切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (09) : 920 -925. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.09.009

妇产科超声影像学

盆底三维超声评价产次及分娩方式对肛提肌裂孔面积的影响
朱霞1, 高艳多1, 许彩1, 唐婉2, 谢磊1, 葛倩1, 陈芬芳1, 赵胜1,()   
  1. 1. 430070 武汉,湖北省妇幼保健院超声诊断科
    2. 430070 武汉,湖北省妇幼保健院盆底康复中心
  • 收稿日期:2020-12-03 出版日期:2022-09-01
  • 通信作者: 赵胜
  • 基金资助:
    武汉市中青年医学骨干人才项目; 湖北省卫生健康委面上项目(WJ2018H0140)

Effect of parity and delivery mode on levator hiatus area evaluated by pelvic floor three-dimensional ultrasound

Xia Zhu1, Yanduo Gao1, Cai Xu1, Wan Tang2, Lei Xie1, Qian Ge1, Fenfang Chen1, Sheng Zhao1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasonography, Material and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430070, China
    2. Department of Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation, Material and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430070, China
  • Received:2020-12-03 Published:2022-09-01
  • Corresponding author: Sheng Zhao
引用本文:

朱霞, 高艳多, 许彩, 唐婉, 谢磊, 葛倩, 陈芬芳, 赵胜. 盆底三维超声评价产次及分娩方式对肛提肌裂孔面积的影响[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(09): 920-925.

Xia Zhu, Yanduo Gao, Cai Xu, Wan Tang, Lei Xie, Qian Ge, Fenfang Chen, Sheng Zhao. Effect of parity and delivery mode on levator hiatus area evaluated by pelvic floor three-dimensional ultrasound[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(09): 920-925.

目的

通过盆底三维超声检查评估不同分娩方式及不同产次对肛提肌裂孔(LH)面积的影响及其与盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的关系。

方法

选择2019年4月至12月湖北省妇幼保健院产后42~60 d常规检查的产妇250例,包括初次经阴道分娩产妇(FVD组)150例、二次经阴道分娩(SVD组)及剖宫产产妇(CS组)各50例,行经会阴超声检查,观察静息状态下及最大Valsalva状态时LH面积的变化,并选择同期120例未分娩女性作为对照组。分析各组内POP盆底超声检出率。并将所有研究对象根据是否有POP分为POP组(167例)和无POP组(203例),比较2组间静息状态下及最大Valsalva状态下的LH面积。SVD组、FVD组、CS组和对照组组间LH面积差异采用方差分析,采用t检验比较有POP组和无POP组间LH面积的差异;采用χ2检验分析SVD组、FVD组、CS组和对照组组间POP的超声检出率差异。

结果

静息状态下SVD组、FVD组、CS组、对照组LH面积分别为(16.59±3.12)cm2、(15.34±3.50)cm2、(13.09±2.78)cm2及(11.09±2.47)cm2;Valsalva状态下各组LH面积分别为(22.80±8.37)cm2、(18.46±6.63)cm2、(15.58±3.91)cm2及(13.11±5.30)cm2;静息状态下及最大Valsalva状态下LH面积,SVD组>FVD组>CS组>对照组,各组组间差异均具有统计学意义(F=31.89、11.14,P均<0.001)。对照组、CS组、FVD组及SVD组POP超声检出率分别为:17.5%、26.0%、60.0%及86.0%,CS组与对照组间比较,差异无统计学意义,其余各组间比较差异均具有统计学意义(SVD组 vs FVD组:χ2=11.38,P<0.001;SVD组 vs CS组:χ2=36.53,P<0.001;SVD组vs对照组:χ2=70.55,P<0.001;FVD组vs CS组:χ2=17.36,P<0.001;FVD组vs对照组:χ2=49.74,P<0.001)。静息状态及最大Valsalva状态下POP组LH面积均大于无POP组[(14.88±3.49)cm2 vs(12.38±2.17)cm2;(20.93±6.53)cm2 vs(15.59±3.50)cm2],差异具有统计学意义(t=8.06、9.50,P均<0.001)。

结论

不同分娩方式及产次对女性LH面积的影响程度不同;LH面积越大,发生POP的风险越高。盆底三维超声能够测量产后女性不同状态下的LH面积,从而早期发现盆底支持结构的改变。

Objective

To observe the effect of parity and delivery mode on levator hiatus (LH) area evaluated by pelvic floor three-dimensional ultrasound, and to explore their relationship with pelvic organ prolapse (POP).

Methods

A total of 250 postpartum women at 42~60 days after childbirth were selected at the Material and Child Health Hospital of Hubei Province from April to December 2019, including 150 first vaginal delivery (FVD) women, 50 second vaginal delivery (SVD) women, and 50 cesarean section (CS) women. The change of LH area was observed at rest and on maximal Valsalva maneuver by pelvic floor three-dimensional ultrasound. And 120 undelivered women were selected as a control group. The detection rate of POP by pelvic floor ultrasound in each group was analyzed. All the subjects were divided into a POP group (n=167) and a non-POP group (n=203) according to whether they had POP or not. The LH area was compared between groups at rest and on maximal Valsalva maneuver. ANOVA was used to compare LH area among different groups. The t-test was used to compare LH between the POP group and non-POP group. The difference of POP detection rate between different groups was analyzed by the χ2 test.

Results

The LH areas at rest in the SVD group, FVD group, CS group, and control group were (16.59±3.12) cm2, (15.34±3.50) cm2, (13.09±2.78) cm2, and (11.09±2.47) cm2, respectively; the corresponding values on maximal Valsalva maneuver were (22.80±8.37) cm2, (18.46±6.63) cm2, (15.58±3.91) cm2, and (13.11±5.30) cm2, respectively. The LH area both at rest and on maximal Valsalva maneuver differed significantly among the groups (F=31.89 and 11.14, respectively, P<0.001), with the SVD group having the greatest values, followed by the FVD group, CS group, and control group. The detection rates of POP by pelvic floor ultrasound were 17.5%, 26.0%, 60.0%, and 86.0% in the control group, CS group, FVD group, and SVD group, respectively; although there was no significant difference between the CS group and control group, the differences between the following groups were statistically significant: SVD group vs FVD group (χ2=11.38, P<0.001); SVD group vs CS group (χ2=36.53, P<0.001); SVD group vs control group (χ2=70.55, P<0.001); FVD group vs CS group (χ2=17.36, P<0.001); FVD group vs control group (χ2=49.74, P<0.001). The LH areas in the POP group were significantly larger than those in the non-POP group both at rest [(14.88±3.49) cm2 vs (12.38±2.17) cm2, t=8.06, P<0.001] and on maximal Valsalva maneuver [(20.93±6.53) cm2 vs (15.59±3.50) cm2, t=9.50, P<0.001].

Conclusion

Different delivery modes and parity have different effects on the LH area. The larger the area, the greater the risk of POP. Three-dimensional ultrasound can measure the LH area of postpartum women in different states, so as to detect the change of pelvic floor structure early.

