Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (09): 957-961. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.09.015

• Interventional Ultrasound • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Application of intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound in poor drainage after catheterization

Hong Han1, Wenping Wang2, Yunjie Jing2, Jiaying Chao2, Chao Fang3, Lijuan Mao2, Zhengbiao Ji2,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China; Shanghai Institute of Medical Imaging, Shanghai 200032, China
    2. Department of Ultrasound, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
    3. Department of Ultrasound, the Central Hospital of Xuhui District, Shanghai 200031, China
  • Received:2020-08-10 Online:2022-09-01 Published:2022-11-03
  • Contact: Zhengbiao Ji

Abstract:

Objective

To investigate the value of intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound in examination of drainage tube in patients with poor drainage.

Methods

From December 2019 to June 2020, patients who underwent ultrasound-guided percutaneous catheter drainage and were clinically considered to have poor drainage at our hospital were enrolled in the study. B-mode ultrasound and intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound were used to observe the position and tip of the drainage catheter, and the effective drainage areas of the tube was evaluated. The contrast agent was SonoVue diluted 1:200 for intraluminal usage. SPSS statistical software was used for statistical analyses.

Results

The times to detect the drain body and the drain tip by intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound were (5.72±0.83) s and (13.4±1.12) s, respectively, which were significantly shorter than those spent by conventional ultrasonography [(69.94±7.06) s and (108.50±7.06) s, t=520.5 and 840.2, respectively, P<0.001]. The detection rates of the drain body and drain head by intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound were 94.2% (49/52) and 88.5% (46/52), respectively, which were significantly better than the corresponding rates [40.4% (21/52) and 21.1% (11/52)] achieved by using conventional ultrasound (χ2=33.28 and 47.55, respectively, P<0.001). Intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound revealed multiple lacunae in six abscesses, including four cases in which the part of the drainage catheter placed in the abscess did not communicate with other abscess parts.

Conclusion

Intracavitary contrast-enhanced ultrasound can provide accurate information about the position of the drainage tube and tip, and can fully evaluate the cause of poor drainage, so as to guide clinicians to adjust the drainage tube.

Key words: Drainage, Ultrasound, Contrast-enhanced ultrasound, Intracavitary application, Intervention

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd