切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (02) : 171 -176. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2021.02.009

所属专题: 乳腺超声 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

超声造影联合声触诊组织成像定量技术对乳腺癌前哨淋巴结转移的评估
左梦1, 张海宇1, 巴黎1, 欧阳伽保1, 张玉莹1, 吴长君1,()   
  1. 1. 150001 哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2020-04-05 出版日期:2021-02-01
  • 通信作者: 吴长君

Evaluation of sentinel lymph node metastasis inbreast cancer by contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with acoustic palpation tissue imaging

Meng Zuo1, Haiyu Zhang1, Li Ba1, Jiabao Ouyang1, Yuying Zhang1, Changjun Wu1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin 150001, China
  • Received:2020-04-05 Published:2021-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Changjun Wu
引用本文:

左梦, 张海宇, 巴黎, 欧阳伽保, 张玉莹, 吴长君. 超声造影联合声触诊组织成像定量技术对乳腺癌前哨淋巴结转移的评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(02): 171-176.

Meng Zuo, Haiyu Zhang, Li Ba, Jiabao Ouyang, Yuying Zhang, Changjun Wu. Evaluation of sentinel lymph node metastasis inbreast cancer by contrast-enhanced ultrasound combined with acoustic palpation tissue imaging[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2021, 18(02): 171-176.

目的

探讨超声造影(CEUS)联合声触诊组织成像定量(VTIQ)技术在术前评估乳腺癌前哨淋巴结(SLN)转移中的临床价值。

方法

收集2019年6月至2020年1月因乳腺癌收住哈尔滨医科大学附属第一医院的患者,共72例患者的72个SLN纳入研究。所有患者均行手术治疗并取得病理结果,术前均行常规超声、CEUS及剪切波弹性成像检查。根据术后病理结果将SLN分为转移组21个和非转移组51个。比较2组SLN的超声造影模式及VTIQ剪切波速度(SWV)值。绘制ROC曲线比较超声造影、SWV及联合诊断预测乳腺癌SLN转移的效能。

结果

转移性SLN与非转移性SLN的CEUS增强模式比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=25.53,P=0.000),2组VTIQ的SWV最大、最小、平均值比较,差异均有统计学意义(t=7.79、7.12、8.75,P均=0.000)。CEUS判断SLN转移的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.829,最佳截断值为1.5,即I型增强模式为非转移性,II、III、IV型增强模式为转移性。以最佳截断值为SLN转移的判定标准,敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为85.71%、70.59%、54.54%、92.31%。绘制SWV最大值、最小值及平均值诊断SLN转移的ROC曲线,AUC分别为0.910、0.873、0.937,最佳截断值分别为3.06、2.23、2.64 m/s。以SWV平均值2.64 m/s为判定标准,敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为76.19%、94.23%、88.89%和90.74%。联合CEUS与VTIQ诊断SLN转移的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值分别为95.24%、96.08%、90.91%、96.08%。绘制CEUS与VTIQ联合方法诊断SLN转移的ROC曲线,AUC为0.957。

结论

CEUS联合VTIQ技术可以提高乳腺癌淋巴结转移的诊断效能,为乳腺癌术前腋窝淋巴结评估提供可靠依据。

Objective

To explore the clinical value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) combined with virtual?touch?tissue?imaging?and?quantification (VTIQ) in the preoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastasis inbreast cancer.

Methods

Seventy-two patients with 72 SLNs admitted to the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University from June 2019 to January 2020 were included in the study. All patients underwent surgical treatment to obtain pathological results. All patients underwent routine ultrasound, CEUS, and shear wave elastography before operation. According to the postoperative pathological results, SLNs were divided into either a metastatic group (n=21) or a non-metastatic group (n=51). Contrast-enhanced ultrasound mode and VTIQ shear wave velocity (SWV) of SLNs were compared between the two groups. ROC curve analysis was performed to compare the performance of CEUS, SWV, and combined diagnosis in predicting SLN metastasis in breast cancer.

Results

The CEUS enhancement mode differed significantly between metastatic and non-metastatic SLNs (χ2=25.53, P=0.000), and the differences in the maximum, minimum, and average SWV of VTIQ between the two groups were statistically significant (t=7.79, 7.12, 8.75, P=0.000). The area under ROC curve (AUC) of CEUS for the diagnosis of SLN metastasis was 0.829, and the best cut-off value was 1.5, that is, type I enhancement mode suggested non-metastatic SLN and types II, III, and IV enhancement modes suggested metastatic SLN. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CEUS were 85.71%, 70.59%, 54.54%, and 92.31%, respectively. ROC curves of maximum, minimum and average SWV for diagnosing SLN metastasis were drawn. The AUCs of maximum, minimum and average SWV for diagnosing SLN metastasis were 0.910, 0.873, and 0.937, respectively, and the best cutoff values were 3.06, 2.23, and 2.64 m/s, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of SWV were 76.19%, 94.23%, 88.89% and 90.74%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of CEUS combined with VTIQ in diagnosing SLN metastasis were 95.24%, 96.08%, 90.91%, and 96.08%, respectively; the AUC was 0.957.

