010, 26(11): 1661-1662,封3.
2
孙咏梅,房世保,宁春平, 等. 常规超声联合超声弹性成像对颈部淋巴结疾病的诊断与鉴别 [J]. 中国现代普通外科进展, 2013, 16(10): 769-771, 780.
3
陈洁,徐辉雄,张一峰, 等. 声触诊组织弹性成像弹性面积比在鉴别甲状腺结节良恶性中的价值 [J/CD].中华临床医师杂志:电子版, 2013, 7(9): 3840-3844.
4
甄熙,王辉,隋国庆, 等. 声触诊组织量化技术对颈部淋巴结良恶性鉴别诊断价值的研究 [J]. 中国实验诊断学, 2013, 17(3): 536-539.
5
Wu CH, Hsu MM, Chang YL, et al. Vascular pathology of malignant cervical lymphadenopathy: qualitative and quantitative assessment with power Doppler ultrasound [J]. Cancer, 1998, 83(6): 1189-1196.
6
Alam F, Ito K, Tachikake T, et al. Accuracy of sonographic elastography in the differential diagnosis of enlarged cervical lymph nodes: comparison with conventional B-mode sonography [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2008, 191(2): 604-610.
7
刘艳君,王学梅. 三维彩色能量图在颈部淋巴结良恶性鉴别诊断中的价值 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2007, 23(1): 43-45.
8
王丽娟,陈东风,王少春, 等. 声脉冲辐射力弹性成像在诊断乳腺小肿瘤中的价值 [J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2013, 21(5): 348-350, 352.
9
Meng W, Zhang G, Wu C, et al. Preliminary results of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) ultrasound imping of breast lesious [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2011, 37(9): 1436-1443.
10
Bhatia KS, Cho CC, Yuen YH, et al. Real-time qualitative ultrasound elastography of cervical lymph nodes in routine clinical practice: interobserver agreement and correlation with malignancy [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2010, 36(12): 1990-1997.
11
熊华花,李泉水,陈胜华, 等. 声脉冲辐射力弹性成像检测乳腺良恶性肿块硬度的初步研究 [J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2012, 14(6): 366-369.
12
Vassallo P, Edel G, Roos N, et al. In-vitro high-resolution ultrasonography of benign and malignant lymph nodes. A sonographic-pathologic correlation [J]. Invest Radiol, 1993, 28(8): 698-705.
13
李延芳,徐辉雄,张一峰, 等. 声触诊组织量化成像(VTIQ)技术对不同大小甲状腺实性结节良恶性鉴别的诊断价值 [J]. 影像诊断与介入放射学, 2014, 23(6): 511-515.
14
邹霞,李泉水,李清山, 等. 声脉冲辐射力弹性成像VTQ在鉴别诊断甲状腺良恶性结节中的应用价值 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2014, 30(7): 588-591.
15
王荣,王兴田,胡春梅, 等. 声脉冲辐射力成像对乳腺肿块鉴别诊断价值的初步研究 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2012, 21(2): 142-145.
16
王兴田,王荣,张星荣, 等. 声触诊组织成像鉴别甲状腺实性小结节的应用价值 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2013, 22(2): 133-136.
[1] 邵华, 那子悦, 荆慧, 李博, 王秋程, 程文. 术前经皮超声造影对乳腺癌腋窝前哨淋巴结转移及负荷的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 849-853.
[2] 孙帼, 谢迎东, 徐超丽, 杨斌. 超声联合临床特征的列线图模型预测甲状腺乳头状癌淋巴结转移的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 734-742.
[3] 李雄雄, 周灿, 徐婷, 任予, 尚进. 初诊导管原位癌伴微浸润腋窝淋巴结转移率的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 466-474.
[4] 杜晓辉, 崔建新. 腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术淋巴结清扫范围与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 5-8.
[5] 燕速, 霍博文, 徐惠宁. 4K荧光腹腔镜扩大右半结肠CME+D3根治术及No.206、No.204组淋巴结清扫术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 14-14.
[6] 袁育韬, 邢金琳, 谢克飞, 殷凯. CT征象及BRAFV600E基因突变与甲状腺乳头状癌中央区淋巴结转移的相关性[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 611-614.
[7] 樊丽超, 郭瑾瑛, 陈鑫. 野生型RET与RET/PTC融合基因检测对甲状腺乳头状癌中央区淋巴结清扫的指导意义[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 631-635.
[8] 徐成, 王璐璐, 王少华. 洗脱液甲状腺球蛋白在甲状腺乳头状癌转移淋巴结中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 701-704.
[9] 燕速. 腹腔镜低位直肠癌盆腔侧方淋巴结清扫指征与策略[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 480-484.
[10] 屈洪波, 朱芳, 徐喆, 武楠, 何建怀, 王先明. 经肌间入路行锁骨下淋巴结清扫在局部晚期乳腺癌中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 510-513.
[11] 罗辉, 熊珍珍, 黄令杰, 林山, 李金雨. 盆腔淋巴结大小对膀胱癌复发的影响[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 495-499.
[12] 潘冰, 吕少诚, 赵昕, 李立新, 郎韧, 贺强. 淋巴结清扫数目对远端胆管癌胰十二指肠切除手术疗效的影响[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 608-612.
[13] 关旭, 王锡山. 基于外科与免疫视角思考结直肠癌区域淋巴结处理的功与过[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 448-452.
[14] 卢艳军, 马健, 白鹏宇, 郭凌宏, 刘海义, 江波, 白文启, 张毅勋. 纳米碳在腹腔镜直肠癌根治术中253组淋巴结清扫的临床效果[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 473-477.
[15] 李英茹, 李非, 张玉茹, 刘莉婷. 单点-点压法注射纳米碳在腹腔结肠癌根治术中应用探讨[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 414-417.
阅读次数
全文


摘要