切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2026, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (04) : 283 -291. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2026.04.004

浅表器官超声影像学

甲状腺乳头状癌术后淋巴结转移的超声特征
张崇霄1,2, 胡紫玥2, 崔立坤2, 王璐2, 卢漫2,()   
  1. 1 611137 成都中医药大学
    2 610041 成都,四川省肿瘤医院超声医学中心
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-25 出版日期:2026-04-01
  • 通信作者: 卢漫
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(82272015); 四川省区域创新合作项目(2024YFHZ0140)

Ultrasound characteristics of lymph node metastasis after papillary thyroid carcinoma surgery

Chongxiao Zhang1,2, Ziyue Hu2, Likun Cui2, Lu Wang2, Man Lu2,()   

  1. 1 Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chengdu 611137, China
    2 Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu 610041, China
  • Received:2025-09-25 Published:2026-04-01
  • Corresponding author: Man Lu
引用本文:

张崇霄, 胡紫玥, 崔立坤, 王璐, 卢漫. 甲状腺乳头状癌术后淋巴结转移的超声特征[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2026, 23(04): 283-291.

Chongxiao Zhang, Ziyue Hu, Likun Cui, Lu Wang, Man Lu. Ultrasound characteristics of lymph node metastasis after papillary thyroid carcinoma surgery[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2026, 23(04): 283-291.

目的

评估甲状腺乳头状癌术后患者颈部淋巴结转移规律、超声检查特征及诊断效能,为术后随访监测及临床决策提供参考依据。

方法

回顾性收集2023年1月至2025年4月于四川省肿瘤医院接受甲状腺术后随访、超声检查发现可疑颈部淋巴结转移并经病理证实的97例甲状腺乳头状癌患者。依据术后病理,将超声可疑恶性淋巴结分为恶性组与良性组。记录转移淋巴结的颈部分区(侧颈区:Ⅱ、Ⅲ、Ⅳ、Ⅴ区;中央区:Ⅵ区及Ⅶ区)、超声表现及临床资料(如淋巴结清扫术式),并采用单因素分析方法(独立样本t检验、χ2检验或Fisher确切概率法、Kruskal-Wallis H检验)比较恶性组与良性组、中央区组与侧颈区组、不同淋巴结清扫术式组间差异。计算常规超声对各分区淋巴结的诊断效能,采用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线进行分析,并采用DeLong检验比较曲线下面积(AUC)的差异。

结果

97例患者中,淋巴结转移以Ⅳ区(60.82%)、Ⅲ区(57.73%)最为常见。超声检查发现的188枚可疑恶性淋巴结中,166枚经病理证实为恶性,22枚为良性。良、恶性淋巴结超声特征比较,恶性组中混合型/周边型血流模式(48.80%/24.70% vs 18.18%/0)及2~3级血流分级(61.45% vs 18.18%)比例更高,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.001;χ2=14.36,P<0.001)。中央区转移恶性淋巴结共40枚,侧颈区转移恶性淋巴结共178枚,中央区转移淋巴结直径更小[(12.36±5.22)mm vs(16.96±6.93)mm,t=4.64,P<0.001],且高回声灶、混合型/周边型血流及2~3级血流分级等典型恶性超声特征患者比例更低(10.00% vs 33.71%;7.50%/35.00% vs 26.97%/48.88%;35.00% vs 66.29%),差异具有统计学意义(χ2=8.15、P=0.004;χ2=21.69、P<0.001;χ2=12.63、P<0.001)。超声对Ⅲ区、Ⅳ区的诊断敏感度较高(87.50%、89.83%),对Ⅱ区及Ⅴ区的诊断敏感度较低(55.00%、52.17%);ROC曲线分析显示,超声对Ⅲ区(AUC=0.901)、Ⅳ区(AUC=0.897)及Ⅵ区(AUC=0.866)诊断效能优于Ⅱ区(AUC=0.731),差异具有统计学意义(Z=3.172、3.033、2.306,P=0.002、0.002、0.021),且对Ⅲ区、Ⅳ区的诊断效能优于Ⅴ区(AUC=0.741),差异具有统计学意义(Z=2.570、2.466,P=0.010、0.014)。初次仅行中央区淋巴结清扫的患者Ⅱ区复发率高于中央区联合侧颈区淋巴结清扫者(55.00% vs 31.58%,χ2=5.36,P=0.021)。

结论

甲状腺乳头状癌术后转移恶性淋巴结多见于Ⅲ区、Ⅳ区,且超声诊断效能优越。混合型血流模式及高血流分级是鉴别良、恶性淋巴结的重要指标。但超声对Ⅱ区及Ⅴ区淋巴结转移诊断效能相对有限,应在随访时进一步结合多区域征象综合判断,以避免漏诊。

Objective

To investigate the distribution patterns and ultrasonographic features of cervical lymph node metastasis in postoperative papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) patients, as well as the diagnostic performance of ultrasound, in order to provide evidence for postoperative surveillance and clinical decision-making.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 97 patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma who underwent postoperative follow-up at Sichuan Cancer Hospital from January 2023 to April 2025 and were found to have suspicious cervical lymph node metastasis on ultrasound and subsequently confirmed by pathology. Based on the pathology, the ultrasound-identified suspiciously malignant lymph nodes were divided into the malignant group and the benign group. The regional distribution of recurrent lymph nodes, ultrasonographic features, and clinical data were recorded. For intergroup comparisons, the t-test or Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for continuous variables, and the χ2 test or Fisher's exact test (when applicable) was used for categorical variables. The diagnostic performance of conventional ultrasound for each cervical compartment, the impact of initial surgical dissection extent on subsequent recurrence sites, the ultrasonographic features of benign versus malignant lymph nodes, and the differences in ultrasonographic features of malignant lymph nodes between different compartments were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed, and the area under the curve (AUC) values were compared using the DeLong test.

Results

Among the 97 patients included, lymph node metastases were most commonly observed in levelⅣ (60.82%) and levelⅢ (57.73%). Vascular patterns were effective indicators for differentiating benign from malignant lymph nodes: the malignant group exhibited a higher proportion of mixed/peripheral vascular pattern (Fisher's exact test, P<0.001) and Adler grade 2-3 blood flow (χ2=14.36, P<0.001). Metastatic lymph nodes in the central compartment had smaller diameters [(12.36±5.22) mm vs (16.96±6.93)mm, t=4.64, P<0.001] and lower proportions of typical malignant ultrasonographic features, including hyperechoic foci (10.00% vs 33.71%; χ2=8.15, P=0.004), mixed/peripheral vascular pattern (7.50%/35.00% vs 26.97%/48.88%; χ2=21.69, P<0.001), and Adler grade 2-3 blood flow (35.00% vs 66.29%; χ2=12.63, P<0.001). Ultrasound demonstrated a high diagnostic sensitivity for levelⅢ (87.50%) and levelⅣ (89.83%), but a low sensitivity for levelⅡ (55.00%) and levelⅤ (52.17%). ROC curve analysis showed that the diagnostic performance for levelⅢ (AUC=0.901), levelⅣ (AUC=0.897), and levelⅥ (AUC=0.866) was superior to that for levelⅡ (AUC=0.731) (Z=3.172, 3.033, and 2.306; P=0.002, 0.002, and 0.021, respectively), and the performance for levelⅢand levelⅣ was also superior to that for levelⅤ (AUC=0.741) (Z=2.570 and 2.466; P=0.010 and 0.014, respectively). Patients who initially underwent central compartment dissection alone had a significantly higher recurrence rate in levelⅡ compared to those who received combined lateral neck dissection (55.00% vs 31.58%, P=0.021).

Conclusion

Postoperative recurrent lymph nodes in PTC are predominantly located in levels ⅢandⅣ, where ultrasound exhibits excellent diagnostic performance. Mixed vascular pattern and high Adler grade are important indicators for differentiating malignant from benign lymph nodes. However, the diagnostic efficacy of ultrasound for levelsⅡandⅤ is relatively limited, necessitating comprehensive evaluation incorporating multi-level signs during follow-up to avoid missed diagnosis.

