切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (11) : 866 -869. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2017.11.014

所属专题: 文献

心血管超声影像学

经食管实时三维超声心动图测量主动脉瓣环与二尖瓣环间夹角
刘古月1, 魏薪1, 李茜1, 王芳1, 蔡宇燕1, 唐红1,()   
  1. 1. 610041 成都,四川大学华西医院心内科
  • 收稿日期:2017-01-29 出版日期:2017-11-01
  • 通信作者: 唐红

Quantitative measurement of the aortic-mitral angle by real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography

Guyue Liu1, Xin Wei1, Xi Li1, Fang Wang1, Yuyan Cai1, Hong Tang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Cardiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2017-01-29 Published:2017-11-01
  • Corresponding author: Hong Tang
引用本文:

刘古月, 魏薪, 李茜, 王芳, 蔡宇燕, 唐红. 经食管实时三维超声心动图测量主动脉瓣环与二尖瓣环间夹角[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(11): 866-869.

Guyue Liu, Xin Wei, Xi Li, Fang Wang, Yuyan Cai, Hong Tang. Quantitative measurement of the aortic-mitral angle by real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2017, 14(11): 866-869.

目的

采用经食管实时三维超声心动图(RT3D-TEE)重建主动脉瓣环与二尖瓣环,探讨正常主动脉瓣环与二尖瓣环间夹角(AMA)随心动周期的变化规律。

方法

选取2016年1至3月在四川大学华西医院行RT3D-TEE检查的19例患者,于左心室长轴观采集3个心动周期包含完整主动脉瓣环、二尖瓣环的三维动态超声图像。采用Acuson-4.0 eSie Valves分析软件获得AMA心动周期的动态值。采用配对t检验比较AMA收缩期和舒张期平均值差异。采用Bland-Altman分析法分析观察者内与观察者应用RT3D-TEE测量AMA的一致性。

结果

本组19例患者AMA收缩期和舒张期平均值分别为(111.35°±10.68°)和(118.14°±10.89°)。AMA舒张期平均值大于收缩期平均值,且差异有统计学意义(t=-2.56,P<0.05),说明AMA在收缩期减小,舒张期增大。Bland-Altman分析结果显示,观察者内与观察者应用RT3D-TEE测量AMA具有较好的一致性,95%置信区间分别为(-6.6°,5.6°)和(-7.1°,8.7°)(r=0.80,P=0.0055;r=0.69,P=0.0283)。

结论

RT3D-TEE能快速定量分析AMA随心动周期的变化,且测量一致性较好,可为临床主动脉瓣、二尖瓣的修复及置换手术提供参考依据。

Objective

To quantitatively investigate the dynamic changes of aortic-mitral angle (AMA) using real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography (RT3D-TEE) in the whole cardiac cycle.

Methods

RT3D-TEE was performed in 19 patients in West China Hospital of Sichuan University in January to March 2016. Custom software of Acuson-4.0 eSie Valves was used to detect and track the mitral and aortic annuli in 3D space throughout the cardiac cycle, allowing automated measurement of changes in AMA. The dynamic changes of AMA during a whole cardiac cycle were observed using paired t test. And the inter-observer and intra-observer variability were evaluated by Bland-Altman analysis.

Results

AMA was smaller in systole than in diastole (111.35°±10.68° vs. 118.14°±10.89°, t=-2.56, P<0.05). The inter-observer and intra-observer repeatability were good, and the 95% confidence interval was (-6.6°, 5.6°) and (-7.1°, 8.7°) (r=0.80, P=0.0055 and r=0.69, P=0.0283).

Conclusions

Quantitative measurement of the AMA by RT3D-TEE is feasible, with good inter-observer and intra-observer agreement. These parameters may contribute to the implementation of the aortic or mitral valves replacement.

