切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (08) : 776 -781. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.08.012

所属专题: 文献

介入超声影像学

人工腹水辅助超声引导下经皮微波消融治疗邻近横膈肝癌的应用价值
刘德林1, 黄斌,1, 孙希希1, 孔梓祥1   
  1. 1. 310023 杭州,浙江中医药大学附属西溪医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2019-12-30 出版日期:2020-08-01
  • 通信作者: 黄斌

Value of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation with artificial ascites in treatment of liver cancer adjacent to the diaphragm

Liu Liu1, Huang Huang,1, Sun Sun1, Kong Kong1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasonography, Xixi Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310023, China
  • Received:2019-12-30 Published:2020-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Huang Huang
引用本文:

刘德林, 黄斌, 孙希希, 孔梓祥. 人工腹水辅助超声引导下经皮微波消融治疗邻近横膈肝癌的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(08): 776-781.

Liu Liu, Huang Huang, Sun Sun, Kong Kong. Value of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation with artificial ascites in treatment of liver cancer adjacent to the diaphragm[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020, 17(08): 776-781.

目的

探讨人工腹水辅助超声引导下经皮微波消融(MWA)治疗邻近横膈肝癌的应用价值。

方法

选取浙江中医药大学附属西溪医院2016年1月至2019年10月,行经皮MWA治疗邻近横膈原发性肝癌的患者83例,共96个病灶。83例患者依据是否建立人工腹水分为:人工腹水组(A组)40例;非人工腹水组(B组)43例。依据病灶声像图显示清晰完整度进行评分,比较2组病例声像图质量。术后1个月行增强MRI或增强CT检查以评估近期疗效,后续每隔3~6个月行增强MRI或增强CT评估局部肿瘤进展情况。对2组患者的不良反应、并发症以及术后疗效进行对比观察。

结果

术中病灶声像图显示清晰完整度评分A组为(4.81±0.35)分,B组为(3.54±0.48)分,2组差异有统计学意义(t=15.352,P<0.05)。不良反应及并发症:发热A组19例(19/40,47.5%),B组20例(20/43,46.5%),2组差异无统计学意义(P=0.928);上腹部隐痛A组16例(16/40,40.0%),B组19例(19/43,44.2%),2组差异无统计学意义(P=0.700);胸腔积液A组1例(1/40,2.5%),B组12例(12/43,27.9%),2组差异有统计学意义(χ2=8.295,P=0.004);横膈损伤A组0例,B组6例(6/43,14.0%),2组差异有统计学意义(P=0.026)。消融后1个月,A组完全消融率为97.5%(39/40),B组完全消融率为95.3%(41/43),2组差异无统计学意义(P=0.600)。83例患者中位随访时间21个月,A组与B组局部肿瘤进展率分别为5.0%(2/40)、7.0%(3/43),2组差异无统计学意义(P=0.705)。

结论

人工腹水辅助超声引导下经皮MWA治疗邻近横膈肝癌可提高病灶声像图质量且消融安全性更高。

Objective

To explore the value of ultrasound-guided percutaneous microwave ablation (MWA) with artificial ascites in the treatment of liver cancer adjacent to the diaphragm.

Methods

Eighty-three patients with 96 lesions of primary liver cancer adjacent to the diaphragm treated by percutaneous MWA from January 2016 to October 2019 at Xixi Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang Chinese Medical University were selected. According to whether artificial ascites was used during ablation, the patients was divided into either an artificial ascites group (group A, 40 cases) or a non-artificial ascites group (group B, 43 cases). The lesions were scored according to the clarity and completeness on images. The quality of sonogram was compared between the two groups. Contrast-enhanced MRI or contrast-enhanced CT was performed one month after ablation to evaluate the short-term efficacy, and then every 3-6 months to evaluate local tumor progression. The adverse reactions, complications, and postoperative efficacy of the two groups were compared.

