切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2023, Vol. 20 ›› Issue (06) : 631 -635. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2023.06.010

浅表器官超声影像学

超声联合乳腺X线摄影及PR、Her-2预测高级别与中低级别乳腺导管原位癌的价值
武壮壮, 张晓娟, 史泽洪, 史瑶, 原韶玲()   
  1. 030001 太原,山西医科大学;030013 太原,山西医科大学附属山西省肿瘤医院超声科
    030013 太原,山西医科大学附属山西省肿瘤医院放射科
    030032 太原,山西白求恩医院
    030013 太原,山西医科大学附属山西省肿瘤医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-15 出版日期:2023-06-01
  • 通信作者: 原韶玲

Prognostic value of ultrasound combined with mammography and PR and HER-2 status in high-grade and middle-low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast

Zhuangzhuang Wu, Xiaojuan Zhang, Zehong Shi, yao Shi, Shaoling Yuan()   

  1. Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030001,China; Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030013, China
    Department of Radiology, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030013, China
    Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Taiyuan 030032, China
    Department of Ultrasound, Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan 030013, China
  • Received:2021-12-15 Published:2023-06-01
  • Corresponding author: Shaoling Yuan
引用本文:

武壮壮, 张晓娟, 史泽洪, 史瑶, 原韶玲. 超声联合乳腺X线摄影及PR、Her-2预测高级别与中低级别乳腺导管原位癌的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(06): 631-635.

Zhuangzhuang Wu, Xiaojuan Zhang, Zehong Shi, yao Shi, Shaoling Yuan. Prognostic value of ultrasound combined with mammography and PR and HER-2 status in high-grade and middle-low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2023, 20(06): 631-635.

目的

探讨超声、乳腺X线影像学特征及孕激素受体(PR)、人表皮生长因子-2(Her-2)对高级别与中低级别乳腺导管原位癌(DCIS)的预测价值。

方法

回顾性分析山西省肿瘤医院2015年1月至2020年12月经手术病理证实的196例DCIS患者,术前均行超声及乳腺X线检查且病理资料完整。根据术后病理结果将其分为高级别DCIS组80例和中低级别DCIS组116例。应用单因素分析方法比较2组患者影像表现及免疫组化的差异,将差异有统计学意义的因素纳入多因素Logistic回归分析,分析高级别与中低级别DCIS的独立预测因素。

结果

将单因素分析有统计学意义的超声表现为肿块、乳腺X线为微钙化、雌激素受体(ER)、PR及Her-2纳入二元 Logistic 回归进行多因素分析。结果表明,超声表现为肿块(OR=0.248,95%CI:0.109~0.562)、PR受体阳性(OR=0.230,95%CI:0.057~0.931)是中低级别DCIS的独立预测因素。乳腺X线表现为微钙化(OR=4.048,95%CI:1.736~9.440)、Her-2阳性(OR=6.160,95%CI:2.149~17.655)是高级别DCIS的独立预测因素。

结论

术前影像学检查及免疫组化PR、Her-2测定对DCIS的预测及DCIS患者的管理及治疗具有一定临床价值。

Objective

To assess the predictive value of ultrasonography, mammography, and progesterone receptor (PR) and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER-2) status for high-grade and middle-low-grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on 196 patients with breast DCIS confirmed by surgical pathology from January 2015 to December 2020 at Shanxi Tumor Hospital. All patients were examined by ultrasonography and mammography before operation, and had complete pathological data. According to postoperative pathological results, the patients were divided into a high-grade DCIS group (n=80) and a middle-low-grade DCIS group (n=116). Univariate analysis was used to compare the differences in imaging and immunohistochemical features of patients in the two groups. Factors with statistically significant differences in the univariate analysis were included in multivariate Logistic regression analysis to analyze the independent predictors of high-grade and middle-low-grade DCIS.

Results

The statistically significant parameters identified in the univariate analysis, such as mass on ultrasound, microcalcification on mammography, and estrogen receptor (ER), PR, and HER-2 status, were included in binary logistic regression for multivariate analysis. The results showed that mass (odds ratio [OR]=0.248, 95% confidence interval [CI]:0.109~0.562) and PR positivity (OR=0.230, 95%CI:0.057~0.931) were independent predictor of middle-low-grade DCIS. Microcalcification (OR=4.048,95%CI:1.736~9.440) and HER-2 positivity (OR=6.160, 95%CI:2.149~17.655) were identified to be independent predictor of high-grade DCIS.

Conclusions

Preoperative imaging examination and immunohistochemical determination of PR and HER-2 status have appreciated clinical value for the prediction of DCIS and the management and treatment of DCIS patients.

表1 高级别与中低级别DCIS组单因素比较分析[例(%)]
图2 患者,女性,57岁,右乳高级别乳腺导管原位癌乳腺X线图像示多发微钙化
表2 高级别与中低级别DCIS预测因素赋值表
表3 高级别与中低级别DCIS多因素Logistic回归分析
[1]
Sanati S. Morphologic and molecular features of breast ductal carcinoma in situ [J]. Am J Pathol, 2019, 189(5): 946-955.
[2]
Liu Y, West R, Weber J, et al. Race and risk of subsequent aggressive breast cancer following ductal carcinoma in situ [J]. Cancer, 2019, 125(18): 3225-3233.
[3]
Ponti A, Ronco G, Lynge E, et al. Low-grade screen-detected ductal carcinoma in situ progresses more slowly than high-grade lesions: evidence from an international multi-centre study [J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2019, 177(3): 761-765.
[4]
孙强, 徐兵河, 邵志敏. 乳腺原位癌诊疗专家共识 [J]. 中华肿瘤杂志, 2016, 38(12): 942-947.
[5]
Tse G, Tan P, Cheung H, et al. Intermediate to highly suspicious calcification in breast lesions: a radio-pathologic correlation [J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2008, 110(1): 1-7.
[6]
O'Flynn E, Morel J, Gonzalez J, et al. Prediction of the presence of invasive disease from the measurement of extent of malignant microcalcification on mammography and ductal carcinoma in situ grade at core biopsy [J]. Clin Radiol, 2009, 64(2): 178-183.
[7]
Cha H, Chang Y, Lee E, et al. Ultrasonographic features of pure ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlations with pathologic features and biological markers [J]. Ultrasonography (Seoul, Korea), 2018, 37(4): 307-314.
[8]
包凌云. 乳腺导管原位癌的超声诊断 [J]. 浙江医学, 2019, 41(11): 1109-1112,1238.
[9]
刘慧敏, 曹小丽, 刘瑞华. 乳腺导管原位癌超声表现与病理关系的研究 [J]. 中华实验外科杂志, 2017, 34(4): 581-583.
[10]
Choi SH, Choi JS, Han BK, et al. Long-term Surveillance of Ductal Carcinoma in Situ Detected with Screening Mammography versus US: Factors Associated with Second Breast Cancer [J]. Radiology, 2019, 292(1): 37-48.
[11]
Bragg A, Candelaria R, Adrada B, et al. Imaging of noncalcified ductal carcinoma in situ [J]. J Clin Imaging Sci, 2021, 11: 34.
[12]
van Dooijeweert C, van Diest P, Baas I, et al. Grading variation in 2,934 patients with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: the effect of laboratory-and pathologist-specific feedback reports [J]. Diagn Pathol, 2020, 15(1): 52.
[13]
Gunawardena D, Burrows S, Taylor D. Non-mass versus mass-like ultrasound patterns in ductal carcinoma in situ: is there an association with high-risk histology? [J]. Clin Radiol, 2020, 75(2): 140-147.
[14]
Watanabe T, Yamaguchi T, Tsunoda H, et al. Ultrasound image classification of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast: analysis of 705 DCIS lesions [J].Ultrasound Med Biol, 2017, 43(5): 918-925.
[15]
Park J, Park Y, Kim E, et al. Sonographic findings of high-grade and non-high-grade ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast [J]. J Ultrasound Med, 2010, 29(12): 1687-1697.
[16]
中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2019年版) [J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2019, 29(8): 609-680.
[17]
Shehata M, Grimm L, Ballantyne N, et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ: current concepts in biology, imaging, and treatment [J]. J Breast Imaging, 2019, 1(3): 166-176.
[18]
Coleman W. Breast ductal carcinoma in situ: precursor to invasive breast cancer [J]. Am J Pathol, 2019, 189(5): 942-945.
[19]
Kong J, Liu X, Zhang X, et al. The predictive value of calcification for the grading of ductal carcinoma in situ in Chinese patients [J]. Medicine, 2020, 99(28): e20847.
[20]
Wu L, Zhao Y, Lin P, et al. Preoperative ultrasound radiomics analysis for expression of multiple molecular biomarkers in mass type of breast ductal carcinoma in situ [J]. BMC Med Imaging, 2021, 21(1): 84.
[21]
Kim HR, Jung HK. Histopathology findings of non-mass cancers on breast ultrasound [J]. Acta Radiol Open, 2018, 7(6): 2058460118774957.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[6] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[7] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[8] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[9] 胡可, 鲁蓉. 基于多参数超声特征的中老年女性压力性尿失禁诊断模型研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 477-483.
[10] 张妍, 原韶玲, 史泽洪, 郭馨阳, 牛菁华. 小肾肿瘤超声漏诊原因分析新思路[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 500-504.
[11] 席芬, 张培培, 孝梦甦, 刘真真, 张一休, 张璟, 朱庆莉, 孟华. 乳腺错构瘤的临床与超声影像学特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 505-510.
[12] 钱警语, 郑明明. 《2024意大利妇产科学会非侵入性和侵入性产前诊断指南》解读[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 486-492.
[13] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[14] 谭瑞义. 小细胞骨肉瘤诊断及治疗研究现状与进展[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(08): 781-784.
[15] 陈秀晓, 隋文倩, 王珉鑫, 吴圆圆. 腹股沟斜疝并腹腔游离体超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 516-517.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?