切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (09) : 873 -876. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.09.001

所属专题: 总编推荐

述评

无创产前诊断时代早孕期超声检查的价值
任芸芸1,()   
  1. 1. 20090 上海,复旦大学附属妇产科医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-17 出版日期:2022-09-01
  • 通信作者: 任芸芸

Value of first trimester ultrasound scanning in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing

Yunyun Ren1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200090, China
  • Received:2022-04-17 Published:2022-09-01
  • Corresponding author: Yunyun Ren
引用本文:

任芸芸. 无创产前诊断时代早孕期超声检查的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(09): 873-876.

Yunyun Ren. Value of first trimester ultrasound scanning in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(09): 873-876.

早孕期筛查有两个目的:胎儿结构筛查及染色体异常筛查。20世纪90年代起开展结合胎儿颈后透明层及孕妇血清学指标筛查胎儿染色体异常,21三体的检出率为85%~90%,假阳性率为5%。2011年起无创产前诊断(NIPT)广泛开展,21三体的检出率达到98%~99%,假阳性率低于0.5%。NIPT筛查常见非整倍体的敏感度及特异度明显优于其他的筛查方案。但颈后透明层增厚胎儿即使染色体正常,一些结构畸形及遗传综合征的风险也会增加,尤其是心脏畸形,这些胎儿异常NIPT无法发现。在NIPT时代,早孕期超声筛查的重点在于了解胎儿有无结构畸形,如果发现颈后透明层增厚,注意了解有无合并结构畸形及遗传综合征。NIPT筛查不能取代早孕期超声筛查。

First trimester screening has two goals: fetal anatomy scanning and aneuploidy screening. In the early 1980s, the screening programs based on fetal nuchal translucency (NT) and maternal serum biochemical markers were established; the detection rate for trisomy 21 was 85%-90%, with a 5% false-positive rate. Since 2011, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been widely carried out. The detection rate for trisomy 21 is 98%-99%, and the false positive rate is less than 0.5%. NIPT provides a test whose sensitivity and specificity in screening for the most common aneuploidies far outstrips anything available at this time. In chromosomally normal fetuses, increased NT raises suspicion for many other anomalies and syndromes, particularly congenital heart defects, which are not amenable to NIPT. In the era of NIPT, the emphasis of ultrasound screening in first trimester pregnancy is to assess fetal anatomy, including NT. If NT is increased, attention should be paid to understanding whether there are structural abnormalities and genetic syndromes. NIPT cannot replace ultrasound scanning in first trimester pregnancy.

表1 不同筛查模式早孕期21三体筛查方案的检出率及假阳性率
1
Bronshtein M, Rottem S, Yoffe N, et al. First-trimester and early second-trimester diagnosis of nuchal cystic hygroma by transvaginal sonography: diverse prognosis of the septated from the nonseptated lesion [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1989, 161(1): 78-82.
2
Nicolaides KH, Azar G, Byrne D, et al. Fetal nuchal translucency: ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects in first trimester of pregnancy [J]. BMJ, 1992, 304(6831): 867-869.
3
Kagan KO, Avgidou K, Molina FS, et al. Relation between increased fetal nuchal translucency thickness and chromosomal defects [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 107(1): 6-10.
4
Wright D, Kagan KO, Molina FS, et al. A mixture model of nuchal translucency thickness in screening for chromosomal defects [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 31(4): 376-383.
5
Souka AP, Snijders RJ, Novakov A, et al. Defects and syndromes in chromosomally normal fetuses with increased nuchal translucency thickness at 10-14 weeks of gestation [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ,1998, 11(6): 391-400.
6
Nicolaides KH. Screening for fetal aneuploidies at 11 to 13 weeks [J]. Prenat Diagn, 2011, 31(1): 7-15.
7
Lo YM, Lun FM, Chan KC, et al. Digital PCR for the molecular detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2007, 104(32): 13116-13121.
8
O'Brien BM, Halliday J, Lambert-Messerlian G, et al. Nuchal translucency measurement in the era of prenatal screening for aneuploidy using cell free (cf)DNA [J]. Prenat Diagn, 2017, 37(3): 303-305.
9
Le Lous M, Bouhanna P, Colmant C, et al. The performance of an intermediate 16th-week ultrasound scan for the follow-up of euploid fetuses with increased nuchal translucency [J]. Prenat Diagn, 2016, 36(2): 148-153.
10
Bakker M, Pajkrt E, Bilardo CM. Increased nuchal translucency with normal karyotype and anomaly scan: what next? [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2014, 28(3): 355-366.
11
Turan S, Goetzinger KR. First-trimester fetal heart evaluation: time to move forward [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 57(5): 677-680.
12
Lopes LM, Brizot ML, Lopes MA, et al. Structural and functional cardiac abnormalities identified prior to 16 weeks' gestation in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ,2003, 22(5): 470-478.
13
Croonen EA, Nillesen WM, Stuurman KE, et al. Prenatal diagnostic testing of the Noonan syndrome genes in fetuses with abnormal ultrasound findings [J]. Eur J Hum Genet, 2013, 21(9): 936-942.
14
Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Audibert F, et al. ISUOG updated consensus statement on the impact of cfDNA aneuploidy testing on screening policies and prenatal ultrasound practice [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 49(6): 815-816.
15
Kelley J, McGillivray G, Meagher S, et al. Increased nuchal translucency after low-risk noninvasive prenatal testing: What should we tell prospective parents? [J]. Prenat Diagn, 2021, 41(10): 1305-1315.
16
Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Bilardo CM, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 41(1): 102-113.
17
Syngelaki A, Hammami A, Bower S, et al. Diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities on routine ultrasound examination at 11-13 weeks' gestation [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 54(4): 468-476.
18
Liao Y, Wen H, Ouyang S, et al. Routine first-trimester ultrasound screening using a standardized anatomical protocol [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 224(4): 396 e391-396 e315.
19
Yagel S. Integration of nuchal translucency screening into the first-trimester fetal anatomy scan: the time has come [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 57(1): 29-31.
20
Ficara A, Syngelaki A, Hammami A, et al. Value of routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation in diagnosis of fetal abnormalities [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 55(1): 75-80.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[6] 李钱梅, 何冠南, 赵婧, 陈曦, 唐玉英, 马丽琼, 梁蓉, 袁桃, 李明星. 早孕期低危妊娠和高危妊娠胎盘微血流成像特征及预后分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 726-732.
[7] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[8] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[9] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[10] 胡可, 鲁蓉. 基于多参数超声特征的中老年女性压力性尿失禁诊断模型研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 477-483.
[11] 张妍, 原韶玲, 史泽洪, 郭馨阳, 牛菁华. 小肾肿瘤超声漏诊原因分析新思路[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 500-504.
[12] 席芬, 张培培, 孝梦甦, 刘真真, 张一休, 张璟, 朱庆莉, 孟华. 乳腺错构瘤的临床与超声影像学特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 505-510.
[13] 钱警语, 郑明明. 《2024意大利妇产科学会非侵入性和侵入性产前诊断指南》解读[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 486-492.
[14] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[15] 陈秀晓, 隋文倩, 王珉鑫, 吴圆圆. 腹股沟斜疝并腹腔游离体超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 516-517.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?