切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 141 -144. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.jssn.2095-5820.2017.02.013

所属专题: 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

超微血管成像技术在甲状腺乳头状癌诊断中的应用
张岩1, 卢瑞刚1, 郭瑞君1,()   
  1. 1. 100020 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-22 出版日期:2017-02-01
  • 通信作者: 郭瑞君

The value of superb microvascular imaging in the evaluation of papillary thyroid carcinoma

Yan Zhang1, Ruigang Lu1, Ruijun Guo1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Beijing 100020, China
  • Received:2016-04-22 Published:2017-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Ruijun Guo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Guo Ruijun, Email:
引用本文:

张岩, 卢瑞刚, 郭瑞君. 超微血管成像技术在甲状腺乳头状癌诊断中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(02): 141-144.

Yan Zhang, Ruigang Lu, Ruijun Guo. The value of superb microvascular imaging in the evaluation of papillary thyroid carcinoma[J/OL]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2017, 14(02): 141-144.

目的

对比彩色多普勒血流成像(CDFI)技术与超微血管成像(SMI)技术在甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)病灶中血管分级及血流显示率方面的差异,探讨SMI技术在甲状腺乳头状癌诊断中的应用。

方法

选取2015年6月至2015年12月在首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院经穿刺或手术病理证实为PTC患者50例,共61个病灶。按照Adler分级标准,CDFI与SMI技术分别观察同一病灶的血流情况,采用χ2检验比较2种技术在血管分级及血流显示率方面的差异。

结果

CDFI技术血流模式检出病灶血管0 ~Ⅰ级33个,Ⅱ~Ⅲ级28个;SMI技术血流模式检出病灶血管0 ~Ⅰ级6个,Ⅱ~Ⅲ级55个,CDFI与SMI 2种技术对病灶血流分级的比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=27.475,P<0.01);CDFI技术显示50例甲状腺乳头状癌内部或周边呈点状、短棒状血流信号,5例病灶显示内部呈分支状血流信号;SMI技术显示42个病灶内部或周边呈点状、短棒状血流信号,17个病灶内部呈分支状血流信号,2种技术检验甲状腺乳头状癌血流显示情况的比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.011,P<0.01)。

结论

与传统CDFI技术相比,SMI技术具有较高血流敏感度,可清晰显示甲状腺乳头状癌病灶内微小杂乱血管,为甲状腺乳头状癌诊断提供了可靠的血管方面的依据。其血流显示率与超声造影强化方式类似,因而具有广阔的研究前景。

Objective

To compare the difference between color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in the evaluation of vascular grading and the display rate of vascular in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).

Methods

Between June 2015 and December 2015 in Beijing Chaoyang Hosptial, 50 patients with 61 thyroid nodules were detected by ultrasonography, and pathologic types were confirmed as PTC. CDFI and SMI were used to evaluation the same nodule respectively according to Adler′s grading criteria. The different flow characteristics were analyzed by the χ2 test.

Results

In CDFI, the vascular grading of 33 patients were 0 ~Ⅰ and these of 28 patients were Ⅱ~Ⅲ by CDFI. In SMI, the vascular grading of 6 patients were 0 ~Ⅰ and these of 55 patients were Ⅱ~Ⅲ by SMI. There was a significant difference between CDFI and SMI for vascular grading (χ2=27.475, P<0.01). In CDFI, 50 patients with PTC showed punctiform and rod-like flow signals, and 5 patients showed more detail internal small branches by CDFI. In SMI, 42 patients with PTC showed punctiform and rod-like flow signals, and 17 patients showed more detail internal small branches. There was a significant difference between CDFI and SMI about the display rate of vascular (χ2=7.011, P<0.01).

Conclusions

Compared with CDFI, SMI is highly improved blood flow sensitivity. It can provide more detail internal small branches in PTC. The characteristics of vascular distribution are similar to strengthening mode of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in PTC, therefore, SMI is worth to further research.