图1 甲状腺癌术后淋巴结转移患者常规超声图像(图a、c)及彩色多普勒血流图像(图b、d);图a、b:29岁女性患者单发Ⅵ区淋巴结转移(5 mm×4 mm×5 mm);图c、d:46岁男性患者Ⅳ区淋巴结转移(16 mm×10 mm×14 mm)
图2 51岁男性患者甲状腺癌术后颈部Ⅵ区淋巴结转移图像。图a为常规超声图像及超微血管成像,超微血管成像见中央及少许周围血流信号;图b:彩色多普勒血流成像见淋巴结门条状血流信号及少许周围点状血流信号;图c:病理切片图(HE×40)
表1 甲状腺乳头状癌患者术后超声检查提示可疑恶性的颈部淋巴结基于病理结果分组的超声特征比较
表2 甲状腺乳头状癌患者术后侧颈区与中央区转移恶性淋巴结的超声特征对比
表3 术前超声对甲状腺乳头状癌术后不同区域淋巴结转移的诊断效能比较
图3 常规超声诊断甲状腺乳头状癌患者术后颈部不同区域淋巴结转移的受试者操作特征曲线
表4 不同初治淋巴结清扫术式甲状腺乳头状癌患者颈部各分区复发转移情况对比(例)
1
Wu LM, Gu HY, Qu XH, et al. The accuracy of ultrasonography in the preoperative diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma: a meta-analysis [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2012, 81(8): 1798-1805.
2
练为芳, 熊超芳, 魏秀霞. 超声诊断分化型甲状腺癌术后复发颈部淋巴结转移患者的临床效果 [J]. 中外医学研究, 2020, 18(26): 75-78.
3
Chung SR, Baek JH, Rho YH, et al. Sonographic diagnosis of cervical lymph node metastasis in patients with thyroid cancer and comparison of European and Korean guidelines for stratifying the risk of malignant lymph node [J]. Korean J Radiol, 2022, 23(11): 1102-1111.
4
Jin P, Chen J, Dong Y, et al. Ultrasound-based radiomics nomogram combined with clinical features for the prediction of central lymph node metastasis in papillary thyroid carcinoma patients with Hashimoto's thyroiditis [J]. Front Endocrinol, 2022, 13: 993564.
5
Eskander A, Merdad M, Freeman JL, et al. Pattern of spread to the lateral neck in metastatic well-differentiated thyroid cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J]. Thyroid, 2013, 23(5): 583-592.
6
陶久梅, 王艳, 朱姝, 等. 甲状腺乳头状癌颈部淋巴结转移规律及影响因素分析 [J]. 临床耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志, 2014, 28(12): 859-861, 864.
7
闫维, 姜涛, 郑晓. 甲状腺乳头状癌颈淋巴结转移特点及危险因素分析 [J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2017, 25(5): 709-712.
8
Xing Z, Qiu Y, Yang Q, et al. Thyroid cancer neck lymph nodes metastasis: meta-analysis of US and CT diagnosis [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2020, 129: 109103.
9
Frates MC, Parziale MP, Alexander EK, et al. Role of sonographic characteristics of thyroid bed lesions identified following thyroidectomy in the diagnosis or exclusion of recurrent cancer [J]. Radiology, 2021, 299(2): 374-380.
10
Choi JY, Choi YS, Park YH, et al. Experience and analysis of level VII cervical lymph node metastases in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma [J]. J Korean Surg Soc, 2011, 80(5): 307-312.
11
曹永晋, 蔡伟华, 郑敏, 等. 甲状腺乳头状癌(cN1b)Ⅶ区淋巴结转移危险因素及规律分析 [J]. 福建医科大学学报, 2018, 52(1): 33-37.
12
An C, Zhang X, Wang S, et al. Efficacy of superselective neck dissection in detecting metastasis in patients with cN0 papillary thyroid carcinoma at high risk of lateral neck metastasis [J]. Med Sci Monit, 2017, 23: 2118-2126.
13
Grégoire V, Ang K, Budach W, et al. Delineation of the neck node levels for head and neck tumors: a 2013 update. DAHANCA, EORTC, HKNPCSG, NCIC CTG, NCRI, RTOG, TROG consensus guidelines [J]. Radiother Oncol, 2014, 110(1): 172-181.
14
Aoki T, Moriyasu F, Yamamoto K, et al. Image of tumor metastasis and inflammatory lymph node enlargement by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography [J]. World J Radiol, 2011, 3(12): 298-305.
15
