切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (05) : 470 -476. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2024.05.004

妇产科超声影像学

神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值
项文静1, 徐燕1,(), 茹彤1, 郑明明1, 顾燕1, 戴晨燕1, 朱湘玉1, 严陈晨2   
  1. 1. 210008 南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院妇产医学中心
    2. 210008 南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2023-08-15 出版日期:2024-05-01
  • 通信作者: 徐燕
  • 基金资助:
    南京市卫生科技发展专项资金(YKK20077); 南京鼓楼医院临床研究专项资金(2021-LCYJ-PY-11)

Application of neurosonography in prenatal diagnosis of fetal corpus callosum malformations

Wenjing Xiang1, Yan Xu1,(), Tong Ru1, Mingming Zheng1, Yan Gu1, Chenyan Dai1, Xiangyu Zhu1, Chenchen Yan2   

  1. 1. Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical Center, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China
    2. Department of Radiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing 210008, China
  • Received:2023-08-15 Published:2024-05-01
  • Corresponding author: Yan Xu
引用本文:

项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.

Wenjing Xiang, Yan Xu, Tong Ru, Mingming Zheng, Yan Gu, Chenyan Dai, Xiangyu Zhu, Chenchen Yan. Application of neurosonography in prenatal diagnosis of fetal corpus callosum malformations[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.

目的

探讨神经学超声在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的临床价值。

方法

2021年1月至2022年12月产前超声筛查疑诊胎儿颅脑异常转诊至南京大学医学院附属鼓楼医院妇产医学中心接受神经学超声检查的胎儿97例(妊娠18~40周),对其中20例发现胼胝体异常胎儿的超声筛查、神经学超声、磁共振成像(MRI)验证结果、遗传学检查和产后随访等临床资料进行分析。对20例胎儿胼胝体异常(胚胎发育停滞期影像表现)进行超声分型:胼胝体完全缺失(CACC)、胼胝体部分缺失(PACC)和胼胝体发育不良(DCC)。以MRI诊断结果为准,评价超声诊断与MRI诊断的一致性。

结果

20例颅脑异常胎儿(单胎18例,双胎1例)MRI诊断胼胝体异常20例,合并其他颅脑畸形18例,其中CACC 9例(合并其他颅脑畸形9例);PACC 7例(合并其他颅脑畸形5例);DCC 4例(合并其他颅脑畸形4例)。超声筛查诊断胼胝体异常3例,与MRI诊断结果一致的符合率为15%(3/20),其中CACC 2例(均合并其他颅脑畸形,11%,2/18)、PACC 1例。神经学超声诊断胎儿胼胝体异常20例(合并颅脑畸形18例),其中诊断CACC 9例(合并其他预脑畸形9例);PACC 9例(合并其他颅脑畸形7例);DCC 2例(合并其他颅脑畸形2例)。神经学超声诊断胼胝体异常的结果与MRI诊断结果一致的符合率为90%(18/20),其中2例将DCC误判为PACC,与MRI诊断结果不一致。神经学超声诊断合并其他颅脑畸形的结果与MRI诊断结果一致的符合率为61%(11/18)。20例胎儿中15例(75%)接受染色体微阵列分析,其中1例出现致病性变异,1例为临床意义不明确变异,余13例胎儿中1例接受全外显子组测序,结果疑似致病变异。临床随访:产前检查后终止妊娠者17例,3例活产,活产儿出生后头颅MRI检查与产前MRI胼胝体异常影像表现一致,1例出生后1年出现左手抽搐,握力差,现复健1年有好转,余2例目前神经发育未见异常。

结论

胎儿神经学超声检查可直观显示胼胝体的形态结构,为临床诊断胼胝体异常及其分型提供准确影像学证据。

Objective

To evaluate the clinical value of neurosonography in prenatal diagnosis of abnormalities of the corpus callosum.

