切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2024, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (05) : 454 -459. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2024.05.002

妇产科超声影像学

经腹二维超声评价胎儿大脑外侧裂的新参数——外侧裂平台角度
曾晴1, 文华轩1, 袁鹰1,(), 廖伊梅1, 秦越1, 罗丹丹1, 梁美玲1, 李胜利1   
  1. 1. 518028 深圳市妇幼保健院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2023-06-21 出版日期:2024-05-01
  • 通信作者: 袁鹰
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(2022YFF0606301); 国家自然科学基金(62227808); 深圳市科技计划项目(JCYJ20220530155208018); 深圳市妇幼保健院院内科研基金项目(FYB2022001)

Sylvian fissure plateau angle: a new parameter to evaluate fetal sylvian fissure by transabdominal two-dimensional ultrasound

Qing Zeng1, Huaxuan Wen1, Ying Yuan1,(), Yimei Liao1, Yue Qin1, Dandan Luo1, Meiling Liang1, Shengli Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital, Shenzhen 518028, China
  • Received:2023-06-21 Published:2024-05-01
  • Corresponding author: Ying Yuan
引用本文:

曾晴, 文华轩, 袁鹰, 廖伊梅, 秦越, 罗丹丹, 梁美玲, 李胜利. 经腹二维超声评价胎儿大脑外侧裂的新参数——外侧裂平台角度[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 454-459.

Qing Zeng, Huaxuan Wen, Ying Yuan, Yimei Liao, Yue Qin, Dandan Luo, Meiling Liang, Shengli Li. Sylvian fissure plateau angle: a new parameter to evaluate fetal sylvian fissure by transabdominal two-dimensional ultrasound[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2024, 21(05): 454-459.

目的

通过测量胎儿颅脑3个常规筛查横切面上外侧裂平台角度,探讨胎儿大脑皮层发育异常筛查中外侧裂平台角度的截断值。

方法

收集2018年6月至2020年7月到深圳市妇幼保健院进行常规超声检查且孕周范围在23~28+6周的180例正常单胎孕妇(正常组)和3例异常病例(异常组)。所有病例都在3个常规颅脑筛查横切面(丘脑水平横切面、侧脑室水平横切面和小脑水平横切面)上测量外侧裂平台角度。外侧裂平台角度测量为脑中线与外侧裂平台线相交的夹角。采用非参数检验比较3个切面测值是否有差异。采用组内相关系数(ICC)评价重测一致性或观察者一致性。

结果

在3个切面上正常组所有病例的外侧裂平台角度都>0°,而异常组的3个病例外侧裂角度均<0°。丘脑水平横切面和侧脑室水平横切面上外侧裂平台角度比较(8.28°±3.00° vs 7.98°±2.86°),差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);但小脑水平横切面上外侧裂平台角度(10.20°±3.46°)大于丘脑水平横切面和侧脑室水平横切面外侧裂平台角度,差异均具有统计学意义(H=-87.458、-103.208,P均<0.05)。重测一致性和观察者间一致性ICC分别为0.971(95%CI:0.945~0.984)、0.936(95%CI:0.819~0.979)。

结论

3个横切面上正常的外侧裂平台角度在23~28+6周相对稳定,0°可能是评估外侧裂异常的较好截断值,可在丘脑水平横切面测量外侧裂平台角度来评价外侧裂发育情况。

Objective

To evaluate the sylvian fissure plateau by sylvian fissure plateau angle (SFPA) and explore the cut-off value of the SFPA in screening for fetal cortical developmental abnormalities.

Methods

From June 2018 to July 2020, a prospective ultrasound evaluation was conducted on 180 normal and 3 abnormal singleton pregnant women at 23-28 weeks of gestation in Shenzhen Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital. All cases were assessed in three axial planes of the fetal brain (transthalamic, transventricular, and transcerebellar) using transabdominal two-dimensional images. The SFPA of all cases was measured between the brain midline (BM) and a line drawn along the sylvian fissure plateau. Non-parametric test was used to compare the differences of the measured SFPA values on the three axial planes. Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used for assessing the intra- and inter-observer repeatability of the SFPA measurements.

Results

The SFPA in normal cases in the transthalamic, transventricular, and transcerebellar planes were all greater than 0°, while in abnormal cases they were smaller than 0°. However, there was no major difference in the angles measured on the transthalamic and transventricular planes (8.28°±3.00° vs 7.98°±2.86°, P>0.05). There was a major difference in the SFPA on the transcerebellar plane (10.20°±3.46°) and transthalamic/transventricular plane (H=-87.458 and -103.208, respectively, P<0.05). The intra- and inter-observer ICC were excellent at 0.971 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.945-0.984) and 0.936 (95%CI: 0.819-0.979), respectively.

Conclusion

The SFPA of normal cases in the three axial views are stable at 23-28+6 weeks of gestation and 0° may be a good cut-off value for evaluating abnormal SFPA. We recommend the SFPA on the transthalamic plane to be used to evaluate the sylvian fissure in clinical work.

图1 胎儿外侧裂平台角度测量方法。图a、b、c分别为正常胎儿经丘脑水平横切面、经侧脑室水平横切面、经小脑水平横切面超声图像上外侧裂平台角度的测量及相应的示意图;图d、e、f分别为异常病例经丘脑水平横切面、经侧脑室水平横切面、经小脑水平横切面超声图像上外侧裂平台角度的测量及相应的示意图;外侧裂平台直线和脑中线向胎儿颅脑前方相交成锐角定义角度为正,而两条直线向胎儿颅脑后方相交成锐角定义角度为负,两条直线平行定义角度为0°
图2 正常和异常组外侧裂平台角度随孕周变化的复合散点图。图a~c分别为丘脑水平横切面、侧脑室水平横切面和小脑水平横切面测得的数据
表1 本研究中3例异常病例的产前和产后随访资料
1
Gindes L, Malach S, Weisz B, et al. Measuring the perimeter and area of the Sylvian fissure in fetal brain during normal pregnancies using 3-dimensional ultrasound[J]. Prenatal Diag, 2015, 35(11): 1097-1105.
2
Toi A, Lister WS, Fong KW. How early are fetal cerebral sulci visible at prenatal ultrasound and what is the normal pattern of early fetal sulcal development?[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2004, 24(7): 706-715.
3
Chen X, Li SL, Luo GY, et al. Ultrasonographic characteristics of cortical sulcus development in the human fetus between 18 and 41 weeks of gestation[J]. Chin Med J, 2017, 130(8): 920-928.
4
陈曦, 李胜利, 袁鹰, 等. 胎儿脑沟回生长发育规律的超声研究[C]. 西安: 中国超声医学工程学会成立30周年暨第十二届全国超声医学学术大会, 2014.
5
Spinelli M, Sica C, Ghezzi F, et al. Nomograms of the fetal sylvian fissure and insular lobe throughout gestation: a multicentric, ultrasonographic cross-sectional study[J]. Fetal Diagn Ther, 2019, 45(5): 325-331.
6
Poon LC, Sahota DS, Chaemsaithong P, et al. Transvaginal three‐dimensional ultrasound assessment of Sylvian fissures at 18–30 weeks' gestation[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2019, 54(2): 190-198.
7
Quarello E, Stirnemann J, Ville Y, et al. Assessment of fetal Sylvian fissure operculization between 22 and 32 weeks: a subjective approach[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 32(1): 44-49.
8
廖伊梅, 文华轩, 汪兵, 等. 产前超声简化分级方法评估正常胎儿外侧裂的可行性研究[J]. 中华超声影像学杂志, 2022, 31(1): 30-36.
9
Droullé P, Gaillet J, Schweitzer M. Maturation of the fetal brain. Echoanatomy: normal development, limits and value of pathology[J]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris), 1984, 13(3): 228-236.
