切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 286 -292. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2016.04.011

所属专题: 文献

腹部超声影像学

肝细胞癌分化程度、病灶大小及肝病背景对超声造影廓清过程的影响
杨丹1, 李锐1,(), 郭燕丽1, 唐春霖1, 陈朝晖1   
  1. 1. 400038 重庆,第三军医大学西南医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-29 出版日期:2016-04-01
  • 通信作者: 李锐

Washout of hepatocellular carcinoma in contrast-enhanced ultrasound: the influence of the degree of cellular differentiation, the tumor size and the background of liver

Dan Yang1, Rui Li1,(), Yanli Guo1, Chunlin Tang1, Zhaohui Chen1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Southwest Hospital Affiliated to Third Military Medical University, Chongqing 400038, China
  • Received:2015-10-29 Published:2016-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Rui Li
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Li Rui, Email:
引用本文:

杨丹, 李锐, 郭燕丽, 唐春霖, 陈朝晖. 肝细胞癌分化程度、病灶大小及肝病背景对超声造影廓清过程的影响[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2016, 13(04): 286-292.

Dan Yang, Rui Li, Yanli Guo, Chunlin Tang, Zhaohui Chen. Washout of hepatocellular carcinoma in contrast-enhanced ultrasound: the influence of the degree of cellular differentiation, the tumor size and the background of liver[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2016, 13(04): 286-292.

目的

探讨分化程度、病灶大小、肝病背景对肝细胞癌(HCC)超声造影廓清过程的影响。

方法

回顾性分析2005年1月至2015年6月第三军医大学西南医院行超声造影检查动脉相呈均匀或不均匀高增强并经手术标本或穿刺活检病理证实的HCC患者403例。所有病例均为单发病灶。将肿瘤廓清的模式分为动脉相、门脉相、延迟相开始廓清及不廓清。其中高、中、低分化HCC分别为115、156、132例;常规超声测得肿瘤最大径≤3.0 cm、3.1~5.0 cm、>5.0 cm分别为116、154、133例;肝硬化239例,非肝硬化164例。采用R×C表的χ2检验比较不同分化程度、不同大小HCC各廓清模式所占比例差异,进一步组间两两比较采用Pearson χ2检验;采用Pearson χ2检验比较不同肝病背景HCC各廓清模式所占比例差异。

结果

403例HCC患者,不同分化程度的HCC在动脉相开始廓清的比例差异无统计学意义。高分化组HCC在门脉相开始廓清的比例均低于中分化组、低分化组HCC,高分化组HCC延迟相开始廓清、不廓清的比例均高于中分化组、低分化组HCC,且差异均有统计学意义(门脉相:χ2=10.358、43.789,P均<0.01;延迟相:χ2=5.134、P<0.05,χ2=13.069、P<0.01;不廓清:χ2=8.669、25.899,P均<0.01)。中分化组HCC在门脉相开始廓清的比例低于低分化组HCC,不廓清的比例高于低分化组HCC,且差异均有统计学意义(门脉相:χ2=8.847;不廓清:χ2=7.396,P均<0.01);但是中分化组HCC与低分化组HCC在延迟相开始廓清的比例差异无统计学意义。不同大小的HCC在动脉相、门脉相、延迟相开始廓清及不廓清的比例差异均无统计学意义。肝硬化背景与非肝硬化背景HCC在动脉相、门脉相、延迟相开始廓清及不廓清的比例差异均无统计学意义。

结论

肝病背景及病灶大小对HCC超声造影开始廓清的时相无明显影响,不同分化程度HCC超声造影开始廓清的时相具有一定的差异,高分化HCC大部分表现为延迟相开始廓清或不廓清,进行超声造影检查时应适当延长扫查时间以提高诊断的准确性。超声造影有助于对肝脏肿瘤的定性诊断及病理分级,为临床治疗提供依据。

Objective

To investigate the influence of the cellular differentiation, the tumor size and the hepatic background on the washout of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

