切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (09) : 908 -914. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.09.007

妇产科超声影像学

妊娠11~13+6周超声诊断胎儿单脐动脉及其与染色体异常的相关性
刘双1, 董虹美1, 张晓航1, 冉茜1, 冉素真1,()   
  1. 1. 401147 重庆市妇幼保健院/重庆医科大学附属妇女儿童医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-18 出版日期:2022-09-01
  • 通信作者: 冉素真
  • 基金资助:
    重庆市卫生适宜技术推广项目(2021jstg041)

Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal single umbilical artery at 11~13+6 weeks of pregnancy and its correlation with chromosome abnormality

Shuang Liu1, Hongmei Dong1, Xiaohang Zhang1, Qian Ran1, Suzhen Ran1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children/Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing 401147, China
  • Received:2020-11-18 Published:2022-09-01
  • Corresponding author: Suzhen Ran
引用本文:

刘双, 董虹美, 张晓航, 冉茜, 冉素真. 妊娠11~13+6周超声诊断胎儿单脐动脉及其与染色体异常的相关性[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(09): 908-914.

Shuang Liu, Hongmei Dong, Xiaohang Zhang, Qian Ran, Suzhen Ran. Ultrasound diagnosis of fetal single umbilical artery at 11~13+6 weeks of pregnancy and its correlation with chromosome abnormality[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(09): 908-914.

目的

探讨早孕期产前超声诊断单脐动脉的可行性,分析其与胎儿染色体异常的关系。

方法

回顾性分析2017年4月至2019年4月重庆市妇幼保健院/重庆医科大学附属妇女儿童医院行妊娠11~13+6周超声检查并诊断为单脐动脉的胎儿的一般临床资料、超声特征、染色体核型或微阵列分析结果及随访结果,根据超声筛查是否合并其他结构畸形,分为孤立型单脐动脉(iSUA)组和非孤立型单脐动脉(niSUA)组;采用t检验或χ2检验比较2组患者的一般临床资料的差异,采用χ2检验比较超声结果及染色体结果的组间差异。

结果

妊娠11~13+6周超声诊断单脐动脉胎儿433例,排除后期复查否定单脐动脉诊断者(31例)及失访病例(42例),满足单脐动脉诊断者共360例,诊断准确率为92.1%(360/391)。获得染色体结果符合入组条件者共271例,其中iSUA组202例(74.54%),niSUA组69例(25.46%),2组一般临床资料比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。染色体异常胎儿共13例,其中iSUA组4例(1.98%,4/202),niSUA组9例(13.04%,9/69);niSUA组包括:niSUA合并其他软指标异常组中染色体异常1例(5.88%,1/17)、niSUA合并单一畸形组中染色体异常4例(11.43%,4/35)、niSUA合并多发畸形组中染色体异常4例(23.53%,4/17),4组间染色体异常发生率差异具有统计学意义(χ2=19.99,P=0.002)。合并畸形部位主要集中在心血管系统、泌尿生殖系统和神经系统。

结论

早孕期产前超声诊断单脐动脉的准确率高。单脐动脉与胎儿的染色体异常具有相关性,iSUA的染色体异常比例较低,niSUA染色体异常发生率高,且合并畸形越多的胎儿染色体异常可能性越大。故早孕期发现单脐动脉时产前超声检查医师应格外警惕是否合并其他软指标异常及结构畸形。

Objective

To explore the feasibility of prenatal ultrasound in the diagnosis of single umbilical artery (SUA) in early pregnancy and its relationship with fetal chromosome abnormality.

Methods

The general information, ultrasonic characteristics, chromosome karyotype or microarray analysis results, and follow-up data of SUA fetuses diagnosed by ultrasound examination at 11~13+6 weeks at Chongqing Health Center for Women and Children/Women and Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University from April 2017 to April 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. According to other ultrasound structural abnormalities combined, the patients were divided into either an isolated SUA group or a non-isolated SUA group. Enumeration data between the two groups were compared by the t test, and measurement data were compared by the χ2 test.

Results

Among 433 cases diagnosed with SUA by ultrasound at 11~13+6 weeks, those who did not conform to the SUA diagnosis by later review (n=31) and those who were lost to follow-up (n=42) were excluded, and a total of 360 patients met the SUA diagnosis, with a diagnostic accuracy of 92.1% (360/391). And 271 cases whose chromosome results were obtained were finally included. There were 202 (74.54%) cases of isolated SUA and 69 (25.46%) cases of non-isolated SUA; there was no statistical difference in general data between the two groups (P>0.05). There were 4 cases (1.98%, 4/202) of isolated SUA and 9 (13.04%, 9/69) cases of non-isolated SUA in the 13 fetuses with chromosomal abnormalities, and the latter group contained 1 (5.88%, 1/17) case with other abnormal soft indicators, 4 (11.43%, 4/35) cases with single malformation, and 4 (23.53%, 4/17) cases with multiple malformations; the differences between the 4 groups were statistically significant (χ2=19.99, P=0.002). Combined malformations were mainly malformations of the cardiovascular system, genitourinary system, and nervous system.

