Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (06): 423-427. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2017.06.006

Special Issue:

• Abdominal Ultrasound • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography and endoscopic ultrasonography in evaluating regional lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer

Liang Wang1, Yan Yang1,(), Xiaohua Wang1, Huiliao He1, Hao Chen2, Zhiqiang Zheng3, Zongmin Wang4   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, the 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China
    2. Department of Gastroenterology, the 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China
    3. Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, the 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China
    4. Department of Pathology, the 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou 325027, China
  • Received:2016-11-26 Online:2017-06-01 Published:2017-06-01
  • Contact: Yan Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yang Yan, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To evaluate the accuracy of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCUS) and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) in the preoperative N staging of gastric cancer.

Methods

Between June 2015 and September 2016, a total of 65 consecutive patients who were diagnosed with histologically confirmed gastric carcinoma and underwent surgery in the 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University were enrolled into this study. DCUS and EUS were performed in all patients to estimate lymph node metastasis (N stage) within 5 days before surgery. The findings of the histopathologic examination of resected specimens were considered as gold standard and were retrospectively compared with the results of DCUS and EUS. The sensitivity, specificity and Youden index of DCUS and EUS were calculated. The difference of diagnostic performance between DCUS and EUS was assessed by chi-square test.

Results

There were 25 N- patients and 40 N+ patients confirmed by pathology. Of all 25 N- cases, 18 cases were diagnosed correctly by DCUS and 20 cases were diagnosed correctly by EUS; Of all 40 N+ cases, 32 cases were diagnosed correctly by DCUS and 31 cases were diagnosed correctly by EUS. The sensitivity, specificity and Youden index of DCUS were 80.0%, 72.0% and 0.52 respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and Youden index of EUS were 77.5%, 80.0% and 0.58 respectively. The overall accuracy of DCUS and EUS in N-staging were 76.9% (50/65) and 78.5% (51/65). There was no significant difference between two methods (χ2=0.044, P=0.833).

Conclusions

There was no significant difference between DCUS and EUS in overall N-staging of gastric cancers. Either of these two methods had its advantages and disadvantages. When the two methods were combined, the accuracy of preoperative N-staging of gastric cancers could be improved and this improvement may influence treatment algorithms.

Key words: Ultrasonography, Contrast media, Endoscopy, Stomach neoplasms, Lymphatic metastasis

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd