切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (07) : 549 -554. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2019.07.010

所属专题: 文献

腹部超声影像学

声脉冲辐射力成像联合瞬时弹性成像对炎性肝纤维化的诊断价值
高明茹1, 董晓秋1,()   
  1. 1. 150001 哈尔滨医科大学附属第四医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2018-10-03 出版日期:2019-07-01
  • 通信作者: 董晓秋

Diagnostic value of acoustic radiation force impulse combined with transient elastography for inflammatory liver fibrosis

Mingru Gao1, Xiaoqiu Dong1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, the Fourth Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150001, China
  • Received:2018-10-03 Published:2019-07-01
  • Corresponding author: Xiaoqiu Dong
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Dong Xiaoqiu, Email:
引用本文:

高明茹, 董晓秋. 声脉冲辐射力成像联合瞬时弹性成像对炎性肝纤维化的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(07): 549-554.

Mingru Gao, Xiaoqiu Dong. Diagnostic value of acoustic radiation force impulse combined with transient elastography for inflammatory liver fibrosis[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2019, 16(07): 549-554.

目的

评估声脉冲辐射力成像(ARFI)技术联合瞬时弹性成像(TE)技术对慢性乙型肝炎(CHB)肝纤维化的诊断价值。

方法

选取2015年10月至2017年6月在哈尔滨医科大学附属第四医院就诊的121例CHB患者,进行肝脏穿刺活检、常规生化检查、ARFI及TE检查。采用方差分析比较肝纤维化各组的年龄、AST、ALT、ARFI值及TE值,进一步比较采用SNK-q检验,并与病理结果做相关性分析。以肝纤维化病理学分期为"金标准",采用工作特征曲线(ROC)对比分析ARFI及TE技术对CHB肝纤维化分期的准确性,并应用Logistic回归进行联合诊断的风险预测,并通过预测值绘制ROC曲线,比较ARFI、TE及两者联合对肝纤维化S≥1期及S≥2期的诊断价值。

结果

ARFI及TE值均与肝纤维化分期具有较好的正相关性(r=0.789、0.845,P均<0.0001)。ARFI及TE技术诊断肝纤维化S≥1期的AUROC分别为0.849及0.903(P=0.424);S≥2期的AUROC分别为0.874及0.923(P=0.191);S≥3期的AUROC分别为0.938及0.954(P=0.526);S=4期的AUROC分别为0.913及0.926 (P=0.842)。ARFI及TE技术联合诊断肝纤维化S≥1期的AUROC为0.925,与两者单独诊断相比,差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05),但联合后的敏感度、特异度及准确性均提高;联合诊断S≥2期的AUROC为0.949,与两者单独诊断相比,仅优于ARFI的单独诊断,差异有统计学意义(P=0.009),但联合后的敏感度及准确性均有所提高。

结论

ARFI技术联合TE技术有助于提高肝纤维化S≥1期及S≥2期的诊断。

Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic value of acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) imaging combined with transient elastography (TE) for liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients.

Methods

One hundred and twenty-one patients with CHB were included from October 2015 to June 2017 at the Fourth Hospital of Harbin Medical University. Liver biopsy, routine biochemical tests, ARFI, and TE were carried out. The age, AST, ALT, ARFI, and TE were calculated and analyzed by one-way ANOVA, followed by pairwise comparisons using the SNK-q test. The results of ARFI and TE were compared with pathological results. Using the pathological stage of liver fibrosis as the golden standard, the accuracy of ARFI and TE in diagnosing different stages of liver fibrosis were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Logistic regression was used to predict the risk of joint diagnosis, and ROC curve was drawn based on the predicted value to compare the diagnostic value of ARFI, TE, and their combination in S≥1 and S≥2 liver fibrosis.

Results

ARFI and TE were positively correlated with the fibrosis degree, and the correlation coefficients were 0.789 and 0.845, respectively (P<0.0001). The areas under the ROC cruves (AUROCs) of ARFI imaging and TE were 0.849 and 0.903 (P=0.424) in diagnosing S≥1 liver fibrosis, 0.874 and 0.923 (P=0.191) for S≥2, 0.938 and 0.954 (P=0.526) for S≥3, and 0.913 and 0.926 (P=0.842) for S4, respectively. The AUROC of ARFI plus TE for diagnosis of S≥1 liver fibrosis was 0.925, with no significant improvement compared with either of them (P>0.05), but the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the combination were improved. The AUROC of the combined diagnosis for S≥2 was 0.949, which was only better than that of ARFI alone (P=0.009), but the sensitivity and accuracy of the combination were improved.

Conclusions

ARFI combined with TE improves the diagnosis of S≥1 and S≥2 liver fibrosis.

