切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (07) : 675 -680. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2024.07.006

超声医学质量控制

河北省超声医学质量管理与控制现状分析
王晓娜1, 张宁1, 宋伟1, 杨明1, 李丽1,(), 薛红元1   
  1. 1. 050051 石家庄,河北省人民医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2024-05-21 出版日期:2024-07-01
  • 通信作者: 李丽

Analysis of current status of ultrasonic medical quality management and control in Hebei Province

Xiaona Wang1, Ning Zhang1, Wei Song1, ming Yang1, Li Li1,(), Hongyuan Xue1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang 050051, China
  • Received:2024-05-21 Published:2024-07-01
  • Corresponding author: Li Li
引用本文:

王晓娜, 张宁, 宋伟, 杨明, 李丽, 薛红元. 河北省超声医学质量管理与控制现状分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 675-680.

Xiaona Wang, Ning Zhang, Wei Song, ming Yang, Li Li, Hongyuan Xue. Analysis of current status of ultrasonic medical quality management and control in Hebei Province[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(07): 675-680.

目的

分析河北省超声医学质量控制现状及各地区差异,发现问题,并提出解决方案。

方法

2022年河北省共有402家设有超声医学专业的医疗机构参与质控网络平台的数据上报,上报数据包括《超声医学专业质量管理控制指标专家共识(2022年版)》中提到的12个超声质控指标:超声医师日均工作量、超声仪器质检率、住院超声检查48 h内完成率、超声危急值10 min内通报完成率、超声报告书写合格率、乳腺病变超声报告进行乳腺影像报告和数据系统(BI-RADS)分类率、超声报告阳性率、超声筛查中胎儿重大致死性畸形的检出率、超声诊断符合率、乳腺占位超声诊断准确率、颈动脉狭窄(≥50%)超声诊断符合率、超声介入相关主要并发症发生率,对全省地市数据进行对比分析。

结果

(1)全省超声医师日均工作量低于全国均值水平(23.50人次vs 29.99人次),其中唐山市最高(30.11人次),邯郸市最低(17.98人次),8个市低于全省平均水平。(2)全省超声仪器质检率平均值接近全国均值水平(97.13% vs 97.14%),其中沧州市、衡水市、秦皇岛市均达100%,3个市低于全省平均水平,其中唐山市最低为87.04%。(3)全省住院超声检查48 h内完成率均值水平稍高于全国均值水平(93.22% vs 93.07%),衡水市最高为99.93%,张家口市最低为79.19%,3个市低于全省平均水平。(4)全省超声危急值10 min内通报完成率低于全国均值水平(96.87% vs 97.33%),其中衡水市、秦皇岛市最高为100%,沧州市最低为87.63%,4个市低于全省平均水平。(5)全省超声报告书写合格率平均值稍高于全国平均水平(99.37% vs 99.11%),其中秦皇岛市最高为99.91%,承德市最低为95.75%,4个市低于全省平均水平。(6)全省乳腺病变超声报告进行BI-RADS分类率低于全国均值水平(75.34% vs 83.95%),其中秦皇岛市最高为98.59%,石家庄市最低为57.03%,5个市低于全省平均水平。(7)全省各医疗机构超声阳性率稍高于全国均值水平(75.37% vs 74.42%),其中秦皇岛市阳性率最高为87.83%,邢台市阳性率最低为68.60%,6个市低于全省平均水平。(8)全省各医疗机构超声筛查中胎儿重大致死性畸形检出率稍低于全国均值水平(0.04% vs 0.06%),其中廊坊市阳性率最高为0.09%,邢台市阳性率最低为0.01%,5个市低于全省平均水平。(9)全省各医疗机构超声诊断符合率低于全国均值水平(86.75% vs 87.78%),其中承德市最高为94.40%,邯郸市最低为71.59%,4个市低于全省平均水平。(10)全省各医疗机构乳腺占位超声诊断准确率高于全国均值水平(85.96% vs 82.49%),其中承德市最高为91.98%,邯郸市最低为81.95%,5个市低于全省平均水平。(11)全省各医疗机构颈动脉狭窄(≥50%)超声诊断准确率高于全国均值水平(91.84% vs 83.76%),其中邯郸市最高为97.75%,廊坊市最低为85.39%,7个市低于全省平均水平。(12)全省各医疗机构超声介入相关主要并发症发生率低于全国均值水平(0.20% vs 0.41%),其中承德市最高为1.15%,秦皇岛市最低为0.03%,6个市高于全省平均水平。

结论

通过质控网络平台数据发现河北省超声医学质量控制现状及各地区差异,及时发现了问题并解决问题,可进一步提升全省超声专业水平。

Objective

To analyze the current situation and regional differences of ultrasound medical quality control in Hebei Province by collecting and sorting out the quality control data of hospitals based on a quality control network platform, in order to find the problems and propose solutions.

