切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (10) : 766 -770. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2017.10.010

所属专题: 乳腺超声 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

超声造影联合超声弹性成像积分法对乳腺影像报告和数据系统3~4类乳腺肿物的诊断价值
徐玉桐1, 安婷婷1, 张久维1, 杨秀华1,()   
  1. 1. 150001 哈尔滨医科大学第一临床医学院腹部超声科
  • 收稿日期:2016-11-15 出版日期:2017-10-01
  • 通信作者: 杨秀华

The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with ultrasound elastography scores in differential diagnosis of breast imaging reporting and data system 3-4 breast lesions

Yutong Xu1, Tingting An1, Jiuwei Zhang1, Xiuhua Yang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Abdominal Ultrasonography, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150001, China
  • Received:2016-11-15 Published:2017-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiuhua Yang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Yang Xiuhua, Email:
引用本文:

徐玉桐, 安婷婷, 张久维, 杨秀华. 超声造影联合超声弹性成像积分法对乳腺影像报告和数据系统3~4类乳腺肿物的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(10): 766-770.

Yutong Xu, Tingting An, Jiuwei Zhang, Xiuhua Yang. The value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with ultrasound elastography scores in differential diagnosis of breast imaging reporting and data system 3-4 breast lesions[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2017, 14(10): 766-770.

目的

探讨超声造影积分法、超声弹性成像及二者联合积分法对乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)3~4类乳腺肿物的诊断价值。

方法

选取2015年10月至2016年3月在哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院行常规超声检查,并依据BI-RADS分类,将定为3~4类的58例乳腺肿物患者(共60个病灶)行超声造影及超声弹性成像检查,依据相关观察指标给予评分,最终以手术病理结果为"金标准",采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分别评估超声造影积分法、超声弹性成像及二者联合成像积分法对BI-RADS 3~4类乳腺肿物良、恶性鉴别诊断的价值。

结果

60个乳腺病灶,病理结果显示良性29个,恶性31个。联合诊断积分法ROC曲线下面积为0.971,大于超声造影积分法及超声弹性成像单独诊断的ROC曲线下面积(分别为0.916及0.908)。联合诊断积分法的敏感度、特异度及准确性为87.1%、96.6%及92.0%;超声造影积分法诊断的敏感度、特异度及准确性为77.4%、93.1%及85.0%;超声弹性成像诊断的敏感度、特异度及准确性为74.2%、93.1%及83.3%。

结论

超声造影联合弹性成像积分法能进一步提高BI-RADS 3~4类乳腺肿物的良、恶性鉴别诊断效能。

Objective

To explore the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) scores, ultrasonic elastography (UE) and their combined scores in diagnosing breast lesions of breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) 3-4.

Methods

From October 2015 to March 2016, 60 BI-RADS 3-4 solid breast masses diagnosed by conventional ultrasound underwent UE and CEUS. According to the relevant indicators, all cases were scored and proved by surgical pathology. The diagnostic sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of CEUS scores, UE and their combined scores were evaluated, and the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was drawn.

Results

Twenty-nine benign and 31 malignant lesions were confirmed by pathology. The area under the ROC curve of CEUS combined with UE scores was 0.971 which was higher than that of CEUS Scores and UE alone (0.916 and 0.908, respectively). Moreover, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 87.1%, 96.6% and 92.0% for CEUS combined with UE Scores, 77.4%, 93.1% and 85.0% for CEUS Scores, 74.2%, 93.1% and 83.3% for UE, respectively.

Conclusion

CEUS combined with UE scores can improve the differetial diagnostic accuracy for BI-RADS 3-4 breast lesions.