图5 患者女性,38岁,左叶PTC,CDFI及mSMI探及病灶内部多量血流信号,Adler分级均为Ⅲ级
表1 彩色多普勒血流成像技术与超微血管显像技术检测甲状腺乳头状癌患者的病灶血流分级及血流显示(个)
图7 患者男性,46岁,左叶PTC,mSMI探及病灶内部杂乱血流信号
[1]
Kuhn E, Teller L, Piana S, et al. Different clonal origin of bilateral papillary thyroid carcinoma, with a review of the literature [J]. Endocr Pathol, 2012, 23(2):101-107.
[2]
Wreesmann VB, Nixon IJ, Rivera M, et al. Prognostic value of vascular invasion in well-differentiated papillary thyroid carcinoma [J]. Thyroid, 2015, 25(5):503-508.
[3]
Ma Y, Li G, Li J, et al. The Diagnostic Value of Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) in Detecting Blood Flow Signals of Breast Lesions: A Preliminary Study Comparing SMI to Color Doppler Flow Imaging [J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2015, 94(36):e1502.
[4]
马燕,李刚,李晶, 等. 超微血管成像技术检测乳腺良恶性肿物血流[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2015, 31(5):659-662.
[5]
Lee YS, Kim MJ, Han SW, et al. Superb microvascular imaging for the detection of parenchymal perfusion in normal and undescended testes in young children [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2016, 85(3):649-656.
[6]
Gabriel M, Tomczak J, Snoch-Ziolkiewicz M, et al. Comparison of Superb Micro-Vascular Ultrasound Imaging (SMI) and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) for Detection of Endoleaks After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) [J]. Am J Case Rep, 2016, 17:43-46.
[7]
Adler DD, Carson PL, Rubin JM, et al. Doppler ultrasound color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: preliminary findings [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 1990, 16(6):553-559.
[8]
张波,姜玉新,戴晴, 等. 前瞻性观察甲状腺结节的SonoVue超声造影增强模式[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2010, 26(5):844-847.
[9]
马燕,李刚,李晶, 等. 超微血管成像技术检测乳腺良恶性肿物血流[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2015, 31(5):659-662.
[10]
Machado P, Segal S, Lyshchik A, et al. A Novel Microvascular Flow Technique: Initial Results in Thyroids [J]. Ultrasound Q, 2016, 32(1):67-74.
[11]
李小鹏,张红丽,何鑫, 等. 甲状腺良恶性结节超声造影特征与病理微血管密度的相关性研究[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2015, 26(9):631-634.
[12]
Moon HJ, Kwak JY, Kim MJ, et al. Can vascularity at power Doppler US help predict thyroid malignancy? [J]. Radiology, 2010, 255(1):260-269.
[1] 王亚红, 蔡胜, 葛志通, 杨筱, 李建初. 颅骨骨膜窦的超声表现一例[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(11): 1089-1091.
[2] 章建全, 程杰, 陈红琼, 闫磊. 采用ACR-TIRADS评估甲状腺消融区的调查研究[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 966-971.
[3] 罗辉, 方晔. 品管圈在提高甲状腺结节细针穿刺检出率中的应用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(10): 972-977.
[4] 刘畅, 蒋洁, 胥雪冬, 崔立刚, 王淑敏, 陈文. 北京市海淀区医疗机构甲状腺超声检查及TIRADS分类基线调查[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(07): 693-697.
[5] 杨敬武, 周美君, 陈雨凡, 李素淑, 何燕妮, 崔楠, 刘红梅. 人工智能超声结合品管圈活动对低年资超声医师甲状腺结节风险评估能力的作用[J/OL]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2024, 21(05): 522-526.
[6] 笪东祝, 林凯, 王小蕊, 王开银, 王敏, 王玮, 李瑾, 刘俊. 低促甲状腺激素水平结节性甲状腺肿的发生发展与促甲状腺激素受体基因D727E 多态性的相关性研究[J/OL]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 443-446.
[7] 谢田伟, 庞于樊, 吴丽. 超声引导下不同消融术对甲状腺良性结节体积缩减率、复发率的影响[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 80-83.
[8] 王伟伟, 费建平, 王璋瑜. 不同手术空间建立方法的经口腔前庭入路腔镜甲状腺术对比研究[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 84-87.
[9] 孙莲, 马红萍, 吴文英. 局部进展期甲状腺癌患者外科处理[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 112-114.
[10] 麻紫月, 王贞文, 张强, 赵代伟, 张翊伦. 右侧喉不返神经1例报告[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2025, 19(01): 115-116.
[11] 顾雯, 凌守鑫, 唐海利, 甘雪梅. 两种不同手术入路在甲状腺乳头状癌患者开放性根治性术中的应用比较[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 687-690.
[12] 田文. 甲状腺癌功能性根治颈淋巴结清扫术[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 482-482.
[13] 王宇, 徐芳泉, 周旋, 姚晓峰, 李强. 不断提高分化型甲状腺癌根治性切除规范化[J/OL]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(05): 473-476.
[14] 杨菲, 刘腾飞, 赵志军, 李睿聪, 张颉, 刘妍, 赵珍. 血清维生素水平与分化型甲状腺癌的关联性研究[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(07): 633-640.
[15] 王曦娅, 尹弘青, 丁伟, 徐滨, 于海源, 马东升, 邵军. 桥本背景下甲状腺乳头状癌多参数分析预测大容量淋巴结转移[J/OL]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(06): 548-554.
阅读次数
全文


摘要