Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) ›› 2021, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (08): 788-794. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2021.08.014

• Abdominal Ultrasound • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Value of conventional ultrasound combined with contrast-enhanced ultrasound in differential diagnosis of serous cystic adenoma and mucinous cystic neoplasm of the pancreas

Yang Liu1, Li Zhu1, Weinan Chen1, Jianchun Li1, Li Wang1, Ligang Wang1, Xiaoming Fan1, Chengzhong Peng1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasonography, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou 310014, China
  • Received:2021-03-09 Online:2021-08-01 Published:2021-09-09
  • Contact: Chengzhong Peng

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the routine ultrasound and contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) manifestations of serous cystic adenoma (SCA) and mucinous cystic neoplasm (MCN) of the pancreas, in order to improve their diagnostic accuracy.

Methods

The clinical data and conventional ultrasound and CEUS imaging data of 86 cases of SCA and MCN confirmed by surgery and pathology at Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital from June 2016 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the diagnostic value of clinical data as well as conventional ultrasound and CEUS characteristics in SCA and MCN.

Results

There were 58 cases of SCA and 28 cases of MCN. Univariate analysis showed that there were no significant differences between SCA and MCN in gender, tumor site, tumor morphology, clinical symptoms, and enhancement intensity and mode of CEUS in the arterial phase (P>0.05). There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in age of onset, the largest diameter of the tumor, the presence of more than six cysts in the lesion or not, the presence of calcification or not and the distribution of calcification in the lesion, the largest diameter of a single cyst more than or equal to 20 mm or not, the uniformity of the thickness of the cyst wall, the presence of cyst wall nodules or not, and the intensity of enhancement in the middle venous phase of CEUS (P<0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the number of cysts ≥6, non-uniform cyst wall, and the diameter of single cyst ≥20 mm were independent risk factors for the diagnosis of MCN, with odds ratio values of 0.163 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.047-0.561), 9.388 (95%CI: 2.663-33.094), and 3.254 (95%CI: 1.037-10.213), respectively. The Logistic regression model was as follows: Logit (P) = -2.792-1.815X3 (number of cystic cavities) + 2.239X5 (characteristics of cystic walls) + 1.180X6 (diameter of single cystic cavities). ROC curve analysis showed that the area under the curve of this regression model for identifying SCA and MCN was 0.823 (95%CI: 0.734-0.913).

Conclusion

Pancreatic SCA and MCN have appreciated imaging characteristics, and ultrasound examination allows for a better differential diagnosis of the two, thus providing a basis for clinical treatment.

Key words: Pancreas, Neoplasms, cystic, mucinous, and serous, Contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd