切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (11) : 1193 -1198. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.2096-1537.2023.11.014

泌尿生殖系统超声影像学

经直肠剪切波弹性成像对存在下尿路症状的前列腺病变良恶性的鉴别诊断价值及其影响因素分析
李辉, 尉维录, 吴茂林()   
  1. 741000 甘肃天水,天水市第一人民医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2022-10-18 出版日期:2023-11-01
  • 通信作者: 吴茂林
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省科技计划项目(21JR7RE901)

Value of transrectal shear-wave elastography in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant prostate lesions with lower urinary tract symptoms and factors related to severity of such symptoms

Hui Li, Weilu Yu, Maolin Wu()   

  1. Department of Ultrasound, Tianshui First People's Hospital, Tianshui 741000, China
  • Received:2022-10-18 Published:2023-11-01
  • Corresponding author: Maolin Wu
引用本文:

李辉, 尉维录, 吴茂林. 经直肠剪切波弹性成像对存在下尿路症状的前列腺病变良恶性的鉴别诊断价值及其影响因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(11): 1193-1198.

Hui Li, Weilu Yu, Maolin Wu. Value of transrectal shear-wave elastography in differential diagnosis of benign and malignant prostate lesions with lower urinary tract symptoms and factors related to severity of such symptoms[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2023, 20(11): 1193-1198.

目的

探讨经直肠剪切波弹性成像(SWE)对前列腺癌和前列腺增生的鉴别诊断价值及下尿路症状严重程度的相关影响因素。

方法

回顾性收集106例自2021年11月至2023年1月天水市第一人民医院诊断为前列腺癌或前列腺增生伴有下尿路症状并行经直肠SWE检查患者的临床资料,其中前列腺癌组33例,前列腺增生组73例。收集所有患者的年龄、总前列腺体积(TPV)、最大杨氏模量值(Emax)、平均杨氏模量值(Emean)、最小杨氏模量值(Emin)、总前列腺特异性抗原(tPSA)、游离前列腺特异性抗原(fPSA)与国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)等临床数据,采用独立样本t检验比较2组间杨氏模量值的差异,绘制受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析杨氏模量值诊断前列腺癌和前列腺增生的诊断效能,并应用Spearman秩相关分析IPSS与年龄、TPV、Emax、Emean、Emin、tPSA、fPSA的相关性。

结果

前列腺癌组Emax值、Emean值、Emin值大于前列腺增生组[(86.63±21.63)kPa vs (59.60±15.52)kPa;(71.31±23.71)kPa vs (48.37±12.87)kPa;(58.69±26.22)kPa vs(41.34±12.66)kPa],差异均具有统计学意义(t=6.463、5.222、3.616,P<0.001、<0.001、=0.001)。ROC曲线分析显示,Emax、Emean及Emin的曲线下面积分别为0.846、0.785、0.670。以曲线下面积>0.7为具有诊断效能的标准,计算Youden指数,获取Emax的最佳截断值为76.25 kPa,敏感度、特异度为72.7%、83.6%;Emean的最佳截断值为54.3 kPa,敏感度、特异度为78.8%,69.9%。年龄(r=0.332,P=0.001)、TPV(r=0.341,P<0.001)、Emax(r=0.282,P=0.003)、Emean(r=0.308,P=0.001)和Emin(r=0.431,P<0.001)与IPSS呈一定正相关。

结论

经直肠SWE对前列腺癌与前列腺增生的鉴别诊断有一定的临床价值。此外下尿路症状的严重程度与年龄、前列腺体积与硬度有一定的相关性。

Objective

To assess the value of transrectal shear wave elastography (SWE) in the differential diagnosis of prostate cancer and prostatic hyperplasia and identify factors related to the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms.

Methods

The clinical data of 106 patients diagnosed with prostate cancer or prostatic hyperplasia accompanied by lower urinary tract symptoms from November 2021 to January 2023 were retrospectively collected from the First People's Hospital of Tianshui, including 33 patients with prostate cancer and 73 patients with prostate hyperplasia. Clinical data analyzed mainly included age,total prostate volume (TPV), Emax, Emean, Emin, total prostate specific antigen (tPSA), free prostate specific antigen (fPSA), and international prostate symptom score (IPSS). The difference of Young's modulus between the two groups was compared by t-test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to assess the diagnostic efficacy for prostate cancer and prostatic hyperplasia. The correlation between IPSS and age, TPV, Emax, Emean, Emin, tPSA, and fPSA was analyzed by Spearman rank correlation.