图1 同一患者静息状态(图a)及最大Valsaval状态下(图b)肛提肌裂孔面积测量注:LUG为肛提肌尿道间隙
表1 各组研究对象一般临床资料比较(
xˉ
±s
表2 各组研究对象间肛提肌裂孔面积测值比较(
xˉ
±s
表3 POP组与无POP组间肛提肌裂孔面积比较(
xˉ
±s
1
白云, 徐莲, 刘菲菲, 等. 不同方式分娩后女性肛提肌损伤的断层超声观察 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2016, 13(3): 209-212.
2
李载红, 洪燕, 游佳, 等. 四维盆底超声评估生产方式及胎次对盆膈裂孔的影响 [J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2016, 27(8): 576-579.
3
段丽, 李菊香, 楚宁宁, 等. 应用三维超声成像技术评估不同分娩方式对产后早期盆底结构的近期影响 [J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2019, 47(3): 340-342.
4
秦学敏, 柏根基, 盛文伟, 等. 三维盆底超声检查联合盆底肌力评估在产后盆底功能中的应用 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2019, 3(12): 1112-1114.
5
Shek KL, Kruger J, Dietz HP. The effect of pregnancy on hiatal dimensions and urethral mobility: an observational study [J]. Int Urogynecol J, 2012, 23(11): 1561-1567.
6
邹霞, 杨秋红, 王慧芳, 等. 经会阴超声评估不同分娩方式对女性后盆腔器官的影响 [J]. 中囯妇幼保健, 2015, 30(20): 3397-3399.
7
Dietz H, De Leon J, Shek K. Ballooning of the levator hiatus [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 31(6): 676-680.
8
林建群, 张逸仲, 许哲, 等. 三维彩超评估女性压力性尿失禁盆底病变的应用 [J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2015, 9(4): 51-54.
9
Dietz HP. Ultrasound in the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2019, 54(1): 12-30.
10
黄泽萍, 毛永江, 杨丽新, 等. 经会阴实时三维超声评估正常女性盆底结构的重复性研究 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2014, 23(11): 966-969.
11
刘茂春, 陈奎喜, 邱燕, 等. 三维超声用于评价阴道分娩产妇盆底肌肉功能的效果 [J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2020, 28(2): 288-290.
12
王丽珍, 冯才敏. 经会阴三维盆底超声检查在诊断经阴道分娩、剖宫产患者盆腔脏器脱垂的价值分析 [J]. 现代医用影像学, 2020, 29(3): 529-531.
13
刘瑞芳. 不同分娩方式对产后骨盆底功能的影响 [J]. 临床合理用药杂志, 2014, 7(7): 146.
14
Horak TA, Guzman-Rojas RA, Shek KLL, et al. Pelvic floor trauma: does the second baby matter? [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 44(1): 90-94.
15
杨慧燕, 温红, 陈子满. 实时三维超声评估分娩方式对经产妇盆底结构的近期影响 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2018, 34(8): 728-731.
16
靳梅, 陈晓敏, 张焱, 等. 初产妇与经产妇孕期尿失禁及盆底结构情况比较 [J]. 中国医学影像学杂, 2019, 27(12): 953-957.
17
徐英姿, 唐海林, 冯泽阳. 盆底超声检查观察二次经阴道分娩对女性盆底结构的近期影响 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(3): 218-222.
18
Handa VL, Blomquist JL, Roem J, et al. Levator morphology and strength after obstetric avulsion of the levator ani muscle [J]. Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg, 2020, 26(1): 56-60.
19
Shek KL, Dietz HP. Intrapartum risk factors of levator trauma [J]. BJOG, 2010, 117(12): 1485-1492.
20
Handa VL, Roem J, Blomquist JL, et al. Pelvic organ prolapse as a function of levator ani avulsion, hiatus size, and strength [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 221(1): 41.e1-41.e7.
21
Zhu YC, Deng SH, Jiang Q, et al. Correlation between delivery mode and pelvic organ prolapse evaluated by four-dimensional pelvic floor ultrasonography [J]. Med Sci Monit, 2018, 24(11): 7891-7897.
22
Patel D, Xu X, Thomason A, et al. Childbirth and pelvic floor dysfunction: an epidemiologic approach to the assessment of prevention opportunities at delivery [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 195(1): 23-28.
23
朱兰, 朗景和. 女性盆底学 [M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2014: 43-50.
24
Dietz HP. Ultrasound in the assessment of pelvic organ prolapse [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2019, 54(1): 12-30.
[1] 何莎, 赵胜, 范建华, 高艳多, 黄君红, 戢秀勤, 朱霞. 盆底超声评价不同产次及分娩方式对耻骨直肠肌厚度改变的影响[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(01): 17-22.
[2] 俞琤, 陈蕾, 张丽丹, 冯婷. 二胎分娩方式与肛提肌裂孔面积的相关性[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(05): 462-466.
[3] 赵春桃, 梁峰雪, 杨瑞敏, 陈云璇, 陈曦, 焦桂清. 三维盆底超声预测产妇发生盆腔脏器脱垂的价值及影响因素[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(05): 606-614.
[4] 董洁晨, 金海红, 龚姗, 李苗, 高淑蕊, 韩惠萍. 生物反馈电刺激联合药物在绝经后盆腔器官脱垂盆底重建术后应用[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(01): 60-64.
[5] 王宏, 肖梅珠, 时晓, 王素美. 硅胶子宫托佩戴患者阴道微生态的特征分析[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 333-336.
[6] 王素美, 杜非凡, 鲁奇, 王宏. 改良阴道全封闭伴子宫切除术治疗高龄女性重度全盆底缺陷器官脱垂的安全性评估[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 329-332.
[7] 刘娟, 肖媛月, 王倩青, 关振堃, 关小明. 盆腔器官脱垂手术新入路:机器人辅助经阴道腹腔镜阴道骶骨固定术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2021, 14(03): 168-171.
[8] 张庆霞, 阳艳军, 王扬, 梁静, 凌斌, 陈庆云. 腹腔镜线性单侧髂耻韧带悬吊术治疗中盆腔器官脱垂[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(06): 362-366.
[9] 赵成志, 卢深涛, 王荥, 刘明博, 孙玉菡, 雷丽, 刘禄斌. 腹腔镜骶骨固定术相关并发症的回顾:7年单中心临床分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(04): 223-228.
[10] 赵文娟, 李斌, 孔佳. 腹腔镜阴道骶骨固定术治疗女性盆腔器官脱垂的40例分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(01): 41-45.
[11] 赵文娟, 李斌, 孔佳. 腹腔镜子宫骶骨固定术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(01): 0-0.
[12] 赵文娟, 李斌, 孔佳. 腹腔镜阴道骶骨固定术[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2020, 13(01): 0-0.
[13] 魏璇, 陈雨柔, 易跃雄, 熊瑶, 张蔚. 单孔腹腔镜与阴式骶棘韧带悬吊术治疗盆腔器官脱垂效果分析[J]. 中华腔镜外科杂志(电子版), 2019, 12(06): 351-355.
[14] 方大俊, 郑勤田. 子痫前期终止妊娠的时机和方式[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2021, 10(03): 151-154.
[15] 李偲琦, 杨鑫, 汪文磊. 盆底超声在评估女性产后盆底结构及功能变化上的临床价值[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2021, 09(02): 183-187.
阅读次数
全文


摘要