切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (01) : 39 -45. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.01.008

所属专题: 文献

腹部超声影像学

肾动脉多普勒超声对经皮血管内支架成形术及支架置入术后肾动脉再狭窄的诊断价值:系统综述和Meta分析
张怡璇1, 王亚红1, 王莹1, 李建初1,()   
  1. 1. 100730 中国医学科学院 北京协和医学院 北京协和医院超声医学科
  • 收稿日期:2019-02-25 出版日期:2020-01-01
  • 通信作者: 李建初

Diagnostic value of renal Doppler ultrasound for renal artery restenosis after percutaneous angioplasty and endoluminal stenting: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

Yixuan Zhang1, Yahong Wang1, Ying Wang1, Jianchu Li1,()   

  1. 1. Deprotment of Ultrasonography, Peking Unior Medical College Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100730, China
  • Received:2019-02-25 Published:2020-01-01
  • Corresponding author: Jianchu Li
  • About author:
    Corrsponding author: Li Jianchu, Email:
引用本文:

张怡璇, 王亚红, 王莹, 李建初. 肾动脉多普勒超声对经皮血管内支架成形术及支架置入术后肾动脉再狭窄的诊断价值:系统综述和Meta分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(01): 39-45.

Yixuan Zhang, Yahong Wang, Ying Wang, Jianchu Li. Diagnostic value of renal Doppler ultrasound for renal artery restenosis after percutaneous angioplasty and endoluminal stenting: a systematic review and Meta-analysis[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020, 17(01): 39-45.

目的

采用Meta分析方法评估肾动脉多普勒超声(RDS)对经皮血管内支架成形术及支架置入术(PTAS)术后肾动脉再狭窄的诊断价值。

方法

在数据库中检索自创刊至2018年12月的国内外文献,将检索得到的文献依照纳入与排除标准进行筛选,对最终纳入的文献进行质量评价和异质性检验,采用Meta分析方法评估RDS对PTAS术后肾动脉再狭窄的诊断价值。

结果

最终纳入6篇合格文献,得到的合并敏感度和特异度分别为92%和89%,合并诊断比值比为83.33,总受试者工作特征曲线(SROC)曲线下面积为0.9542,Q指数为0.8963。

结论

RDS在PTAS术后肾动脉再狭窄中具有较高的诊断准确性和诊断价值。

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic value of renal duplex sonography (RDS) for renal artery restenosis after percutaneous angioplasty and endoluminal stenting (PTAS) by meta-analysis.

Methods

Domestic and international databases were searched from inception to December 2018 for relevant articles. The retrieved articles were screened according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the quality evaluation and heterogeneity test were carried out. The diagnostic value of RDS for renal artery restenosis after PTAS was evaluated by meta-analysis.

Results

There were six qualified articles included in this meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 92% and 89%, respectively, and the pooled diagnostic odds ratio was 83.33. The area under the curve (AUC) of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) was 0.9542, and the Q* index was 0.8963.

Conclusion

RDS is highly valuable in the diagnosis of renal artery restenosis after PTAS.

表1 文献的纳入与排除标准
图1 文献检索筛选流程图
表2 纳入文献的基本特征
图2 纳入文献偏倚风险及临床适用性评估图
图3 多普勒超声诊断经皮血管内支架成形术及支架置入术术后肾动脉再狭窄合并诊断比值比森林图。合并诊断比值比为83.33(95%置信区间:42.84~162.08)
图4 彩色多普勒超声诊断经皮血管内支架成形术及支架置入术术后肾动脉再狭窄合并敏感度森林图。合并后的敏感度为92%(95%置信区间:0.87~0.96)
图5 彩色多普勒超声诊断经皮血管内支架成形术及支架置入术术后肾动脉再狭窄合并敏感度森林图。合并后的特异度为89%(95%置信区间:0.85~0.92)
图6 彩色多普勒超声诊断经皮血管内支架成形术及支架置入术术后肾动脉再狭窄合并阳性似然比森林图。合并后的阳性似然比为7.51(95%置信区间:5.43~10.38)
图7 彩色多普勒超声诊断经皮血管内支架成形术及支架置入术术后肾动脉再狭窄合并阴性似然比森林图。合并后的阴性似然比为0.10(95%置信区间:0.06~0.16)
图8 肾动脉多普勒超声诊断经皮血管内支架成形术及支架置入术术后肾动脉再狭窄总受试者工作特征曲线图
1
Bavishi C, de Leeuw PW, Messerli FH. Atherosclerotic Renal Artery Stenosis and Hypertension: Pragmatism, Pitfalls, and Perspectives [J]. Am J Med, 2016, 129(6): 635 e5-e14.
2
Cooper CJ, Murphy TP, Cutlip DE, et al. Stenting and medical therapy for atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis [J]. N Engl J Med, 2014, 370(1): 13-22.
3
ASTRAL I, Wheatley K, Ives N, et al. Revascularization versus medical therapy for renal-artery stenosis [J]. N Engl J Med, 2009, 361(20): 1953-1962.
4
Perkovic V, Thomson KR, Mitchell PJ, et al. Treatment of renovascular disease with percutaneous stent insertion: Long-term outcomes [J]. Australas Radiol, 2001, 45(4): 438-443.
5
Przewlocki T, Rzeznik D, Kablak-Ziembicka A, et al. Predictors of cardiovascular events and restenosis in patients undergoing stenting for renal artery stenosis [J]. Eur heart j, 2011, 32: 1048.