Results

The Emax, Emean, and Emin in the prostate cancer group were significantly higher than those of the prostate hyperplasia group [(86.63±21.63) kPa vs (59.60±15.52) kPa, t=6.463, P<0.001; (71.31±23.71) kPa vs (48.37±12.87) kPa, t=5.222, P<0.001; (58.69±26.22) kPa vs (41.34±12.66) kPa, t=3.616, P=0.001]. ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve values of Emax, Emean, and Emin for the differential diagnosis of the two disease entities were 0.846, 0.785, and 0.670, respectively. AUC>0.7 was taken as the criterion of diagnostic efficacy, and the maximum Youden index was calculated. The optimal cut-off value of Emax was 76.25 kPa, and the sensitivity and specificity were 72.7% and 83.6%, respectively. The optimal cut-off value of Emean was 54.3 kPa, and the sensitivity and specificity were 78.8% and 69.9%, respectively. Age (r=0.332, P=0.001), TPV (r=0.341, P<0.001), Emax (r=0.282, P=0.003), Emean (r=0.308, P=0.001), and Emin (r=0.431, P<0.001) were correlated with IPSS.

Conclusion

Transrectal shear wave elastography has appreciated clinical value in the differential diagnosis of prostate cancer and prostatic hyperplasia. The severity of lower urinary tract symptoms is associated with age, prostate volume, and prostate stiffiness.

