切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2020, Vol. 17 ›› Issue (10) : 965 -969. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2020.10.006

所属专题: 文献

腹部超声影像学

口服造影剂胃超声检查对胃息肉的诊断价值
董嘉文1, 毛建强1,(), 金卫利1, 邢旭峰1   
  1. 1. 313009 湖州市南浔区人民医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2020-06-09 出版日期:2020-10-01
  • 通信作者: 毛建强

Value of oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of gastric polyps

Jiawen Dong1, Jianqiang Mao1,(), Weili Jin1, Xufeng Xing1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Nanxun District People's Hospital of Huzhou City, Huzhou 313009, China
  • Received:2020-06-09 Published:2020-10-01
  • Corresponding author: Jianqiang Mao
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Mao Jianqiang, Email:
引用本文:

董嘉文, 毛建强, 金卫利, 邢旭峰. 口服造影剂胃超声检查对胃息肉的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(10): 965-969.

Jiawen Dong, Jianqiang Mao, Weili Jin, Xufeng Xing. Value of oral contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of gastric polyps[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2020, 17(10): 965-969.

目的

探讨口服造影剂胃超声检查在胃息肉诊断中的应用价值。

方法

回顾性选取2016年1月至2019年12月于湖州市南浔区人民医院就诊、经口服造影剂胃超声检查诊断的胃息肉患者67例。所有患者均经胃镜和病理诊断确诊为胃息肉。对患者的超声表现、分型及诊断符合率等进行分析。

结果

本组67例患者超声检查共发现胃息肉69个,息肉最大径5~34 mm,平均(15.6±4.8)mm。经病理诊断腺瘤性息肉34个、增生性息肉23个、炎性息肉9个、脂肪瘤1个、腺瘤恶变2个,超声诊断与胃镜和病理诊断符合率为95.65%(66/69)。胃息肉超声表现为起自黏膜层凸向胃腔的丘状、球状、乳头状、杆状及不规则形结构,边界多清晰;形态上无蒂28个(Ⅰ型12个、Ⅱ型16个),有蒂41个(Ⅲ型18个、Ⅳ型23个);肿块内回声表现为低回声58个、高回声10个、混合回声1个;彩色多普勒显示14个有内部血流信号。本组胃息肉分为肿瘤性(包括腺瘤性、脂肪瘤和恶变者)37个和非肿瘤性(包括增生性和炎性)32个,2组在息肉大小、回声分布均匀性、内部有无血流信号、基底有无蒂方面,差异均有统计学意义(P=0.009、0.036、0.036、0.000)。

结论

胃息肉具有特征性的超声声像图表现,超声诊断符合率较高,体积较大、内部有血流信号、回声欠均匀的有蒂息肉需警惕存在恶变可能。口服造影剂胃超声检查方法便捷、患者依从性好,具有一定的临床应用价值。

Objective

To assess the value of oral contrast-enhanced gastric ultrasonography in the diagnosis of gastric polyps.

Methods

A retrospective study was performed on 67 patients with gastric polyps diagnosed by oral contrast-enhanced ultrasound at the People's Hospital of Nanxun District, Huzhou City from January 2016 to December 2019. All patients were diagnosed with gastric polyps by gastroscopy and pathology. Ultrasound manifestations, classification, and diagnostic coincidence rate were analyzed.

Results

A total of 69 gastric polyps were found on ultrasound examination of 67 patients in this group. The maximum diameter of polyps was 5 to 34 mm, with an average value of (15.6±4.8) mm. According to pathological diagnosis, there were 34 adenomatous polyps, 23 hyperplastic polyps, 9 inflammatory polyps, 1 lipoma, and 2 adenomas. The coincidence rate of ultrasound diagnosis with gastroscopic and pathological diagnosis was 95.65% (66/69). Ultrasound manifestations of gastric polyps included round-shaped, spherical, papillary, rod-shaped, or irregular structures protruding from the mucosal layer to the gastric cavity, with clear boundaries. Twenty-eight polyps had pedicles (12 type Ⅰ and 16 type Ⅱ) and 41 had no pedicles (18 type Ⅲ and 23 type Ⅳ). There were 58 hypoechoic masses and 10 hyperechoic masses, and 1 had mixed echo. Color Doppler showed that 14 polyps had internal blood flow signal. We then divided these gastric polyps into two groups: 37 tumors (including adenomatous polyps, lipomas, and malignant transformations) and 32 non-neoplastic (including proliferative and inflammatory) polyps. The two groups differed significantly with regard to polyp size, uniformity of echo distribution, presence of blood flow, and presence of pedicles (P=0.009, 0.036, 0.036, 0.000).

Conclusion

Gastric polyps have characteristic sonographic manifestations. The ultrasound diagnosis has a high coincidence rate with gastroscopic and pathological diagnosis. Clinicians should be vigilant for the possibility of malignant transformation of pedicled polyps with a large volume, internal blood flow signals, and uneven echo. Oral contrast-enhanced ultrasound is convenient and has good patient compliance.

图1 不同形态的胃息肉超声声像图。图a为丘状息肉(箭头所示);图b为半球形息肉(箭头所示);图c为亚蒂息肉(箭头所示);图d为带蒂息肉(箭头所示)
图2 胃息肉二维灰阶超声及彩色多普勒血流显像图。图a为二维超声灰阶图像示胃息肉(箭头所示);图b为彩色多普勒血流显像可见条形滋养血管伸入(箭头所示)
图3 胃息肉恶变超声声像图。图a为二维灰阶超声示幽门管高回声团块随胃蠕动脱至十二指肠球部腔内(箭头所示);图b为彩色多普勒示团块内可见丰富血流信号(箭头所示)
表1 肿瘤性胃息肉与非肿瘤性胃息肉超声特征比较(例)
1
董超,郭君,刘众, 等. 胃腔充盈下超声联合谐波超声造影对胃良性病变诊断与胃镜对照研究 [J/CD]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2012, 6(21): 6873-6875.
2
张蕊红,梁永康,杜日昌. 胃肠超声造影检查在胃十二指肠疾病筛查中的应用价值 [J].实用医学影像杂志, 2015, 16(3): 212-214.
3
胡兵,周进祝. 胃肠道肿瘤超声诊断 [J]. 世界华人消化杂志, 2003, 11(9): 1408-1410.
4
黄品同,李艳萍,赵雅萍, 等. 超声双重造影对胃癌术前T分期的价值 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2008, 17(1): 33-36.
5
袁帆,陆文明,傅绢, 等. 胃超声助显剂胃充盈检查在进展期胃癌诊断的临床应用探讨[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2013, 29(8): 693-697.
6
Yamada T, Ichikawa H. X-ray diagnosis of elevated lesions of the stomach [J]. Radiology, 1974, 110(1): 79-83.
7
Goddard AF, Badreldin R, Pritchard DM, et al. The management of gastric [J]. Gut, 2010, 59(9): 1270-1276.
8
曹海根,王金锐. 实用腹部超声诊断学 [M]. 2版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2005: 216-217.
9
张瑞梅,张健康. 1063例胃息肉的临床及病理特点分析 [J/CD]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2017, 11(5): 860-862.
10
林泳,聂玉强,王红, 等. 近15年2643例胃息肉临床病理学特征和变化趋势分析 [J].中华消化杂志, 2014, 34(4): 247-250.
11
胡文聪,周顺军,王建国, 等. 近15年1566例胃息肉临床流行病学分析 [J]. 肿瘤预防与治疗, 2019, 32(6): 524-527.
12
朱海珍,陈志芬. 2178例胃息肉的临床病理特征 [J]. 武汉大学学报, 2016, 37(1): 145-148.
13
袁韬,顾世明,任凯荣, 等. 超声诊断胃息肉的临床价值 [J]. 现代实用医学, 2017, 29(7): 963-964.
14
李婷婷,卢漫,陆文明, 等. 胃隆起样病变的胃充盈下CEUS特征分析研究 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2015, 31(12): 1096-1098.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 燕速, 霍博文. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治性切除术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 13-13.
[4] 李国新, 陈新华. 全腹腔镜下全胃切除术食管空肠吻合的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 1-4.
[5] 李子禹, 卢信星, 李双喜, 陕飞. 食管胃结合部腺癌腹腔镜手术重建方式的选择[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 5-8.
[6] 李乐平, 张荣华, 商亮. 腹腔镜食管胃结合部腺癌根治淋巴结清扫策略[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 9-12.
[7] 陈方鹏, 杨大伟, 金从稳. 腹腔镜近端胃癌切除术联合改良食管胃吻合术重建His角对术后反流性食管炎的效果研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 15-18.
[8] 许杰, 李亚俊, 韩军伟. 两种入路下腹腔镜根治性全胃切除术治疗超重胃癌的效果比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 19-22.
[9] 李刘庆, 陈小翔, 吕成余. 全腹腔镜与腹腔镜辅助远端胃癌根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 23-26.
[10] 刘世君, 马杰, 师鲁静. 胃癌完整系膜切除术+标准D2根治术治疗进展期胃癌的近中期随访研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 27-30.
[11] 任佳, 马胜辉, 王馨, 石秀霞, 蔡淑云. 腹腔镜全胃切除、间置空肠代胃术的临床观察[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 31-34.
[12] 杨建波, 马欢, 黄小梅, 刘华柱. 结肠镜辅助下EMR、CSP和RFA术治疗直径<1cm结直肠息肉的疗效和安全性比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 76-79.
[13] 韩戟, 杨力, 陈玉. 腹部形态CT参数与完全腹腔镜全胃切除术术中失血量的关系研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 88-91.
[14] 王露, 周丽君. 全腹腔镜下远端胃大部切除不同吻合方式对胃癌患者胃功能恢复、并发症发生率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 92-95.
[15] 陈浩, 王萌. 胃印戒细胞癌的临床病理特征及治疗选择的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 108-111.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?