切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2015, Vol. 12 ›› Issue (08) : 657 -662. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2015.08.015

所属专题: 文献

基础研究

剪切波弹性成像技术对兔脂肪肝硬度的研究
李玲1, 贺鹏1, 唐盈1, 郑小燕1, 顾鹏1,(), 曹礼庭1   
  1. 1. 637000 南充,川北医学院附属医院超声科 四川省医学影像学重点实验室
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-10 出版日期:2015-08-01
  • 通信作者: 顾鹏
  • 基金资助:
    四川省科技厅基金资助项目(2012sz0072)

Preliminary study of liver stiffness assessment of hepatic steatosis in rabbit model using real-time shear wave elastography imaging

Ling Li1, Peng He1, Ying Tang1, Xiaoyan Zheng1, Peng Gu1,(), Liting Cao1   

  1. 1. Departent of Ultrasound, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong 63700, China
  • Received:2014-11-10 Published:2015-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Peng Gu
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Gu Peng, Email:
引用本文:

李玲, 贺鹏, 唐盈, 郑小燕, 顾鹏, 曹礼庭. 剪切波弹性成像技术对兔脂肪肝硬度的研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2015, 12(08): 657-662.

Ling Li, Peng He, Ying Tang, Xiaoyan Zheng, Peng Gu, Liting Cao. Preliminary study of liver stiffness assessment of hepatic steatosis in rabbit model using real-time shear wave elastography imaging[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2015, 12(08): 657-662.

目的

采用剪切波弹性成像技术探讨兔脂肪肝硬度的变化。

方法

将25只雄性新西兰大白兔随机分为2组,17只采用高脂饲料喂养,8只采用普通饲料喂养,21周时分别检测2组兔肝脏杨氏模量最大值(MAX)、最小值(MIN)、平均值(MEAN)及肝功能指标,包括丙氨酸氨基转移酶(ALT)、天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶(AST)、谷氨酰转移酶(GGT)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、白蛋白与球蛋白比(A/G)、白蛋白(ALB)、球蛋白(GLB)、总胆红素(TBIL)、直接胆红素(DBIL)、间接胆红素(IBIL)。将高脂饲料喂养组兔处死,并做肝脏病理切片,将符合脂肪肝的纳入研究作为实验组。实验组与对照组的杨氏模量值及肝功能指标比较采用独立样本t检验;实验组肝功能指标与杨氏模量值相关性采用Pearson相关分析。

结果

实验组纳入研究13只,正常对照组8只。实验组肝脏杨氏模量MAX、MIN、MEAN值均比正常对照组增高,差异具有统计学意义[(11.35±3.18)kPa vs (8.61±1.19)kPa,t=2.800,P=0.013;(3.78±1.41)kPa vs (2.52±0.37)kPa,t=2.448,P=0.024;(6.92±1.76)kPa vs (5.07±0.49)kPa,t=3.558,P=0.003]。实验组肝功能指标AST、ALT、ALP、GGT、TBIL、DBIL、IBIL较对照组升高[(82.00±25.52)U/L vs (10.37±13.09)U/L,t=2.209,P=0.040;(43.91±20.76)U/L vs (24.85±4.77)U/L,t=2.533,P=0.020;(49.92±13.42)g/L vs (31.40±8.26)g/L,t=3.913,P=0.002;(9.27±3.82)U/L vs (5.40±1.66)U/L,t=2.694,P=0.014;(3.63±0.26)μmol/L vs (0.21±0.09)μmol/L,t=44.206,P=0.000;(0.84±0.52)μmol/L vs (0.03±0.04)μmol/L,t=4.322,P=0.000;(2.98±0.43)μmol/L vs (0.30±0.14)μmol/L,t=20.682,P=0.000]。ALB、GLB、A/G较对照组降低[(33.71±3.56)g/L vs (43.10±2.62)g/L,t=6.937,P=0.000;(42.88±15.48)g/L vs (23.45±1.80) g/L,t=3.500,P=0.002;0.88±0.21 vs 1.84±0.14,t=11.290,P=0.000];杨氏模量平均值与ALP、A/G具有相关性(r=-0.676,P=0.011;r=-0.632,P=0.021),最小值与A/G、GGT具有相关性(r=-0.549,P=0.050,r=0.589,P=0.034),最大值与ALB、TBIL具有相关性(r=-0.583,P=0.037;r=0.600,P=0.03)。

结论

脂肪肝硬度增加,杨氏模量值与肝脏功能指标具有相关性;通过剪切波弹性成像技术可检测脂肪肝硬度的变化,可为脂肪肝的临床诊断提供一种方法。

Objective

To explore the hardness of hepatic steatosis of rabbit model by real-time shear wave elastography imaging (SWE).

Methods

Twenty-five healthy male rabbits were divided into two groups, one group was feed high diet (n=17) and the other group was feed normal diet (n=8). For 21 weeks, detected the Young′s modulus value of two groups rabbits by SWE and hepatic function: alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspatate aminotransferase( AST), glutamyltransferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), albumin/globulin (A/G), albumin (ALB), globulin (GLB), total bilirubin (TBIL), direct bilirubin (DBIL), indirect bilirubin (IBIL). And the rabbits of high diet group were put to death, detected the pathology of liver by microscope, the rabbit up to fatty liver standard was the experimental group, and the group feed normal diet was control group. And then comparison the Young′s modulus value and hepatic function value between two group rabbits by t-test. Analyzed the relationship of Young′s modulus value between hepatic function value of model rabbits by Pearson′s correlation test.

Results

The model group has 13 rabbits, the control group has 8 rabbits. The Young′s modulus value of model group is higher compare to the control group [(11.35±3.18) kPa vs (8.61±1.19) kPa, t=2.800, P=0.013; (3.78±1.41) kPa vs (2.52±0.37) kPa, t=2.448, P=0.024; (6.92±1.76) kPa vs (5.07±0.49) kPa, t=3.558, P=0.003]. AST, ALT, ALP, GGT, TBIL, DBIL, IBIL of model group is higher compare to the control group [(82.00±25.52) U/L vs (10.37±13.09) U/L, t=2.209, P=0.040; (43.91±20.76) U/L vs (24.85±4.77) U/L, t=2.533, P=0.020; (49.92±13.42) g/L vs (31.40±8.26) g/L, t=3.913, P=0.002; (9.27±3.82) U/L vs (5.40±1.66) U/L, t=2.694, P=0.014; (3.63±0.26) μmol/L vs (0.21±0.09) μmol/L, t=44.206, P=0.000; (0.84±0.52) μmol/L vs (0.03±0.04) μmol/L, t=4.322, P=0.000; (2.98±0.43) μmol/L vs (0.30±0.14) μmol/L, t=20.682, P=0.000]. ALB, GLB, A/G were lower than that of the control group [(33.71±3.56) g/L vs (43.10±2.62) g/L, t=6.937, P=0.000; (42.88±15.48) g/L vs (23.45±1.80) g/L, t=3.500, P=0.002; 0.88±0.21 vs 1.84±0.14, t=11.290, P=0.000]. There was significant positive correlation between MEAN and ALP, A/G (r=-0.676, P=0.011; r=-0.632, P=0.021), between MIN and A/G, GGT (r=-0.549, P=0.050, r=0.589, P=0.034), and between MAX and ALB, TBIL (r=-0.583, P=0.037; r=0.600, P=0.03).

Conclusions

The Young′s modulus value of hepatic steatosis is higher than healthy. SWE is a convenience and shortcut method for detection the change in consistency of fatty liver.

