切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (07) : 549 -554. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2019.07.010

所属专题: 文献

腹部超声影像学

声脉冲辐射力成像联合瞬时弹性成像对炎性肝纤维化的诊断价值
高明茹1, 董晓秋1,()   
  1. 1. 150001 哈尔滨医科大学附属第四医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-03 出版日期:2019-07-01
  • 通信作者: 董晓秋

Diagnostic value of acoustic radiation force impulse combined with transient elastography for inflammatory liver fibrosis

Mingru Gao1, Xiaoqiu Dong1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, the Fourth Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150001, China
  • Received:2018-10-03 Published:2019-07-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaoqiu Dong
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Dong Xiaoqiu, Email:
引用本文:

高明茹, 董晓秋. 声脉冲辐射力成像联合瞬时弹性成像对炎性肝纤维化的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(07): 549-554.

Mingru Gao, Xiaoqiu Dong. Diagnostic value of acoustic radiation force impulse combined with transient elastography for inflammatory liver fibrosis[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2019, 16(07): 549-554.

目的

评估声脉冲辐射力成像(ARFI)技术联合瞬时弹性成像(TE)技术对慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)肝纤维化的诊断价值。

方法

选取2015年10月至2017年6月在哈尔滨医科大学附属第四医院就诊的121例CHB患者,进行肝脏穿刺活检、常规生化检查、ARFI及TE检查。采用方差分析比较肝纤维化各组的年龄、AST、ALT、ARFI值及TE值,进一步比较采用SNK-q检验,并与病理结果做相关性分析。以肝纤维化病理学分期为"金标准",采用工作特征曲线(ROC)对比分析ARFI及TE技术对CHB肝纤维化分期的准确性,并应用Logistic回归进行联合诊断的风险预测,并通过预测值绘制ROC曲线,比较ARFI、TE及两者联合对肝纤维化S≥1期及S≥2期的诊断价值。

结果

ARFI及TE值均与肝纤维化分期具有较好的正相关性(r=0.789、0.845,P均<0.0001)。ARFI及TE技术诊断肝纤维化S≥1期的AUROC分别为0.849及0.903(P=0.424);S≥2期的AUROC分别为0.874及0.923(P=0.191);S≥3期的AUROC分别为0.938及0.954(P=0.526);S=4期的AUROC分别为0.913及0.926 (P=0.842)。ARFI及TE技术联合诊断肝纤维化S≥1期的AUROC为0.925,与两者单独诊断相比,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05),但联合后的敏感度、特异度及准确性均提高;联合诊断S≥2期的AUROC为0.949,与两者单独诊断相比,仅优于ARFI的单独诊断,差异有统计学意义(P=0.009),但联合后的敏感度及准确性均有所提高。

结论

ARFI技术联合TE技术有助于提高肝纤维化S≥1期及S≥2期的诊断。

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic value of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging combined with transient elastography (TE) for liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.

Methods

One hundred and twenty-one patients with CHB were included from October 2015 to June 2017 at the Fourth Hospital of Harbin Medical University. Liver biopsy, routine biochemical tests, ARFI, and TE were carried out. The age, AST, ALT, ARFI, and TE were calculated and analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by pairwise comparisons using the SNK-q test. The results of ARFI and TE were compared with pathological results. Using the pathological stage of liver fibrosis as the golden standard, the accuracy of ARFI and TE in diagnosing different stages of liver fibrosis were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Logistic regression was used to predict the risk of joint diagnosis, and ROC curve was drawn based on the predicted value to compare the diagnostic value of ARFI, TE, and their combination in S≥1 and S≥2 liver fibrosis.

Results

ARFI and TE were positively correlated with the fibrosis degree, and the correlation coefficients were 0.789 and 0.845, respectively (P<0.0001). The areas under the ROC cruves (AUROCs) of ARFI imaging and TE were 0.849 and 0.903 (P=0.424) in diagnosing S≥1 liver fibrosis, 0.874 and 0.923 (P=0.191) for S≥2, 0.938 and 0.954 (P=0.526) for S≥3, and 0.913 and 0.926 (P=0.842) for S4, respectively. The AUROC of ARFI plus TE for diagnosis of S≥1 liver fibrosis was 0.925, with no significant improvement compared with either of them (P>0.05), but the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the combination were improved. The AUROC of the combined diagnosis for S≥2 was 0.949, which was only better than that of ARFI alone (P=0.009), but the sensitivity and accuracy of the combination were improved.

Conclusions

ARFI combined with TE improves the diagnosis of S≥1 and S≥2 liver fibrosis.