Conclusion

CEUS combined with VTIQ technique can improve the diagnostic efficiency for lymph node metastasis of breast cancer and provide a reliable basis for axillary lymph node assessment before breast cancer operation.

图1 前哨淋巴结的4种超声造影增强模式(白色箭头为超声造影显示淋巴结,黑色箭头为二维超声显示淋巴结)。图a为I型总体均匀强化;图b为II型不均匀强化;图c为III型环形强化;图d为IV型不强化或弱强化
表1 转移性SLN与非转移性SLN的超声造影和VTIQ结果比较
图2 超声造影及声触诊组织定量技术评估乳腺癌前哨淋巴结转移的ROC曲线
图3 非转移性前哨淋巴结超声造影Ⅱ型增强及剪切波弹性成像图像。图a为超声造影显示淋巴结为不均匀增强,即Ⅱ型增强(白色箭头为二维超声显示淋巴结);图b为剪切波弹性成像显示剪切波速度最大值2.14 m/s,平均值2.11 m/s
图4 非转移性前哨淋巴结超声造影Ⅲ型增强及剪切波弹性成像图像。图a为超声造影显示淋巴结为环形增强,即Ⅲ型增强(白色箭头为二维超声显示淋巴结);图b为剪切波弹性成像显示剪切波速度最大值2.1 m/s,平均值2.07 m/s
图5 超声造影联合剪切波速度平均值诊断乳腺癌前哨淋巴结转移的ROC 曲线
1
Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, et al. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(6): 394-424.
2
中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会. 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范2019年版[J].中国癌症杂志, 2019, 29(8): 609-680.
3
Hankó-Bauer O, Podoleanu C, Georgescu R, et al. The accuracy of the preoperative axillary ultrasound examination in predicting the status of the sentinel lymph node involvement in patients with infiltrating breast carcinoma[J]. Chirurgia (Bucur), 2019, 114(3): 384-391.
4
高军喜, 王雅婷, 杨磊, 等. 乳腺癌超声造影特征及边缘带定量参数与生物学预后因子相关性研究[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2019, 35(4):306-309.
5
李静怡, 韩峰, 郑玮, 等. 经静脉与经皮超声造影鉴别诊断兔腋窝淋巴结良恶性[J].中国医学影像技术, 2011, 27(6): 1111-1115.
6
梁舒媛, 罗渝昆, 费翔, 等. 高帧频超声造影在鉴别浅表淋巴结性质中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(9): 841-847.
7
Dellaportas D, Koureas A, Contis J, et al. Contrast-enhanced color Doppler ultrasonography for preoperative evaluation of sentinel lymph node in breast cancer patients[J]. Breast care (Basel), 2015, 10(5): 331-335.
8
Zhao YY, Xi JY, Zhao BZ, et al. Preliminary evaluation of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification for differential diagnosis of metastatic and nonmetastatic cervical lymph nodes[J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2017, 36(3): 557-563.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 汪洪斌, 张红霞, 何文, 杜丽娟, 程令刚, 张雨康, 张萌. 低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤与阑尾黏液腺癌超声及超声造影特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 865-871.
[3] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[4] 王博冉, 乔春梅, 李春歌, 王欣, 王晓磊. 超声造影评估类风湿关节炎亚临床滑膜炎疾病进展的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 802-808.
[5] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[6] 马晓菊, 梁潇, 段云友, 袁丽君, 赵萍. NBAV脂质纳泡对ApoE -/-小鼠动脉粥样硬化病变的评估和干预[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 608-616.
[7] 刘伟, 牛云峰, 安杰. LINC01232 通过miR-516a-5p/BCL9 轴促进三阴性乳腺癌的恶性进展[J/OL]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 330-338.
[8] 郑大雯, 王健东. 胆囊癌辅助诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2024, 13(06): 769-773.
[9] 刘琦, 王守凯, 王帅, 苏雨晴, 马壮, 陈海军, 司丕蕾. 乳腺癌肿瘤内微生物组的研究进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(09): 841-845.
[10] 崔军威, 蔡华丽, 胡艺冰, 胡慧. 亚甲蓝联合金属定位夹及定位钩针标记在乳腺癌辅助化疗后评估腋窝转移淋巴结的临床应用价值探究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 625-632.
[11] 王誉英, 刘世伟, 王睿, 曾娅玲, 涂禧慧, 张蒲蓉. 老年乳腺癌新辅助治疗病理完全缓解的预测因素分析[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 641-646.
[12] 王帅, 张志远, 苏雨晴, 李雯雯, 王守凯, 刘琦, 李文涛. 孟德尔随机化及其在乳腺癌研究中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 671-676.
[13] 温绍敏, 王雅晳, 施依璐, 段莎莎, 云书荣, 张小杉. 靶向超声造影技术在动脉粥样硬化治疗中的应用进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 496-499.
[14] 张梦婷, 穷拉姆, 色珍, 李逸群, 德庆旺姆. 西藏地区藏族乳腺癌新辅助化疗的真实世界研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 441-446.
[15] 史宛瑞, 崔立刚. 颈动脉一过性血管周围炎综合征的影像学诊断研究进展[J/OL]. 中华脑血管病杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 516-519.
阅读次数
全文


摘要