切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"
高级检索
中华医学超声杂志（电子版）

中华医学超声杂志（电子版） ›› 2022, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (07) : 660 -666. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.07.012

妇产科超声影像学

剪切波弹性成像技术评估子痫前期胎盘弹性的临床价值
壮健1, 潘昌杰2,†(), 李晓琴1, 于梦霞1, 张超1, 朱韦文1   
  1. 1. 213164　江苏常州，南京医科大学附属常州第二人民医院超声科
    2. 213164　江苏常州，南京医科大学附属常州第二人民医院放射科
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-24 出版日期:2022-07-01
  • 通信作者: 潘昌杰

Clinical value of shear wave elastography in evaluating placental elasticity in patients with preeclampsia

Jian Zhuang1, Changjie Pan2,†(), Xiaoqin Li1, Mengxia Yu1, Chao Zhang1, Weiwen Zhu1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou 213164, China
    2. Department of Radiology, Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou 213164, China
  • Received:2021-04-24 Published:2022-07-01
  • Corresponding author: Changjie Pan
全文 ( ) 下载PDF ( ) 导出引用
引用本文：

壮健, 潘昌杰, 李晓琴, 于梦霞, 张超, 朱韦文. 剪切波弹性成像技术评估子痫前期胎盘弹性的临床价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2022, 19(07): 660-666.

Jian Zhuang, Changjie Pan, Xiaoqin Li, Mengxia Yu, Chao Zhang, Weiwen Zhu. Clinical value of shear wave elastography in evaluating placental elasticity in patients with preeclampsia[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(07): 660-666.

目的

评价剪切波弹性成像技术对子痫前期的诊断价值。

方法

前瞻性纳入2019年10月至2020年12月在常州第二人民医院超声科检查的晚孕期孕妇177名。根据临床诊断将孕妇分为健康组152名和子痫前期组25例。采用单因素分析比较2组间一般临床资料、二维超声、彩色多普勒超声参数及胎盘（母体面和胎儿面）杨氏模量值（Emean、Emax、Emin）间的差异。采用Spearman相关分析胎盘杨氏模量值与胎儿脐血流参数间的相关性，并建立受试者工作特征曲线，评价胎盘杨氏模量值诊断子痫前期的诊断效能。

结果

健康组与子痫前期组孕妇的羊水指数、胎盘厚度以及脐动脉血流收缩/舒张期速度比（S/D）、阻力指数（RI）、搏动指数（PI）比较，差异均无统计学意义（P均＞0.05）。除胎盘母体面Emin以外，子痫前期组孕妇胎盘母体面Emean、Emax及胎儿面Emean、Emax、Emin均高于健康组［（5.87±0.41）kPa vs（5.30±0.53）kPa；8.67（8.30，9.66）kPa vs 8.01（7.56，8.50）kPa；（5.15±0.34）kPa vs（4.65±0.52）kPa；（8.07±0.70）kPa vs（7.11±0.85）kPa；（3.28±0.44）kPa vs（3.01±0.54）kPa］，差异具有统计学意义（t=-6.215、Z=-4.566、t=-6.298、t=-5.376、t=-2.430，P＜0.001、＜0.001、＜0.001、＜0.001、=0.016）。健康组和子痫前期组孕妇胎盘自身的母体面Emean、Emax、Emin均高于胎儿面，差异具有统计学意义（t=11.319、Z=-8.461、t=12.118、t=6.266、Z=-3.807、t=5.416，P均＜0.001）。相关性分析显示2组中各杨氏模量值与脐动脉血流的S/D、RI、PI值均无显著相关性（P均＞0.05）。当截断值为5.85 kPa时，胎盘母体面的Emean值诊断子痫前期的效能最佳，其敏感度、特异度、准确性分别为68.0%、85.5%、83.1%。

结论

子痫前期孕妇胎盘的杨氏模量值高于健康孕妇。剪切波弹性成像技术可通过评价胎盘硬度辅助子痫前期的诊断。

关键词: 剪切波弹性成像, 子痫前期, 胎盘, 超声
Objective

To evaluate the diagnostic value of shear wave elastography in preeclampsia.