Conclusion

The accuracy of prenatal ultrasound in the diagnosis of single umbilical artery in early pregnancy is high. SUA is associated with chromosomal abnormalities in the fetus. The proportion of chromosomal abnormalities in isolated SUA is low. Non-solitary SUA chromosome abnormality has a high incidence, and the possibility of chromosome abnormality in fetuses with more complicated malformations is greater. When single umbilical artery is found by prenatal ultrasound in early pregnancy, doctors should be cautious of other soft indicators and malformation.

表1 iSUA及niSUA病例的一般临床资料对比
表2 各组单脐动脉胎儿染色体结果异常分布情况
图1 孕22+5周,系统超声检查示胎儿腹部可见“双泡征”,大泡与小泡间可见较窄的无回声区相通
图2 孕12+5周,胎儿颈后透明层检查中超声提示胎儿仅见右侧脐动脉,左侧脐动脉未显示
图3 孕22+5周,胎儿超声心动图检查示左肺动脉起自右肺动脉主干,自右向左绕行于食管及气管的后方,形成血管环
1
Burshtein S, Levy A, Holcberg G, et al. Is single umbilical artery an independent risk factor for perinatal mortality? [J]. Arch Gynecol Obstet, 2011, 283(2): 191-194.
2
Friebe-Hoffmann U, Hiltmann A, Friedl TWP, et al. Prenatally diagnosed single umbilical artery (SUA)-retrospective analysis of 1169 fetuses [J]. Ultraschall Med, 2019, 40(2): 221-229.
3
Martinez-Payo C, Cabezas E, Nieto Y, et al. Detection of single umbilical artery in the first trimester ultrasound: its value as a marker of fetal malformation [J]. Biomed Res Int, 2014, 2014: 548729.
4
涂艳萍, 尚宁, 张婕, 等. 超声诊断胎儿单脐动脉合并畸形及其与染色体异常的关系 [J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2019, 27(4): 309-312, 319.
5
Audibert F, De Bie I, Johnson JA, et al. No. 348-joint SOGC-CCMG guideline: update on prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy, fetal anomalies, and adverse pregnancy outcomes [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2017, 39(9): 805-817.
6
Scala C, Morlando M, Familiari A, et al. Fetal tricuspid regurgitation in the first trimester as a screening marker for congenital heart defects: systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2017, 42(1): 1-8.
7
Rao R, Platt LD. Ultrasound screening: status of markers and efficacy of screening for structural abnormalities [J]. Semin Perinatol, 2016, 40(1): 67-78.
8
Shen O, Rabinowitz R, Yagel S, et al. Absent gallbladder on fetal ultrasound: prenatal findings and postnatal outcome [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2011, 37(6): 673-677.
9
Taghavi K, Sharpe C, Stringer MD. Fetal megacystis: a systematic review [J]. J Pediatr Urol, 2017, 13(1): 7-15.
10
Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), Fox NS, Monteagudo A, et al. Mild fetal ventriculomegaly: diagnosis, evaluation, and management [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 219(1): B2-B9.
11
Scala C, Leone Roberti Maggiore U, Candiani M, et al. Aberrant right subclavian artery in fetuses with Down syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2015, 46(3): 266-276.
12
Ari ME, Dogan V, Ozgur S, et al. Persistent left superior vena cava accompanying congenital heart disease in children: experience of a tertiary care center [J]. Echocardiography, 2017, 34(3): 436-440.
13
Lide B, Lindsley W, Foster MJ, et al. Intrahepatic persistent right umbilical vein and associated outcomes: a systematic review of the literature [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2016, 35(1): 1-5.
14
D'Antonio F, Khalil A, Zidere V, et al. Fetuses with right aortic arch: a multicenter cohort study and meta-analysis [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 47(4): 423-432.
15
Van den Hof MC, Wilson RD, Diagnostic Imaging Committee Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada, et al. Fetal soft markers in obstetric ultrasound [J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2005, 27(6): 592-636.
16
马婷婷, 刘华平, 侯朝晖, 等. 无创DNA检测技术对胎儿染色体非整倍体疾病的筛查效果 [J]. 空军医学杂志, 2015, 31(4): 235-239.
