切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (08) : 625 -630. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2019.08.014

所属专题: 文献

基础研究

基于压痕松弛实验的黏弹性参数评价大鼠肝纤维化的实验研究
刘冬1, 苏晨1, 钱林学1,(), 李国洋2, 曹艳平2   
  1. 1. 100050 首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院超声科
    2. 100084 北京,清华大学航天航空学院工程力学系
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-19 出版日期:2019-08-01
  • 通信作者: 钱林学

Indentation relaxation test based viscoelastic parameters for evaluation of liver fibrosis in rats

Dong Liu1, Chen Su1, Linxue Qian1,(), Guoyang Li2, Yanping Cao2   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China
    2. Department of Engineering Mechanics, School of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  • Received:2019-07-19 Published:2019-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Linxue Qian
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Qian Linxue, Email:
引用本文:

刘冬, 苏晨, 钱林学, 李国洋, 曹艳平. 基于压痕松弛实验的黏弹性参数评价大鼠肝纤维化的实验研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(08): 625-630.

Dong Liu, Chen Su, Linxue Qian, Guoyang Li, Yanping Cao. Indentation relaxation test based viscoelastic parameters for evaluation of liver fibrosis in rats[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2019, 16(08): 625-630.

目的

探讨基于压痕松弛实验的黏弹性参数评价肝纤维化的可行性,以期为弹性成像诊断肝纤维化提供有价值的参数和方法。

方法

选取雄性SD大鼠50只,平均体质量(180±20)g,将其分为2组,肝纤维化组(40只)和对照组(10只)。最终纳入43只,其中肝纤维化组36只,对照组7只。实验组大鼠采用四氯化碳-橄榄油溶液建立肝纤维化模型,对照组大鼠采用单纯橄榄油溶液灌胃。分离大鼠肝脏后进行压痕松弛实验,测算肝脏黏弹性参数。对离体肝脏病理标本进行肝组织纤维化分期(S1~S4期)。对不同肝纤维化分期的各组大鼠黏弹性参数进行比较,并进行黏弹性参数与大鼠肝纤维化程度的相关性分析。

结果

对照组与肝纤维化S1~S4期各组的黏弹性参数应力下降开始时的变化程度(g1)、应力降低到平衡时的变化程度(g2)、黏弹性材料的总松弛程度(g1g2)、应力下降开始时间(τ1)、应力降低到平衡时的时间(τ2)进行比较,τ1τ2g1组间差异有统计学意义(F=23.598、2.836、2.506,P均<0.05),进一步两两比较,黏弹性参数τ1在正常肝脏组与S1、S2、S3、S4期肝纤维化组之间的差异均有统计学意义(t=2.367、1.689、2.887、3.195,P均<0.05);黏弹性参数τ2在S1期和S3期肝纤维化组之间差异有统计学意义(t=2.048,P<0.05);黏弹性参数g1在S2期和S3期肝纤维化组之间差异有统计学意义(t=3.211,P<0.05)。Spearman相关性分析显示,黏弹性参数g1g1g2与肝纤维化程度呈正相关(r=0.513、0.439,P均<0.001),τ1与肝纤维化程度呈负相关(r=-0.509,P<0.001)。

结论

黏弹性参数与肝纤维化分期具有相关性,将黏弹性参数应用于大鼠肝脏纤维化分期的评估具有可行性,这也为黏弹性参数运用于剪切波弹性成像评价肝纤维化提供了可靠的实验论据。

Objective

To explore the feasibility of viscoelastic parameters based on the indentation relaxation test in evaluating liver fibrosis, so as to provide valuable parameters and methods for elastography in diagnosing liver fibrosis.

Methods

Fifty male SD rats with an average body mass of (180±20) g were selected and divided into two groups: a liver fibrosis group (n=40) and a control group (n=10). Finally, 43 SD rats were included, including 36 in the hepatic fibrosis group and 7 in the control group. Liver fibrosis was induced in rats with carbon tetrachloride, while the control group was fed olive oil solution alone. The indentation relaxation test was performed to determine the viscoelastic parameters of the liver after liver isolation. Liver fibrosis staging (stages S1~S4) was performed on isolated liver pathological specimens. The viscoelastic parameters of different liver fibrosis stages in rats were compared and the correlation between viscoelastic parameters and the degree of liver fibrosis in rats was analyzed.

Results

Viscoelastic parameters τ1, τ2, and g1 were statistically significant different between the groups (F=23.598, 2.836, and 2.506, respectively, all P<0.05). In further pairwise comparisons, τ1 was statistically different between the control group and group S1, S2, S3, or S4 (t=2.367, 1.689, 2.887, and 3.195, respectively, all P<0.05). τ2 was statistically different between groups S1 and S3 (t=2.048, P<0.05), and g1 was statistically different between groups S2 and S3 (t=3.211, P<0.05). Spearman correlation analysis showed that viscoelastic parameters g1 and g1+ g2 were positively correlated with the degree of liver fibrosis (r=0.513 and 0.439, respectively, both P<0.001), while τ1 was negatively correlated with the degree of liver fibrosis (r=-0.509, P<0.001).

Conclusion

Viscoelastic parameters correlate with liver fibrosis stages, so it is feasible to use viscoelastic parameters to evaluate liver fibrosis stage in rats, which provides reliable experimental evidence for the application of viscoelastic parameters in shear wave elastography to evaluate liver fibrosis.

图1 ElectroForce? 3100(Bose,Eden Prairie,MN)测试仪进行压痕松弛实验。图a为ElectroForce? 3100(Bose, Eden Prairie,MN)测试仪器;图b为通过测试仪的球形压头和肝脏组织接触并施加压力,使其产生形变后,压力传感器测量应力变化,从而得到反映肝脏黏弹性的参数
图2 大鼠肝纤维化病理切片图。图a~d分别为肝纤维化S1~S4期HE染色病理图片(×40);图e~h分别为肝纤维化S1~S4期天狼星染色病理图片(×40)
表1 不同肝纤维化分期的各组大鼠黏弹性参数比较(±s
图3 应力下降开始时的变化程度与大鼠肝纤维化程度的相关性分析散点图
图4 黏弹性材料的总松弛程度与大鼠肝纤维化程度的相关性分析散点图
图5 应力下降开始时间与大鼠肝纤维化程度相关性分析散点图
1
Wells RG. The role of matrix stiffness in hepatic stellate cell activation and liver fibrosis [J]. J Clin Gastroenterol, 2005, 9(4 Suppl 2): S158-S161.
2
Muller M, Gennisson JL, Deffieux T, et al. Quantitative viscoelasticity mapping of human liver using supersonic shear imaging: preliminary in vivo feasibility study [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2009, 35(2): 219-229.
3
Bavu E, Gennisson JL, Couade M, et al. Noninvasive in vivo liver fibrosis evaluation using supersonic shear imaging: a clinical study on 113 hepatitis C virus patients [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2011, 37(9): 1361-1373.
4
郭燕荣, 陈昕, 林浩铭, 等. 基于剪切波频散超声振动技术的大鼠肝纤维化粘弹性测量[J]. 生物医学工程学进展, 2014(2): 71-77.
5
周光泉, 刘孝敏. 黏弹性理论 [M]. 合肥: 中国科学技术大学出版社, 1996.
6
Kerdok AE, Ottensmeyer MP, Howe RD. Effects of perfusion on the viscoelastic characteristics of liver [J]. J Biomech, 2006, 39(12): 2221-2231.
7
Cao YP, Zhang MG, Feng XQ. Indentation method for measuring the viscoelastic kernel function of nonlinear viscoelastic soft materials [J]. J Mater Res, 2013, 28(6): 806-816.
8
Cao YP, Ji XY, Feng XQ. Geometry independence of the normalized relaxation functions of viscoelastic materials in indentation [J]. Philos Mag, 2010, 90(12): 1639-1655.
9
Bedossa P, Poynard T. An algorithm for the grading of activity in chronic hepatitis C. The METAVIR Cooperative Study Group [J]. Hepatology, 1996, 24( 2): 289-293.
10
张义同. 热粘弹性理论 [M]. 天津: 天津大学出版社, 2002.
11
Zhu Y, Chen X, Zhang X, et al. Modeling the mechanical properties of liver fibrosis in rats [J]. J Biomech, 2016, 49(9): 1461-1467.
12
Chen S, Sanchez W, Callstrom MR et al. Assessment of liver viscoelasticity by using shear waves induced by ultrasound radiation force [J]. Radiology, 2013, 266(3): 964-970.
13
Chen X, Shen Y, Zheng Y, et al. Quantification of liver viscoelasticity with acoustic radiation force: a study of hepatic fibrosis in a rat model [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2013, 39(11):2091-2102.
14
Sugimoto K, Moriyasu F, Oshiro H, et al. Viscoelasticity measurement in rat livers using shear-wave US elastography [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2018, 44(9): 2018-2024.
15
Zhu Y, Zhang X, Zheng Y, et al. Quantitative analysis of liver fibrosis in rats with shearwave dispersion ultrasound vibrometry: Comparison with dynamic mechanical analysis [J]. Med Eng Phys, 2014, 36(11): 1401-1407.
16
Guzmán Aroca F, Ayala I, Serrano L, et al. Assessment of liver steatosis in chicken by using acoustic radiation force impulse imaging: Preliminary results [J]. Eur Radiol, 2010, 20(10): 2367-2371.
17
Yoneda M, Suzuki K, Kato S, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Us-based acoustic radiation force impulse elastography [J]. Radiology, 2010, 256(2): 640-647.
18
Fierbinteanu Braticevici C, Sporea I, Panaitescu E, et al. Value of acoustic radiation force impulse imaging elastography for non- invasive evaluation of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2013, 39(11): 1942-1950.
19
Zhang X, Gao X, Zhang P, et al. Dynamic mechanical analysis to assess viscoelasticity of liver tissue in a rat model of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease [J]. Med Eng Phys, 2017, 44: 79-86.
[1] 高建松, 陈晓晓, 冯婷, 包剑锋, 魏淑芳, 潘林. 基于超声瞬时弹性成像的多参数决策树模型评估慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化等级[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 923-929.
[2] 骆云凯, 鄢曹鑫, 张宣宣, 李如梅, 王文倩, 洪行行, 夏斌, 邹伟璞, 张珊珊, 陈剑. 声触诊弹性成像检测脾硬度对诊断慢性乙肝肝纤维化程度的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(11): 1232-1237.
[3] 张巧梅, 孙小平, 李冠胜, 邓扬嘉. 针灸对大鼠呼吸机相关性肺炎中性粒细胞归巢及胞外诱捕网的影响[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(04): 265-271.
[4] 张晓燕, 肖东琼, 高沪, 陈琳, 唐发娟, 李熙鸿. 转录因子12过表达对脓毒症相关性脑病大鼠大脑皮质的保护作用及其机制[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(05): 540-549.
[5] 靳茜雅, 黄晓松, 谭诚, 蒋琴, 侯昉, 李瑶悦, 徐冰, 贾红慧, 刘文英. 产前他克莫司治疗对先天性膈疝大鼠病理模型肺血管重构的影响[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 428-436.
[6] 强坤坤, 罗红. 杜氏肌营养不良症患儿的高频超声与剪切波弹性成像诊断研究现状及前景[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 162-167.
[7] 朱美缔, 王树明, 郭思佳, 井维斌, 马明明, 刘锐. 丙戊酸钠对50%总体表面积Ⅲ度烫伤大鼠肺功能保护作用的研究[J]. 中华损伤与修复杂志(电子版), 2023, 18(01): 47-52.
[8] 魏强, 张明祥, 陈强谱, 孙宝房. 增味小承气汤对梗阻性黄疸大鼠胃肠道动力的影响[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 267-270.
[9] 李义亮, 买买提·依斯热依力, 王永康, 王志, 赛甫丁·艾比布拉, 李赞林, 克力木·阿不都热依木. 聚丙烯和生物补片对腹壁疝大鼠腹横筋膜组织氧化应激、MMPs及TIMPs的影响[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(02): 125-129.
[10] 卢强, 杨丽斐, 刘康, 余佳薇, 任璐, 张谞丰, 吕毅. 供肝免冲洗灌注的大鼠肝移植实验研究[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(01): 103-107.
[11] 杨蕴钊, 周诚, 石美涵, 赵静, 白雪源. 人羊水间充质干细胞对膜性肾病大鼠的治疗作用[J]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2023, 12(04): 181-186.
[12] 隆昱洲, 柳华, 张云茜, 李兴统, 范云虎, 尚正良, 宋镇妤, 罗丽华. 依达拉奉预适应延长急性缺血性脑卒中溶栓时间窗的研究及ROS/TXNIP/NLRP3通路参与机制的探讨[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(02): 65-74.
[13] 萨仁高娃, 张英霞, 邓伟, 闫诺, 樊宁. 超声引导下鼠肝消融术后组织病理特征的变化规律及影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 394-398.
[14] 王小红, 钱晶, 翁文俊, 周国雄, 朱顺星, 祁小鸣, 刘春, 王萍, 沈伟, 程睿智, 秦璟灏. 巯基丙酮酸硫基转移酶调控核因子κB信号介导自噬对重症急性胰腺炎大鼠的影响及机制[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 422-426.
[15] 戚晓阳, 杨平, 杜忠秋, 邱旭升, 汤黎明, 陈一心. 袖状胃切除术对肥胖合并2型糖尿病大鼠模型骨密度的影响[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 102-108.
阅读次数
全文


摘要