URL    
6
Rocha-Singh KJ, Novack V, Pencina M, et al. Objective performance goals of safety and blood pressure efficacy for clinical trials of renal artery bare metal stents in hypertensive patients with atherosclerotic renal artery stenosis [J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2011, 78(5): 779-789.
7
Shammas NW, Kapalis MJ, Dippel EJ, et al. Clinical and angiographic predictors of restenosis following renal artery stenting [J]. J Invasive Cardiol, 2004, 16(1): 10-13.
8
Girndt M, Kaul H, Maute C, et al. Enhanced flow velocity after stenting of renal arteries is associated with decreased renal function [J]. Nephron Clin Pract, 2007, 105(2): c84-c89.
9
Chi YW, White CJ, Thornton S, et al. Ultrasound velocity criteria for renal in-stent restenosis [J]. J Vasc Surg, 2009, 50(1): 119-123.

URL    
10
Del Conde I, Galin ID, Trost B, et al. Renal artery duplex ultrasound criteria for the detection of significant in-stent restenosis [J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2014, 83(4): 612-618.
11
Fleming SH, Davis RP, Craven TE, et al. Accuracy of duplex sonography scans after renal artery stenting [J]. J Vasc Surg, 2010, 52(4): 953-957; discussion 958.

URL    
12
Napoli V, Pinto S, Bargellini I, et al. Duplex ultrasonographic study of the renal arteries before and after renal artery stenting [J]. Eur Radiol, 2002, 12(4): 796-803.

URL    
13
Rocha-Singh K, Jaff MR, Lynne Kelley E, et al. Renal artery stenting with noninvasive duplex ultrasound follow-up: 3-year results from the RENAISSANCE renal stent trial [J]. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2008, 72(6): 853-862.
14
Wuamett JC, Soult M, Larion S, et al. Duplex criteria for renal artery in-stent restenosis [J]. J vascular surg, 2016, 63(6): 151S-152S.
15
Bakker J, Beutler JJ, Elgersma OE, et al. Duplex ultrasonography in assessing restenosis of renal artery stents [J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 1999, 22(6): 475-480.
16
Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies [J]. Ann Intern Med, 2011, 155(8): 529-536.

URL    
17
张天嵩,钟文昭. Meta-DiSc软件在诊断试验Meta分析中的应用 [J]. 循证医学, 2008, 8(2): 97-100, 108.
18
Zamora J, Abraira V, Muriel A, et al. Meta-DiSc: a software for meta-analysis of test accuracy data [J]. BMC Med Res Methodol, 2006, 6: 31.
19
Boateng FK, Greco BA. Renal artery stenosis: Prevalence of, risk factors for, and management of in-stent stenosis [J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2013, 61(1): 147-160.

URL    
20
Takahashi EA, McKusick MA, Bjarnason H, et al. Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis in Patients with Renal Artery Stenosis [J]. J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2016, 27(11): 1657-1662.
21
Hoffmann U, Edwards JM, Carter S, et al. Role of duplex scanning for the detection of atherosclerotic renal artery disease [J]. Kidney Int, 1991, 39(6): 1232-1239.
22
Nchimi A, Biquet JF, Brisbois D, et al. Duplex ultrasound as first-line screening test for patients suspected of renal artery stenosis: prospective evaluation in high-risk group [J]. Eur Radiol, 2003, 13(6): 1413-1419.