图5 正常主动脉瓣环与二尖瓣环间夹角随心动周期的动态变化曲线:0点为舒张早期,可见随心动周期正常主动脉瓣环与二尖瓣环间夹角逐渐增大,在收缩期正常主动脉瓣环与二尖瓣环间夹角减小
图6,7 观察者内(图6)与观察者间(图7)应用经食管实时三维超声心动图测量正常主动脉瓣环与二尖瓣环间夹角一致性的Bland-Altman分析图。观察者内与观察者间应用经食管实时三维超声心动图测量正常主动脉瓣环与二尖瓣环间夹角具有较好的一致性,95%置信区间分别为(-6.6°,5.6°)和(-7.1°,8.7°)(r=0.80,P=0.0055;r=0.69,P=0.0283)
[1]
Veronesi F, Corsi C, Sugeng L, et al. A study of functional anatomy of aortic-mitral valve coupling using 3D matrix transesophageal echocardiography [J]. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging, 2009, 2(1):24-31.
[2]
Qu SH, Hsiung MC, Leng XP, et al. Three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic study of aortic-mitral valve coupling after coronary artery bypass grafting [J]. Echocardiography, 2015, 32(6):983-992.
[3]
Lansac E, Lim KH, Shomura Y, et al. Dynamic balance of the aortomitral junction [J]. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2002, 123(5):911-918.
[4]
Veronesi F, Caiani EG, Sugeng L, et al. Effect of mitral valve repair on mitral-aortic coupling: a real-time three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography study [J]. J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 2012, 25(5):524-531.
[5]
Mahmood F, Warraich HJ, Gorman JH 3rd, et al. Changes in mitral annular geometry after aortic valve replacement: a three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic study [J]. J Heart Valve Dis, 2012, 21(6):696-701.
[6]
Sugeng L, Shernan SK, Salgo IS, et al. Live 3-dimensional transe-sophageal echocardiography: initial experience using the fully-sampled matrix array probe [J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2008, 52(6):446-449.
[7]
Nishimura RA, Otto CM, Bonow RO, et al. 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines [J]. Circulation, 2014, 63(22):57-185.
[8]
Pang DC, Choo SJ, Luo HH, et al. Significant increase of aortic root volume and commissural area occurs prior to aortic valve opening [J]. J Heart Valve Dis, 2000, 9(1):9-15.
[9]
Lansac E, Lim HS, Shomura Y, et al. Aortic root dynamics are asymmetric [J]. J Heart Valve Dis, 2005, 14(3):400-407.
[10]
Bouma W, Aoki C, Vergnat M, et al. Saddle-Shaped Annuloplasty Improves Leaflet Coaptation in Repair for Ischemic Mitral Regurgitation [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2015, 100(4):1360-1366.
[11]
Santarpino G, Pfeiffer S, Fischlein T. First-in-man implantation of a Sorin Memo 3D ring: mitral annular flexibility is still preserved at 5 years of follow-up [J]. Int J Cardiol, 2012, 159(2):23-24..
[12]
Gupta C, Shetti VR, Manju BVM. Dimensions of the human adult mitral valve in the embalmed cadaver [J]. J Morphologic Sci, 2013, 30(1):6-10.
[13]
Girdauskas E, Rouman M, Disha K, et al. Aortopathy in patients with bicuspid aortic valve stenosis: role of aortic root functional parameters [J]. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg, 2015, 49(2):635-643.
[14]
Warraich HJ, Matyal R, Bergman R, et al. Impact of aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis on dynamic mitral annular motion and geometry [J]. Am J Cardiol, 2013, 112(9):1445-1449.
[15]
Timek TA, Green GR, Tibayan FA, et al. Aorto-mitral annular dynamics [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2003, 76(6):1944-1950.
[16]
Caimmi PP, Diterlizzi M, Grossini E, et al. Impact of prosthetic mitral rings on aortomitral apparatus function: a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2009, 88(3):740-744.
[17]
Vergnat M, Levack MM, Jackson BM, et al. The effect of surgical and transcatheter aortic valve replacement on mitral annular anatomy [J]. Ann Thorac Surg, 2013, 95(2):614-619.
[1] 任书堂, 刘晓程, 张亚东, 孙佳英, 陈萍, 周建华, 龙进, 黄云洲. 左心室辅助装置支持下单纯收缩期主动脉瓣反流的超声心动图特征[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1023-1028.
[2] 钟露, 曹省, 宋宏宁, 陈金玲, 周青. 超声心动图定量评估二尖瓣反流程度的质量控制[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 705-711.
[3] 应康, 杨璨莹, 刘凤珍, 陈丽丽, 刘燕娜. 左心室心肌应变对无症状重度主动脉瓣狭窄患者的预后评估价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 581-587.
[4] 李嵘娟, 宋砾, 王月丽, 崇梅, 牛宝荣, 李菁, 陈倬, 谷孝艳, 张涵, 张烨, 何怡华. 大动脉炎与白塞病所致主动脉瓣反流的临床及超声心动图特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(02): 213-218.
[5] 张红梅, 李春梅, 王胰, 张清凤, 丁戈琦, 邓燕, 林薿, 李文华, 尹立雪. 经胸右心声学造影不同右心房增压方式评估卵圆孔未闭隐匿性右向左分流的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(06): 508-513.
[6] 戴江, 王生伟, 李进华, 刘岳, 朱恩军, 来永强. 内皮素-1水平与单纯行主动脉瓣置换术患者术后新发房颤的相关性分析[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2022, 17(04): 308-314.
[7] 郝莉茹, 林永俭, 马英东, 陈卓萍, 刘丽. 高龄微创经股静脉经导管二尖瓣夹合术患者一例的术中护理配合[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2023, 11(04): 372-376.
[8] 吴建涛, 牛兆倬, 张文峰, 生伟, 王天毅, 李好友, 王吉显, 王祯宝. 经心尖入径介入主动脉瓣联合二尖生物瓣毁损后替换术一例[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(03): 347-348.
[9] 潘文志, 龙愉良, 周达新, 葛均波. 单纯主动脉瓣反流经导管主动脉瓣置换的解剖分析及操作技巧[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 141-146.
[10] 陈丹丹, 潘文志, 陈莎莎, 张源, 张晓春, 李明飞, 周达新, 葛均波. 结构性心脏病年度报告2022[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 129-140.
[11] 翁梓珑, 朱丽, 林大卫, 潘文志, 周达新, 葛均波. 国产经导管瓣膜系统治疗重度主动脉瓣狭窄长期预后及其预测因素分析[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 114-119.
[12] 漆祎鸣, 潘文志, 朱风琴, 周达新, 葛均波. 新型冠状病毒感染后经导管主动脉瓣置换术安全性分析[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(02): 105-108.
[13] 张蕾, 李伟, 潘文志, 张晓春, 管丽华, 张源, 陈莎莎, 李明飞, 潘翠珍, 周达新, 葛均波. 国产经导管二尖瓣间接瓣环修复系统治疗二尖瓣反流一例[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 54-57.
[14] 党梦秋, 范嘉祺, 戴晗怡, 陈俊, 李然犀, 徐建国, 李程, 郭宇超, 刘先宝, 王建安. 智能手表对主动脉瓣置换术后患者心房颤动及左束支传导阻滞的诊断价值[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2023, 11(01): 24-27.
[15] 张颖倩, 陈韵岱, 蒋博, 刘长福. 经导管主动脉瓣植入术后左冠状动脉部分闭塞一例[J]. 中华心脏与心律电子杂志, 2022, 10(04): 221-224.
阅读次数
全文


摘要