Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (06): 523-527. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.06.007

Special Issue: Ultrasound medicine

• Obstetric and Gynecologic Ultrasound • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Assessment of uterine scar after caesarean section by contrast-enhanced ultrasound

Dongmei Liu1, Qingqing Wu2, Xiaoning Gu1, Fang Liu1, Fuwen Shi1, Min Yang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100038, China
    2. Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100026, China
  • Received:2020-04-15 Online:2020-06-01 Published:2020-06-01
  • Contact: Min Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yang Min, Email:

Abstract:

Objective

To assess the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) in uterine scar after cesarean section by comparing with transvaginal ultrasound (TVS).

Methods

From May 2017 to May 2019, 75 patients at Beijing Shijitan Hospital with a history of previous cesarean section for more than 6 months were included. All the patients underwent TVS and CEUS, and 11 patients underwent saline infusion sonohysterography. The detection rate and diagnosis accuracy of CEUS were assessed by comparing with TVS and saline infusion sonohysterography. The results of CEUS and TVS in measuring the morphological parameters of cesarean scar diverticulum (CSD) were compared. The relationship between TIC parameters and CSD was analyzed.

Results

The detection rate of CSD by TVS was 53.3% (40/75) versus 68% (51/75) by CEUS, and there was a statistical difference between them (χ2=40.336, P<0.05). Compared with TVS, the CSD measured by CEUS was deeper, and the residual myometrium was thinner; there was a statistical difference between them (t=4.463 and 6.480, respectively; P<0.001). CSD showed higher peak intensity and greater enhancement rate in the CSD group than in the intact scar group (t=-4.961 and -3.837, respectively; P<0.001).

Conclusion

CEUS can provide more accurate evidence for uterine scar than TVS, and TIC parameters (peak intensity and enhancement rate) can reflect the microvascular density of uterine scar through the perfusion of contrast agent microbubbles, and evaluate the scar healing. The application of CEUS in the evaluation of cesarean scar has a good prospect.

Key words: Cicatrix, Diverticulun, Contrast enhanced ultrasound, Cesarean section

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd