切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2016, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (12) : 936 -941. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2016.12.012

所属专题: 乳腺超声 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

乳腺单纯性浸润性微乳头状癌超声表现及其与病理的关系
张美恋1, 林礼务1, 薛恩生1, 叶琴1, 陈瑚2, 何以敉1,()   
  1. 1. 350001 福州,福建医科大学附属协和医院超声科 福建省超声医学研究所;350001 福州,福建医科大学附属协和医院病理科
  • 收稿日期:2016-07-13 出版日期:2016-12-01
  • 通信作者: 何以敉
  • 基金资助:
    福建医科大学教授基金(JS09013)

Ultrasonic findings of pure invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast and its relationship with pathology

Meilian Zhang1, Liwu Lin1, Ensheng Xue1, Qin Ye1, Hu Chen2, Yimi He1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasonography, Affiliated Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China
    2. Department of Pathology, Affiliated Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou 350001, China
  • Received:2016-07-13 Published:2016-12-01
  • Corresponding author: Yimi He
  • About author:
    *Corresponding author: He Yimi, Email:
引用本文:

张美恋, 林礼务, 薛恩生, 叶琴, 陈瑚, 何以敉. 乳腺单纯性浸润性微乳头状癌超声表现及其与病理的关系[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2016, 13(12): 936-941.

Meilian Zhang, Liwu Lin, Ensheng Xue, Qin Ye, Hu Chen, Yimi He. Ultrasonic findings of pure invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast and its relationship with pathology[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2016, 13(12): 936-941.

目的

探讨乳腺单纯性浸润性微乳头状癌(PIMPC)超声表现及其与病理的关系。

方法

选取2010年1月至2015年8月福建医科大学附属协和医院收治并经手术病理证实18例乳腺PIMPC患者共18个病灶与40例乳腺浸润性导管癌(IDC)患者共40个病灶。对比观察乳腺PIMPC与IDC的超声表现,并与病理结果进行对照。采用χ2检验及Fisher确切概率法比较乳腺PIMPC与IDC超声声像图特征差异;采用χ2检验比较乳腺PIMPC与IDC淋巴结转移率;以术后病理结果作为金标准,计算超声检查提示乳腺PIMPC淋巴结转移的敏感度、特异度、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值。

结果

18个乳腺PIMPC病灶(100%,18/18)表现为低回声;18个病灶(100%,18/18)形态不规则;16个病灶(88.9%,16/18)边界不清;16个病灶(88.9%,16/18)边缘毛刺;15个病灶(83.3%,15/18)内部见钙化灶,微钙化灶数量一般大于3个,且多集中分布在病灶近中央的位置,而病灶边缘分布较少;16个病灶(88.9%,16/18)后方回声正常或增强;14个病灶(77.7%,14/18)边缘无蟹足状改变;13个病灶(72.2%,13/18)周围无高回声晕;10个病灶(55.6%,10/18)血流信号0~Ⅰ级。乳腺PIMPC病灶边缘蟹足状改变、周围高回声晕、纵横比≥0.7、后方回声衰减、血流信号Ⅱ~Ⅲ级的检出率均低于乳腺IDC,且差异均有统计学意义,二者病灶最大径、形态、边界、边缘毛刺、微钙化灶等超声声像图特征差异均无统计学意义。病理检查示PIMPC癌细胞微乳头状排列呈集块型分布;PIMPC血流信号0~Ⅰ级为主,镜下见肿块少量新生血管主要在细胞簇周围的透明带;而IDC血流信号以Ⅱ~Ⅲ级为主,镜下可见较多再生血管分布在胶原纤维;PIMPC缺乏周围高回声晕,其镜下见肿块边缘无纤维组织簇包饶,IDC周围常见高回声晕其镜下肿块边缘见较多的纤维组织。术后病理结果证实乳腺PIMPC淋巴结转移率达72.2%(13/18),高于乳腺IDC的45.0%(18/40)(χ2=3.697,P=0.05)。术后病理结果证实13个病灶淋巴结转移,其中超声检查提示淋巴结异常6个(46.2%,6/13),表现为皮髓质结构异常4个(30.8%,4/13)、淋巴门偏心4个(30.8%,4/13),血流信号0~Ⅰ级5个(38.5%,5/13)。以术后病理结果作为金标准,超声检查提示乳腺PIMPC淋巴结转移的敏感度、特异度、准确性、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为46.2%、60.0%、50.0%、75.0%、30.0%。

结论

乳腺PIMPC超声表现以形态不规则、边界不清、边缘毛刺及内部微钙化灶为主要特征,其超声表现与其特殊的病理特点有密切关系。超声检查对于提示PIMPC患者腋窝淋巴结转移具有一定价值。

Objective

To investigate ultrasonic findings of pure invasive micropapillary carcinoma (PIMPC) of breast.

