切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (02) : 141 -144. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.jssn.2095-5820.2017.02.013

所属专题: 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

超微血管成像技术在甲状腺乳头状癌诊断中的应用
张岩1, 卢瑞刚1, 郭瑞君1,()   
  1. 1. 100020 首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-22 出版日期:2017-02-01
  • 通信作者: 郭瑞君

The value of superb microvascular imaging in the evaluation of papillary thyroid carcinoma

Yan Zhang1, Ruigang Lu1, Ruijun Guo1,()   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Beijing 100020, China
  • Received:2016-04-22 Published:2017-02-01
  • Corresponding author: Ruijun Guo
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Guo Ruijun, Email:
引用本文:

张岩, 卢瑞刚, 郭瑞君. 超微血管成像技术在甲状腺乳头状癌诊断中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(02): 141-144.

Yan Zhang, Ruigang Lu, Ruijun Guo. The value of superb microvascular imaging in the evaluation of papillary thyroid carcinoma[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2017, 14(02): 141-144.

目的

对比彩色多普勒血流成像(CDFI)技术与超微血管成像(SMI)技术在甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)病灶中血管分级及血流显示率方面的差异,探讨SMI技术在甲状腺乳头状癌诊断中的应用。

方法

选取2015年6月至2015年12月在首都医科大学附属北京朝阳医院经穿刺或手术病理证实为PTC患者50例,共61个病灶。按照Adler分级标准,CDFI与SMI技术分别观察同一病灶的血流情况,采用χ2检验比较2种技术在血管分级及血流显示率方面的差异。

结果

CDFI技术血流模式检出病灶血管0 ~Ⅰ级33个,Ⅱ~Ⅲ级28个;SMI技术血流模式检出病灶血管0 ~Ⅰ级6个,Ⅱ~Ⅲ级55个,CDFI与SMI 2种技术对病灶血流分级的比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=27.475,P<0.01);CDFI技术显示50例甲状腺乳头状癌内部或周边呈点状、短棒状血流信号,5例病灶显示内部呈分支状血流信号;SMI技术显示42个病灶内部或周边呈点状、短棒状血流信号,17个病灶内部呈分支状血流信号,2种技术检验甲状腺乳头状癌血流显示情况的比较,差异有统计学意义(χ2=7.011,P<0.01)。

结论

与传统CDFI技术相比,SMI技术具有较高血流敏感度,可清晰显示甲状腺乳头状癌病灶内微小杂乱血管,为甲状腺乳头状癌诊断提供了可靠的血管方面的依据。其血流显示率与超声造影强化方式类似,因而具有广阔的研究前景。

Objective

To compare the difference between color Doppler flow imaging (CDFI) and superb microvascular imaging (SMI) in the evaluation of vascular grading and the display rate of vascular in papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC).

Methods

Between June 2015 and December 2015 in Beijing Chaoyang Hosptial, 50 patients with 61 thyroid nodules were detected by ultrasonography, and pathologic types were confirmed as PTC. CDFI and SMI were used to evaluation the same nodule respectively according to Adler′s grading criteria. The different flow characteristics were analyzed by the χ2 test.

Results

In CDFI, the vascular grading of 33 patients were 0 ~Ⅰ and these of 28 patients were Ⅱ~Ⅲ by CDFI. In SMI, the vascular grading of 6 patients were 0 ~Ⅰ and these of 55 patients were Ⅱ~Ⅲ by SMI. There was a significant difference between CDFI and SMI for vascular grading (χ2=27.475, P<0.01). In CDFI, 50 patients with PTC showed punctiform and rod-like flow signals, and 5 patients showed more detail internal small branches by CDFI. In SMI, 42 patients with PTC showed punctiform and rod-like flow signals, and 17 patients showed more detail internal small branches. There was a significant difference between CDFI and SMI about the display rate of vascular (χ2=7.011, P<0.01).

Conclusions

Compared with CDFI, SMI is highly improved blood flow sensitivity. It can provide more detail internal small branches in PTC. The characteristics of vascular distribution are similar to strengthening mode of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in PTC, therefore, SMI is worth to further research.

