切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2022, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (09) : 873 -876. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.09.001

所属专题: 总编推荐

述评

无创产前诊断时代早孕期超声检查的价值
任芸芸1,()   
  1. 1. 20090 上海,复旦大学附属妇产科医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-17 出版日期:2022-09-01
  • 通信作者: 任芸芸

Value of first trimester ultrasound scanning in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing

Yunyun Ren1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200090, China
  • Received:2022-04-17 Published:2022-09-01
  • Corresponding author: Yunyun Ren
引用本文:

任芸芸. 无创产前诊断时代早孕期超声检查的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(09): 873-876.

Yunyun Ren. Value of first trimester ultrasound scanning in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2022, 19(09): 873-876.

早孕期筛查有两个目的:胎儿结构筛查及染色体异常筛查。20世纪90年代起开展结合胎儿颈后透明层及孕妇血清学指标筛查胎儿染色体异常,21三体的检出率为85%~90%,假阳性率为5%。2011年起无创产前诊断(NIPT)广泛开展,21三体的检出率达到98%~99%,假阳性率低于0.5%。NIPT筛查常见非整倍体的敏感度及特异度明显优于其他的筛查方案。但颈后透明层增厚胎儿即使染色体正常,一些结构畸形及遗传综合征的风险也会增加,尤其是心脏畸形,这些胎儿异常NIPT无法发现。在NIPT时代,早孕期超声筛查的重点在于了解胎儿有无结构畸形,如果发现颈后透明层增厚,注意了解有无合并结构畸形及遗传综合征。NIPT筛查不能取代早孕期超声筛查。

First trimester screening has two goals: fetal anatomy scanning and aneuploidy screening. In the early 1980s, the screening programs based on fetal nuchal translucency (NT) and maternal serum biochemical markers were established; the detection rate for trisomy 21 was 85%-90%, with a 5% false-positive rate. Since 2011, non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been widely carried out. The detection rate for trisomy 21 is 98%-99%, and the false positive rate is less than 0.5%. NIPT provides a test whose sensitivity and specificity in screening for the most common aneuploidies far outstrips anything available at this time. In chromosomally normal fetuses, increased NT raises suspicion for many other anomalies and syndromes, particularly congenital heart defects, which are not amenable to NIPT. In the era of NIPT, the emphasis of ultrasound screening in first trimester pregnancy is to assess fetal anatomy, including NT. If NT is increased, attention should be paid to understanding whether there are structural abnormalities and genetic syndromes. NIPT cannot replace ultrasound scanning in first trimester pregnancy.

表1 不同筛查模式早孕期21三体筛查方案的检出率及假阳性率
1
Bronshtein M, Rottem S, Yoffe N, et al. First-trimester and early second-trimester diagnosis of nuchal cystic hygroma by transvaginal sonography: diverse prognosis of the septated from the nonseptated lesion [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 1989, 161(1): 78-82.
2
Nicolaides KH, Azar G, Byrne D, et al. Fetal nuchal translucency: ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects in first trimester of pregnancy [J]. BMJ, 1992, 304(6831): 867-869.
3
Kagan KO, Avgidou K, Molina FS, et al. Relation between increased fetal nuchal translucency thickness and chromosomal defects [J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 107(1): 6-10.
4
Wright D, Kagan KO, Molina FS, et al. A mixture model of nuchal translucency thickness in screening for chromosomal defects [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 31(4): 376-383.
5
Souka AP, Snijders RJ, Novakov A, et al. Defects and syndromes in chromosomally normal fetuses with increased nuchal translucency thickness at 10-14 weeks of gestation [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ,1998, 11(6): 391-400.
6
Nicolaides KH. Screening for fetal aneuploidies at 11 to 13 weeks [J]. Prenat Diagn, 2011, 31(1): 7-15.
7
Lo YM, Lun FM, Chan KC, et al. Digital PCR for the molecular detection of fetal chromosomal aneuploidy [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 2007, 104(32): 13116-13121.
8
O'Brien BM, Halliday J, Lambert-Messerlian G, et al. Nuchal translucency measurement in the era of prenatal screening for aneuploidy using cell free (cf)DNA [J]. Prenat Diagn, 2017, 37(3): 303-305.
9
Le Lous M, Bouhanna P, Colmant C, et al. The performance of an intermediate 16th-week ultrasound scan for the follow-up of euploid fetuses with increased nuchal translucency [J]. Prenat Diagn, 2016, 36(2): 148-153.
10
Bakker M, Pajkrt E, Bilardo CM. Increased nuchal translucency with normal karyotype and anomaly scan: what next? [J]. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol, 2014, 28(3): 355-366.
11
Turan S, Goetzinger KR. First-trimester fetal heart evaluation: time to move forward [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 57(5): 677-680.
12
Lopes LM, Brizot ML, Lopes MA, et al. Structural and functional cardiac abnormalities identified prior to 16 weeks' gestation in fetuses with increased nuchal translucency [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ,2003, 22(5): 470-478.
13
Croonen EA, Nillesen WM, Stuurman KE, et al. Prenatal diagnostic testing of the Noonan syndrome genes in fetuses with abnormal ultrasound findings [J]. Eur J Hum Genet, 2013, 21(9): 936-942.
14
Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Audibert F, et al. ISUOG updated consensus statement on the impact of cfDNA aneuploidy testing on screening policies and prenatal ultrasound practice [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2017, 49(6): 815-816.
15
Kelley J, McGillivray G, Meagher S, et al. Increased nuchal translucency after low-risk noninvasive prenatal testing: What should we tell prospective parents? [J]. Prenat Diagn, 2021, 41(10): 1305-1315.
16
Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Bilardo CM, et al. ISUOG practice guidelines: performance of first-trimester fetal ultrasound scan [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2013, 41(1): 102-113.
17
Syngelaki A, Hammami A, Bower S, et al. Diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities on routine ultrasound examination at 11-13 weeks' gestation [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 54(4): 468-476.
18
Liao Y, Wen H, Ouyang S, et al. Routine first-trimester ultrasound screening using a standardized anatomical protocol [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 224(4): 396 e391-396 e315.
19
Yagel S. Integration of nuchal translucency screening into the first-trimester fetal anatomy scan: the time has come [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 57(1): 29-31.
20
Ficara A, Syngelaki A, Hammami A, et al. Value of routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation in diagnosis of fetal abnormalities [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 55(1): 75-80.
[1] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[2] 张璇, 马宇童, 苗玉倩, 张云, 吴士文, 党晓楚, 陈颖颖, 钟兆明, 王雪娟, 胡淼, 孙岩峰, 马秀珠, 吕发勤, 寇海燕. 超声对Duchenne肌营养不良儿童膈肌功能的评价[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1068-1073.
[3] 朱连华, 费翔, 韩鹏, 姜波, 李楠, 罗渝昆. 高帧频超声造影在胆囊息肉样病变中的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 904-910.
[4] 张梅芳, 谭莹, 朱巧珍, 温昕, 袁鹰, 秦越, 郭洪波, 侯伶秀, 黄文兰, 彭桂艳, 李胜利. 早孕期胎儿头臀长正中矢状切面超声图像的人工智能质控研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 945-950.
[5] 陈舜, 薛恩生, 叶琴. PDCA在持续改进超声危急值管理制度中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 974-978.
[6] 周钰菡, 肖欢, 唐毅, 杨春江, 周娟, 朱丽容, 徐娟, 牟芳婷. 超声对儿童髋关节暂时性滑膜炎的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 795-800.
[7] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[8] 郏亚平, 曾书娥. 含鳞状细胞癌成分的乳腺化生性癌的超声与病理特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 844-848.
[9] 张丽丽, 陈莉, 余美琴, 聂小艳, 王婧玲, 刘婷. PDCA循环法在超声浅表器官亚专科建设中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 717-721.
[10] 罗刚, 泮思林, 陈涛涛, 许茜, 纪志娴, 王思宝, 孙玲玉. 超声心动图在胎儿心脏介入治疗室间隔完整的肺动脉闭锁中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 605-609.
[11] 黄佳, 石华, 张玉国, 胡佳琪, 陈茜. 胎儿左头臂静脉正常与异常超声图像特征及其临床意义[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 610-617.
[12] 袁泽, 庄丽. 超声检测胎儿脐动脉和大脑中动脉血流对胎儿宫内窘迫的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 618-621.
[13] 蒋佳纯, 王晓冰, 陈培荣, 许世豪. 血清学指标联合常规超声及超声造影评分诊断原发性干燥综合征的临床价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 622-630.
[14] 廖梅, 张红君, 金洁玚, 吕艳, 任杰. 床旁超声造影对肝移植术后早期肝动脉血栓的诊断价值[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 630-634.
[15] 杨天池, 韩威, 邱枫, 祁佳慧. 术中胰腺超声弹性成像在胰腺质地评估中的应用[J]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2023, 12(06): 646-650.
阅读次数
全文


摘要