表1 乳腺良、恶性肿物超声造影成像特征比较[例(%)]
图3,4 乳腺恶性肿物患者超声造影及弹性成像声像图(术后病理结果:浸润性癌,WHO Ⅱ~Ⅲ级)。图3为弹性成像评分5分;图4为超声造影表现向心性不均匀高增强,周边见粗大血管影,评分9分,联合诊断评分14分,诊断为恶性病灶
图5 超声造影积分法、弹性成像及联合诊断积分法鉴别诊断BI-RADS 3~4类乳腺良、恶性肿物的ROC曲线
[1]
Torre LA, Islami F, Siegel RL, et al. Global Cancer in Women: Burden and Trends [J]. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, 2017, 26(4):444-457.
[2]
中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会. 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2017年版) [J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2017, 27(9):695-760.
[3]
朱庆莉,姜玉新. 乳腺影像报告与数据系统指南(第5版)超声内容更新介绍 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2016, 13(1):5-7.
[4]
罗葆明,曾婕,欧冰, 等. 乳腺超声弹性成像检查感兴趣区域大小对诊断结果影响 [J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2007, 23(9):1330-1332.
[5]
艾慧俊,黄品同,游向东, 等. 超声弹性成像在乳腺小实性病灶中的诊断价值 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2012, 28(11):985-987.
[6]
Zhi H, Ou B, Xiao XY, et al. Ultrasound Elastography of Breast Lesions in Chinese Women: A Multicenter Study in China [J]. Clin Breast Cancer, 2013, 13(5):392-400.
[7]
Du J, Wang L, Wan CF, et al. Differentiating benign from Malignant solid breast lesions: Combined utility of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(12):3890-3899.
[8]
Du J, Li FH, Fang H, et al. Correlation of real-time gray scale contrastenhanced ultrasonography with microvessel density and vascular endothelial growth factor expression for assessment of angiogenesis in breast lesions [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2008, 27(6):821-831.
[9]
Grajo JR, Barr RG. Strain elastography for prediction of breast cancer tumor grades [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2014, 33(1):129-134.
[10]
Giuseppetti GM, Martegani A, Di Cioccio B, et al. Elastosonography in the diagnosis of the nodular breast lesions: preliminary report [J]. Radiol Med, 2005, 110(1-2):69-76.
[11]
Park AY, Seo BK. Up-to-date Doppler techniques for breast tumor vascularity: superb microvascular imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound [J]. Ultrasonography, 2017. [Epub ahead of print].
[12]
Du J, Li FH, Fang H, et al. Microvascular architecture of breas lesions: evaluation with contrast-enhanced ultrasonographic micro flow imaging [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2008, 27(6):833-842.
[13]
Jiang YX, Liu H, Liu JB, et al. Breast tumor size assessment: comparison of conventional ultrasound and contrast-enhanced ultrasound [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2007, 33(12):1873-1881.
[14]
张璟,姜玉新,戴晴, 等. 实时灰阶超声造影增强模式在乳腺良、恶性病灶诊断中的应用 [J]. 中国医学科学院学报, 2008, 30(1):49-53.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 汪洪斌, 张红霞, 何文, 杜丽娟, 程令刚, 张雨康, 张萌. 低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤与阑尾黏液腺癌超声及超声造影特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 865-871.
[3] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[4] 王博冉, 乔春梅, 李春歌, 王欣, 王晓磊. 超声造影评估类风湿关节炎亚临床滑膜炎疾病进展的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 802-808.
[5] 马晓菊, 梁潇, 段云友, 袁丽君, 赵萍. NBAV脂质纳泡对ApoE -/-小鼠动脉粥样硬化病变的评估和干预[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 608-616.
[6] 邢益民, 张天飞, 戴慧勇. 胃肠充盈超声造影检查在反酸、嗳气患者临床诊断中的应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(03): 303-306.
[7] 郑大雯, 王健东. 胆囊癌辅助诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
[8] 张红君, 郑博文, 廖梅, 任杰. 超声及超声造影在肝移植术后上腹部淋巴结良恶性鉴别诊断中的应用[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 562-567.
[9] 温绍敏, 王雅晳, 施依璐, 段莎莎, 云书荣, 张小杉. 靶向超声造影技术在动脉粥样硬化治疗中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 496-499.
[10] 黄宏山, 陈成彩. 经淋巴管超声造影在乳腺癌前哨淋巴结诊断中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 411-414.
[11] 赵欣, 李昊昌, 卫星彤. 多模态超声在非肿块型乳腺病变中的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 407-410.
[12] 曹建辉, 冯斌, 黄伟伟, 张超. 超声造影在乳腺BI-RADS 4A类结节诊断及穿刺活检中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 363-368.
[13] 卫星彤, 李昊昌, 赵欣. 甲状腺木乃伊结节于多模态超声下的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 415-419.
[14] 徐森胤, 黄斌, 郭绍锋, 王涵. 超声造影引导下关节囊内注射治疗老年粘连性关节囊炎的疗效分析[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2024, 11(03): 24-27.
[15] 史宛瑞, 崔立刚. 颈动脉一过性血管周围炎综合征的影像学诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 516-519.
阅读次数
全文


摘要