Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (03): 226-231. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2017.03.012

Special Issue:

• Superficial Parts Ultrasound • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Sonographic findings and pathological features of ductal carcinoma in situ without microcalcifications on mammography

Dequan Liu1, Hongyu Ding2,(), Jing Cui3, Hao Shi4, Kai Zhang5, Fengjing Fan5, Fei Li6   

  1. 1. Tai Shan Medical College, Taian 271000, China; Department of Ultrasound, People′s Hospital of Gaotang, Liaocheng 252800, China
    2. Department of Diagnostic Ultrasound, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan 250014, China
    3. Department of Pathology, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan 250014, China
    4. Department of Medical Imaging, Shandong Provincial Qianfoshan Hospital, Jinan 250014, China
    5. Tai Shan Medical College, Taian 271000, China
    6. School of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan 250014, China
  • Received:2016-06-05 Online:2017-03-01 Published:2017-03-01
  • Contact: Hongyu Ding
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Ding Hongyu, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the characteristic sonographic and pathological features of breast ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) without microcalcifications on mammography (MG).

Methods

Forty cases of DCIS without microcalcifications on MG were retrospectively reviewed. The 40 lesions were classified into mass and non-mass groups according to their sonographic findings. The pathological subtypes and nuclear grades of these cases were also analyzed. Fisher exact test was used to compare the differences of the sonographic accuracy rate, sonographic microcalcification rate, pathological nuclear grade and subtype rate between mass and non-mass groups.

Results

No abnormal finding was found in sixteen cases (40.0%) on MG and only one case (2.5%) on ultrasonography (US), respectively. The most common sonographic feature of DCIS without microcalcifications on MG were masses (75.0%, 30/40), and other sonographic findings were round/oval and irregular shape, microlobulated margin, heterogeneous hypoechogenicity and isoechogenicity, and posterior acoustic feature. Ductal dilatations and heterogeneous isoechogenicity were present in most non-mass lesions of DCIS without microcalcifications on MG (22.5%, 9/40). The ultrasonographic microcalcifications were found in 5 cases of DCIS without microcalcifications on MG. The common pathological features of DCIS without microcalcifications on MG were medium-low nuclear grade (85.0%, 34/40) and noncomedo (87.5%, 35/40). The difference of US accuracy rate in mass and non-mass groups was statistically significant [73.3% (22/30) vs 33.3% (3/9), P=0.047]. The differences of US microcalcification rate, pathological subtype and nuclear grade were not significant (P=1.000, 0.070).

Conclusions

The mass appearance and medium-low nuclear grade were most common sonographic findings and pathological features of DCIS without microcalcifications on MG. Ultrasonography should be an helpful tool for improving the diagnostic sensitivity of mammography in breast DCIS.

Key words: Breast neoplasms, Carcinoma, intraductal, noninfiltrating, Ultrasonography, Pathology

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd