切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2021, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (09) : 828 -833. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2021.09.003

浅表器官超声影像学

超声引导下细针穿刺洗脱液测定BRAFV600E突变丰度预测甲状腺乳头状癌颈部淋巴结转移
栾梦琪1, 夏蜀珺1, 林琳1, 张桂萍1, 詹维伟1,()   
  1. 1. 上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-14 出版日期:2021-09-01
  • 通信作者: 詹维伟
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然基金面上项目(82071923)

BRAFV600E mutation abundance determined based on ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration samples for predicting lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid cancer

Mengqi Luan1, Shujun Xia1, Lin Lin1, Guiping Zhang1, Weiwei Zhan1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
  • Received:2021-04-14 Published:2021-09-01
  • Corresponding author: Weiwei Zhan
引用本文:

栾梦琪, 夏蜀珺, 林琳, 张桂萍, 詹维伟. 超声引导下细针穿刺洗脱液测定BRAFV600E突变丰度预测甲状腺乳头状癌颈部淋巴结转移[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(09): 828-833.

Mengqi Luan, Shujun Xia, Lin Lin, Guiping Zhang, Weiwei Zhan. BRAFV600E mutation abundance determined based on ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration samples for predicting lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid cancer[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2021, 18(09): 828-833.

目的

探索超声引导下细针穿刺洗脱液测定BRAFV600E突变丰度在预测甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)颈部淋巴结转移中的临床价值。

方法

收集在上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院2020年1月至12月间行甲状腺手术且病理证实为PTC的1046例患者,术前均行超声引导下细针穿刺活检测定BRAFV600E突变丰度。根据淋巴结转移情况将患者分为淋巴结转移组(419例)和无淋巴结转移组(627例)。采用χ2检验或t检验分析2组患者间的临床特征(性别、年龄、肿瘤最大径、结节数目、结节位置)以及突变丰度之间是否存在差异,并采用二元Logistic回归进行多因素分析,同时构建受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线评估BRAFV600E基因突变丰度预测PTC患者淋巴结转移的诊断效能。

结果

淋巴结转移组中男性、<45岁、肿瘤最大径≥1 cm、多发结节数目以及多侧结节比例高于无淋巴结转移组(32.0% vs 19.9%;72.1% vs 54.5%;38.9% vs 19.0%;25.8% vs 18.0%;16.2% vs 10.4%),差异均具有统计学意义(χ2=19.56、32.62、50.63、9.06、7.78;P<0.001、<0.001、<0.001、=0.003、=0.005);PTC伴有淋巴结转移的BRAFV600E突变丰度高于无淋巴结转移者[(32.44±20.23)% vs(27.21±20.82)%],差异具有统计学意义(t=-4.29,P<0.001)。多因素回归分析结果提示男性、年龄、最大径≥1 cm、多发结节、BRAFV600E突变丰度高为PTC颈部淋巴结转移的独立危险因素(OR=1.935、0.425、2.578、1.651、2.057;P均<0.05)。ROC曲线显示BRAFV600E突变丰度预测颈部淋巴结转移的敏感度、特异度、阳性预测值、阴性预测值和曲线下面积分别为48.69%、65.71%、48.69%、65.71%、0.574。

结论

BRAFV600E突变丰度高的PTC患者更容易发生淋巴结转移,BRAFV600E突变丰度高是PTC颈部淋巴结转移的危险因素。

Objective

To assess the clinical value of the abundance of BRAFV600E mutation detected in ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration samples in predicting cervical lymph node metastasis (LNM) of papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).

Methods

A total of 1046 patients with pathologically confirmed PTC between January 2020 and December 2020 at Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine were collected. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration samples were collected to determine the abundance of BRAFV600E mutation before surgery. Patients were classified into lymph node metastasis group (n=419) and no lymph node metastasis group (n=627) based on lymph node metastasis. The correlation between clinical characteristics (sex, age, tumor diameter, number of nodes, nodal location, and mutation abundance) and cervical LNM in PTC patients was analyzed using χ2 test or t-test. Multifactorial analysis was performed by binary logistic regression analysis, and the diagnostic efficacy of BRAFV600E mutation abundance in predicting cervical LNM in PTC patients was assessed by constructing receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

The proportions of males, patients<45 years old, patients with tumor maximum diameter ≥1 cm, patients with multiple nodes, and those with multiple bilateral nodes in patients with cervical LNM was significantly higher than those in patients without (32.0% vs 19.9%, 72.1% vs 54.5%, 38.9% vs 19.0%, 25.8% vs 18.0%, and 16.2% vs 10.4%; χ2=19.56, 32.62, 50.63, 9.06, and 7.78; P<0.001,<0.001,<0.001, =0.003, and =0.005, respectively); the abundance of BRAFV600E mutation was significantly higher in PTC patients with cervical LNM than in those without [(32.44±20.23)% vs (27.21±20.82) %, t=-4.29, P<0.001]. Multifactorial regression analysis suggested that male gender, age, maximum diameter ≥1 cm, multiple nodes, and high abundance of BRAFV600E mutation were independent risk factors for cervical LNM in PTC (OR=1.935, 0.425, 2.578, 1.651, and 2.057, respectively; P<0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and area under the curve of BRAFV600E mutation abundance in predicting cervical LNM were 48.69%, 65.71%, 48.69%, 65.71%, and 0.574, respectively.

Conclusion

The detection of BRAFV600E mutation abundance can provide a reference for clinical decision making in cervical LNM resection in patients with PTC.