17
Gornall AS, Kurinczuk JJ, Konje JC. Antenatal detection of a single umbilical artery: does it matter? [J]. Prenat Diagn, 2003, 23(2): 117-123.
18
Geipel A, Germer U, Welp T, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of single umbilical artery: determination of the absent side, associated anomalies, Doppler findings and perinatal outcome [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2000, 15(2): 114-117.
19
邓春艳, 王晓东, 余海燕. 胎儿单脐动脉的研究进展 [J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2015, 11(6): 786-788.
20
董虹美, 张晓航, 冉素真. 一条脐动脉栓塞的产前超声特征分析 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2020, 29(10): 892-896.
21
李胜利. 胎儿畸形产前超声诊断学 [M]. 2版. 北京: 人民军医出版社, 2017: 86.
22
Persutte WH, Hobbins J. Single umbilical artery: a clinical enigma in modern prenatal diagnosis [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 1995, 6(3): 216-229.
23
Granese R, Coco C, Jeanty P. The value of single umbilical artery in the prediction of fetal aneuploidy: findings in 12,672 pregnant women [J]. Ultrasound Q, 2007, 23(2): 117-121.
24
Arcos-Machancoses JV, Marin-Reina P, Romaguera-Salort E, et al. Postnatal development of fetuses with a single umbilical artery: differences between malformed and non-malformed infants [J]. World J Pediatr, 2015, 11(1): 61-66.
25
Hua M, Odibo AO, Macones GA, et al. Single umbilical artery and its associated findings [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 115(5): 930-934.
26
Wu YP, Tsai HF, Cheng YC, et al. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis of single umbilical artery: emphasis on the absent side and its relation to associated anomalies [J]. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 53(2): 197-201.
27
Malova J, Bohmer D, Luha J, et al. Single umbilical artery and reproduction losses in Slovak population: relation to karyotype and fetal anomalies [J]. Bratisl Lek Listy, 2018, 119(6): 330-334.
[1] 张梅芳, 谭莹, 朱巧珍, 温昕, 袁鹰, 秦越, 郭洪波, 侯伶秀, 黄文兰, 彭桂艳, 李胜利. 早孕期胎儿头臀长正中矢状切面超声图像的人工智能质控研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 945-950.
[2] 李鑫, 邓学东, 殷林亮, 赵巧梅, 季春亚. 早孕期双胎妊娠胎儿颈项透明层增厚与不良妊娠结局的关系[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(11): 1198-1204.
[3] 张红彬, 栗河舟, 刘灵. 早孕期超声筛查胎儿巨膀胱的临床价值分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(09): 894-898.
[4] 任芸芸. 无创产前诊断时代早孕期超声检查的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(09): 873-876.
[5] 高琳, 张一休, 杨筱, 刘思锐, 欧阳云淑, 武玺宁, 牛梓涵, 杨萌, 孟华. 西藏高原地区正常早孕期孕妇子宫动脉血流变化研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(08): 801-806.
[6] 韩利, 吴青青. 超声检查评估胎儿肝强回声的价值及预后分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(11): 1061-1066.
[7] 林文志, 邓学东, 殷林亮, 苟中山. 早孕期胎儿心轴的参考值及其临床意义[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(04): 270-274.
[8] 徐学翠, 张冰, 茹彤, 杨燕, 顾圆圆. 早孕期超声筛查多胎胎儿巨膀胱的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(08): 626-629.
[9] 刘磊, 王优, 黄锐斌, 张丽娜, 宋一丹, 雷婷缨. 染色体微阵列分析技术在股骨长度偏短胎儿遗传学诊断中的应用[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2023, 19(04): 437-445.
[10] 刘磊, 李颖思, 周航, 程肯, 霍颖, 雷婷缨. 单脐动脉合并其他先天性结构畸形胎儿预后的临床分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(04): 427-432.
[11] 王巍, 李顺双, 刘刚. 《2020 ACOG实践简报:孕龄≤70 d药物流产(No.225)》解读[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(03): 275-281.
[12] 赵旭亮, 田瑞霞, 王伦善, 魏玉业, 张曼, 俞敏. 早孕期胎儿颈项透明层超声检测联合胎儿DNA无创产前检测对高龄孕妇胎儿性别发育异常的诊断价值[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2020, 16(04): 478-482.
[13] 王宏, 段纯, 袁晖, 吴晓霞, 谢建生, 赵光临. 早孕期筛查唐氏综合征或18-三体综合征不同风险值与胎儿染色体异常及妊娠结局分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(06): 646-654.
[14] 唐敬龙, 王丽媛, 冯雪花. 不良孕产史夫妇染色体核型的大样本分析[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2019, 15(03): 314-319.
[15] 栾泽东, 杨楠, 綦洪敏, 庞文艳, 王晓燕, 邹艳丽, 刘亚琴, 王好玲, 张锦婷. 超声五切面在早孕期诊断胎儿严重心脏畸形中的临床价值[J]. 中华诊断学电子杂志, 2023, 11(03): 190-197.
阅读次数
全文


摘要