Methods

One hundred and seventy-seven pregnant women in the third trimester were prospectively enrolled at the Department of Ultrasound of Changzhou No. 2 People's Hospital from October 2019 to December 2020. Pregnant women were divided into a healthy group (n=152) and a preeclampsia group (n=25) according to clinical diagnosis. The differences in general data, two-dimensional ultrasound and color Doppler ultrasound parameters, and placental Young's modulus (Emean, Emax, and Emin) were compared. The correlation between placental Young's modulus values and fetal umbilical blood flow parameters was analyzed by Spearman correlation, and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of placental Young's modulus in the diagnosis of preeclampsia.

Results

There was no difference in amniotic fluid index, placental thickness, systolic/diastolic velocity ratio (S/D), resistance index (RI), or pulsatility index (PI) between the two groups (P＞0.05). Except for the Emin of the maternal side of the placenta, Emean and Emax of the maternal side of the placenta and Emean, Emax, and Emin of the fetal side of the placenta in the preeclampsia group were significantly higher than those in the healthy group [(5.87±0.41) kPa vs (5.30±0.53) kPa, t=-6.215, P＜0.001; 8.67 (8.30, 9.66) kPa vs 8.01 (7.56, 8.50) kPa, Z=-4.566, P＜0.001; (5.15±0.34) kPa vs (4.65±0.52) kPa, t=-6.298, P＜0.001; (8.07±0.70) kPa vs (7.11±0.85) kPa, t=-5.376, P＜0.001; (3.28±0.44) kPa vs (3.01±0.54) kPa, t=-2.430, P=0.016]. Emean, Emax, and Emin of the maternal side of the placenta itself were significantly higher than those of the fetal side of the placenta in both groups (t=11.319, Z=-8.461, t=12.118, t=6.266, Z=-3.807, and t=5.416, respectively; P＜0.001). Correlation analysis showed no significant correlation between Young's modulus values and S/D, RI, or PI values in the umbilical artery in the two groups (P＞0.05). When the cut-off value was 5.85 kPa, the diagnostic performance of Emean of the maternal side of the placenta was the best; the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 68.0%, 85.5%, and 83.1%, respectively.

Conclusion

Young's modulus values of the placenta in pregnant women with preeclampsia are higher than those of healthy pregnant women. Shear wave elastography can assist in the diagnosis of preeclampsia by measuring placental stiffness.

Key words: Shear wave elastography, Preeclampsia, Placenta, Ultrasound
表1 健康组与子痫前期组孕妇的二维及彩色多普勒超声各测值的比较
组别 例数 脐动脉（
x¯
±s）		 羊水指数［cm，M（QR）］ 胎盘厚度［cm，M（QR）］
S/D RI PI
健康组 152 2.06±0.30 0.51±0.07 0.71±0.14 12.6（11.1，15.1） 3.2（2.9，3.7）
子痫前期组 25 2.16±0.29 0.53±0.06 0.75±0.13 12.4（11.1，14.3） 3.2（3.1，3.5）
统计值 t=-1.565 t=-1.451 t=-1.607 Z=-0.463 Z=-0.316
P值 0.127 0.149 0.117 0.643 0.752
表2 健康组与子痫前期组孕妇胎盘母体面及胎儿面杨氏模量值比较（kPa）
组别 例数 母体面 胎儿面
Emean（
x¯
±s）		 Emax［M（QR）］ Emin（
x¯
±s）		 Emean（
x¯
±s）		 Emax（
x¯
±s）		 Emin（
x¯
±s）
健康组 152 5.30±0.53 8.01（7.56，8.50） 3.67±0.53 4.65±0.52 7.11±0.85 3.01±0.54
子痫前期组 25 5.87±0.41 8.67（8.30，9.66） 3.97±0.34 5.15±0.34 8.07±0.70 3.28±0.44
统计值 t=-6.215 Z=-4.566 t=-2.745 t=-6.298 t=-5.376 t=-2.430
P值 ＜0.001 ＜0.001 0.070 ＜0.001 ＜0.001 0.016
图1 健康组与子痫前期组孕妇胎盘自身的母体面及胎儿面杨氏模量值比较。图a~f分别为健康组Emean、Emax、Emin和子痫前期组Emean、Emax、Emin，胎盘母体面与胎儿面比较，差异均具有统计学意义（t=11.319、Z=-8.461、t=12.118、t=6.266、Z=-3.807、t=5.416，P均＜0.001） 注：Emean、Emax、Emin为杨氏模量的平均值、最大值、最小值；“***”为P＜0.001，“****”为P＜0.0001
图2 妊娠28周健康孕妇胎盘母体面及胎儿面杨氏模量值
图3 妊娠28周子痫前期孕妇胎盘母体面及胎儿面杨氏模量值
图4 健康组（图a）和子痫前期组（图b）孕妇胎盘杨氏模量值与脐血流参数的相关性热图 注：红色系表示参数间呈正相关，紫色系表示参数间呈负相关，格中的数字表示相关系数；Emean、Emax、Emin为杨氏模量的平均值、最大值、最小值；S/D为收缩/舒张期速度比；RI为阻力指数；PI为搏动指数
图5 胎盘各杨氏模量值诊断子痫前期的受试者操作特征曲线
表3 胎盘各杨氏模量值诊断子痫前期的诊断效能
杨氏模量值 曲线下面积 95%CI 截断值（kPa） 敏感度（%） 特异度（%） 准确性（%） 阳性预测值（%） 阴性预测值（%）
Emean母体面 0.81 0.75~0.87 5.85 68.00 85.50 83.10 43.60 94.20
Emean胎儿面 0.79 0.72~0.85 5.02 72.00 77.60 76.80 34.60 94.40
Emax母体面 0.79 0.72~0.84 7.92 96.00 48.70 55.40 23.50 98.70
Emax胎儿面 0.79 0.72~0.85 7.19 96.00 53.30 59.30 25.30 98.80
Emin母体面 0.70 0.63~0.77 3.74 80.00 61.80 64.40 25.60 94.90
Emin胎儿面 0.65 0.57~0.72 2.83 88.00 44.70 50.80 20.80 95.80
1
Poon LC, Shennan A, Hyett JA, et al. The International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) initiative on pre-eclampsia: A pragmatic guide for first-trimester screening and prevention [J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2019, 145 Suppl 1: 1-33.
2
杜晓艳, 郭昕. 600例不同高危妊娠产妇的胎盘病理差异分析 [J]. 中华保健医学杂志, 2019, 21(2): 147-150.
3
Allotey J, Snell KI, Smuk M, et al. Validation and development of models using clinical, biochemical and ultrasound markers for predicting pre-eclampsia: an individual participant data meta-analysis [J]. Health Technol Assess, 2020, 24(72): 1-252.
4
邓晨晨, 陶峰, 陈红波. 子宫动脉多普勒超声预测子痫前期的研究现状 [J]. 中华全科医学, 2020, 18(6): 1002-1005.
5
Chen YL, Kuo YW, Wu HD, et al. The application of ultrasound shear wave elastography in the prediction of paradoxical upgrading reaction in tuberculous lymphadenitis. a pilot study [J]. J Formos Med Assoc, 2021: S0929-6646(21)00535-0.
6
Golatta M, Pfob A, Büsch C, et al. The potential of combined shear wave and strain elastography to reduce unnecessary biopsies in breast cancer diagnostics-An international, multicentre trial [J]. Eur J Cancer, 2022, 161: 1-9.
7
杨怡珂, 漆洪波. 美国妇产科医师学会(ACOG)“妊娠期高血压和子痫前期指南2019版”要点解读(第一部分) [J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2019, 35(8): 895-899.
8
Mulders A, Kropman A, Reijnders I, et al. EP03.02: First trimester placental growth trajectories are associated with maternal and neonatal placenta-related pregnancy complications [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 54(S1): 245-245.
9
Michalczyk M, Celewicz A, Celewicz M, et al. The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia [J]. Mediators Inflamm, 2020, 2020: 3864941.
10
Weiner E, Feldstein O, Tamayev L, et al. Placental histopathological lesions in correlation with neonatal outcome in preeclampsia with and without severe features [J]. Pregnancy Hypertens, 2018, 12: 6-10.
11
Nowicki A. Safety of ultrasonic examinations; thermal and mechanical indices [J]. Med Ultrason, 2020, 22(2): 203-210.
12