10
Monteagudo A, Timor-Tritsch IE. Development of the fetal gyri, sulci and fissures: a transvaginal sonographic study[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 1997, 9(4): 222-228.
11
Pistorius LR, Stoutenbeek P, Groenendaal F, et al. Grade and symmetry of normal fetal cortical development a longitudinal two and three dimensional ultrasound study[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2010, 36(6): 700-708.
12
Alves CMS, Júnior EA, Nardozza LMM, et al. Reference ranges for fetal brain fissure development on 3‐dimensional sonography in the multiplanar mode[J]. J Ultras Med, 2013, 32(2): 269-277.
13
Harvey B, Sarnat LF. Telencephalic flexure and malformations of the lateral cerebral (Sylvian) fissure[J]. Pediatr Neurol, 2016, 63: 23-38.
14
Cohen-Sacher B, Lerman-Sagie T, Lev D, et al. Sonographic developmental milestones of the fetal cerebral cortex a longitudinal study[J]. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 27(5): 494-502.
[1] 王秋莲, 张莹, 李春敏, 徐树明, 张玉奇. 胎儿主动脉弓部梗阻伴发复杂心内畸形的产前超声诊断及漏误诊分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 718-725.
[2] 顾莉莉, 姜凡. 安徽省超声产前筛查切面图像质量现状调查情况及分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 671-674.
[3] 王水清, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 马明明, 狄敏. 16~40周正常胎儿左心房后间隙指数及其Z评分的定量研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 460-469.
[4] 罗刚, 泮思林, 孙玲玉, 李志新, 陈涛涛, 乔思波, 庞善臣. 一种新型语义网络分析模型对室间隔完整型肺动脉闭锁和危重肺动脉瓣狭窄胎儿右心发育不良程度的评价作用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(04): 377-383.
[5] 张帧, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 陈阳. 二维斑点追踪技术评价正常中晚孕期胎儿右心房功能的初步研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(04): 384-390.
[6] 张盼盼, 赵博文, 潘美, 彭晓慧, 陈冉, 田园诗, 林仙方, 惠姗姗, 沈婷婷. 胎儿左心房后间隙指数在胎儿肺动脉瓣缺如综合征中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(04): 391-398.
[7] 曾晴, 文华轩, 袁鹰, 廖伊梅, 秦越, 罗丹丹, 梁美玲, 彭桂艳, 林毅, 谭莹, 温昕, 黄文兰, 李胜利. 胎儿颅脑五横切面法的临床应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 243-250.
[8] 朱惠娟, 邝海燕, 骆迎春, 邓光祁, 蒋凌晖, 汪圣, 王政, 孔一凡, 龙煜. 胎儿脐-门-体静脉系统异常分流的产前超声诊断及产后结局[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 257-267.
[9] 谢峰, 伍玉晗, 赵胜, 杨小红, 王玉波, 石珍, 范建华, 章敏. 产前超声和MRI诊断胎儿硬脑膜窦畸形的联合应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(03): 275-280.
[10] 李博, 彭芳华, 孔德璇, 张欢欢, 曲东辉, 王锟, 阚长利, 聂明辉, 刘天鑫, 吴文瑛. 超声心动图诊断胎儿单纯肺动脉瓣狭窄的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(02): 158-162.
[11] 肖莉莉, 吴道珠, 陈晓乐, 李秀云, 寇红菊. 胎儿心脏参数对胎儿宫内生长受限的预测价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(01): 24-31.
[12] 谭芳, 杨娇娇, 范思涵, 叶彩玲, 纪学芹. 产前超声心动图在先天性血管环诊断中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(01): 37-41.
[13] 贾赛君, 张英, 万佳义. 妊娠合并亚临床甲状腺功能减退孕妇的妊娠结局[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(02): 140-147.
[14] 马海月, 南晓琴. 网织红细胞百分比/未成熟网织红细胞指数联合胆红素与白蛋白比值对新生儿溶血病的病情评估意义[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2024, 20(01): 89-96.
[15] 卫星, 孙路明. 辅助生殖技术与胎儿生长障碍[J]. 中华产科急救电子杂志, 2024, 13(02): 88-92.
阅读次数
全文


摘要