图1 S3期肝纤维化患者声脉冲辐射力成像图
图2 S3期肝纤维化患者瞬时弹性成像成像图
表1 慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化不同分期的临床特征(±s
图3 ARFI技术与TE技术诊断慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化程度的受试者工作特征曲线。图a为肝纤维化程度S≥1;图b为肝纤维化程度S≥2;图c为肝纤维化程度S≥3;图d为肝纤维化程度S=4;图e为肝纤维化程度S≥1;图f为肝纤维化程度S≥2
表2 ARFI与TE技术诊断肝纤维化程度的指标
表3 ARFI联合TE诊断S≥1及S≥2期的指标
1
Ekiz F, Yuksel İ, Arikök AT, et al. Will a second biopsy sample affect treatment decisions in patients with chronic hepatitis B? [J]. Hepatol Int, 2016, 10(4): 602-605.
2
中华医学会肝病学分会、中华医学会感染病学分会. 慢性乙型肝炎防治指南(2010年版) [J].中华肝脏病杂志, 2011, 19(1): 13-24.
3
中华医学会传染病与寄生虫病学分会、肝病学分会.病毒性肝炎防治方案[J]. 中华内科学杂志, 2001, 40(1): 62-68.
4
Zoubek ME, Trautwein C, Strnad P. Reversal of liver fibrosis: From fiction to reality [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 2017, 31(2): 129-141.
5
Castera L. Noninvasive methods to assess liver disease in patients with hepatitis B or C [J]. Gastroenterology, 2012, 142(6): 1293-1302. e4.
6
Bohte AE, de Niet A, Jansen L, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis: a comparison of ultrasound-based transient elastography and MR elastography in patients with viral hepatitis B and C [J]. Eur Radiol, 2014, 24(3): 638-648.
7
Nightingale K, Soo MS, Nightingale R, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging:in vivo demonstration of clinical feasibility [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2002, 28(2): 227-235.
8
Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM, et al. Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2003, 29(12): 1705-1713.
9
Rifai K, Cornberg J, Mederacke I, et al. Clinical feasibility of liver elastography by acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) [J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2011, 43(6): 491-497.
10
Ghany MG, Doo E. Assessment of liver fibrosis: palpate, poke or pulse [J]. Hepatology, 2005, 42(4): 759-761.
11
张大鹍, 陈敏, 刘阳, 等. 声脉冲辐射力成像与瞬时弹性成像诊断慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化的对比研究[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2016, 18(1): 21-24.
12
Gerber L, Kasper D, Fitting D, et al. Assessment of liver fibrosis with 2-D shear wave elastography in comparison to transient elastography and acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in patients with chronic liver disease [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2015, 41(9): 2350-2359.
13
Friedrich-Rust M, Wunder K, Kriener S, et al. Liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis: noninvasive assessment with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging versus transient elastography [J]. Radiology, 2009, 252(2): 595-604.
14
Dayem WAAEL, Emam M, Shaheen NE, et al. Can combinations of non-invasive parameters replace liver biopsy in the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis in egyptian patients with chronic hepatitis C [J]. British Microbiology Research Journal, 2013, 3(3): 259.
15
Castera L, Winnock M, Pambrun E, et al. Comparison of transient elastography (FibroScan), FibroTest, APRI and two algorithms combining these non-invasive tests for liver fibrosis staging in HIV/HCV coinfected patients: ANRS CO13 HEPAVIH and FIBROSTIC collaboration [J]. HIV medicine, 2014, 15(1): 30-39.
[1] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[2] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[3] 朱连华, 费翔, 韩鹏, 姜波, 李楠, 罗渝昆. 高帧频超声造影在胆囊息肉样病变中的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 904-910.
[4] 张梅芳, 谭莹, 朱巧珍, 温昕, 袁鹰, 秦越, 郭洪波, 侯伶秀, 黄文兰, 彭桂艳, 李胜利. 早孕期胎儿头臀长正中矢状切面超声图像的人工智能质控研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 945-950.
[5] 陈舜, 薛恩生, 叶琴. PDCA在持续改进超声危急值管理制度中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 974-978.
[6] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[7] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[8] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[9] 张丽丽, 陈莉, 余美琴, 聂小艳, 王婧玲, 刘婷. PDCA循环法在超声浅表器官亚专科建设中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 717-721.
[10] 罗刚, 泮思林, 陈涛涛, 许茜, 纪志娴, 王思宝, 孙玲玉. 超声心动图在胎儿心脏介入治疗室间隔完整的肺动脉闭锁中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 605-609.
[11] 黄佳, 石华, 张玉国, 胡佳琪, 陈茜. 胎儿左头臂静脉正常与异常超声图像特征及其临床意义[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 610-617.
[12] 袁泽, 庄丽. 超声检测胎儿脐动脉和大脑中动脉血流对胎儿宫内窘迫的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 618-621.
[13] 李建美, 邓静娟, 杨倩. 两种术式联合治疗肝癌合并肝硬化门静脉高压的安全性及随访评价[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 41-44.
[14] 吴方园, 孙霞, 林昌锋, 张震生. HBV相关肝硬化合并急性上消化道出血的危险因素分析[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 45-47.
[15] 孔凡彪, 杨建荣. 肝脏基础疾病与结直肠癌肝转移之间关系的研究进展[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(07): 818-822.
阅读次数
全文


摘要