表1 存在下尿路症状患者临床资料比较
图1 前列腺癌患者剪切波弹性成像检查结果,平均杨氏模量值为100.9 kPa,最大杨氏模量值为120.6 kPa,最小杨氏模量值为85.2 kPa
图2 良性前列腺增生患者剪切波弹性成像检查结果,平均杨氏模量值为26.9 kPa,最大杨氏模量值为30.4 kPa,最小杨氏模量值为22.5 kPa
表2 2组存在下尿路症状患者杨氏模量值比较(kPa,
图3 剪切波弹性成像测量参数诊断前列腺癌和前列腺增生的受试者操作特征曲线图 注:Emax为最大杨氏模量值,Emean为平均杨氏模量值,Emin为最小杨氏模量值
1
Young GJ, Metcalfe C, Lane JA, et al. Prostate surgery for men with lower urinary tract symptoms: do we need urodynamics to find the right candidates? Exploratory findings from the UPSTREAM trial [J]. Eur Urol Focus, 2022, 8(5): 1331-1339.
2
Abrams P, Cardozo L, Fall M, et al. The standardisation of terminology of lower urinary tract function: report from the Standardisation Sub-committee of the International Continence Society [J]. Neurourol Urodyn, 2002, 21(2): 167-178.
3
Schenk JM, Kristal AR, Arnold KB, et al. Association of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer: results from the prostate cancer prevention trial [J]. Am J Epidemiol, 2011, 173(12): 1419-1428.
4
Deng Y, Yi Z, Zhang T, et al. Magnetic resonance elastography of the prostate in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms: feasibility of the modified driver at high multi-frequencies [J]. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2022, 47(1): 399-408.
5
付宜永. 剪切波弹性成像对前列腺良恶性疾病的诊断价值 [D]. 唐山: 华北理工大学, 2019.
6
Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2020 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2020, 70(1): 7-30.
7
Nordström T, Engel JC, Bergman M, et al. Identifying prostate cancer among men with lower urinary tract symptoms [J]. Eur Urol Open Sci, 2021, 24: 11-16.
8
Frnlund M, Carlsson S, Stranne J, et al. The absence of voiding symptoms in men with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration of ≥3.0 ng/ml is an independent risk factor for prostate cancer: results from the Gothenburg Randomized Screening Trial [J]. BJU Int, 2012, 110(5): 638-643.
9
Shah JB, Reese AC, Mckiernan JM, et al. PSA updated: still relevant in the new millennium? [J]. Eur Urol, 2005, 47(4): 427-432.
10
Weinreb JC, Barentsz JO, Choyke PL, et al. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2 [J]. Eur Urol, 2015, 69(1): 16-40.
11
Kesch C, Schütz V, Diefenbacher S, et al. Multiparametric MRI fusion-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer [J]. Curr Opin Urol, 2018, 28(2): 172-177.
12
Zhang M, Tang J, Luo Y, et al. Diagnostic performance of multiparametric transrectal ultrasound in localized prostate cancer: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2019, 38(7): 1823-1830.
13
Singh H, Canto EI, Shariat SF, et al. Predictors of prostate cancer after initial negative systematic 12 core biopsy [J]. J Urol, 2004, 171(5): 1850-1854.
14
Mian BM, Naya Y, Okihara K, et al. Predictors of cancer in repeat extended multisite prostate biopsy in men with previous negative extended multisite biopsy [J]. Urology, 2003, 60(5): 836-840.
15
Loeb S, Vellekoop A, Ahmed HU, et al. Systematic review of complications of prostate biopsy [J]. Eur Urol, 2013, 64(6): 876-892.
16
Barr RG, Cosgrove D, Brock M, et al. WFUMB guidelines and recommendations on the clinical use of ultrasound elastography: part 5. Prostate [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2017, 43(1): 27-48.
17
Good DW, Stewart GD, Hammer S, et al. Elasticity as a biomarker for prostate cancer: a systematic review [J]. BJU Int, 2014, 113(4): 523-534.
18
Ji Y, Litao R, Ren W, et al. Stiffness of prostate gland measured by transrectal real-time shear wave elastography for detection of prostate cancer: a feasibility study [J]. Br J Radiol, 2019, 92(1097): 20180970.
19
张耀仁, 艾红, 姬永浩, 等. 超声弹性成像组织弥散定量分析在前列腺良恶性病变中的诊断效果 [J]. 长春中医药大学学报, 2020, 36(5): 1002-1005.
20
梁蕾, 孙铮, 孙亚, 等. 经直肠超声剪切波弹性成像在鉴别前列腺外周带良恶性病变中的应用 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2021, 37(9): 1049-1052.
[1] 方晔, 谢晓红, 罗辉. 品管圈在提高前列腺癌穿刺检出率中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 722-727.
[2] 王珏, 陈赛君, 贲志飞, 詹锦勇, 徐开颖. 剪切波弹性成像联合极速脉搏波技术评估颈动脉弹性对糖尿病性视网膜病变的预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 636-641.
[3] 郭云云, 解翔, 彭梅, 姜凡, 毕玉, 何年安, 胡蕾, 杨杨, 王涛, 石玉洁, 陈冬冬. ACR-TIRADS与C-TIRADS分类分别联合二维剪切波弹性成像对甲状腺结节分类的诊断效能——多中心回顾性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(05): 511-516.
[4] 黄珈瑶, 林满霞, 田文硕, 何璟怡, 赖佳明, 谢晓燕, 龙海怡. 健康成人胰腺剪切波弹性成像的可行性和测量值及其影响因素[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(05): 524-529.
[5] 曹建辉, 徐栋, 冯斌, 郑俊彪, 黄伟伟. 超声造影在不同前列腺特异抗原含量前列腺癌穿刺活检中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(03): 307-312.
[6] 李全喜, 唐辉军, 张健生, 杨飞. 基于MUSE-DWI与SS-DWI技术在前列腺癌图像中的对比研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 553-557.
[7] 梅津熠, 王燕, 瞿旻, 董振阳, 周增辉, 沈显琦, 李嘉伦, 高旭. 机器人前列腺癌根治术中"膀胱外中叶"的处理[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 429-433.
[8] 韩广玮, 申雪晴, 吴涵潇, 曹炎武, 唐黎明. 前列腺增生并轻度尿道狭窄行去外鞘半导体激光汽化剜除与等离子电切的比较[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 490-494.
[9] 熊风, 林辉煌, 陈晓波. 铥激光在泌尿外科中的临床应用及研究进展[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 533-536.
[10] 穆靖军, 马增妮, 曹晓明. 临床局限性前列腺癌包膜外侵犯的危险因素分析[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 326-331.
[11] 李全喜, 唐辉军, 唐友杰, 杨飞. DISCO成像技术在前列腺增生与前列腺癌鉴别诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 332-335.
[12] 王邦郁, 陈晓鹏, 唐国军, 王佳妮. 尿液细胞外囊泡circRNA分类器对高级别前列腺癌诊断价值的初步研究[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 339-342.
[13] 刘硕儒, 王功炜, 张斌, 李书豪, 胡成. 新型溶瘤病毒M1激活内质网应激致前列腺癌细胞凋亡的机制[J]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 388-393.
[14] 张宁, 张梦菲, 邱建新, 高闫尧, 陈育, 高靖榆. 腹腔镜下经尿道等离子电切术联合疝环充填式无张力疝修补术治疗腹股沟斜疝合并前列腺良性增生[J]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 441-444.
[15] 王苏贵, 皇立媛, 姜福金, 吴自余, 张先云, 李强, 严大理. 异质性细胞核核糖蛋白A2B1在前列腺癌中的作用及其靶向中药活性成分筛选研究[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 731-736.
阅读次数
全文


摘要