图5 患者女性,38岁,左叶PTC,CDFI及mSMI探及病灶内部多量血流信号,Adler分级均为Ⅲ级
表1 彩色多普勒血流成像技术与超微血管显像技术检测甲状腺乳头状癌患者的病灶血流分级及血流显示(个)
图7 患者男性,46岁,左叶PTC,mSMI探及病灶内部杂乱血流信号
[1]
Kuhn E, Teller L, Piana S, et al. Different clonal origin of bilateral papillary thyroid carcinoma, with a review of the literature [J]. Endocr Pathol, 2012, 23(2):101-107.
[2]
Wreesmann VB, Nixon IJ, Rivera M, et al. Prognostic value of vascular invasion in well-differentiated papillary thyroid carcinoma [J]. Thyroid, 2015, 25(5):503-508.
[3]
Ma Y, Li G, Li J, et al. The Diagnostic Value of Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) in Detecting Blood Flow Signals of Breast Lesions: A Preliminary Study Comparing SMI to Color Doppler Flow Imaging [J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2015, 94(36):e1502.
[4]
马燕,李刚,李晶, 等. 超微血管成像技术检测乳腺良恶性肿物血流[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2015, 31(5):659-662.
[5]
Lee YS, Kim MJ, Han SW, et al. Superb microvascular imaging for the detection of parenchymal perfusion in normal and undescended testes in young children [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2016, 85(3):649-656.
[6]
Gabriel M, Tomczak J, Snoch-Ziolkiewicz M, et al. Comparison of Superb Micro-Vascular Ultrasound Imaging (SMI) and Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS) for Detection of Endoleaks After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (EVAR) [J]. Am J Case Rep, 2016, 17:43-46.
[7]
Adler DD, Carson PL, Rubin JM, et al. Doppler ultrasound color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: preliminary findings [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 1990, 16(6):553-559.
[8]
张波,姜玉新,戴晴, 等. 前瞻性观察甲状腺结节的SonoVue超声造影增强模式[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2010, 26(5):844-847.
[9]
马燕,李刚,李晶, 等. 超微血管成像技术检测乳腺良恶性肿物血流[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2015, 31(5):659-662.
[10]
Machado P, Segal S, Lyshchik A, et al. A Novel Microvascular Flow Technique: Initial Results in Thyroids [J]. Ultrasound Q, 2016, 32(1):67-74.
[11]
李小鹏,张红丽,何鑫, 等. 甲状腺良恶性结节超声造影特征与病理微血管密度的相关性研究[J]. 中国临床医学影像杂志, 2015, 26(9):631-634.
[12]
Moon HJ, Kwak JY, Kim MJ, et al. Can vascularity at power Doppler US help predict thyroid malignancy? [J]. Radiology, 2010, 255(1):260-269.
[1] 魏淑婕, 惠品晶, 丁亚芳, 张白, 颜燕红, 周鹏, 黄亚波. 单侧颈内动脉闭塞患者行颞浅动脉-大脑中动脉搭桥术的脑血流动力学评估[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(10): 1046-1055.
[2] 丁雷, 罗文, 杨晓, 庞丽娜, 张佩蒂, 刘海静, 袁佳妮, 刘瑾. 高帧频超声造影在评价C-TIRADS 4-5类甲状腺结节成像特征中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 887-894.
[3] 张茜, 陈佳慧, 高雪萌, 赵傲雪, 黄瑛. 基于高帧频超声造影的影像组学特征鉴别诊断甲状腺结节良恶性的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(09): 895-903.
[4] 刘欢颜, 华扬, 贾凌云, 赵新宇, 刘蓓蓓. 颈内动脉闭塞病变管腔结构和血流动力学特征分析[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(08): 809-815.
[5] 孙帼, 谢迎东, 徐超丽, 杨斌. 超声联合临床特征的列线图模型预测甲状腺乳头状癌淋巴结转移的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 734-742.
[6] 李卫民, 陈军民, 黄艳丽, 范晓芳, 韩文, 贾磊, 张俊超, 瞿辰. 基于中国甲状腺超声报告与数据系统分析超声在不同大小甲状腺结节中的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2023, 20(07): 743-748.
[7] 李俊, 彭健韵, 邱婉冰, 窦倩怡, 潘福顺, 梁瑾瑜. 甲状腺结节恶性风险分层(指南):ACR TI-RADS与C-TIRADS诊断效能及不同医师使用指南一致性的多中心回顾性比较研究[J]. 中华普通外科学文献(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 401-407.
[8] 杨体飞, 杨传虎, 陆振如. 改良无充气经腋窝入路全腔镜下甲状腺手术对喉返神经功能的影响研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2024, 18(01): 74-77.
[9] 江振剑, 蒋明, 黄大莉. TK1、Ki67蛋白在分化型甲状腺癌组织中的表达及预后价值研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 623-626.
[10] 黄汇, 朱信强. 131I治疗45岁以下分化型甲状腺癌的疗效及影响因素[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 627-630.
[11] 樊丽超, 郭瑾瑛, 陈鑫. 野生型RET与RET/PTC融合基因检测对甲状腺乳头状癌中央区淋巴结清扫的指导意义[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 631-635.
[12] 徐成, 王璐璐, 王少华. 洗脱液甲状腺球蛋白在甲状腺乳头状癌转移淋巴结中的应用[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 701-704.
[13] 陈航, 闵翔. 日间甲状腺切除术后出血的12例临床分析及应对措施[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 600-602.
[14] 罗佳, 赵晶晶, 曹小珍, 钟玲, 范林军, 曾令娟. 单侧腋窝双侧乳晕入路机器人甲状腺术后局部加压预防皮下隧道出血的对照研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 603-606.
[15] 黄崇植, 肖映胜, 杨熙鸿, 林炘. 甲状腺下动脉的上行分支在甲状腺术中定位喉返神经的应用研究[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(06): 607-610.
阅读次数
全文


摘要