切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (04) : 281 -285. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2016.04.010

所属专题: 文献

腹部超声影像学

肝细胞癌超声造影特征与其分化程度的关系
赖江琼1, 徐超丽2, 刘国安1, 杨斌2,()   
  1. 1. 362000 泉州,解放军第一八〇医院超声科
    2. 210000 南京军区总医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-01 出版日期:2016-04-01
  • 通信作者: 杨斌

Features of primary hepatocellular carcinoma at contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: comparison with histologic differentiation

Jiangqiong Lai1, Chaoli Xu2, Guoan Liu1, Bin Yang2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, 180th Hospital of Chinese People's Liberation Army, Quanzhou 362000, China
    2. Department of Ultrsound, Genenal Hospital of Nanjing Command, Nanjing 210000, China
  • Received:2015-07-01 Published:2016-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Bin Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yang Bin, Email:
引用本文:

赖江琼, 徐超丽, 刘国安, 杨斌. 肝细胞癌超声造影特征与其分化程度的关系[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2016, 13(04): 281-285.

Jiangqiong Lai, Chaoli Xu, Guoan Liu, Bin Yang. Features of primary hepatocellular carcinoma at contrast-enhanced ultrasonography: comparison with histologic differentiation[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2016, 13(04): 281-285.

目的

探讨肝细胞癌(HCC)肿瘤大小、分化程度与超声造影(CEUS)特征之间的关系。

方法

回顾性分析2010年1月至2015年1月南京军区南京总医院收治的行CEUS并经穿刺活检或手术病理证实的57例HCC患者CEUS表现。采用R×C表的χ2检验比较不同直径、不同分化程度HCC CEUS特征,进一步组间两两比较采用R×C表的χ2检验;采用Fisher确切概率法比较有无肝硬化HCC患者CEUS增强模式差异。

结果

本组57例HCC患者,肿瘤直径≤3 cm 20例,直径3~5 cm 15例,直径>5 cm 22例;高分化10例,中分化27例,低分化20例;36例患者合并乙型病毒性肝炎相关性结节性肝硬化,21例患者肝脏正常或未形成肝硬化。(1)直径<3 cm HCC CEUS主要表现为均匀高增强;直径3~5 cm HCC CEUS主要表现为均匀或不均匀高增强;直径>5 cm HCC CEUS主要表现为不均匀高增强。直径<3 cm与直径3~5 cm、直径>5 cm HCC CEUS增强强度差异均有统计学意义(χ2=7.445,P<0.05;χ2=0.481,P<0.01),而直径3~5 cm与直径>5 cm HCC CEUS增强强度差异无统计学意义。直径<3 cm、直径3~5 cm与直径>5 cm HCC CEUS增强模式均以快进快出为主。不同直径HCC CEUS增强模式差异无统计学意义。(2)高、中、低分化HCC CEUS增强强度可为均匀或不均匀高增强。不同分化程度HCC CEUS增强强度差异无统计学意义。高分化HCC CEUS增强模式可为快进快出、快进同出或快进慢出,中、低分化HCC CEUS增强模式主要为快进快出。高分化与中分化、低分化HCC CEUS增强模式差异均有统计学意义(χ2=10.72,8.505,P均<0.01),中分化与低分化HCC CEUS增强模式差异无统计学意义。(3)有肝硬化HCC患者与无肝硬化HCC患者CEUS增强模式差异无统计学意义。

结论

不同直径HCC CEUS增强强度有一定的差异,体积大的肿瘤多出现内部充盈缺损,可能与肿瘤的微血管分布和内部出血坏死有关。不同分化程度HCC CEUS增强模式有一定差异,对于高分化HCC,应适当延长造影剂消退的观察时间,有助于提高诊断准确率。

Objective

To investigate the characteristics of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) with different tumor size and the degree of HCC histologic differentiation.

