Home    中文  
 
  • Search
  • lucene Search
  • Citation
  • Fig/Tab
  • Adv Search
Just Accepted  |  Current Issue  |  Archive  |  Featured Articles  |  Most Read  |  Most Download  |  Most Cited

Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition) ›› 2022, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (08): 832-836. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2022.08.019

• Continuing Medical Education • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of effects of skill training of ultrasound residents based on an ultrasound simulator

Xining Wu1, Mengsu Xiao1, Yixiu Zhang1,(), Hua Meng1, Peipei Zhang1, Yunshu Ouyang1, Meng Yang1, Jianchu Li1   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
  • Received:2021-01-01 Online:2022-08-01 Published:2022-08-18
  • Contact: Yixiu Zhang

Abstract:

Objective

To assess the value of an ultrasound simulator in evaluating the effect of ultrasonic residents training.

Methods

Eleven residents who underwent standardized resident training at Department of Ultrasound of Peking Union Medical College Hospital were selected. Seven normal ultrasound sections and three cases of abdominal organs were displayed by residents using an ultrasound simulator, and six parameters such as the long diameter and short diameter of the largest section of the lesion were completed, which were compared with the measurements of senior doctors. After two months of outpatient practice, the virtual ultrasound model was used again for resident evaluation, which was recorded as G0M and G2M (G, group; M, month) before and after the exercise. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the examination time between the two groups, and independent sample t-test was used to compare the measurements between residents and senior doctors. Chi-square test (Fisher exact probability test) was used to compare the completion rate and the qualified rate between the two groups.

Results

The average qualified rate of seven normal sections in G0M was 59.46% (44/74), and the average examination time was (8.18±2.96) min. In G2M, the qualified rate was 71.43%, the average qualified rate was increased to 88.31%, and the average time was reduced to (5.45±1.57) min, which were significantly different from those in G0M (χ2=44.101, P<0.001; t=-2.698, P=0.014). The completion rate for the three cases in G2M was higher than that in G0M, but there was no significant difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The examination time for case 1 and case 2 in G2M was less than that in G0M [1.00 (2.00, 1.00) min vs 3.00 (4.00, 2.00) min; 2.00 (2.00, 1.00) min vs 2.50 (3.00, 2.00) min], and the difference between the two groups was statistically significant (Z=-3.089 and -2.061, P=0.002 and 0.039, respectively). The long diameter measurement accuracy for case 3 in the G2M group was lower than that of the G0M group, and there was a significant difference between G2M and senior doctors [(8.42±0.88) cm vs 9.45 cm; t=-3.097, P=0.021].

Conclusion

The ultrasound simulator can be used to evaluate the effects of skill training of ultrasound residents during the initial and practice stage.

Key words: Ultrasound simulator, Resident, Training

Copyright © Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), All Rights Reserved.
Tel: 010-51322630、2632、2628 Fax: 010-51322630 E-mail: csbjb@cma.org.cn
Powered by Beijing Magtech Co. Ltd