图1 S3期肝纤维化患者声脉冲辐射力成像图
图2 S3期肝纤维化患者瞬时弹性成像成像图
表1 慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化不同分期的临床特征(±s
图3 ARFI技术与TE技术诊断慢性乙型肝炎患者肝纤维化程度的受试者工作特征曲线。图a为肝纤维化程度S≥1;图b为肝纤维化程度S≥2;图c为肝纤维化程度S≥3;图d为肝纤维化程度S=4;图e为肝纤维化程度S≥1;图f为肝纤维化程度S≥2
表2 ARFI与TE技术诊断肝纤维化程度的指标
表3 ARFI联合TE诊断S≥1及S≥2期的指标
1
Ekiz F, Yuksel İ, Arikök AT, et al. Will a second biopsy sample affect treatment decisions in patients with chronic hepatitis B? [J]. Hepatol Int, 2016, 10(4): 602-605.
2
中华医学会肝病学分会、中华医学会感染病学分会. 慢性乙型肝炎防治指南(2010年版) [J].中华肝脏病杂志, 2011, 19(1): 13-24.
3
中华医学会传染病与寄生虫病学分会、肝病学分会.病毒性肝炎防治方案[J]. 中华内科学杂志, 2001, 40(1): 62-68.
4
Zoubek ME, Trautwein C, Strnad P. Reversal of liver fibrosis: From fiction to reality [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 2017, 31(2): 129-141.
5
Castera L. Noninvasive methods to assess liver disease in patients with hepatitis B or C [J]. Gastroenterology, 2012, 142(6): 1293-1302. e4.
6
Bohte AE, de Niet A, Jansen L, et al. Non-invasive evaluation of liver fibrosis: a comparison of ultrasound-based transient elastography and MR elastography in patients with viral hepatitis B and C [J]. Eur Radiol, 2014, 24(3): 638-648.
7
Nightingale K, Soo MS, Nightingale R, et al. Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging:in vivo demonstration of clinical feasibility [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2002, 28(2): 227-235.
8
Sandrin L, Fourquet B, Hasquenoph JM, et al. Transient elastography: a new noninvasive method for assessment of hepatic fibrosis [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2003, 29(12): 1705-1713.
9
Rifai K, Cornberg J, Mederacke I, et al. Clinical feasibility of liver elastography by acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) [J]. Dig Liver Dis, 2011, 43(6): 491-497.
10
Ghany MG, Doo E. Assessment of liver fibrosis: palpate, poke or pulse [J]. Hepatology, 2005, 42(4): 759-761.
11
张大鹍, 陈敏, 刘阳, 等. 声脉冲辐射力成像与瞬时弹性成像诊断慢性乙型肝炎肝纤维化的对比研究[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2016, 18(1): 21-24.
12
Gerber L, Kasper D, Fitting D, et al. Assessment of liver fibrosis with 2-D shear wave elastography in comparison to transient elastography and acoustic radiation force impulse imaging in patients with chronic liver disease [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2015, 41(9): 2350-2359.
13
Friedrich-Rust M, Wunder K, Kriener S, et al. Liver fibrosis in viral hepatitis: noninvasive assessment with acoustic radiation force impulse imaging versus transient elastography [J]. Radiology, 2009, 252(2): 595-604.
14
Dayem WAAEL, Emam M, Shaheen NE, et al. Can combinations of non-invasive parameters replace liver biopsy in the diagnosis of hepatic fibrosis in egyptian patients with chronic hepatitis C [J]. British Microbiology Research Journal, 2013, 3(3): 259.
15
Castera L, Winnock M, Pambrun E, et al. Comparison of transient elastography (FibroScan), FibroTest, APRI and two algorithms combining these non-invasive tests for liver fibrosis staging in HIV/HCV coinfected patients: ANRS CO13 HEPAVIH and FIBROSTIC collaboration [J]. HIV medicine, 2014, 15(1): 30-39.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[6] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[7] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[8] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[9] 胡可, 鲁蓉. 基于多参数超声特征的中老年女性压力性尿失禁诊断模型研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 477-483.
[10] 张妍, 原韶玲, 史泽洪, 郭馨阳, 牛菁华. 小肾肿瘤超声漏诊原因分析新思路[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 500-504.
[11] 席芬, 张培培, 孝梦甦, 刘真真, 张一休, 张璟, 朱庆莉, 孟华. 乳腺错构瘤的临床与超声影像学特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 505-510.
[12] 王浩源, 汪海洋, 孙建明, 陈以宽, 祁小桐, 唐博. 腹腔镜与开放修补对肝硬化腹外疝患者肝功能及凝血的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 654-659.
[13] 邓万玉, 陈富, 许磊波. 肝硬化与非肝硬化乙肝相关性肝癌患者术后无复发生存比较及其影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(05): 670-674.
[14] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[15] 陈秀晓, 隋文倩, 王珉鑫, 吴圆圆. 腹股沟斜疝并腹腔游离体超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 516-517.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?