表1 甲状腺乳头状癌淋巴结转移组与无淋巴结转移组的临床特征比较
表2 BRAFV600E突变丰度对甲状腺乳头状癌患者临床特征的影响(%,
xˉ
±s
表3 甲状腺乳头状癌颈部淋巴结转移多因素回归分析
图1 BRAFV600E突变丰度诊断甲状腺乳头状癌患者颈部淋巴结转移的受试者操作特征曲线
1
Fagin JA, Wells SA. Biologic and clinical perspectives on thyroid cancer [J]. N Engl J Med, 2016, 375(11): 1054-1067.
2
Bikas A, Burman KD. Epidemiology of Thyroid Cancer [G]//Luster M, Duntas LH, Wartofsky L. Thyroid Its Dis. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019: 541-547.
3
Xing M. BRAF mutation in papillary thyroid cancer: pathogenic role, molecular bases, and clinical implications [J]. Endoc. Rev, 2007, 28(7): 742-762.
4
Niault TS, Baccarini M. Targets of Raf in tumorigenesis [J]. Carcinogenesis, 2010, 31(7): 1165-1174.
5
Rashid FA, Munkhdelger J, Fukuoka J, et al. Prevalence of BRAFV600E mutation in Asian series of papillary thyroid carcinoma—a contemporary systematic review [J]. Gland Surg, 2020, 9(5): 1878-1900.
6
Kim TH, Park YJ, Lim JA, et al. The association of the BRAFV600E mutation with prognostic factors and poor clinical outcome in papillary thyroid cancer: a meta-analysis [J]. Cancer, 2012, 118(7): 1764-1773.
7
Tufano RP, Teixeira GV, Bishop J, et al. BRAF mutation in papillary thyroid cancer and its value in tailoring initial treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2012, 91(5): 274-286.
8
Haugen BR, Alexander EK, Bible KC, et al. 2015 American thyroid association management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: the American Thyroid Association Guidelines Task Force on Thyroid Nodules and Differentiated Thyroid Cancer [J]. Thyroid, 2016, 26(1): 1-133.
9
Wang W, Su X, He K, et al. Comparison of the clinicopathologic features and prognosis of bilateral versus unilateral multifocal papillary thyroid cancer: an updated study with more than 2000 consecutive patients: bilateral vs unilateral-multifocal PTC [J]. Cancer, 2016, 122(2): 198-206.
10
Xing M, Alzahrani AS, Carson KA, et al. Association between BRAF V600E mutation and mortality in patients with papillary thyroid cancer [J]. JAMA, 2013, 309(14): 1493.
11
Nikiforov YE, Nikiforova MN. Molecular genetics and diagnosis of thyroid cancer [J]. Nat Rev Endocrinol, 2011, 7(10): 569-580.
12
Grogan RH, Mitmaker EJ, Clark OH. The evolution of biomarkers in thyroid cancer—from mass screening to a personalized biosignature [J]. Cancers, 2010, 2(2): 885-912.
13
Rusinek D, Swierniak M, Chmielik E, et al. BRAFV600E-associated gene expression profile: early changes in the transcriptome, based on a transgenic mouse model of papillary thyroid carcinoma [J]. PLoS One, 2015, 10(12): e0143688.
14
Lee JH, Lee ES, Kim YS. Clinicopathologic significance of BRAF V600E mutation in papillary carcinomas of the thyroid: a meta-analysis [J]. Cancer, 2007, 110(1): 38-46.
15
Ming J, Liu Z, Zeng W, et al. Association between BRAF and RAS mutations, and RET rearrangements and the clinical features of papillary thyroid cancer [J]. Int J Clin Exp Pathol, 2015, 8(11): 15155-15162.
16
Chakraborty A, Narkar A, Mukhopadhyaya R, et al. BRAF V600E mutation in papillary thyroid carcinoma: significant association with node metastases and extra thyroidal invasion [J]. Endocr Pathol, 2012, 23(2): 83-93.
17
Li C, Lee KC, Schneider EB, et al. BRAF V600E mutation and its association with clinicopathological features of papillary thyroid cancer: a meta-analysis [J]. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 2012, 97(12): 4559-4570.
18
Cappola AR, Mandel SJ. Molecular testing in thyroid cancer: BRAF mutation status and mortality [J]. JAMA, 2013, 309(14): 1529-1530.
19
Xing M, Alzahrani AS, Carson KA, et al. Association between BRAF V600E mutation and recurrence of papillary thyroid cancer [J]. J Clin Oncol, 2015, 33(1): 42-50.
20
Guo L, Ma Y, Yao Y, et al. Role of ultrasonographic features and quantified BRAFV600E mutation in lymph node metastasis in Chinese patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma [J]. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1): 75.
21
Beiša A, Kvietkauskas M, Beiša V, et al. The utility of the Bethesda category and its association with BRAF mutation in the prediction of papillary thyroid cancer stage [J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2017, 402(2): 227-234.
[1] 李素娟, 丁文波, 武心萍, 邓学东. 被膜侵犯的甲状腺微小乳头状癌发生颈部淋巴结转移的超声相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(04): 455-461.
[2] 陈启阳, 刘玉江, 刘金苹, 谭小蕖, 钱林学, 胡向东. 基于超声造影的预测模型对甲状腺乳头状癌颈中央区淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(04): 442-448.
[3] 崔亭亭, 李俨育, 王茜, 傅晓凤, 范公林, 高力, 谢磊, 章德广, 朱江. 细针穿刺洗脱液甲状腺球蛋白诊断甲状腺乳头状癌颈部淋巴结转移的阈值及效能分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(02): 219-226.
[4] 魏莹, 赵朕龙, 彭丽丽, 李妍, 卢乃聪, 伍洁, 于明安. 淋巴联合静脉超声造影对甲状腺乳头状癌颈部淋巴结转移的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(08): 761-766.
[5] 张雨康, 何文, 万芳, 广旸. 多模态超声对甲状腺微小乳头状癌颈部淋巴结转移的预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(09): 834-840.
[6] 张桂萍, 张璐, 侯怡卿, 陈煜东, 詹维伟. 超声引导下甲状腺细针穿刺活检在未成年人甲状腺结节诊断中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(09): 822-827.
[7] 章美武, 吕淑懿, 范晓翔, 庄鲁辉, 裘玉琴, 张燕. 甲状腺微小乳头状癌颈部淋巴结转移的相关危险因素[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(06): 570-577.
[8] 刘鑫, 朱乔丹, 刘俊平, 徐栋, 黄品同. 甲状腺髓样癌的超声特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(03): 266-271.
[9] 张玉莹, 巴黎, 张锋, 左梦, 吴长君. 计算机辅助检测和诊断系统对甲状腺结节细针穿刺活检的评估价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(12): 1236-1240.
[10] 郭为衡, 高璐滢, 李小毅, 刘春浩, 刘睿峰, 史新龙, 夏宇, 姜玉新. cN0单侧叶甲状腺乳头状癌对侧中央区淋巴结转移的相关危险因素分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(11): 1131-1136.
[11] 李俊, 彭健韵, 邱婉冰, 窦倩怡, 潘福顺, 梁瑾瑜. 甲状腺结节恶性风险分层(指南):ACR TI-RADS与C-TIRADS诊断效能及不同医师使用指南一致性的多中心回顾性比较研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 401-407.
[12] 樊逸隽, 杨枫, 王玮, 殷鹤英, 刘俊. 喉前淋巴结转移对甲状腺乳头状癌诊疗价值的研究进展[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(04): 306-310.
[13] 李永浩, 高雪菲, 郭田田, 张进, 刘静. 峡部甲状腺乳头状癌手术方式的研究现状[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(03): 225-230.
[14] 周辰杰, 莫雪林, 韩炜蔚. 柴胡皂苷D对甲状腺乳头状癌细胞TPC-1生物学行为的影响[J]. 中华细胞与干细胞杂志(电子版), 2022, 12(04): 200-205.
[15] 王佳讯, 陈毓菁, 梁展鹏, 伍卓强, 邬家明, 林毅迪. 超声TI-RADS分类与细针穿刺活检在诊断甲状腺恶性结节中的临床应用[J]. 中华介入放射学电子杂志, 2022, 10(01): 61-64.
阅读次数
全文


摘要