Methods

In 2022, a total of 402 medical institutions with ultrasound medicine specialty in Hebei Province participated in reporting the data to a quality control network platform. The reported data included 12 ultrasound quality control indicators mentioned in the Expert Consensus on the Quality Management and Control Indicators of Ultrasound Medicine ( 2022 Edition): ultrasound physician per capita workload, ultrasonic instrument quality inspection rate, completion rate of ultrasound examination within 48 hours of admission, completion rate of ultrasound critical value report within 10 minutes, qualified rate of ultrasound report writing, classification rate of breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) for ultrasound report of breast lesions, positive rate of ultrasound report, detection rate of fetal major lethal malformations in ultrasound screening, coincidence rate of ultrasound diagnosis, accuracy of ultrasound diagnosis of breast lesions, coincidence rate of ultrasound diagnosis of carotid stenosis (≥50%), and incidence of major complications related to ultrasound intervention. These data were compared and analyzed.

Results

The average number of daily ultrasound examinations in the whole province was lower than the national average level (23.50 vs 29.99). Among cities in the province, Tangshan had the highest average number of daily ultrasound examinations (30.11 person-times), Handan had the lowest number (17.98 person-times), and 8 cities had a number below the average. The average quality inspection rate of ultrasonic instruments in the whole province was close to the national average level (97.13% vs 97.14%). This rate reached 100% in Cangzhou, Hengshui, and Qinhuangdao, 3 cities had a rate lower than the average, and Tangshan City had the lowest rate at 87.04%. The average completion rate of ultrasound examination within 48 hours of admission in the whole province was slightly higher than the national average level (93.22 % vs 93.07 %). Hengshui had the highest completion rate at 99.93 %, Zhangjiakou had the lowest rate at 79.19%, and three cities had a rate lower than the average. The completion rate of ultrasound critical value report within 10 minutes in the whole province was lower than the national average level (96.87% vs 97.33%). Hengshui and Qinhuangdao had the highest completion rate at 100%, and Cangzhou had the lowest completion rate at 87.63%. The average qualified rate of ultrasound report writing in the whole province was slightly higher than the national average (99.37% vs 99.11%). Qinhuangdao had the highest rate at 99.91%, Chengde had the lowest rate at 95.75%, and 4 cities had a rate below the average. The classification rate of BI-RADS in the ultrasound report of breast lesions in the overall province was lower than the national average level (75.34 % vs 83.95%). Qinhuangdao had the highest classification rate at 98.59%, Shijiazhuang had the lowest rate at 57.03%, and 5 cities had a rate below the average. The positive rate of ultrasound in medical institutions in the province was slightly higher than the national average level (75.37% vs 74.42%). Qinhuangdao had the highest positive rate at 87.83%, Xingtai had the lowest rate at 68.60%, and 6 cities had a rate below the average. The detection rate of fetal major lethal malformations in ultrasound screening in medical institutions in the province was slightly lower than the national average level (0.04% vs 0.06%). Langfang had the highest positive rate at 0.09%, Xingtai had the lowest positive rate at 0.01%, and 5 cities had a rate below the average. The coincidence rate of ultrasound diagnosis in medical institutions in the province was lower than the national average level (86.75 % vs 87.78 %). Chengde had the highest coincidence rate at 94.40%, Handan had the lowest rate at 71.59%, and 4 cities had a rate lower than the average. The accuracy of ultrasound diagnosis of breast masses in medical institutions in the province was higher than the national average level (85.96% vs 82.49%). Chengde had the highest accuracy at 91.98%, Handan had the lowest accuracy at 81.95%, and 5 cities had an accuracy below the average. The accuracy of ultrasound diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis (≥50%) in medical institutions in the province was higher than the national average level (91.84% vs 83.76%). Handan had the highest accuracy at 97.75%, Langfang had the lowest accuracy at 85.39%, and 7 cities had an accuracy below the average. The incidence of major complications related to medical ultrasound intervention in the province was lower than the national average level (0.20% vs 0.41%). Chengde had the highest incidence at 1.15%, Qinhuangdao had the lowest incidence at 0.03%, and 6 cities had an incidence higher than the average.

Conclusion

Based on the data of a quality control network platform, we summarize the current situation and regional differences in ultrasonic medical quality control in Hebei Province, so that we can find problems in time and solve problems to further improve the professional level of ultrasound in the province.

表1 2022年河北省超声医学专业医疗质量控制指标抽样医疗机构分布情况(家)
表2 2022年河北省不同地市质控指标分布情况
1
薛恩生, 陈舜. 超声医学专业医疗质量控制指标(2022年版)的解读及临床应用 [J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(7): 690-692.
2
王红燕, 马莉, 谷杨, 等. 加强超声医学质量控制 促进学科创新发展 [J/CD].中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(5): 321-326, 400.
3
国家超声医学质量控制中心, 中华医学会超声医学分会. 超声医学专业质量管理控制指标专家共识(2018年版) [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2018, 27(11): 921-923.
4
赵娜, 郑权, 张瑞芳. 超声医学质量控制与区域医疗合作信息化建设初探 [J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(7): 614-618.
5
王志兰. 浅谈超声医学质量控制的内容与方法 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2019, 16(5): 339-341.
6
尹立雪, 张红梅. 超声医学质量控制的基本概念和基本原则 [J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(7): 609-612.
[1] 顾莉莉, 姜凡. 安徽省超声产前筛查切面图像质量现状调查情况及分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 671-674.
[2] 周易, 张红梅, 尹立雪, 杨浩, 付培. 四川省超声医学质量控制指标动态变化趋势分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 664-670.
[3] 王益佳, 周青, 曹省, 袁芳洁, 周妍, 张梅. 中国经胸超声心动图检查存图及报告质控现状分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 657-663.
[4] 张亚庆, 黄旴宁, 许珊珊, 刘小蓝. 海南省二级与三级医院超声医学质量控制指标分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 681-685.
[5] 刘畅, 蒋洁, 胥雪冬, 崔立刚, 王淑敏, 陈文. 北京市海淀区医疗机构甲状腺超声检查及TIRADS分类基线调查[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 693-697.
[6] 吴禾禾, 马春亮, 常青, 陈宇, 牛丽娟, 王勇. 超声医学质量控制与住院医师规范化培训相结合的实践探讨[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 698-701.
[7] 高琼, 孙终霞, 张戈, 王敏, 徐子杭, 张佳藤, 蒋天安. 超声诊断胰腺占位性病变漏误诊原因及对策分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 517-521.
[8] 德央, 尼玛玉珍, 苏娜, 普布次仁, 拉姆次仁, 嘎措, 格桑德吉, 姜玉新, 李建初, 王红燕. 西藏自治区超声医学专业质量控制现状分析及对策[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 327-330.
[9] 王佳佳, 王丽丽, 彭梅, 姜凡. 基于2020至2021年安徽省哨所医院质量控制数据探讨超声诊断符合率影响指标[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(01): 63-68.
[10] 张梅芳, 谭莹, 朱巧珍, 温昕, 袁鹰, 秦越, 郭洪波, 侯伶秀, 黄文兰, 彭桂艳, 李胜利. 早孕期胎儿头臀长正中矢状切面超声图像的人工智能质控研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 945-950.
[11] 赵瑞娜, 姜玉新, 陈涛, 张莉, 陈程, 晋思琦, 陈雪琪, 杨筱, 李建初. 北京市超声医学专业继续医学教育现状及改革需求研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 966-973.
[12] 姚宏伟, 魏鹏宇, 高加勒, 张忠涛. 不断提高腹腔镜右半结肠癌D3根治术的规范化[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 1-4.
[13] 陶莹, 李晓光, 朱桃红, 杨彦, 陈琦. Westgard西格玛规则在中孕期母血清学产前筛查质量管理中的应用[J]. 中华临床实验室管理电子杂志, 2024, 12(02): 65-69.
[14] 倪沂江, 张伟亚, 蒋伟, 秦辉. 一体化创伤中心对严重多发伤患者救治质量的影响[J]. 中华卫生应急电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 21-25.
[15] 赵稳, 刘浩, 李丁昌, 高文星, 刘先强, 武现生, 董光龙. 重视SADI-S手术全流程质量控制[J]. 中华肥胖与代谢病电子杂志, 2024, 10(01): 15-20.
阅读次数
全文


摘要