Methods

A total of 18 patients with surgically confirmed PIMPC and 40 patients with surgically confirmed invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) treated between January 2010 and August 2015 in Affiliated Union Hospital of Fujian Medical University, who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination, were included in the study. To compared with the postoperative pathological examination, the value of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of axillary lymph node metastasis was discussed. Ultrasound findings of PIMPC and pathological results were compared.

Results

Ultrasound analysis of PIMPC masses identified predominantly hypoechoic lesions and irregular shape 100% (18/18), obscure lesion boundaries 88.9% (16/18), spiculated or angular margins 83.3% (15/18), combined microcalcifications 83.3% (15/18), with posterior acoustic enhancement or normal 88.9% (16/18), dcrab claws changes 77.7% (14/18), witout hyperechoic halo72.2% (13/18) and with 0-?Ⅰ grade flow signals 55.6% (10/18). Compared to the IDC, the PIMPC had lower proportions in long speculation, hyperechoic halo, aspect ratio≥0.7, posterior echo attenuation, Ⅱ-Ⅲ grade blood flow signals (P<0.05), while their lesions in the maximal tumor size, shape, boundary, edge bur, microcalcification has no significance (P>0.05). The rate of lymph node metastasis of PIMPC was 72.2% (13/18), which was significantly higher than that of IDC 45.0% (18/40) (t=3.697, P=0.05). 13 cases were pathologically confirmed lymph nodes metastasis in 18 cases, and among them, the ultrasound indicated abnormal 46.2% (6/13), and showed abnormal cortex and medulla structure 30.8% (4/13), eccentric lymph door 30.8% (4/13), poor blood flow signals 38.5% (5/13). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of PIMPC lymph node metastasis by preoperative ultrasound were respectively 46.2%, 60.0%, 75.0%, 30.0%, 50.0%. Ultrasound performance of PIMPC has a certain relationship with its special pathological characteristics. Sonography findings were compared with pathological results: Microscopically, PIMPC cell arranged as pseudo-papillary or tubuloalveolar structures floating in empty spaces; PIMPC with 0-Ⅰ grade flow signals were seen that the small amount of new blood vessels of the tumor were mainly found in the pellucid zone around the cell clusters under the microscope, while IDC with Ⅱ-Ⅲ grade blood flow signals were found that more regenerated blood vessels were distributed in the collagen fibers. PIMPC witout hyperechoic halo were noticed that under the microscope, there were no fibrous tissue clusters in the edge of the tumor, meanwhile, IDC with hyperechoic halo were discovered that fibrous tissue was seen at the edge of the mass of the lens.

Conclusions

Ultrasound performance of PIMPC has a close relationship with its special pathological characteristics. To be familiar with ultrasound characteristic of PIMPC is significant for improving its ultrasound detection rate.