Methods

All 403 cases of single HCC with arterial hyperenhancement (homogeneous or heterogeneous) who underwent CEUS examination in Southwest Hospital Affiliated to Third Military Medical University and were pathologically demonstrated as HCC by surgery or needle biopsy from January 2005 to June 2015 were retrospectively enrolled. Four washout patterns were classified according to the start time of washout: washout in arterial phase, washout in portal phase, washout in delayed phase and no washout. According to the cellular differentiation, the patients were grouped as well differentiated HCCs (n=115), moderately differentiated HCCs (n=156) and poorly differentiated HCCs (n=132). Based on the tumor size measured by ultrasound, the patients were divided into three groups: ≤3 cm (n=116), 3.1-5 cm (n=154) and >5 cm (n=133). On the basis of pathology, the background of liver were divided into cirrhosis (n=239) and non-cirrhosis (n=164). R×C table χ2 test was used to analyze the proportion of different washout patterns among different cellular differentiation groups or different tumor size groups, and Pearson χ2 test was used in the further two-two comparison among groups. Pearson χ2 test was used to analyze the percentage of four washout patterns between cirrhosis and non-cirrhosis groups.

Results

Of 403 cases, the percentage of initial washout occurring in arterial phase was not significantly different among different cellular differentiation HCCs. Well differentiated HCCs had significantly lower percentage of washout firstly emerging in portal phase and significantly higher percentage of washout firstly emerging in delayed phase or no washout when compared with moderately or poorly differentiated HCCs (portal phase: χ2=10.358 and 47.398, both P< 0.01; delayed phase: χ2=5.134, P<0.05, χ2=13.069, P<0.01; no washout: χ2=8.669 and 25.899, both P<0.05). The percentage of washout firstly occurring in portal phase of moderate differentiation lesions was significantly lower and the percentage of no washout of moderate differentiation lesions was significantly higher when compared with poor differentiation lesions respectively (portal phase: χ2=8.847; no washout: χ2=7.396; both P<0.01), while the percentage of washout firstly occurring in delayed phase was not statistically significant. There were no significant differences for the percentage of different washout patterns among the three groups of various size. The percentage of different washout patterns was not statistically different between cirrhosis and non-cirrhosis groups.

Conclusions

The tumor size and the background of liver did not influence the washout of HCC on CEUS. The percentage of different washout patterns differs significantly among different cellular differentiation lesions. Most well differentiated HCC displayed late washout or non-washout. So extended observation is necessary as late washout or sustained enhancement usually occur in most well differentiated HCCs. CEUS is useful for the diagnosis and classification of HCCs.

