切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (01) : 79 -83. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2021.01.016

所属专题: 文献

妇产科超声影像学

高频超声在产后女性腹直肌分离评估中的应用价值
付鹏1, 江凌1,(), 崔立刚1   
  1. 1. 100191 北京大学第三医院超声诊断科
  • 收稿日期:2019-06-20 出版日期:2021-01-01
  • 通信作者: 江凌

Value of high frequency ultrasound in evaluation of diastasis recti abdominis in postpartum women

Peng Fu1, Ling Jiang1,(), Ligang Cui1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Third Hospital of Peking University, Beijing 10086, China
  • Received:2019-06-20 Published:2021-01-01
  • Corresponding author: Ling Jiang
引用本文:

付鹏, 江凌, 崔立刚. 高频超声在产后女性腹直肌分离评估中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(01): 79-83.

Peng Fu, Ling Jiang, Ligang Cui. Value of high frequency ultrasound in evaluation of diastasis recti abdominis in postpartum women[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2021, 18(01): 79-83.

目的

本研究旨在利用高频超声定量评估产后女性腹直肌分离程度,探索恰当的诊断界值以及影响腹直肌分离程度的相关因素。

方法

2019年4月至7月招募51名在北京大学第三医院生产后6~30个月的女性,采集年龄、身高、体质量、体质量指数、产后时间、生产方式、胎产次,测量腹围,超声评估皮下脂肪厚度、放松时及收缩时腹直肌最大间距,采用Pearson相关分析方法分析年龄、身高、体质量、体质量指数、产后时间、腹围、皮下脂肪厚度与腹直肌间距的相关性,利用Point-biserial相关分析法分析生产方式、胎产次与腹直肌间距的相关性。利用独立样本t检验比较剖宫产与顺产女性腹直肌间距放松与收缩状态下的差异。

结果

51名女性放松状态下平均腹直肌最大间距为(2.88±1.04)cm,收缩状态下腹直肌最大间距为(2.45±1.15)cm,如将腹直肌间距偏离正常人群75%设为诊断界值,放松时及收缩时腹直肌分离诊断界值分别为3.0 cm、2.8 cm,放松状态下腹直肌间距与收缩状态下间距呈线性相关(r=0.899,P<0.001)。放松及收缩状态下腹直肌间距与年龄、身高、体质量、体质量指数、产后时间、腹围、皮下脂肪厚度、胎产次均无明显相关性,仅生产方式与收缩时腹直肌间距存在相关性(r=0.369,P=0.008)。剖宫产女性放松及收缩状态下腹直肌间距均大于顺产女性[(3.16±1.31)cm vs (2.58±0.47)cm;(2.85±1.35)cm vs (2.00±0.64)cm],差异均具有统计学意义(t=-2.082、-2.828,P=0.038、0.007)。

结论

高频超声能准确定量评估腹直肌分离程度,可以为探索腹直肌分离机制及相关影响因素提供有效信息。

Objective

To quantitatively evaluate diastasis recti abdominis in postpartum women by high frequency ultrasound, investigate the appropriate diagnostic threshold, and identify the factors related to diastasis recti abdominis.

Methods

From April to July 2019, 51 women at 6-30 months after delivery at Third Hospital of Peking University were recruited. Age, height, weight, body mass index, postpartum time, mode of delivery, and delivery times were collected. Abdominal circumference was measured. Subcutaneous fat thickness and maximum rectus abdominis distance during relaxation and contraction were evaluated by ultrasound. Pearson correlation analysis was used to explore the relationship between rectus abdominis distance and age, postpartum time, height, and physique. Point biserial correlation analysis was used to explore the correlation between delivery mode or delivery times and rectus abdominis distance. Independent sample t test was used to compare the difference of rectus distance in relaxation or contraction state between cesarean section and natural delivery women.

Results

The average maximum distance of the rectus abdominis was (2.88±1.04) cm in relaxation and (2.45±1.15) cm in contraction. When 75% of the rectus abdominis distance deviated from the normal population was set as the diagnostic cut-off value, the diagnostic cut-off values of diastasis recti abdominis during relaxation and contraction were 3.0 cm and 2.8 cm, respectively. There was a linear correlation between rectus abdominis distance during relaxation and contraction (r=0.899, P<0.001). There was no significant correlation between the distance of the rectus abdominis and age, height, weight, body mass index, postpartum time, abdominal circumference, subcutaneous fat thickness, or delivery times. Only the mode of delivery had a weak correlation with the distance of the rectus abdominis during contraction (r=0.369, P=0.008). There was no significant difference in the distance of the rectus abdominis between the first and second births. The distance of the rectus abdominis in women with a caesarean section was significantly larger than that of women with a natural delivery [(3.16±1.31) cm vs (2.58±0.47) cm, t=-2.082, P=0.038; (2.85±1.35) cm vs (2.00±0.64) cm, t=-2.828, P=0.007].

Conclusion

High frequency ultrasound can accurately and quantitatively evaluate diastasis recti abdominis, and the measurement of rectus abdominis distance in relaxation or contraction state has similar value. High frequency ultrasound can provide useful information for exploring the mechanism of diastasis recti abdominis and related influencing factors.