表1 乳腺PIMPC与IDC患者一般临床资料比较(±s
表2 乳腺PIMPC与IDC超声声像图特征比较(个)
图1~6 乳腺单纯性浸润性微乳头状癌与浸润性导管癌超声表现与病理对照。图1 为超声检查示乳腺单纯性浸润性微乳头状癌肿块周围无高回声晕,彩色多普勒血流成像示血流信号Ⅰ级;图2 为病理检查示乳腺单纯性浸润性微乳头状癌肿块微乳头状细胞簇周围透明带见一新生血管(HE,×10);图3 为病理检查示乳腺单纯性浸润性微乳头状癌肿块边缘无纤维组织簇包饶(HE,×4);图4 为超声检查示乳腺浸润性导管癌肿块周围见高回声晕,彩色多普勒血流成像示血流信号Ⅲ级,血管走行不规则,粗细不均;图5 为病理检查示乳腺浸润性导管癌癌灶内可见粗细不一的新生血管(HE,×10);图6 为病理检查示乳腺浸润性导管癌癌灶边缘可见大量的纤维组织(HE,×4)
表3 乳腺PIMPC术前超声检查提示淋巴结癌转移与术后病理结果比较(个)
[1]
丁华野. 乳腺病理诊断和鉴别诊断 [M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2014: 163-166.
[2]
Cui ZQ, Feng JH, Zhao YJ. Clinicopathological features of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast [J]. Oncol Lett, 2015, 9(3): 1163-1166.
[3]
Yu Ji, Choi DH, Huh SJ, et al. Differences in Prognostic Factors and Failure Patterns Between Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma and Carcinoma With Micropapillary Component Versus Invasive Ductal Carcinoma of the Breast: Retrospective Multicenter Case-Control Study (KROG 13-06) [J]. Clin Breast Cancer, 2015, 15(5): 353-361. e1-e2.
[4]
Chen AC, Paulino AC, Schwartz MR, et al. Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast [J]. Br J Cancer, 2014, 111(3): 619-622.
[5]
田丽元. 乳腺癌超声表现与病理和分子生物学指标关系的研究[D].天津: 天津医科大学, 2011.
[6]
Adler DD, CarsonPL, Rubin JM, et al. Doppler ultrasound color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: preliminary findings [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 1990, 16(6): 553-559.
[7]
詹维伟. 浅表组织超声与病理诊断 [M]. 北京: 人民军医出版社, 2015: 144-147.
[8]
Siriaunkgul S, Tavassoli FA. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast [J]. Mod Pathol, 1993, 6(6): 660-662.
[9]
Chen AC, Paulino AC, Schwartz MR, et al. Population-based comparison of prognostic factors in invasive micropapillary and invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast [J]. Br J Cancer, 2014, 111(3): 619-622.
[10]
Liu F, Yang M, Li Z, et al. Invasive micropapillary mucinous carcinoma of the breast is associated with poor prognosis [J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2015, 151(2): 443-451.
[11]
付丽, 松山郁生, 付笑影, 等. 乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌的形态改变与生物学行为的关系[J]. 中华病理学杂志, 2004, 33(1): 21-25.
[12]
陈琬萍, 何以敉, 林礼务, 等. 超声在乳腺浸润性微乳头状癌诊断及术前TNM分期中的应用 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2013, 22(12): 1049-1052.
[13]
Kuroda H, Sakamoto G, Ohnisi K, et al. Clinical and pathologic features of invasive micropapillary carcinoma [J]. Breast Cancer, 2004, 11(2): 169-174.
[14]
Gokce H, Durak MG, Akin MM, et al. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: a clinicopathologic study of 103 cases of an unusual and highly aggressive variant of breast carcinoma [J]. Breast J, 2013, 19(4): 374-381.
[15]
Liu F, Yang M, Li Z, et al. Invasive micropapillary mucinous carcinoma of the breast is associated with poor prognosis [J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2015, 151(2): 443-451.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[6] 河北省抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会护理协作组. 乳腺癌中心静脉通路护理管理专家共识[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 321-329.
[7] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[8] 张晓宇, 殷雨来, 张银旭. 阿帕替尼联合新辅助化疗对三阴性乳腺癌的疗效及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 346-352.
[9] 邱琳, 刘锦辉, 组木热提·吐尔洪, 马悦心, 冷晓玲. 超声影像组学对致密型乳腺背景中非肿块型乳腺癌的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 353-360.
[10] 程燕妮, 樊菁, 肖瑶, 舒瑞, 明昊, 党晓智, 宋宏萍. 乳腺组织定位标记夹的应用与进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 361-365.
[11] 涂盛楠, 胡芬, 张娟, 蔡海峰, 杨俊泉. 天然植物提取物在乳腺癌治疗中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 366-370.
[12] 朱文婷, 顾鹏, 孙星. 非酒精性脂肪性肝病对乳腺癌发生发展及治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 371-375.
[13] 韩萌萌, 冯雪园, 马宁. 乳腺癌改良根治术后桡神经损伤1例[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 117-118.
[14] 高杰红, 黎平平, 齐婧, 代引海. ETFA和CD34在乳腺癌中的表达及与临床病理参数和预后的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 64-67.
[15] 王曦娅, 尹弘青, 丁伟, 徐滨, 于海源, 马东升, 邵军. 桥本背景下甲状腺乳头状癌多参数分析预测大容量淋巴结转移[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 548-554.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?