切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (07) : 671 -674. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2024.07.005

所属专题: 总编推荐

超声医学质量控制

安徽省超声产前筛查切面图像质量现状调查情况及分析
顾莉莉1, 姜凡1,()   
  1. 1. 230601 合肥,安徽医科大学第二附属医院超声医学科
  • 收稿日期:2023-04-29 出版日期:2024-07-01
  • 通信作者: 姜凡

Survey and analysis of quality of screening prenatal ultrasound images in Anhui Province

Lili Gu1, Fan Jiang1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230601, China
  • Received:2023-04-29 Published:2024-07-01
  • Corresponding author: Fan Jiang
引用本文:

顾莉莉, 姜凡. 安徽省超声产前筛查切面图像质量现状调查情况及分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 671-674.

Lili Gu, Fan Jiang. Survey and analysis of quality of screening prenatal ultrasound images in Anhui Province[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(07): 671-674.

目的

调查安徽省超声产前筛查切面标准率及完整率基本情况,分析促进超声产前筛查和产前诊断服务标准化、同质化的措施。

方法

安徽省内各产前筛查和(或)产前诊断医疗机构超声医学科于2024年4月在产前超声人工智能助手云平台上传2023年3月的筛查病例(包括至少2例早孕期、5例中孕期筛查病例),依据2022版超声产前筛查指南、产科超声规范化培训考核标准中国专家共识(2022版),对66家医院上传的图像进行智慧质控,质控内容包括:切面标准率、完整率,单切面得分,切面扣分项。

结果

早孕期产前筛查病例共185例,缺失病例数91例,平均得分80.38分,切面标准率、完整率分别为40.7%、50.8%;得分较高切面分别是经侧脑室横切面(63.8%,118/185)和颈项透明层测量切面(58.9%,109/185),得分较低切面分别为脐带腹壁入口横切面(27.0%,50/185)和胎儿正中矢状切面(13.0%,24/185),漏检最多的是脐带腹壁入口横切面(71.9%,133/185)。中孕期产前筛查病例共373例,缺失病例数265例,平均得分85.38分,切面标准率、完整率分别为54.6%、29.0%;得分较高切面分别是胫腓骨长轴切面(85.8%,320/373)和上唇冠状切面(84.2%,314/373),得分较低切面分别为三血管气管切面(66.2%,247/373)和肱骨长轴切面(65.4%,244/373),漏检最多的是双肾水平横切面(16.1%,60/373)。

结论

安徽省超声产前筛查切面标准率和完整率低是省内医院面临的共同问题,对产前超声检查医师进行规范化培训,增加检查前后的质量控制是有必要的。

Objective

To investigate the the of qualified sections and the rate of cases with qualified sections in prenatal ultrasound screening in Anhui Province, in order to promote the standardization and homogenization of prenatal ultrasound screening and prenatal diagnostic services.

Methods

The ultrasound medicine departments of all prenatal screening and/or prenatal diagnosis medical institutions in Anhui Province uploaded the cases screened in March 2023 to the prenatal ultrasound artificial intelligence assistant cloud platform in April 2024 (including at least 2 cases in the first trimester and 5 cases in the second trimester). According to the Practice guidelines for performance of prenatal ultrasound screening (2022) and Chinese expert consensus on assessment standards of obstetric ultrasound training program (2022 edition), intelligent quality control was conducted on the images uploaded by 66 hospitals. The quality control contents included the rate of qualified sections, the rate of cases with qualified sections, single section scores, and sections with lower scores.

Results

A total of 185 cases of prenatal screening in the first trimester were encompassed. The number of cases with non-qualified sections was 91, with an average score of 80.38. The rate of qualified sections and the rate of cases with qualified sections were 40.7% and 50.8%, respectively. The sections obtaining higher scores were the transventricular section (63.8%, 118/185) and the view of nuchal translucency (58.9%, 109/185), while the sections obtaining lower scores were the transverse section of the cord insertion into the fetal abdomen (27.0%, 50/185) and the midsagittal view of the fetus (13.0%, 24/185). The section most often missed was the transverse section of the cord insertion into the fetal abdomen (71.9%, 133/185). A total of 373 cases of prenatal screening in the second trimester were encompassed. The number of cases with non-qualified sections was 265, with an average score of 85.38. The rate of qualified sections and the rate of cases with qualified sections were 54.6% and 29.0%, respectively. The sections obtaining higher scores were the longitudinal cross-section of the tibia and fibula (85.8%, 320/373) and the coronal section of the upper lip (84.2%, 314/373), while the sections obtaining lower scores were the three vessels and trachea view (66.2%, 247/373) and the longitudinal axial section of the humerus (65.4%, 244/373). The section most often missed was the transverse section of the kidneys (16.1%, 60/373).

Conclusion

The low standard rate and integrity rate of ultrasound prenatal screening section in Anhui Province are the common problems faced by hospitals in Anhui province. It is necessary to conduct standardized training for prenatal ultrasound doctors and strengthen quality control before and after the examination.

1
Salomon LJ, Alfirevic Z, Berghella V, et al. ISUOG Practice Guidelines (updated): performance of the routine mid-trimester fetal ultrasound scan [J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2022, 59(6): 840-856.
2
吴青青, 杨文娟. 解读胎儿孕中期常规超声筛查应用指南[国际妇产科超声学会(ISUOG)] [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2011, 8(1): 17-21.
3
中华医学会超声医学分会妇产超声学组, 国家卫生健康委妇幼司全国产前诊断专家组医学影像组. 超声产前筛查指南 [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2022, 31(1): 1-12.
4
欧阳云淑, 张一休, 孟华, 等. iworks智能工作流对孕中期超声检查质量的影响 [J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2022, 38(4): 570-574.
5
中国医师协会超声医师分会. 产科超声规范化培训考核标准中国专家共识(2022版) [J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2022, 31(5): 369-378.
6
张海春, 陈钟萍, 黄苑铭, 等. 产前超声诊断质量控制体系的建立及应用价值研究 [J]. 现代医院, 2017, 17(2): 164-165, 168.
7
孙丽娟, 王欣, 吴青青, 等. 超声检查胎儿颈项透明层厚度在筛查胎儿染色体异常中的价值 [J]. 中华妇产科杂志, 2013, 48(11): 819-823.
[1] 戴飞, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 狄敏. 胎儿心脏超声定量多参数对主动脉缩窄胎儿心脏结构及功能的诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 950-958.
[2] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[3] 杜祖升, 赵博文, 张帧, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 毛彦恺. 应用二维斑点追踪成像技术评估孕周及心尖方向对中晚孕期正常胎儿左心房应变的影响[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 843-851.
[4] 杨忠, 时敬业, 邓学东, 姜纬, 殷林亮, 潘琦, 梁泓, 马建芳, 王珍奇, 张俊, 董姗姗. 产前超声在胎儿22q11.2 微缺失综合征中的应用价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(09): 852-858.
[5] 张商迪, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 毛彦恺, 陈阳, 袁华, 陈燕. 中晚孕期胎儿心房内径定量评估心房比例失调胎儿心脏畸形的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(08): 785-793.
[6] 王益佳, 周青, 曹省, 袁芳洁, 周妍, 张梅. 中国经胸超声心动图检查存图及报告质控现状分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 657-663.
[7] 周易, 张红梅, 尹立雪, 杨浩, 付培. 四川省超声医学质量控制指标动态变化趋势分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 664-670.
[8] 王晓娜, 张宁, 宋伟, 杨明, 李丽, 薛红元. 河北省超声医学质量管理与控制现状分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 675-680.
[9] 张亚庆, 黄旴宁, 许珊珊, 刘小蓝. 海南省二级与三级医院超声医学质量控制指标分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 681-685.
[10] 刘畅, 蒋洁, 胥雪冬, 崔立刚, 王淑敏, 陈文. 北京市海淀区医疗机构甲状腺超声检查及TIRADS分类基线调查[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 693-697.
[11] 吴禾禾, 马春亮, 常青, 陈宇, 牛丽娟, 王勇. 超声医学质量控制与住院医师规范化培训相结合的实践探讨[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 698-701.
[12] 王秋莲, 张莹, 李春敏, 徐树明, 张玉奇. 胎儿主动脉弓部梗阻伴发复杂心内畸形的产前超声诊断及漏误诊分析[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 718-725.
[13] 曾晴, 文华轩, 袁鹰, 廖伊梅, 秦越, 罗丹丹, 梁美玲, 李胜利. 经腹二维超声评价胎儿大脑外侧裂的新参数——外侧裂平台角度[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 454-459.
[14] 王濛, 王華麟, 王鉴, 孙锟. 先天性心脏病宫内诊疗现状与展望[J/OL]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(05): 481-485.
[15] 嵇振岭, 陈杰, 唐健雄. 重视复杂腹壁疝手术并发症的预防和处理[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 601-606.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?