切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (03) : 251 -256. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2024.03.002

妇产科超声影像学

颈后透明层和头臀长在妊娠11~13+6周双胎心脏畸形筛查中的价值
尹宏宇1, 吴青青2,(), 李晓菲2   
  1. 1. 100026 首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院/北京妇幼保健院超声科;050011 石家庄市第四医院超声科
    2. 100026 首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院/北京妇幼保健院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-01 出版日期:2024-03-01
  • 通信作者: 吴青青
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2016YFC1000104)

Value of fetal nuchal translucency and crown-rump length in screening for fetal heart malformation in twins at 11-13+6 weeks of pregnancy

Hongyu Yin1, Qingqing Wu2,(), Xiaofei Li2   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University·Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing 100026, China;Department of Ultrasound, the Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang 050011, China
    2. Department of Ultrasound, Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital, Capital Medical University·Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Beijing 100026, China
  • Received:2023-07-01 Published:2024-03-01
  • Corresponding author: Qingqing Wu
引用本文:

尹宏宇, 吴青青, 李晓菲. 颈后透明层和头臀长在妊娠11~13+6周双胎心脏畸形筛查中的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 251-256.

Hongyu Yin, Qingqing Wu, Xiaofei Li. Value of fetal nuchal translucency and crown-rump length in screening for fetal heart malformation in twins at 11-13+6 weeks of pregnancy[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(03): 251-256.

目的

探讨妊娠11~13+6周双胎颈后透明层(NT)增厚、NT差异及头臀长(CRL)差异在筛查双胎胎儿不同严重程度心脏畸形中的临床价值。

方法

回顾性分析在首都医科大学附属北京妇产医院(2012年1月至2016年12月)和石家庄市第四医院(2014年1月至2018年12月)建档并已知妊娠结局的双胎病例,筛选双胎之一或两胎儿发生心脏畸形的病例,按照心脏畸形严重程度分为轻度心脏畸形组和复杂心脏畸形组,将同时期分娩的正常双胎作为对照组。记录所有入组病例在妊娠11~13+6周的NT值、NT值≥第95百分位数和NT值≥第99百分位数的例数、NT差异≥20%和CRL差异≥10%的例数。采用χ2检验或Fisher's确切概率法进行组间对比分析,再应用Logistic回归分析筛选双胎心脏畸形发生的危险因素。

结果

(1)双胎心脏畸形者共23例,其中轻度心脏畸形组14例,复杂心脏畸形组9例,正常对照组1906例。(2)与正常对照组相比,复杂心脏畸形组NT值≥第95百分位数和NT值≥第99百分位数的发生率、CRL差异≥10%的发生率明显增高,差异具有统计学意义(χ2=63.628、53.480、8.064,P<0.001、<0.001、=0.020),而NT差异≥20%的发生率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。轻度心脏畸形组与正常对照组相比各项指标差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。轻度心脏畸形组与复杂心脏畸形组之间除NT值≥第95百分位数的发生率差异具有统计学意义(χ2=4.480,P=0.014),其他指标差异均无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。(3)多因素Logistic回归分析显示,NT值增厚(即NT值≥第95百分位数)是双胎复杂心脏畸形发生的独立危险因素(OR=31.571,95%CI:8.022~124.246,P<0.001),但CRL差异≥10%并不是双胎复杂心脏畸形发生的独立危险因素(P>0.05)。

结论

妊娠11~13+6周超声发现一胎或两胎NT值增厚、两胎儿间CRL差异≥10%提示双胎发生复杂性心脏畸形的风险增加;NT增厚是双胎发生复杂性心脏畸形的危险因素。

Objective

To assess the clinical value of nuchal translucency (NT) thickening, NT discordance, and crown-rump length (CRL) discordance in screening twins with different degrees of congenital heart malformation at 11-13+6 weeks of pregnancy.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed on twin fetal cases collected from Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Capital Medical University/Beijing Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital (January 2012 to December 2016) and the Fourth Hospital of Shijiazhuang City (January 2014 to December 2018). Fetuses with cardiac malformation were screened out and divided into either a mild cardiac malformation group or a complex cardiac malformation group according to the degree of cardiac malformation, and normal twins delivered at the same time were used as controls. The NT value of all enrolled cases at 11-13+6 weeks of gestation was obtained, and the number of cases with NT value ≥ the 95th percentile, NT value ≥ the 99th percentile, NT discordance ≥ 20%, and CRL discordance ≥ 10% was recorded. The χ2 test or Fisher's exact probability method was used for comparative analysis between groups, and Logistic regression analysis was used to screen the risk factors for cardiac malformations in twins.

Results

There were 23 cases of twins with cardiac malformation, including 14 cases in the mild cardiac malformation group, 9 cases in the complex cardiac malformation group, and 1906 cases in the normal control group. Compared with the control group, the incidence of NT value ≥ the 95th percentile, NT value ≥ the 99th percentile, and CRL discordance ≥ 10% in the complex cardiac malformation group was significantly higher (χ2=63.628, 53.480, and 8.064; P<0.001, <0.001, and =0.020, respectively), while the incidence of NT discordance ≥ 20% was not statistically different between the complex cardiac malformation group and the control group. There was no statistically significant difference in various indicators between the mild cardiac malformation group and the control group. Except for the NT value ≥ the 95th percentage (χ2=4.480, P=0.014), there was no significant difference in other indicators between the mild cardiac malformation group and the complex cardiac malformation group. Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that increased NT (NT value ≥ the 95th percentile) was an independent risk factor for the occurrence of complex cardiac malformations in twins (odds ratio=31.571, 95% confidence interval: 8.022-124.246, P<0.001), but CRL discordance ≥ 10% was not an independent risk factor for complex cardiac malformation in twins (P>0.05).

Conclusion

Ultrasound at 11-13+6 weeks of gestation reveals NT increase in one or two fetuses of the twins, and CRL discordance ≥ 10% indicates an increased risk of complex cardiac malformations in twins. Increased NT is a risk factor for complex heart malformations in twins.

表1 23例双胎心脏畸形病例超声诊断和随访结果
表2 3组研究对象各超声检查指标比较(例)
表3 双胎复杂心脏畸形发生的多因素Logistic回归分析结果
1
李胜利. 胎儿心脏畸形产前超声筛查与诊断策略 [J]. 现代实用医学, 2011, 23(4): 364-366,封2.
2
Pettit KE, Merchant M, Machin GA, et al. Congenital heart defects in a large, unselected cohort of monochorionic twins [J]. Perinatol, 2013, 33(6): 457-461.
3
李晓菲, 吴青青. 妊娠早中期超声指标在单绒毛膜双胎中的临床研究进展[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(7): 716-719.
4
李胜利. 早孕期胎儿严重心脏畸形的产前筛查与咨询 [J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2018, 20(1): 1-4.
5
Carvalho JS. Fetal heart scanning in the first trimester [J]. Prenat Diagn, 2004, 24(13): 1060-1067.
6
Bottelli L, Franzè V, Tuo G, et al. Prenatal detection of congenital heart disease at 12-13 gestational weeks: detailed analysis of false-negative cases [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2023, 61(5): 577-586.
7
Esteves KM, Tugarinov N, Lechmann G, et al. The value of detailed first-trimester ultrasound in the era of noninvasive prenatal testing [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2023, 229(3): 326.e1-326.e6.
8
李胜利, 文华轩. 11~13+6周早孕期胎儿超声规范化扫查技术及判断标准[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2014, 11(1): 6-12.
9
中华医学会超声医学分会超声心动图学组. 中国胎儿超声心动图检查规范 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2015, 24(11): 921-926.
10
范海波, 焦阳, 陈立新, 等. 胎儿心脏畸形的超声诊断及临床分型[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2014, 11(10): 820-827.
11
李军,苏海砾,张军,等.胎儿先天性心脏病的超声诊断及分型[J].中华超声影像学杂志, 2011, 20(11): 940-943.
12
徐金玉, 吴青青. ISUOG临床应用指南:双胎妊娠超声诊断规范解读[J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(5): 334-341.
13
Ji X, Xia Y, Zhang H, et al. Study on the application of ultrasonography in the diagnosis of fetal cardiac structural abnormalities and the relationship between fetal cardiac structural abnormalities with chromosome abnormalities in early pregnancy [J]. Ann Transl Med, 2021, 9: 1790.
14
Makrydimas G, Sotiriadis A, Ioannidis JP. Screening performance of first-trimester nuchal translucency for major cardiac defects: a meta-analysis [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2003, 189(5): 1330-1335.
15
D'Antonio F, Khalil A, Pagani G, et al. Crown-rump length discordance and adverse perinatal outcome in twin pregnancies: systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2014, 44(2): 138-146.
16
裴秋艳, 张晓红, 李建国, 等. 胎儿颈项透明层增厚及静脉导管血流频谱异常在先天性心脏畸形筛查中的价值 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2011, 27(2): 169-172.
17
Li X, Xuan Y, Wang J, et al. Crown-rump length discordance, increased nuchal translucency, and detection of fetal structural anomalies in twin pregnancies in the first trimester: 5 years of experience in a tertiary hospital in China [J]. Ultrasound Med, 2022, 41(4): 971-982.
18
Elger T, Akolekar R, Syngelaki A, et al. Fetal loss after chorionic villus sampling in twin pregnancy [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 58(1): 48-55.
19
Khalil A, Rodgers M, Baschat A, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines: role of ultrasound in twin pregnancy [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2016, 47(2): 247-263.
20
Litwinska E, Syngelaki A, Cimpoca B, et al. Intertwin discordance in fetal size at 11-13 weeks' gestation and pregnancy outcome [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2020, 55(2): 189-197.
21
Syngelaki A, Hammami A, Bower S, et al. Diagnosis of fetal non-chromosomal abnormalities on routine ultrasound examination at 11-13 weeks' gestation [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 54(4): 468-476.
22
Kalish RB, Gupta M, Perni SC, et al. Clinical significance of first trimester crown-rump length disparity in dichorionic twin gestations [J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 191(4): 1437-1440.
23
尹宏宇, 吴青青, 李晓菲, 等. 妊娠11~13+6周胎儿超声指标在双胎胎儿心脏畸形筛查中的价值 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2022, 31(9): 779-784.
[1] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[4] 孙佳丽, 金琳, 沈崔琴, 陈晴晴, 林艳萍, 李朝军, 徐栋. 机器人辅助超声引导下经皮穿刺的体外实验研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 884-889.
[5] 史学兵, 谢迎东, 谢霓, 徐超丽, 杨斌, 孙帼. 声辐射力弹性成像对不可切除肝细胞癌门静脉癌栓患者放射治疗效果的评价[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 778-784.
[6] 张商迪, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 毛彦恺, 陈阳, 袁华, 陈燕. 中晚孕期胎儿心房内径定量评估心房比例失调胎儿心脏畸形的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 785-793.
[7] 李洋, 蔡金玉, 党晓智, 常婉英, 巨艳, 高毅, 宋宏萍. 基于深度学习的乳腺超声应变弹性图像生成模型的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 563-570.
[8] 洪玮, 叶细容, 刘枝红, 杨银凤, 吕志红. 超声影像组学联合临床病理特征预测乳腺癌新辅助化疗完全病理缓解的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(06): 571-579.
[9] 项文静, 徐燕, 茹彤, 郑明明, 顾燕, 戴晨燕, 朱湘玉, 严陈晨. 神经学超声检查在产前诊断胼胝体异常中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 470-476.
[10] 胡可, 鲁蓉. 基于多参数超声特征的中老年女性压力性尿失禁诊断模型研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 477-483.
[11] 张妍, 原韶玲, 史泽洪, 郭馨阳, 牛菁华. 小肾肿瘤超声漏诊原因分析新思路[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 500-504.
[12] 席芬, 张培培, 孝梦甦, 刘真真, 张一休, 张璟, 朱庆莉, 孟华. 乳腺错构瘤的临床与超声影像学特征分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 505-510.
[13] 钱警语, 郑明明. 《2024意大利妇产科学会非侵入性和侵入性产前诊断指南》解读[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 486-492.
[14] 张琛, 秦鸣, 董娟, 陈玉龙. 超声检查对儿童肠扭转缺血性改变的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2024, 14(06): 565-568.
[15] 陈秀晓, 隋文倩, 王珉鑫, 吴圆圆. 腹股沟斜疝并腹腔游离体超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 516-517.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?