Methods

Of 57 consecutive patients with core needle biopsy or surgical specimen histologically proved HCC, the relationship between tumor size and histologic differentiation was analyzed by using R×C χ2 test. The enhancement degrees and enhancement patterns of each group were compared, and the influence of cirrhosis on contrast-enhanced patterns was investigated by Fisher exact test.

Results

There were 20 small HCC, 15 moderated-size HCC, 22 large HCC and 10 well differentiated HCC, 27 moderately differentiated HCC, 20 poorly differentiated HCC. And there were 36 patients with hepatitis B viral hepatitis related nodular cirrhosis, and 21 patients without nodular cirrhosis of the liver. (1) The enhancement degrees of small HCC were homogeneous hypervascularity, the moderated-size HCC were homogeneous hypervascularity or heterogeneous hypervascularity, and the large HCC were heterogeneous hypervascularity. The pattern of contrast-enhanced US has no significant difference among three groups.The small HCC showed a significantly different enhancement compared with moderated-size HCC and large HCC (χ2=7.445, P<0.05; χ2=0.481, P<0.01). (2) The well differentiated HCC, moderately differentiated HCC and poorly differentiated HCC could show homogeneous hypervascularity or heterogeneous hypervascularity, there were no significant differences on enhancement degree among three groups. The well differentiated HCC showed fast wash-in and fast wash-out, iso-wash-in and iso-wash-out or fast wash-in and late wash-out patterns. Moderated and poor differentiated HCC showed fast wash-in and fast wash-out. There were significant differences between well differentiated HCC with moderated HCC and poor HCC (χ2=10.702, 8.505, both P<0.01). But no significant dirrerence was found between moderated and poor HCC. (3) The enhancement pattern between patients with and without cirrhosis were compared, and negative result were obtained.

Conclusions

The enhancement degree was dependent with tumor size, the large tumor tend to present heterogeneous hypervascularity. It may be related to the microvescular density distribution and necrosis formation. The enhancement pattern was dependent with histologic differentiation. Extended observation in the portal phase is important to detect the occurence of late washout in well differentiated HCC, which is useful to improve the diagnostic accuracy of CEUS in HCC.