Methods

From January 2021 to December 2022, the data of 97 fetuses who were suspected to have fetal brain abnormalities by prenatal ultrasound screening during 18-40 weeks of gestation and transferred to the Obstetrics and Gynecology Medical Center of Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University Medical School were analyzed. The clinical data of 20 fetuses with corpus callosum malformations were analyzed, including ultrasonic screening, neurosonography screening, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), genetic examination, and postpartum follow-up. Twenty cases of fetal corpus callosum abnormalities were classified into three types: complete agenesis of the corpus callusom (CACC), partial agenesis of the corpus callusom (PACC), and dysgenesis of the corpus callosum (DCC). The consistency of ultrasound diagnosis with MRI diagnosis was evaluated.

Results

Among the 20 fetuses with brain abnormalities (18 singleton and two twins), MRI showed that 20 had corpus callosum abnormalities and 18 had other brain malformations, including 9 cases of CACC (all with other brain malformations), 7 cases of PACC (5 combined with other brain malformations), and 4 cases of DCC (all combined with other brain malformations). There were 3 cases of corpus callosum abnormalities detected by ultrasound screening, and the coincidence rate with MRI diagnosis was 15% (3/20); there were 2 cases of CACC (both combined with other brain malformations, 2/18 [11%]) and 1 case of PACC. Twenty cases (18 cases combined with brain malformations) of fetal corpus callosum abnormalities were diagnosed by neurosonography. Nine cases were diagnosed as CACC (9 cases combined with other brain malformations); 9 cases of PACC (7 cases combined with other brain malformations); 2 cases of DCC (2 with other brain malformations). The coincidence rate with MRI diagnosis was 90% (18/20) in fetal corpus callosum abnormalities and 61% (11/18) in corpus callosum abnormalities with other brain malformations. DCC was misdiagnosed as PACC in 2 cases. Of the 20 fetuses with corpus callosum abnormalities, 15 (75%) underwent chromosomal microarray analysis, of which one was found to have pathogenic variants, one was found to have variants of uncertain significance, and one of the remaining 13 fetuses underwent whole exome sequencing, which was suspected to have pathogenic variants. During clinical follow-up, 17 cases were terminated after prenatal examination, and 3 cases were born alive; the postnatal brain MRI findings were consistent with prenatal MRI abnormalities of the corpus callosum. One case had left hand convulsion and poor grip strength 1 year after birth, and improved after 1 year of rehabilitation, and the remaining 2 cases had no abnormal mental development.

Conclusion

Fetal neurosonography can display the morphological structure of the corpus callosum visually, and provide accurate imaging evidence for clinical diagnosis and classification of corpus callosum malformations.

表1 20例胼胝体异常胎儿超声筛查、神经学超声与MRI诊断结果对照及影像表现
异常类型 超声筛查 神经学超声 MRI
CACC 诊断2例[2/9(2)],均合并其他颅脑畸形,颅脑横切面显示透明隔腔缺失,侧脑室后角增宽呈泪滴状 诊断9例[9/9(9)],其中9例合并其他颅脑畸形:CSP缺失9例,侧脑室后角增宽8例,半球间囊肿5例,蛛网膜囊肿1例,皮质发育不良1例 诊断9例[9/9(9)],均合并其他颅脑畸形:CSP缺失8例,侧脑室后角增宽8例,半球间囊肿4例,皮质发育不良2例
PACC 诊断1例[1/7(0)],颅脑横切面上显示透明隔腔形态异常,宽径大于长径,长/宽比值为0.7 诊断9例[应为7例,误诊2例,9/7(7)],其中7例合并其他颅脑畸形:小头畸形1例,侧脑室后角增宽4例,室管膜下囊肿1例,蛛网膜囊肿2例,脉络丛囊肿1例,半球间囊肿1例,皮质发育不良3例,颅内出血1例 诊断7例[7/7(5)],其中5例合并其他颅脑畸形:小头畸形1例,侧脑室后角增宽4例,室管膜下囊肿1例,皮质发育不良2例
DCC 未诊断[0/4(0)] 诊断2例[2/4(2)],正中矢状切面声像图上均显示膝部及体部偏薄,2例合并其他颅脑畸形:双侧脑室后角增宽1例,双侧室管膜下囊肿1例、颅后窝Blake囊肿1例,小脑及蚓部发育不良2例 诊断4例[4/4(4)],均合并其他颅脑畸形:CSP显示不清1例,CSP增宽1例,基底节区出血1例、侧脑室后角增宽2例,灰质异位、多小脑回1例,小脑及蚓部发育不良2例,室管膜下囊肿1例
合计 3(2) 20(18) 20(18)
与MRI一致 3(2) 18(11) 20(18)
图1 孕23+3周CACC胎儿神经学超声检查切面(上图)和颅脑MRI检查切面(下图)。图a侧脑室体部横切面:箭头示半球间囊肿;图b侧脑室横切面示:第三脑室上抬,未见透明隔腔;图c丘脑冠状切面示侧脑室前角外展;图d正中矢状切面:箭头示胼胝体缺失;图e左旁矢状切面(上图)左侧枕叶多小脑回,小脑冠状位(下图):箭头示左侧枕叶多小脑回
图2 孕27+5周PACC胎儿神经学超声检查切面。图a 双顶径横切面:箭头示透明隔腔形态异常(横径大于长径,);图b 丘脑冠状切面:箭头示胼胝体膝部;图c正中矢状切面:胼胝体压部未显示
图3 孕26+4周DCC胎儿神经学超声检查切面图。图a侧脑室横切面示:远场侧脑室增宽;图b丘脑冠状切面:箭头示胼胝体膝部偏薄;图c正中矢状切面:箭头示胼胝体膝部及体部偏薄
1
Aboitiz F, Montiel J. One hundred million years of interhemispheric communication: the history of the corpus callosum[J]. Braz J Med Biol Res, 2003, 36(4): 409-420.
2
曾晴, 李胜利. 产前超声评估胎儿胼胝体发育状况的研究进展[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志 (电子版), 2019, 16(3): 166-172.
3
Malinger G, Ben-Sira L, Lev D, et al. Fetal brain imaging: a comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and dedicated neurosonography[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 23(4): 333-340.
4
Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system: guidelines for performing the 'basic examination' and the 'fetal neurosonogram'[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2007, 29(1): 109-116.
5
Paladini D, Malinger G, Birnbaum R, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system. Part 2: performance of targeted neurosonography[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 57(4): 661-671.
6
中华医学会放射学分会儿科学组, 中华医学会儿科学分会放射学组.胎儿MRI中国专家共识[J]. 中华放射学杂志, 2020, 54(12): 1153-1161.
7
Pashaj S, Merz E, Wellek S. Biometry of the fetal corpus callosum by three-dimensional ultrasound[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 42(6): 691-698.
8
Paladini D, Pastore G, Cavallaro A, et al. Agenesis of the fetal corpus callosum: sonographic signs change with advancing gestational age[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 42(6): 687-690.
9
Karl K, Esser T, Heling KS, et al. Cavum septi pellucidi (CSP) ratio: a marker for partial agenesis of the fetal corpus callosum[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 50(3): 336-341.
10
Turkyilmaz G, Sarac Sivrikoz T, Erturk E, et al. Utilization of neurosonography for evaluation of the corpus callosum malformations in the era of fetal magnetic resonance imaging[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2019, 45(8): 1472-1478.
11
Malinger G, Ben-Sira L, Lev D, et al. Fetal brain imaging: a comparison between magnetic resonance imaging and dedicated neurosonography[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 23(4): 333-340.
12
Paladini D, Quarantelli M, Sglavo G, et al. Accuracy of neurosonography and MRI in clinical management of fetuses referred with central nervous system abnormalities[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 44(2): 188-196.
13
Malinger G, Paladini D, Pilu G, et al. Fetal cerebral magnetic resonance imaging, neurosonography and the brave new world of fetal medicine[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 50(6): 679-680.
14
Sileo FG, Di Mascio D, Rizzo G, et al. Role of prenatal magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses with isolated agenesis of corpus callosum in the era of fetal neurosonography: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2021, 100(1): 7-16.
15
Folliot-Le Doussal L, Chadie A, Brasseur-Daudruy M, et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome in prenatally diagnosed isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum[J]. Early Hum Dev, 2018, 116: 9-16.
16
D'Antonio F, Pagani G, Familiari A, et al. Outcomes associated with isolated agenesis of the corpus callosum: a meta-analysis[J]. Pediatrics, 2016, 138(3): e20160445.
17
Zhang Y. Prenatal ultrasound for the diagnosis of the agenesis of corpus callosum: a meta-analysis[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2023, 36(2): 2228454.
[1] 谢峰, 伍玉晗, 赵胜, 杨小红, 王玉波, 石珍, 范建华, 章敏. 产前超声和MRI诊断胎儿硬脑膜窦畸形的联合应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 275-280.
[2] 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨, 陈玲, 戴晨燕. Miller-Dieker综合征胎儿产前超声、磁共振影像学特征及遗传学分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 281-287.
[3] 戴超超, 蒋天安, 包凌云, 谭艳娟. 乳腺局部结构扭曲病变的X线摄影与自动乳腺容积超声、乳腺增强磁共振的对比研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(12): 1237-1241.
[4] 丁建民, 秦正义, 张翔, 周燕, 周洪雨, 王彦冬, 经翔. 超声造影与普美显磁共振成像对具有高危因素的≤3 cm肝结节进行LI-RADS分类诊断的前瞻性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 930-938.
[5] 张莲莲, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳. 颈部血管超声在粥样硬化斑块易损性评估中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 816-821.
[6] 陈海香, 王元银, 蒋盼. 冠突过长患者的临床表现及磁共振影像学分析[J]. 中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 169-174.
[7] 谢丽春, 欧庆芬, 张秋萍, 叶升. 简化和标准肝脏MRI方案在结直肠癌肝转移患者随访中的临床应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 434-437.
[8] 吴浩凡, 刘元豪, 张锋敏, 张现中, 朱金浩, 黄嘉莹, 刘忠臣, 丁良福, 庄成乐. 基于术前MRI的盆底解剖参数对超低位直肠癌精准功能保肛手术时间的影响[J]. 中华结直肠疾病电子杂志, 2024, 13(03): 209-216.
[9] 蒋启红, 任勇军. 钆塞酸二钠增强MRI在评估肝功能的研究进展[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(02): 183-187.
[10] 黄霓, 张仕勇, 兰茜琳, 周奕, 明兵. 双源CT与MRI在结直肠癌术前分期中的临床价值分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(01): 57-61.
[11] 钟广俊, 刘春华, 朱万森, 徐晓雷, 王兆军. MRI联合不同扫描序列在胃癌术前分期诊断及化疗效果和预后的评估[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(06): 378-382.
[12] 庄旭, 丁立, 许丽, 张宁, 张羽, 林建华. 慢性肾病孕妇肾脏超声异常与不良妊娠结局的相关性研究[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 100-105.
[13] 田春蕾, 李瑞雨, 肖凌勇, 刘艺, 王晓璇, 戴晓矞. 针刺治疗缺血性卒中后肢体功能障碍的神经影像研究概况[J]. 中华针灸电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 78-82.
[14] 轩欢欢, 刘凤麟, 李伟, 李自普, 贾宝俊, 王金菊, 满宜刚. 儿童川崎病休克综合征合并可逆性胼胝体压部病变综合征的诊断学特征并文献复习[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 95-100.
[15] 胡秀朝, 徐霁华, 米荷音, 郝咏刚, 秦伟, 王韵. 高分辨磁共振成像在颈部动脉夹层致脑卒中诊断及随访研究中的价值[J]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(02): 140-144.
阅读次数
全文


摘要