Results

The score of clarity and completeness was 4.81±0.35 in group A and 3.54±0.48 in group B, and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (t=15.352, P<0.05). The statistics of adverse reactions and complications are as follows: 19 cases with fever in group A (19/40, 47.5%) and 20 cases in group B (20/43, 46.5%), with no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.928);16 cases with upper abdominal dull pain in group A (16/40, 40.0%) and 19 cases in group B (19/43, 44.2%) , with no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.700); 1 case with pleural effusion in group A (1/40, 2.5%) and 12 cases in group B (12/43, 27.9%), with a significant difference between the two groups (χ2=8.295, P=0.004); 0 cases with diaphragmatic injury in group A and 6 cases in group B (6/43, 14.0%) with a significant difference between the two groups (Fisher's exact test, P=0.026). One month after ablation, the complete ablation rate was 97.5% (39/40) in group A and 95.3% (41/43) in group B; there was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.600). The median follow-up time for the 83 patients was 21 months. The rate of local tumor progression was 5.0% (2/40) in group A and 7.0% (3/43) in group B, and there was no significant difference between the two groups (P=0.705).

Conclusion

Artificial ascites assisted ultrasound-guided percutaneous MWA can improve the quality of sonogram and the safety of ablation in the treatment of liver cancer adjacent to the diaphragm.

