Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) ›› 2017, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (10): 755-759. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2017.10.008

Special Issue:

• Superficial Parts Ultrasound • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Ultrasonography in the diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules with rim calcification

Cuiping Hua1, Jianwei Wang1, Zhixing Guo1, Qingguang Lin1, Xuebin Zou1, Zimin Lai1, Jueming Chen1, Feng Han1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou 510060, China
  • Received:2016-12-11 Online:2017-10-01 Published:2017-10-01
  • Contact: Feng Han
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Han Feng, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

The aim of this study was to investigate the value of ultrasound in diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules with rim calcification.

Methods

Sixty thyroid nodules with rim calcifications from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer center which were detected on ultrasound from January 2008 to December 2015 were included in this study, and all the thyroid nodules had pathological results. Ultrasonic features of thyroid nodules, including the size, border, internal echo, growth pattern, rear echo, interruption or inner sink of the rim calcification and hypoechoic soft tissue extrusion around rim calcification were analyzed.

Results

Thirty-seven nodules (61.7%) were confirmed to be benign, and twenty-three nodules (38.3%) were malignant. The ultrasonic features of interruption or inner sink of rim calcifications and hypoechoic soft tissue extrusion around rim calcification, were more often in malignant nodules than benign nodules. The sensitivity, specificity, the positive predictive values and the negative predictive values for interruption or inner sink of rim calcifications were 85.7%, 89.4%, 85.7% and 89.4%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, the positive predictive values and the negative predictive values for hypoechoic soft tissue extrusion around rim calcification were 81.3%, 94.4%, 92.9% and 85.0%, respectively. Internal hypoechogenicity was more frequently observed in the malignant nodules (82.6%) than in benign nodules (40.5%). The longitudinal growth pattern of thyroid was more frequently observed in malignant nodules (30.4%) than in benign nodules (2.7%). The differences of this two ultrasound features were statistically significant (χ2=9.958 and 9.440, both P<0.01). There were no significant differences in size, border and the rear echo between malignant and benign nodules (all P>0.05).

Conclusion

The interruption or inner sink of the rim calcification could be useful in differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules with rim calcification.

Key words: Thyroid nodules, Rim calcification, Ultrasonography, Differential diagnosis

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd