切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2019, Vol. 16 ›› Issue (08) : 602 -608. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2019.08.010

所属专题: 文献

中枢神经系统超声影像学

大脑中动脉慢性闭塞患者脑血流动力学参数与脑梗死体积的相关性研究
韩佳霖1, 惠品晶1,(), 颜燕红1, 胡春洪2, 方琪3   
  1. 1. 215006 苏州大学附属第一医院颈脑血管超声科
    2. 215006 苏州大学附属第一医院影像科
    3. 215006 苏州大学附属第一医院神经内科
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-23 出版日期:2019-08-01
  • 通信作者: 惠品晶
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省干部保健科研项目(BJ17010); 江苏省科技厅社会发展项目-重点病种规范化诊疗项目(BE2016670); 江苏省医学创新团队(领军人才)(CXTDA2017026); 苏州市民生科技示范工程项目(SS201714、SS201859); 科技部十三五重大专项:数字化诊疗示范应用及脑卒中临床解决方案(2017YFC0114302); 江苏数字创新诊疗装备应用示范研究(2017YFC0114300)

Correlation between cerebral hemodynamic parameters and cerebral infarction volume in patients with chronic middle cerebral artery occlusion

Jialin Han1, Pinjing Hui1,(), Yanhong Yan1, Chunhong Hu2, Qi Fang3   

  1. 1. Department of Carotid and Cerebralvascular Ultrasonography, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China
    2. Department of Radiology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China
    3. Department of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China
  • Received:2019-01-23 Published:2019-08-01
  • Corresponding author: Pinjing Hui
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Hui Pinjing, Email:
引用本文:

韩佳霖, 惠品晶, 颜燕红, 胡春洪, 方琪. 大脑中动脉慢性闭塞患者脑血流动力学参数与脑梗死体积的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(08): 602-608.

Jialin Han, Pinjing Hui, Yanhong Yan, Chunhong Hu, Qi Fang. Correlation between cerebral hemodynamic parameters and cerebral infarction volume in patients with chronic middle cerebral artery occlusion[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2019, 16(08): 602-608.

目的

探讨单侧大脑中动脉慢性闭塞(CMCAO)患者大脑中动脉(MCA)区域血流动力学参数与脑梗死体积的相关性。

方法

回顾性连续纳入2015年10月至2018年7月就诊于苏州大学附属第一医院神经内科、神经外科,经颅多普勒超声(TCD)确诊为单侧CMCAO的患者43例,行数字减影血管造影(DSA)评估软脑膜侧支(LMA)分级并将患者分为LMA良好组(26例,3~4级)和LMA不良组(17例,0~2级)。TCD和(或)经颅彩色多普勒超声(TCCS)检测并记录健侧(c)及患侧(i)MCA平均流速(MV),计算健侧与患侧MCA的MV比值(MVcMCA/MViMCA)。根据磁共振弥散加权成像(DWI)检查结果计算脑梗死体积,并将43例患者分为无梗死、小体积、中体积及大体积梗死组。分别比较LMA良好组与不良组之间一般资料、实验室检查、临床症状、MCA流速及脑梗死体积的差异,采用Spearman秩相关分析MCA流速与脑梗死体积的相关性。

结果

2组患者临床症状表现差异有统计学意义(P=0.031),LMA良好组卒中比例显著低于LMA不良组[15(57.7%)vs 16(94.1%)],且无症状患者比例显著高于LMA不良组[5(19.2%)vs 0(0)]。LMA良好组的MViMCA显著高于LMA不良组[(40.15±12.32)vs(20.82±6.73)],MVcMCA/MViMCA低于LMA不良组[1.38(1.12,1.65) vs 2.60(2.12,3.05)],差异均有统计学意义(t=-5.900、Z=-4.434,P均<0.001)。LMA良好组无梗死及小体积梗死患者比例较高,LMA不良组中体积及大体积梗死患者比例较高,LMA良好组与不良组脑梗死体积分布差异有统计学意义(Z=-3.518,P<0.001)。脑梗死体积与MViMCA呈中度负相关(r=-0.574,P<0.001),与MVcMCA/MViMCA呈中度正相关(r=0.615,P<0.001);LMA不良组脑梗死体积与MViMCA呈中度负相关(r=-0.621,P=0.008),与MVcMCA/MViMCA呈高度正相关(r=0.721,P=0.001)。

结论

MCA区域流速与脑梗死体积明显相关,可以通过检测脑血流动力学变化,直接评估LMA逆向血流代偿以及MCA区域血流代偿情况,间接反映患者脑梗死病灶体积大小,从而为个体化诊疗方案的制定以及患者随访提供可靠、实时、动态的评估依据。

Objective

To investigate the correlation between hemodynamic parameters in the middle cerebral artery region and cerebral infarction volume in patients with chronic middle cerebral artery occlusion (CMCAO).

Methods

From October 2015 to July 2018, 43 consecutive patients diagnosed with unilateral CMCAO by transcranial Doppler (TCD) at the neurology and neurosurgery department were enrolled retrospectively. The leptomeningeal anastomosis (LMA) grades were assessed by digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and all patients were divided into a good LMA group (n=26, grades 3~4) or a poor LMA group (n=17, grades 0~2). TCD and/or transcranial color-coded sonography (TCCS) were used to measure and record the mean velocity (MV) of the contralateral and ipsilateral MCA, and the ratios of bilateral MV of MCA were calculated (MVcMCA/MViMCA). According to the results of magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), the patients were divided into four groups, including no infarction, small volume, medium volume, and large volume of cerebral infarction. The differences in general data, laboratory tests, clinical symptoms, and MCA flow velocity between the good and poor LMA group were compared, and Spearman rank correlation analysis was used to analyze the correlation between MCA flow parameters and the cerebral infarction volume.

Results

The difference in the clinical symptoms of the two groups was statistically significant (P=0.031). The proportion of stroke patients in the good LMA group was significantly lower than that in the poor LMA group [15(57.7%) vs 16(94.1%)], and the proportion of asymptomatic patients was significantly higher that in the poor LMA group [5 (19.2%) vs 0 (0%)]. The MViMCA in the good LMA group was significantly higher than that in the poor LMA group [(40.15±12.32) vs (20.82±6.73), t=-5.900, P<0.001], and the MVcMCA/MViMCA ratio was lower than that of the poor LMA group [1.38 (1.12, 1.65) vs 2.60 (2.12, 3.05), Z=-4.434, P<0.001]. The proportion of patients with no cerebral infarction or small volume infarction was significantly higher in the good LMA group, while the proportion of patients with moderate and large volume cerebral infarction was significantly higher in the poor LMA group. There was a statistically significant difference in the distribution of cerebral infarction between the two groups (Z=-3.518, P<0.001). Cerebral infarction volume had a moderate negative correlation with MViMCA (r=-0.574, P<0.001), and a moderate positive correlation with MVcMCA/MViMCA (r=0.615, P<0.001). The cerebral infarction volume in the poor LMA group was moderately negatively correlated with MViMCA (r=-0.621, P=0.008), and highly positively correlated with MVcMCA/MViMCA (r=0.721, P=0.001).

Conclusion

The flow velocity in the MCA significantly correlates with the volume of cerebral infarction. Using TCD or TCCS to detect cerebral hemodynamic changes can directly evaluate reverse blood flow compensation like LMA and blood flow compensation in the MCA, and indirectly reflect the size of the brain infarction in patients, thus providing a reliable, real-time, dynamic assessment basis for the formulation of individualized treatment protocols and follow-up.

表1 单侧CMCAO患者LMA良好组与不良组一般资料、实验室检查及临床症状比较
表2 单侧CMCAO患者LMA良好组与不良组血流动力学参数比较
表3 单侧CMCAO患者LMA良好组与不良组脑梗死体积比较[例(%)]
图1 大脑中动脉慢性闭塞患者脑梗死体积与患侧大脑中动脉平均流速的相关性分析散点图
图2 大脑中动脉慢性闭塞患者脑梗死体积与健侧、患侧大脑中动脉平均流速比值的相关性分析散点图
图3 大脑中动脉慢性闭塞软脑膜侧支循环不良患者脑梗死体积与患侧大脑中动脉平均流速的相关性分析散点图
图4 大脑中动脉慢性闭塞软脑膜侧支循环不良患者脑梗死体积与健侧、患侧大脑中动脉平均流速比值的相关性分析散点图
图5 单侧大脑中动脉慢性闭塞患者超声、颈内动脉造影及MRI图像。图a~d为软脑膜侧支循环良好患者,其中图a为经颅彩色多普勒超声显示右侧大脑中动脉闭塞(白色箭头所示);图b为经颅多普勒超声示右侧(患侧)大脑中动脉区域的平均流速=64.2 cm/s,为"低搏动性"血流频谱;图c为右侧颈内动脉造影显示右侧大脑中动脉闭塞,周围可见侧支血管(红色箭头所示),软脑膜侧支分级为4级(黑色箭头所示);图d为MRI弥散加权成像(DWI)未见梗死灶。图e~h为软脑膜侧支循环不良患者,其中图e为经颅彩色多普勒超声显示右侧大脑中动脉闭塞(白色箭头所示);图f为经颅多普勒超声示右侧(患侧)大脑中动脉区域的平均流速=25.9 cm/s,为低流速"低搏动性"血流频谱;图g为右侧颈内动脉造影显示右侧大脑中动脉闭塞,周围未见明显侧支血管(红色箭头示),软脑膜侧支分级为1级(黑色箭头所示);图h为MRI弥散加权成像(DWI)可见大体积梗死(19.3 cm3
1
Wang Y, Zhao X, Liu L, et al. Prevalence and Outcomes of Symptomatic Intracranial Large Artery Stenoses and Occlusions in China: The Chinese Intracranial Atherosclerosis (CICAS) Study [J]. Stroke, 2014, 45(3): 663-669.
2
Shin HS, Ryu CW, Ko HC, et al. Clinical Manifestations of Isolated Chronic Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion in Relation to Angiographic Features [J]. World Neurosurg, 2017,108: 303-309.
3
Cuccione E, Versace A, Cho TH, et al. Multi-site laser Doppler flowmetry for assessing collateral flow in experimental ischemic stroke: Validation of outcome prediction with acute MRI [J]. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab, 2017, 37(6): 2159-2170.
4
华扬, 惠品晶, 邢瑛琦. 中国脑卒中血管超声检查指导规范 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2015(8): 599-610.
5
中国卒中学会脑血流与代谢分会. 缺血性卒中脑侧支循环评估与干预中国指南(2017) [J]. 中华内科杂志, 2017, 56(6): 460-471.
6
Lee DK, Kim JS, Kwon SU, et al. Lesion patterns and stroke mechanism in atherosclerotic middle cerebral artery disease: early diffusion-weighted imaging study [J]. Stroke, 2005, 36(12): 2583-2588.
7
许开喜, 丰广魁, 左涛生, 等. 大脑后动脉偏侧优势对大脑中动脉闭塞与急性缺血性卒中体积的关系研究 [J]. 中风与神经疾病杂志, 2018, 35(2): 100-102.
8
Tanaka M, Shimosegawa E, Kajimoto K, et al. Chronic Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion: A Hemodynamic and Metabolic Study with Positron-Emission Tomography [J]. Am J Neuroradiol, 2008, 29(10): 1841-1846.
9
Fanou EM, Knight J, Aviv RI, et al. Effect of Collaterals on Clinical Presentation, Baseline Imaging, Complications, and Outcome in Acute Stroke [J]. AJNR. Am J Neuroradiol, 2015, 36(12): 2285-2291.
10
Wang Z, Luo W, Zhou F, et al. Dynamic change of collateral flow varying with distribution of regional blood flow in acute ischemic rat cortex [J]. J Biomed Opt, 2012, 17(12): 125001.
11
Liebeskind DS, Cotsonis GA, Saver JL, et al. Collaterals dramatically alter stroke risk in intracranial atherosclerosis [J]. Ann Neurol, 2011, 69(6): 963-974.
12
黄光坚, 钟维章, 陈渊, 等. 大脑中动脉闭塞患者侧枝循环开放与脑梗死的关系及其影响因素 [J]. 中风与神经疾病杂志, 2014, 31(5): 436-440.
13
罗语嫣, 郭鹏, 许斌, 等. 大脑中动脉M1段闭塞患者软脑膜侧支循环与脑梗死体积及其分布的关系 [J]. 中国脑血管病杂志, 2012, 9(2): 77-81.
14
Brozici M, van der Zwan A, Hillen B. Anatomy and Functionality of Leptomeningeal Anastomoses: A Review [J]. Stroke, 2003, 34(11): 2750-2762.
15
Kim Y, Sin DS, Park HY, et al. Relationship between flow diversion on transcranial Doppler sonography and leptomeningeal collateral circulation in patients with middle cerebral artery occlusive disorder [J]. J Neuroimaging, 2009, 19(1): 23-26.
16
Wu F, Cao W, Ling Y, et al. Flow diversion within seven days after stroke onset is associated with favorable outcome in anterior circulation stroke [J]. J Clin Neurosci, 2017, 45: 205-208.
17
Iwasawa E, Ichijo M, Ishibashi S, et al. Acute development of collateral circulation and therapeutic prospects in ischemic stroke [J]. Neural Regen Res, 2016, 11(3): 368-371.
18
张雄伟, 张以善, 张智杰, 等. 大脑中动脉主干闭塞患者的经颅多普勒超声检测 [J]. 中国临床医学, 2006, 13(5): 719-721.
19
Kao YJ, Oyarzabal EA, Zhang H, et al. Role of Genetic Variation in Collateral Circulation in the Evolution of Acute Stroke: A Multimodal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study [J]. Stroke, 2017, 48(3): 754-761.
20
Croal PL, Leung J, Kosinski P, et al. Assessment of cerebral blood flow with magnetic resonance imaging in children with sickle cell disease: A quantitative comparison with transcranial Doppler ultrasonography [J]. Brain and Behav, 2017, 7(11): e00811.
21
颜燕红, 惠品晶, 惠国桢, 等. 经颅多普勒联合CT灌注成像对单侧颈内动脉重度狭窄或闭塞患者脑血流动力学评价 [J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2013, 29(6): 603-607.
22
韩佳霖, 惠品晶, 郑园园, 等. 超声评估大脑中动脉慢性闭塞患者侧支循环的临床意义[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(9): 654-660.
[1] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[2] 刘晨鹭, 刘洁, 张帆, 严彩英, 陈倩, 陈双庆. 增强MRI 影像组学特征生境分析在预测乳腺癌HER-2 表达状态中的应用[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 339-345.
[3] 庄若语, 杭明辉, 李文华, 张霆, 侯炜. 膝骨关节炎半定量磁共振评分研究进展[J/OL]. 中华关节外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 545-552.
[4] 谢丽春, 欧庆芬, 张秋萍, 叶升. 简化和标准肝脏MRI方案在结直肠癌肝转移患者随访中的临床应用[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 434-437.
[5] 丁荷蓓, 王珣, 陈为国. 七氟烷吸入麻醉与异丙酚静脉麻醉在儿童腹股沟斜疝手术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 570-574.
[6] 刘明辉, 葛方明. MRI 对腹股沟疝修补术后患者早期并发症的评估价值研究[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 579-583.
[7] 李先锋, 何懿, 程贞永, 邓国魁, 胡波, 谢红, 王莉, 王小燕, 李晓明. 右美托咪定对腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术患者血流动力学及麻醉复苏效果的影响[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(04): 437-441.
[8] 孙顗淼, 张颖. 糖尿病患者急性脑梗死取栓术后发生对比剂肾病的影响因素及预测模型建立[J/OL]. 中华肾病研究电子杂志, 2024, 13(04): 188-194.
[9] 王守森, 傅世龙, 鲜亮, 林珑. 深入理解控制性减压技术对创伤性颅脑损伤术中脑膨出的预防机制与效果[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 257-262.
[10] 谢井伟, 王森, 王非, 郭永坤. STA-MCA血管搭桥术治疗烟雾病[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(05): 318-320.
[11] 李刚, 潘晓帆, 田雪, 刘路路. CT灌注成像参数及血栓弹力图对急性前循环脑梗死早期神经功能恶化的预测价值分析[J/OL]. 中华神经创伤外科电子杂志, 2024, 10(04): 226-232.
[12] 谢浩文, 丁建英, 刘小霞, 冯毅, 姚婧. 椎旁神经阻滞对微创胃切除肥胖患者术中血流、术后应激及康复质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 569-573.
[13] 张立俊, 孙存杰, 胡春峰, 孟冲, 张辉. MSCT、DCE-MRI 评估术前胃癌TNM 分期的准确性研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 519-523.
[14] 克地尔牙·马合木提, 胡波, 杨琼, 闫素, 胡岚卿, 高沛沛, 姚恩生. 依达拉奉右莰醇对急性脑梗死后认知功能障碍的疗效观察[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 459-466.
[15] 金安松, 邹玉松, 刘玖涛, 薛凤麟, 庞爱兰. 孤立性颅内浆细胞瘤一例及相关文献复习[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 495-500.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?