Huang T, Huang PT, Luo ZY, et al. Use superb microvascular imaging to diagnose and predict metastatic cervical lymph nodes in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma [J]. J Cancer Res Clinl Oncol, 2024, 150(5): 268.
16
Yang Z, Cai J, Wang Y, et al. Comparison of Doppler imaging and microvascular imaging in cervical lymph node blood flow analysis [J]. Curr Med Imaging, 2024, 20(1): e15734056306197.
17
Lee S, Lee JY, Yoon RG, et al. The value of microvascular imaging for triaging indeterminate cervical lymph nodes in patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma [J]. Cancers, 2020, 12(10): 2839.
18
Nakamura T, Sumi M. Nodal imaging in the neck: recent advances in US, CT and MR imaging of metastatic nodes [J]. Eur Radiol, 2007, 17(5): 1235-1241.
19
陈雨桐, 王燕. 超声诊断甲状腺乳头状癌颈部转移淋巴结的研究进展 [J]. 肿瘤影像学, 2022, 31(2): 203-207.
20
Matlim Ozel T, Akbulut S, Celik A, et al. Is it possible to rule out level II and level VB dissection in patients with metastatic papillary thyroid cancer? [J]. Front Endocrinol, 2025, 16: 1520539.
21
Gane EM, Michaleff ZA, Cottrell MA, et al. Prevalence, incidence, and risk factors for shoulder and neck dysfunction after neck dissection: a systematic review [J]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2017, 43(7): 1199-1218.
[1] 殷信宇, 孟雪勤, 张凯, 陈嘉莹, 陈建刚, 李佳伟. 基于多模态融合特征的甲状腺乳头状癌中央区淋巴结转移预测模型的构建[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2026, 23(01): 30-39.
[2] 潘辰蕊, 杨冰洁, 沈会明, 王颖彦, 韩佳豪, 李嘉. 多模态超声联合免疫炎症指标预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的价值[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(10): 969-975.
[3] 高昕雨, 杨楷熠, 陈慧婷, 朱丽, 方雅滨, 宋梅, 曾锦树. 甲状腺乳头状癌术后颈部转移淋巴结超声引导下微波消融与再次手术的疗效比较[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(09): 858-867.
[4] 张娅茹, 逄川, 庞宇, 范方莹, 梁萍, 于杰. 消融对T1N0M0 甲状腺乳头状癌患者抑郁状态及生活质量的影响[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2025, 22(04): 328-336.
[5] 柳敏, 赵敬柱, 候秀坤, 张淼, 吴小灿, 郑向前. SF3B5在甲状腺乳头状癌中的表达特征与临床意义及其抑制肿瘤进展的分子机制研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 103-111.
[6] 邓励旺, 黄予希, 刘施沂, 李彬. 肝内胆管癌中三级淋巴结构及其他病理特征对预后的影响[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2026, 20(02): 91-97.
[7] 阳敏, 廖江秀, 章国智, 张晔, 范林军. 常规超声联合临床特征对甲状腺微小乳头状癌中央区淋巴结转移的术前诊断价值[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(04): 396-400.
[8] 朱宗恒, 张志火. 甲状腺乳头状癌对侧中央区淋巴结转移的危险因素分析及预测模型构建[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(03): 337-340.
[9] 蒋钟吉, 郭洪, 王东文. 近红外显影技术在前列腺癌淋巴组织显影及病理评估中的应用[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 8-14.
[10] 田超, 黄若曦, 蒋茂林, 谢崇伟, 刁鹏飞, 钟苏权, 陈东, 王航涛, 陈桂柳, 陈虞娟, 李国良. 不同亚型前列腺癌新辅助化疗后盆腔淋巴结转移的风险因素及时间分布[J/OL]. 中华腔镜泌尿外科杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(06): 727-735.
[11] 孔博, 张璟, 于双妮, 孝梦甦, 齐振红, 吕珂. 腹壁型侵袭性纤维瘤病的超声特征[J/OL]. 中华疝和腹壁外科杂志(电子版), 2026, 20(01): 15-18.
[12] 俞颖倩, 徐兴祥. 淋巴结转移与非转移对原发性支气管肺癌免疫微环境及免疫治疗的影响[J/OL]. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版), 2025, 18(06): 1027-1030.
[13] 王淼, 贺佳佳, 潘颖威, 王小兰, 姚袆, 刘明宝, 陆兮, 苏丽洁. 远端胆管癌术后生存预后及其影响因素分析[J/OL]. 中华肝脏外科手术学电子杂志, 2025, 14(04): 582-588.
[14] 李广飞, 李振涛, 刘宝, 胥明婧, 年梦雨. 超声剪切波弹性成像在直肠癌诊断及淋巴结转移评估中的应用研究[J/OL]. 中华消化病与影像杂志(电子版), 2026, 16(01): 21-25.
[15] 康煜, 李刚, 高琴, 李汉杰, 张夏萌, 李建华. 基于磁共振成像参数的可解释性机器学习模型对老年乳腺癌前哨淋巴结转移的预测价值[J/OL]. 中华老年病研究电子杂志, 2025, 12(04): 26-32.
阅读次数
全文


摘要


AI


AI小编
你好!我是《中华医学电子期刊资源库》AI小编,有什么可以帮您的吗?