图1~6 不同分化程度肝细胞癌超声造影表现。图1~3 为68岁肝硬化男性患者,右肝内探及直径约3.0 cm的病灶,动脉相(15 s)为整体增强(图1箭头所示),门脉相(87 s)为等增强(图2箭头所示),延迟相(185 s)为稍低增强(图3箭头所示),病理证实为高分化肝细胞癌。图4~6 为52岁肝硬化女性患者,右肝内探及直径约3.5 cm的病灶,动脉相(11 s)为不均匀增强(图4箭头所示),门脉相(103 s)病灶内高增强部分为稍低增强(图5箭头所示),延迟相(201 s)病灶内高增强部分仍为稍低增强(图6箭头所示),病理证实为低分化肝细胞癌
表1 不同分化程度的HCC开始廓清的时相比较[个(%)]
图7~12 不同大小肝细胞癌超声造影表现。图7~9 为46岁肝硬化男性患者,右肝内探及直径约2.1 cm的病灶,动脉相(13 s)为整体增强(图7箭头所示),门脉相(103 s)为等增强(图8箭头所示),延迟相(173 s)为稍低增强(图9箭头所示),病理证实为高分化肝细胞癌。图10~12 为63岁肝硬化男性患者,右肝内探及直径约5.7 cm的病灶,动脉相(15 s)为不均匀增强,内部可见无增强区(图10箭头所示),门脉相(81 s)病灶内高增强部分为等增强(图11箭头所示),延迟相(167 s)病灶内高增强部分为稍低增强(图12箭头所示),病理证实为高分化肝细胞癌
表2 不同大小HCC开始廓清的时相比较[个(%)]
图13~18 不同肝病背景肝细胞癌超声造影表现。图13~15 为62岁肝硬化男性患者,右肝内探及直径约3.7 cm的病灶,动脉相(13 s)为整体增强(图13箭头所示),门脉相(92 s)为稍低增强(图14箭头所示),延迟相(189 s)为中度低增强(图15箭头所示),病理证实为中分化肝细胞癌。图16~18 为46岁非肝硬化男性患者,右肝内探及直径约4.0 cm的病灶,动脉相(10 s)为整体增强(图16箭头所示),门脉相(103 s)为稍低增强(图17箭头所示),延迟相(206 s)仍为稍低增强(图18箭头所示),病理证实为中分化肝细胞癌
表3 不同肝病背景HCC开始廓清的时相比较[个(%)]
[1]
Ferlay J, Shin HR, Bray F, et al. Estimates of worldwide burden of cancer in 2008: GLOBOCAN 2008 [J]. Int J Cancer, 2010, 127(12): 2893-2917.
[2]
Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T, et al. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) -- update 2008 [J]. Ultraschall Med, 2008, 29(1): 28-44.
[3]
Boozari B, Soudah B, Rifai K, et al. Grading of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma using late phase of contrast enhanced sonography -- a prospective study [J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2011, 43(6): 484-490.
[4]
廖继安, 王爱玉, 张化诚, 等. 不同分化程度、不同病理类型小肝癌患者超声造影表现分析 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志:电子版, 2012, 9(2): 136-141.
[5]
Jang HJ, Kim TK, Bums PN, et al. Enhancement patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma at contrast-enhanced US: comparison with histologic differentiation [J]. Radiology, 2007, 244(3): 898-906.
[6]
Fan ZH, Chen MH, Dai Y, et al. Evaluation of primary malignancies of the liver using contrast-enhanced sonography: correlation with pathology [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2006, 186(6): 1512-1519.
[7]
Dumitrescu CI, Gheonea IA, Sandulescu L, et al. Contrast enhanced ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis [J]. Med Ultrason, 2013, 15(4): 261-267.
[8]
Beaton C, Cochlin D, Kumar N. Contrast enhanced ultrasound should be the initial radiological investigation to characterise focal liver lesions [J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2010, 36(1): 43-46.
[9]
Niu Y, Huang T, Lian F, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for the diagnosis of small hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis and meta-regression analysis [J]. Tumour Biol, 2013, 34(6): 3667-3674.
[10]
von Herbay A, Vogt C, Westendorff J, et al. Correlation between SonoVue enhancement in CEUS, HCC differentiation and HCC diameter: analysis of 130 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [J]. Ultraschall Med, 2009, 30(6): 544-550.
[11]
Nicolau C, Catal V, Vilana RN, et al. Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma using SonoVue, a second generation ultrasound contrast agent: correlation with cellular differentiation [J]. Eur Radiol, 2004, 14(6): 1092-1099.
[12]
Iavarone M, Sangiovanni A, Forzenigo LV, et al. Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis by dynamic contrast imaging: the importance of tumor cell differentiation [J]. Hepatology, 2010, 52(5): 1723-1730.
[13]
Sakamoto M, Hirohashi S, Shimosato Y. Early stages of multistep hepatocarcinogenesis: adenomatous hyperplasia and early hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Hum Pathol, 1991, 22(2): 172-178.
[14]
范智慧, 陈敏华, 戴莹, 等. 原发性肝细胞癌不同分化程度超声造影模式分析 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志:电子版, 2006, 3(3): 152-154.
[15]
Quaia E, Calliada F, Bertolotto M, et al. Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-specific US modes and a sulfur hexafluoride-filled microbubble contrast agent: diagnostic performance and confidence [J]. Radiology, 2004, 232(2): 420-430.
[16]
Forner A, Vilana R, Ayuso C, et al. Diagnosis of hepatic nodules 20 mm or smaller in cirrhosis: prospective validation of the noninvasive diagnostic criteria for hepatocellular carcinoma [J]. Hepatology, 2008, 47(1): 97-104.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[6] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[7] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[8] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[9] 高俊颖, 张海洲, 区泓乐, 孙强. FOLFOX-HAIC 为基础的肝细胞癌辅助转化治疗的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 457-463.
[10] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[11] 赖全友, 高远, 汪建林, 屈士斌, 魏丹, 彭伟. 三维重建技术结合腹腔镜精准肝切除术对肝癌患者术后CD4+、CD8+及免疫球蛋白水平的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 651-654.
[12] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[13] 陆镜明, 韩大为, 任耀星, 黄天笑, 向俊西, 张谞丰, 吕毅, 王傅民. 基于术前影像组学的肝内胆管细胞癌淋巴结转移预测的系统性分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 852-858.
[14] 陈意志. 核磁共振钆造影剂导致的肾源性系统性纤维化[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 358-358.
[15] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?