表1 人工腹水组与非人工腹水组一般资料比较(±s
图1 患者男性,67岁,右肝邻近膈顶肝癌超声图像。图a为常规超声病灶显示不清,超声造影时病灶随呼吸若隐若现,不能完全显示(箭头所示为肿瘤位置);图b为消融术中建立人工腹水,病灶轮廓清晰可见(箭头所示低回声结节);图c为超声引导下微波消融,术中精准布针,完成微波消融治疗
图2 患者,女性,68岁,肝癌病灶位于S7段紧贴横膈,微波消融术后CT及超声造影图像。图a为微波消融术后6个月CT发现右侧胸腔少量积液(白色箭头所示低密度灶为消融灶,红色箭头所示为右侧胸腔积液),后持续存在;图b为超声造影通过腹腔引流管注入1:100稀释造影剂50 ml,1 s后见造影剂通过S7段消融灶紧邻的横膈流入右侧胸腔(箭头所示为造影剂流经横膈穿孔处);图c为25 s后造影剂布满右侧胸腔积液内(箭头所示),证实微波消融术后横膈穿孔
1
中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会. 原发性肝癌诊疗规范(2017年版)[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2017, 33(8): 1419-1431.
2
李凯,王平,郑荣琴, 等. 超声引导下人工腹水辅助肝癌微波消融治疗研究[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2010, 7(10): 1685-1690.
3
Liang P, Yu J, Yu XL, et al. Percutaneous cooled-tip microwave ablation under ultrasound guidance for primary liver cancer:a multicenter analysis of 1363 treatment-naïve lesions in 1007 patients in China[J]. Gut, 2012, 61(7): 1100-1101.
4
张曼,李凯,苏中振, 等. 融合成像技术辅助普通超声显示困难的肝恶性肿瘤射频消融的应用价值[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2016, 25(8): 691-695.
5
Kang TW, Rhim H, Kim EY, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation for the hepatocellular carcinoma abutting the diaphragm assessment of safety and therapeutic efficacy[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2009, 10(1): 34-42.
6
高军喜,谷昊,王雅婷, 等. 经皮局麻联合超声造影对困难肝癌射频消融治疗的可行性及安全性分析[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2019, 34(7): 572-575.
7
Lee MW. Fusion imaging of real-time ultrasonography with CT or MRI for hepatic intervention[J]. Ultrasonography, 2014, 33(4): 227-239.
8
Wang CC, Kao JH. Artificial ascites is feasible and effective for difficult-to-ablate hepatocellular carcinoma[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2010, 74(3): 536-540.
9
郑云,张亚奇,邹如海, 等. 人工胸水协助超声引导肝穹窿部肿瘤治疗[J]. 中山大学学报(医学科学版), 2005, 26(6): 696-699.
10
张浩,范卫君,黄子林, 等. CT引导经皮微波消融治疗邻近横膈肝肿瘤的近期疗效及安全性分析[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2014, 94(17): 1313-1317.
11
丁建民,经翔,王彦冬, 等. 人工胸腹水对肝癌经皮微波消融治疗的影响[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2013, 29(12): 1086-1090.
12
黄倩楠,许尔蛟,曾庆劲, 等. 人工腹水辅助热消融有腹腔手术史患者邻近胃肠道肝肿瘤的应用价值[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2016, 25(1): 36-39.
13
Kondo Y, Yoshida H, Tateishi R, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of liver cancer in the hepatic dome using the intrapleural fluid infusion technique[J]. Br J Surg, 2008, 95(8): 996-1004.
14
黄斌,荀运浩,刘德林, 等. 特殊部位原发性肝癌经皮微波消融临床观察[J]. 浙江临床医学, 2017, 19(6): 1019-1023.
15
Jiang C, Liu B, Chen S, et al. Safety margin after radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma:precise assessment with a three-dimensional reconstruction technique using CT imaging[J]. Int J Hyperthermia, 2018, 34(8): 1135-1141.
16
张玉杰,李文伦,李丹丹, 等. 超声引导经皮射频消融治疗毗邻横膈部肝癌的疗效与安全性评估[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2012, 28(8): 737-740.
17
韩浩,陈敏华,杨薇, 等. 肝细胞癌射频消融后局部肿瘤进展多因素分析[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2012, 21(2): 128-132.
[1] 韩丹, 王婷, 肖欢, 朱丽容, 陈镜宇, 唐毅. 超声造影与增强CT对儿童肝脏良恶性病变诊断价值的对比分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 939-944.
[2] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[3] 陈忠垚, 陈胜灯, 李秋. 不同手术时机对原发性肝癌自发破裂出血患者远期预后的影响[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 518-521.
[4] 孟令展, 朱震宇. 达芬奇机器人辅助肝中叶切除术[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 373-373.
[5] 任茂玲, 孙晓容, 何晓丽. CT引导下微波消融术在肺部结节治疗中的应用及术后并发症的危险因素分析[J]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2023, 16(05): 718-720.
[6] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[7] 唐灿, 李向阳, 秦浩然, 李婧, 王天云, 柯阳, 朱红. 原发性肝脏神经内分泌肿瘤单中心12例诊治与疗效分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 674-680.
[8] 崔佳琪, 吴迪, 陈海艳, 周惠敏, 顾元龙, 周光文, 杨军. TACE术后并发肝脓肿的临床诊治分析[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 688-693.
[9] 杜锡林, 谭凯, 贺小军, 白亮亮, 赵瑶瑶. 肝细胞癌转化治疗方式[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 597-601.
[10] 韩冰, 顾劲扬. 深度学习神经网络在肝癌诊疗中的研究及应用前景[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 480-485.
[11] 何传超, 肖治宇. 晚期肝癌综合治疗模式与策略[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 486-489.
[12] 王楚风, 蒋安. 原发性肝癌的分子诊断[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 499-503.
[13] 顾娇娇, 邹燕, 陈奕辰, 黄师菊, 张慧玲, 林楠. 基于简易营养评价精法评估肝癌患者出院后营养状况及其影响因素[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 534-539.
[14] 孟令展, 李虎, 俞鹏, 于燕宾, 曹李, 翟伟, 高远, 邵艳玲, 严锦, 朱震宇. ICG荧光染色在肝癌腹腔镜解剖性肝切除术中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(05): 557-561.
[15] 萨仁高娃, 张英霞, 邓伟, 闫诺, 樊宁. 超声引导下鼠肝消融术后组织病理特征的变化规律及影响[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 394-398.
阅读次数
全文


摘要