图1 实验组兔脂肪肝与对照组正常肝脏组织病理图(HE×400)。
表1 实验组与对照组兔肝脏杨氏模量值的比较(kPa,±s
图2 实验组兔脂肪肝(图a) 与对照组正常肝脏(图b) 杨氏模量值比较,实验组杨氏模量值比对照组高
表2 实验组与对照组兔肝功能指标的比较(±s
图3 实验组兔脂肪肝杨氏模量平均值与肝功能指标ALP、A/G呈线性负相关关系
图4 实验组兔脂肪肝杨氏模量指标最大值与肝功能指标ALB呈线性负相关,与TBIL呈线性正相关
图5 实验组兔脂肪肝杨氏模量指标最小值与A/G呈线性负相关,与GGT呈线性正相关
1
Paschos P, Paletas K. Non alcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome[J]. Hippokratia, 2009, 13(1): 9-19.
2
Brunt EM. Nonalcohlic steatohepatitis[J]. Semin Liver Dis, 2004, 24(1): 3-20.
3
Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, et al. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association[J]. Hepatology, 2012, 55(6): 2005-2023.
4
付超,崔可飞,秦石成, 等. 实时剪切波弹性成像在甲状腺实性结节良恶性鉴别诊断中的临床应用[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2012,21(1): 49-51
5
李俊来,黄炎,王知力, 等. 乳腺实时剪切波弹性成像的组织定征研究[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志:电子版, 2011, 8(4): 812-819.
6
曾婕,吴莉莉,郑荣琴, 等. 实时剪切波弹性成像检测肝脏弹性模量与肝纤维化分期的相关性研究[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志:电子版,2012, 9(8): 781-784.
7
Athanasiou A, Tardivon A, tanter M, et a1. Breast lesions: quantitative elastography with suppersonic shear imaginig-pre-liminary results[J]. Radiology, 2010, 256(1): 297-303.
8
Bavu E, Gennisson JL, Couade M, et a1. Noninvasive in vivo liver fibrosis evaluation using supersonic shear imaging: a clinical study on 113 hepatitis C virus patients[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2011, 37(9): 1361-1373.
9
Lu Y, Wei J, Tang Y. Evaluation of fatty liver fibrosis in rabbits using real- time shear wave elastography[J]. Exp Ther Med, 2014, 8(2): 355-362.
10
唐少珊,赵国家,王一姣. 超声弹性成像评价大鼠脂肪肝分级的应用价值[J]. 临床肝胆病杂志, 2013, 29(4): 282-285.
11
Streba LA, Cârstea D, Mitruţ P, et al. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and metabolic syndrome: a concise review[J]. Rom J Morphol Embryol, 2008, 49(1): 13-20.
12
Farrell GC, Larter CZ. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: from steatosis to cirrhosis[J]. Hepatology, 2006, 43(2 Suppl 1): S99-S112..
[1] 骆云凯, 鄢曹鑫, 张宣宣, 李如梅, 王文倩, 洪行行, 夏斌, 邹伟璞, 张珊珊, 陈剑. 声触诊弹性成像检测脾硬度对诊断慢性乙肝肝纤维化程度的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(11): 1232-1237.
[2] 樊文莉, 梁潇, 杜京奚, 王鹏, 杨勇. 慢性肾病患者肾功能与主动脉僵硬度超声评价指标的相关性[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(11): 1084-1089.
[3] 江宇轩, 刘文丽, 武会娟, 方晨, 钱嘉林. 神经动态超声弹性成像的三维有限元分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(06): 583-589.
[4] 张君, 沈素红, 刘春龙, 张志杰. 剪切波弹性成像技术量化评估健康人斜方肌弹性模量的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(03): 307-312.
[5] 魏丽群, 李一丹, 丁雪晏, 朱维维, 王娟, 王江涛, 吕秀章. 心肌弹性成像对高血压左心室不同构型患者心肌僵硬度的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(02): 128-134.
[6] 谢晓宁, 王晓萍, 邵萍. 老年2型糖尿病患者非酒精性脂肪肝患病率及危险因素分析[J]. 中华危重症医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 15(04): 308-311.
[7] 强坤坤, 罗红. 杜氏肌营养不良症患儿的高频超声与剪切波弹性成像诊断研究现状及前景[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(02): 162-167.
[8] 张晋平, 朱志军, 孙丽莹, 魏林, 曲伟, 曾志贵, 张海明. 活体肝移植供肝脂肪变性评估研究进展[J]. 中华移植杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 249-255.
[9] 李运林, 娄冬华. 滨海县非酒精性脂肪肝发病与消退的影响因素分析[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(05): 354-358.
[10] 刘立业, 赵德芳. 非酒精性脂肪肝患者血清细胞因子信号转导抑制因子3、肝X受体α水平与CT影像学特征的相关性[J]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2023, 13(04): 211-215.
[11] 孔凡彪, 杨建荣. 肝脏基础疾病与结直肠癌肝转移之间关系的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 818-822.
[12] 马文文, 呼敏, 王贵红, 高健. miR-103a-2、miR-122和vaspin在非酒精性脂肪性肝病合并HBV感染中的表达及意义[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 170-174.
[13] 林海燕, 程宁, 黄鑫, 刘威, 王园园. 自拟疏肝健脾方对肝郁脾虚型非酒精性单纯性脂肪肝患者短链脂肪酸的影响[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(11): 871-876.
[14] 梁文迪, 苏钰琦, 胡彪, 甘胤文, 黄卫超, 杨其霖. 高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和非酒精性脂肪肝发生的相关性——基于日本人群的一项横断面研究[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2021, 09(03): 154-159.
[15] 何亚伟, 陈皖京, 宋佳宏, 于刚, 贾犇黎, 汪泳. 肥胖患者SCH、血清维生素D水平与NAFLD严重程度关系的研究[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2023, 09(02): 95-101.
阅读次数
全文


摘要