URL    
23
李建初. 肾动脉狭窄的超声规范化检测与结果分析 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2010, 7(1): 5-9.
24
House MK, Dowling RJ, King P, et al. Using Doppler sonography to reveal renal artery stenosis: an evaluation of optimal imaging parameters [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1999, 173(3): 761-765.
25
Strandness DE Jr. Duplex imaging for the detection of renal artery stenosis [J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 1994, 24(4): 674-678.
26
Schäberle W, Leyerer L, Schierling W, et al. Ultrasound diagnostics of renal artery stenosis: Stenosis criteria, CEUS and recurrent in-stent stenosis [J]. Gefasschirurgie, 2016, 21: 4-13.
27
Kuppler CS, Christie JW, Newton WB, et al. Stent effects on duplex velocity estimates [J]. J Surg Res, 2013, 183(1): 457-461.
28
Nederkoorn PJ, Brown MM. Optimal cut-off criteria for duplex ultrasound for the diagnosis of restenosis in stented carotid arteries: review and protocol for a diagnostic study [J]. BMC Neurol, 2009, 9: 36.
29
Corriere MA, Edwards MS, Pearce JD, et al. Restenosis after renal artery angioplasty and stenting: Incidence and risk factors [J]. J Vasc Surg, 2009, 50(4): 813-819.e1.

URL    
30
Christie JW, Conlee TD, Craven TE, et al. Early duplex predicts restenosis after renal artery angioplasty and stenting [J]. J Vasc Surg, 2012, 56(5): 1373-1380; discussion 1380.

URL    
31
Behar JV, Nelson RC, Zidar JP, et al. Thin-Section Multidetector CT Angiography of Renal Artery Stents [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2002, 178(5): 1155-1159.
32
Raza SA, Chughtai AR, Wahba M, et al. Multislice CT angiography in renal artery stent evaluation: prospective comparison with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography [J]. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2004, 27(1): 9-15.
[1] 马艳波, 华扬, 刘桂梅, 孟秀峰, 崔立平. 中青年人颈动脉粥样硬化病变的相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 822-826.
[2] 张思平, 刘伟, 马鹏程. 全膝关节置换术后下肢轻度内翻对线对疗效的影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 808-817.
[3] 罗旺林, 杨传军, 许国星, 俞建国, 孙伟东, 颜文娟, 冯志. 开放性楔形胫骨高位截骨术不同植入材料的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 818-826.
[4] 马鹏程, 刘伟, 张思平. 股骨髋臼撞击综合征关节镜手术中闭合关节囊的疗效影响[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 653-662.
[5] 陈宏兴, 张立军, 张勇, 李虎, 周驰, 凡一诺. 膝骨关节炎关节镜清理术后中药外用疗效的Meta分析[J]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 663-672.
[6] 李雄雄, 周灿, 徐婷, 任予, 尚进. 初诊导管原位癌伴微浸润腋窝淋巴结转移率的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 466-474.
[7] 张再博, 王冰雨, 焦志凯, 檀碧波. 胃癌术后下肢深静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 475-480.
[8] 武慧铭, 郭仁凯, 李辉宇. 机器人辅助下经自然腔道取标本手术治疗结直肠癌安全性和有效性的Meta分析[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 395-400.
[9] 莫闲, 杨闯. 肝硬化患者并发门静脉血栓危险因素的Meta分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 678-683.
[10] 朱良振, 于永刚, 陈杲, 廖松柏. 儿童高级别闭合性肾损伤肾动脉栓塞与手术探查的疗效比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 461-465,475.
[11] 吴新兰, 余静. 彩色多普勒超声在腹股沟斜疝和直疝与股疝鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 611-614.
[12] 段文忠, 白延霞, 徐文亭, 祁虹霞, 吕志坚. 七氟烷和丙泊酚在肝切除术中麻醉效果比较Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 640-645.
[13] 杨海龙, 邓满军, 樊羿辰, 徐梦钰, 陈芳德, 吴威浩, 张生元. 腹腔镜胆总管探查术一期缝合术后胆漏危险因素Meta分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 545-550.
[14] 何彬, 王静. 彩色多普勒超声血流参数、血清尿酸、胱抑素C对短暂性脑缺血发作患者颈动脉狭窄的诊断价值[J]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 289-294.
[15] 徐红莉, 杨钰琳, 薛清, 张茜, 马丽虹, 邱振刚. 体外冲击波治疗非特异性腰痛疗效的系统评价和Meta分析[J]. 中华老年骨科与康复电子杂志, 2023, 09(05): 307-314.
阅读次数
全文


摘要