Issaoui M, Debost-Legrand A, Skerl K, et al. Shear wave elastography safety in fetus: a quantitative health risk assessment [J]. Diagn Interv Imaging, 2018, 99(9): 519-524.
13
Rana S, Lemoine E, Granger JP, et al. Preeclampsia: pathophysiology, challenges, and perspectives [J]. Circ Res, 2019, 124(7): 1094-1112.
14
张永清, 陈丹青. 胎盘的结构及功能与母儿疾病 [J]. 实用妇产科杂志, 2021, 37(1): 1-3.
15
Roland CS, Hu J, Ren CE, et al. Morphological changes of placental syncytium and their implications for the pathogenesis of preeclampsia [J]. Cell Mol Life Sci, 2016, 73(2): 365-376.
16
赵静, 邓学东. 不良妊娠结局胎盘影像学评价及病理研究进展 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2018, 15(2): 101-106.
17
Li WJ, Wei ZT, Yan RL, et al. Detection of placenta elasticity modulus by quantitative real-time shear wave imaging [J]. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, 2012, 39(4): 470-473.
18
Cimsit C, Yoldemir T, Akpinar IN. Shear wave elastography in placental dysfunction: comparison of elasticity values in normal and preeclamptic pregnancies in the second trimester [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2015, 34(1): 151-159.
19
Spiliopoulos M, Kuo CY, Eranki A, et al. Characterizing placental stiffness using ultrasound shear-wave elastography in healthy and preeclamptic pregnancies [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2020, 302(5): 1103-1112.
20
Kılıç F, Kayadibi Y, Yüksel MA, et al. Shear wave elastography of placenta: in vivo quantitation of placental elasticity in preeclampsia [J]. Diagn Interv Radiol, 2015, 21(3): 202-207.
21
葛成霞, 郭建锋. 正常中晚孕胎盘弹性模量评价及影响因素初探 [J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2019, 30(10): 726-729.
22
张宇鹏, 于金华, 王新, 等. 超声检测妊娠期高血压孕妇胎儿血流动力学变化与妊娠结局的相关性分析 [J]. 医学影像学杂志, 2018, 28(2): 308-312.
23
Zhou X, Qu L, Zhang W, et al. Analysis of proteomic characteristics of peripheral blood in preeclampsia and study of changes in fetal arterial doppler parameters based on magnetic nanoparticles [J]. Comput Math Methods Med, 2021, 2021: 7145487.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 李晓妮, 卫青, 孟庆龙, 牛丽莉, 田月, 吴伟春, 朱振辉, 王浩. 超声心动图在孤立性左心室心尖发育不良疾病中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(10): 937-942.
[3] 陈慧, 姚静, 张宁, 刘磊, 马秀玲, 王小贤, 方爱娟, 管静静. 超声心动图在多发性骨髓瘤心脏淀粉样变中的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(10): 943-949.
[4] 戴飞, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 狄敏. 胎儿心脏超声定量多参数对主动脉缩窄胎儿心脏结构及功能的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(10): 950-958.
[5] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[6] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[7] 杜祖升, 赵博文, 张帧, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 毛彦恺. 应用二维斑点追踪成像技术评估孕周及心尖方向对中晚孕期正常胎儿左心房应变的影响[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(09): 843-851.
[8] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[9] 包艳娟, 杨小红, 张涛, 赵胜, 张莉. 阴道斜隔综合征的超声诊断与临床分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(09): 859-864.
[10] 汪洪斌, 张红霞, 何文, 杜丽娟, 程令刚, 张雨康, 张萌. 低级别阑尾黏液性肿瘤与阑尾黏液腺癌超声及超声造影特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(09): 865-871.
[11] 农云洁, 黄小桂, 黄裕兰, 农恒荣. 超声在多重肺部感染诊断中的临床应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(09): 872-876.
[12] 刘思锐, 赵辰阳, 张睿, 张一休, 杨萌. 多普勒超声对孕鼠子宫动脉不同节段血流动力学参数的评估[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(09): 877-883.
[13] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[14] 宋勇, 李东炫, 王翔, 李锐. 基于数据挖掘法分析3 种超声造影剂不良反应信号[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志（电子版）, 2024, 21(09): 890-898.
[15] 常小伟, 蔡瑜, 赵志勇, 张伟. 高强度聚焦超声消融术联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术治疗原发性肝细胞癌的效果及安全性分析[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 56-59.
阅读次数
全文


摘要

版权所有 中华医学会 中华医学电子音像出版社有限责任公司  京ICP备14006079号-1  网络出版服务许可证：(署)网出证(京)字第075号

AI
小
编
AI小编
你好！我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编，有什么可以帮您的吗？