图1 超声测量两侧腹直肌肌腹内缘间距。图a为放松状态下测量,图b为收缩状态下测量
图2 产妇腹直肌间距数值分布情况。图a为放松状 态下,图b为收缩状态下
图3 放松时与收缩时腹直肌间距数值分布散点图
表1 顺产与剖宫产女性不同状态下腹直肌分离程度比较(cm,
xˉ
±s
1
Axer H, Dietrich GVK, Prescher A. Collagen fibers in linea alba and rectus sheaths: I. general scheme and morphological aspects [J]. J Surg Res, 2001, 96(1): 127-134.
2
De Mota PGF, AGBA Pascoal, AIAD Carita, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of diastasis recti abdominis from late pregnancy to 6 months postpartum, and relationship with lumbo-pelvic pain [J]. Man Ther, 2015, 20(1): 200-205.
3
Mota P, Pascoal AG, Carita AI, et al. Normal width of the inter-recti distance in pregnant and postpartum primiparous women [J]. Musculoskelet Sci Pract, 2018, 35: 34-37.
4
Gilleard WL, Brown JMM. Structure and function of the abdominal muscles in primigravid subjects during pregnancy and the immediate postbirth period [J]. Phys Therapy, 1996, 76(7): 750-762.
5
BøKari, Hilde G, Tennfjord MK, et al. Pelvic floor muscle function, pelvic floor dysfunction and diastasis recti abdominis: prospective cohort study [J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2016, 36(3): 716-721.
6
Benjamin DR, Frawley HC, Shields N, et al. Relationship between diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle (DRAM) and musculoskeletal dysfunctions, pain and quality of life: a systematic review [J]. Physiotherapy, 2019, 105(1): 24-34.
7
Eriksson Crommert M, Petrov Fieril K, Gustavsson C. Women's experiences of living with increased inter-recti distance after childbirth: an interview study [J]. BMC Womens Health, 2020, 20(1): 260.
8
Beer GM, Schuster A, Seifert B, et al. The normal width of the linea alba in nulliparous women [J]. Clinical Anatomy, 2009, 22(6): 706-711.
9
Brauman D. Diastasis recti: clinical anatomy [J]. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2008, 122(5): 1564-1569.
10
Van de Water ATM, Benjamin DR. Measurement methods to assess diastasis of the rectus abdominis muscle (DRAM): a systematic review of their measurement properties and meta-analytic reliability generalisation [J]. Man Ther, 2016, 21: 41-53.
11
Rath AM, Attali P, Dumas JL, et al. The abdominal linea alba: an anatomo-radiologic and biomechanical study [J]. Surg Radiol Anat, 1996, 18(4): 281-288.
12
Candido G, Lo T, Janssen PA. Risk factors for diastasis of the recti abdominis [J]. J Assoc Chart Physiotherapists Womens Health, 2005, 97: 49-54.
[1] 李敏, 邱逦. 健康人群指甲与邻近组织超声测值的初步研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(04): 449-454.
[2] 王慧芳, 胡守容, 郭蓉, 张丹丹, 曾娜君, 贺玉梅, 张蕾, 郄建英, 林燕秋, 蔡阿乔. 多途径超声联合检查在先天性阴道闭锁诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(10): 1065-1070.
[3] 陈广兰, 王慧芳, 胡守容, 张丹丹, 贺玉梅, 郭蓉, 张蕾, 陈小清, 华琪, 张元吉, 林燕秋. MRKH综合征的超声影像学特征及其诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(10): 1046-1051.
[4] 胡守容, 王玥, 陈广兰, 杨俊英, 蒋璐, 王慧芳. 经直肠双平面高频超声对正常女性阴道形态的评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(11): 1056-1060.
[5] 强坤坤, 罗红. 杜氏肌营养不良症患儿的高频超声与剪切波弹性成像诊断研究现状及前景[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 162-167.
[6] 谢丹丹, 巩尊科, 樊莉琳, 张彩侠. 产后早期静力性收缩训练联合神经肌肉电刺激治疗产后腹直肌分离的疗效研究[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(03): 357-365.
[7] 李炳根, 龚独辉, 赖泽如, 聂向阳. 产后腹直肌分离全腔镜下肌后/腹膜外补片修补术的临床研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 724-727.
[8] 凌振华, 张斌. 彩色多普勒血流显像及高频超声在腹股沟斜疝、直疝及股疝鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 326-329.
[9] 张俊松, 刘玉海, 吴立胜. 腹直肌分离的外科治疗[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(05): 497-501.
[10] 李梦梅, 张春晓. 高频超声在不同类型腹股沟疝患者中的鉴别及与精索腹壁下动脉的关系研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(03): 313-316.
[11] 王成昊, 赵强, 潘吉祥, 陈震. 高频超声结合彩色多普勒超声在腹股沟斜疝和股疝中的应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 224-226.
[12] 周珊珊, 王超. 高频超声在腹股沟疝修补术前诊断的准确性研究[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 169-171.
[13] 张泽, 王琦, 杨文强, 张黎. 肌骨超声在周围神经病诊疗中的应用[J]. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 257-263.
[14] 李丽芬, 梁淑贤, 叶淑芬. 高频超声在跟腱断裂及断端被动运动状态的研究[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(01): 38-40.
[15] 陈旭, 肖翼春, 项霞青. 肺部高频超声与CT扫描对儿童肺炎支原体肺炎的诊断效能对比研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(12): 944-947.
阅读次数
全文


摘要