表1 不同直径HCC分化程度比较(例)
表2 不同直径HCC CEUS增强强度比较(例)
表3 不同直径HCC CEUS增强模式比较(例)
图1,2 原发性高分化肝细胞癌超声造影图。图1示动脉期呈快速高增强;图2示延迟期造影剂仍未消退,箭头示肿块内造影剂滞留。左图为超声造影图,右图为常规超声声像图
表4 不同分化程度HCC CEUS增强强度比较(例)
表5 不同分化程度HCC CEUS增强模式比较(例)
表6 有肝硬化HCC患者与无肝硬化HCC患者CEUS增强模式比较(例)
[1]
Claudon M, Cosgrove D, Albrecht T, et al. EFSUMB Study Group. Guidelines and good clinical practice recommendations for Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) [J]. Ultraschall Med, 2008, 29: 28-44.
[2]
Dietrich CF, Maddalena ME, Cui XW, et al. Liver tumor characterization-review of the literature [J]. Ultraschall Med, 2012, 33 Suppl 1: S3-S10.
[3]
Nicolau C, Catala V, Vilana R, et al. Evaluation of hepatocellular carcinoma using SonoVue, a second generation ultrasound contrast agent: correlationwith cellular differentiation [J]. Eur Radiol, 2004, 14(6): 1092-1099.
[4]
Wu W, Chen MH, Sun M, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound of hepatocarcinogenesis in liver cirrhosis [J]. Chin Med J (Engl), 2012, 125(17): 3104-3109.
[5]
Facciorusso A, Licinio R, Muscatiello N, et al.Transarterial chemoembolization: evidences from the literature and applications in hepatocellular carcinoma patients [J]. World J Hepatol, 2015, 7(16): 2009-2019.
[6]
Wáng YX, De Baere T, Idée JM, et al.Transcatheter embolization therapy in liver cancer: an update of clinical evidences [J]. Chin J Cancer Res, 2015, 27(2): 96-121.
[7]
Pacella CM, Bizzarri G, Cecconi P, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: long-term results of combined treatment with laser thermal ablation and transcatheter arterial chemoembolization [J]. Radiology, 2001, 219(3): 669-678.
[8]
Wu W, Chen M, Yan K, et al. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for diagnosis of dysplastic nodules with a focus of hepatocellular carcinoma in liver cirrhosis patients [J]. Chin J Cancer Res, 2015, 27(1): 83-89.
[9]
Fan ZH, Chen MH, Dai Y, et al. Evaluation of primary malignancies of the liver using contrast-enhanced sonography: correlation with pathology [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2006, 186(6): 1512-1519.
[10]
Beaton C, Cochlin D, Kumar N. Contrast enhanced ultrasound should be the initial radiological investigation to characterise focal liver lesions [J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2010, 36(1): 43-46.
[11]
高军喜, 姚兰辉. 超声造影对肝脏肿瘤诊断价值的Meta分析 [J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2009, 25(4): 646-649.
[12]
El-Assal ON, Yamanoi A, Soda Y, et al. Clinical significance of microvessel density and vascular endothelial growth factor expression in hepatocellular carcinoma and surrounding liver: possible involvement of vascular endothelial growth factor in the angiogenesis of cirrhotic liver [J]. Hepatology, 1998, 27(6): 1554-1562.
[13]
李功杰, 杨立, 史晓林, 等. 原发性肝癌肿瘤微血管形态特征与其生物学特性的关系 [J]. 世界华人消化杂志, 2005, 13(13): 1503-1506.
[14]
Jang HJ, Kim TK, Burns PN, et al. Enhancement patterns of hepatocellular carcinoma at contrast-enhanced US: comparison with histologic differentiation [J]. Radiology, 2007, 244(3): 898-906.
[15]
李功杰, 杨立, 史晓林, 等. 原发性肝癌血供分型与其病理分化程度关系的研究 [J]. 军事医学科学院院刊, 2004, 28(4): 398-399.
[16]
Endo T, Kozaka K, Kobayashi S, et al. Hemodynamics and progression of a hypervascular focus in a borderline lesion of hepatocellular carcinoma: analysis by angiography-assisted CT and histopathology [J]. Jpn J Radiol, 2014, 32(2): 69-79.
[17]
Quaia E, Calliada F, Bertolotto M, et al. Characterization of focal liver lesions with contrast-specific US modes and a sulfur hexafluoride–filled microbubble contrast agent: diagnostic performance and confidence [J]. Radiology, 2004, 232(2): 420-430.
[18]
Nicolau C, Vilana R, Catala V, et al. Importance of evaluating all vascular phases on contrast-enhanced sonography in the differentiation of benign from malignant focal liver lesions [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2006, 186(1): 158-167.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[6] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[7] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[8] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[9] 李华志, 曹广, 刘殿刚, 张雅静. 不同入路下行肝切除术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的临床对比[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 52-55.
[10] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
[11] 屈翔宇, 张懿刚, 李浩令, 邱天, 谈燚. USP24及其共表达肿瘤代谢基因在肝细胞癌中的诊断和预后预测作用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 659-662.
[12] 任江波, 李丽, 王萍. 阻断PI3K/Akt信号通路促进低表达FoxA2肝脏前体细胞对分化诱导剂应答并朝肝细胞方向分化[J/OL]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 336-343.
[13] 公宇, 廖媛, 尚梅. 肝细胞癌TACE术后复发影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 818-824.
[14] 李一帆, 朱帝文, 任伟新, 鲍应军, 顾俊鹏, 张海潇, 曹耿飞, 阿斯哈尔·哈斯木, 纪卫政. 血GP73水平在原发性肝癌TACE疗效评价中的作用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 825-830.
[15] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
阅读次数
全文


摘要