Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) ›› 2015, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (04): 319-324. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2015.04.013

Special Issue:

• Obstetric and Gynecologic Ultrasound • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Study on transvaginal two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound in the eveluation of endometrial receptivity during in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer treatment

Jinhui Wang1,(), Zifang Yu1, Fang Yan1, Ying Liu1, Shuo Zhang2   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, the Second People’s Hospital of Taiyuan, Taiyuan 030002, China
    2. Reproduction Medicine Center, Taiyuan Center Hospital, Taiyuan 030002, China
  • Received:2014-07-09 Online:2015-04-01 Published:2015-04-01
  • Contact: Jinhui Wang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Wang Jinhui, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To determine endometrial thickness, endometrial volumeand, endometrial and subendometrial blood flows, by using transvaginal two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound examination and to compare the value of all the parameters in the prediction of endometrial receptivity during in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) cycles.

Methods

One hundred and twenty patients undergoing IVF cycles were recruited for this study. Transvaginal 2D and 3D ultrasound examination was performed to determine endometrial thickness, endometrial volume, pulsatility index (PI), resisitance index (RI) , systolic/diastolic ratio (S/D) of endometrial, subendometrial blood flows , vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI) and vascularization flow index (VFI) of endometrial and subendometrial regions by experienced sonographers on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) injection. Statistical comparison was carried out by Mann-Whitney test. The receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was applied and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated. Statistic analyses were performed using SPSS 13.0. The two-tailed value of was considered statistically significant.

Results

There were no significant differences between the pregnant group and non-pregnant group in endometrial thickness, endometrial volume (P>0.05). Patients in the pregnant group had lower PI, RI and S/D of endometrial and subendometrial blood flows than those in the non-pregnant group (Z=-3.811, -3.097, -2.071, P=0.001, 0.001, 0.038), with statisticalsignificant difference. Patients in the pregnant group had higher VI, FI and VFI of endometrial and subendometrial regions than those in the non-pregnant group (Z=-1.970, -2.698, -1.981, P=0.490, 0.007, 0.048; Z=-2.098, -2.090, -2.115, P=0.036, 0.037, 0.034), with statistical significant difference.

Conclusions

Endometrial and subendometria blood flows measured by transvaginal 2D and 3D ultrasound can be as a reliable indicator to assess endometrial receptivity and predict the pregnancy outcome. Among all the endometrial and subendometrial blood flow parameters, VI of endometrial and subendometrial are better predicators.

Key words: Ultrasonography, interventional, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Fertilization in vitro, Embryo transfer

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd