切换至 "中华医学电子期刊资源库"

中华医学超声杂志(电子版) ›› 2017, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (07) : 519 -525. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1672-6448.2017.07.008

所属专题: 乳腺超声 文献

浅表器官超声影像学

自动乳腺全容积成像联合声触诊组织成像量化技术在鉴别乳腺良恶性肿块中的价值
朱罗茜1, 黄品同1,(), 包凌云2, 谭艳娟2, 许晓静2, 俞丽芳2   
  1. 1. 310009 杭州,浙江大学医学院附属第二医院超声科
    2. 310006 杭州市第一人民医院超声科
  • 收稿日期:2017-03-16 出版日期:2017-07-01
  • 通信作者: 黄品同
  • 基金资助:
    杭州市农业与社会发展科研计划项目(20170533B29)

The value of automated breast volume scanning, combined with virtual touch tissue imaging quantification in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesion

Luoxi Zhu1, Pintong Huang1,(), Lingyun Bao2, Yanjuan Tan2, Xiaojing Xu2, Lifang Yu2   

  1. 1. Department of Ultrasound, the Second Hospital Affiliated to Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310009, China
    2. Department of Ultrasound, Hangzhou First People′s Hospital, Hangzhou 310006, China
  • Received:2017-03-16 Published:2017-07-01
  • Corresponding author: Pintong Huang
  • About author:
    Corresponding author: Huang Pintong, Email:
引用本文:

朱罗茜, 黄品同, 包凌云, 谭艳娟, 许晓静, 俞丽芳. 自动乳腺全容积成像联合声触诊组织成像量化技术在鉴别乳腺良恶性肿块中的价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2017, 14(07): 519-525.

Luoxi Zhu, Pintong Huang, Lingyun Bao, Yanjuan Tan, Xiaojing Xu, Lifang Yu. The value of automated breast volume scanning, combined with virtual touch tissue imaging quantification in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesion[J]. Chinese Journal of Medical Ultrasound (Electronic Edition), 2017, 14(07): 519-525.

目的

探讨自动乳腺全容积成像(ABVS)技术联合声触诊组织成像量化(VTIQ)技术在鉴别乳腺良恶性肿块中的价值。

方法

选取2016年3月至2017年1月因乳腺疾病到杭州市第一人民医院行ABVS检查的患者507例,共675个肿块,采用ABVS与VTIQ技术对乳腺肿块进行检测,获得冠状面图像及肿块内剪切波速度(SWV)最大值、最小值及平均值(单位为m/s);对照手术病理或穿刺组织学结果,判断冠状面有无"汇聚征",比较良恶性肿块的SWV值,根据受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线确定准确性最高的一组SWV值,获得其诊断最佳截断值;评估冠状面"汇聚征"及VTIQ技术单独及联合使用后对诊断乳腺肿块良恶性的效能,采用独立样本t检验比较乳腺良恶性病变组间差异。

结果

504个肿块病理组织学证实为良性,171个为恶性,冠状面"汇聚征"在乳腺恶性病灶内的出现率高于良性病灶,差异有统计学意义(χ2=279.89,P<0.001);恶性病灶组的SWV值最大值、最小值、平均值均高于乳腺良性病灶组[(6.79±1.71)m/s vs(3.41±1.51)m/s、(5.03±1.24)m/s vs(2.46±0.87)m/s、(5.74±1.36)m/s vs(2.65±1.23)m/s],差异均有统计学意义(t=32.43、33.85、26.77,P均<0.001),恶性病灶组SWV(最大值、最小值和平均值)ROC曲线下面积分别为0.922、0.934、0.937,其中,以肿块内SWV平均值的诊断效能为最佳,其截断值为4.045 m/s。ABVS冠状面"汇聚征"、VTIQ(SWV平均值)及两者联合诊断乳腺肿块良恶性的敏感度分别为39.65%、94.39%、95.78%;特异度97.50%、94.39%、95.53%;准确性82.84%、93.51%、94.25%;阳性预测值84.33%、82.64%、85.12%;阴性预测值82.64%、96.83%、97.68%。

结论

ABVS冠状面"汇聚征"及VTIQ技术均有较高的诊断价值,两种方法联合使用能提高乳腺肿块良恶性鉴别的敏感度及准确性。

Objective

To investigate the value of the automated breast volume scanning (ABVS) combined with virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ) in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesion.

Methods

Five hundred and seven patients with a total of 675 breast nodules were detected using ABVS and VTIQ technique. Of them, coronal plane imaging, SWVmax, SWVmin, and SWVmean (in m/s) for each nodule was acquired three days before operation or core needle biopsy. According to pathological results, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to evaluate the utility of the ABVS alone (retraction phenomenon on coronal plane), VTIQ alone and their combination in the diagnosis of breast lesions.

Results

Among all nodules, 504 lesions were benign, and 171 were malignant. The rate of retraction phenomenon on coronal plane in malignant lesions was significantly higher than that in benign lesions (χ2=279.89, P<0.001). The value of SWVmax, SWVmin, SWVmean (6.79±1.71 m/s, 5.03±1.24 m/s, 5.74±1.36 m/s) in malignant nodules were higher than that of benign nodules [(3.41±1.51) m/s, (2.46±0.87) m/s, (2.65±1.23) m/s], the differences were statistically significant (t=32.43, 33.85, 26.77, all P<0.001). The AUC of malignant nodules for SWV (maximum, minimum, and average) were 0.922, 0.934 and 0.937, respectively. With cut-off value of 4.045 m/s, SWVmean showed the best diagnostic performance. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of the retraction phenomenon on coronal plane, SWVmean and their combination in diagnosing malignant breast lesion were (39.65%, 94.39%, 95.78%), (97.50%, 94.39%, 95.53%) and (82.84%, 93.51%, 94.25%), respectively. And the SWVmean showed significant higher sensitivity than that of retraction phenomenon. The diagnostic capacity significantly improved when the two approaches were combined.

Conclusion

Both the retraction phenomenon on coronal plane and VTIQ had high diagnostic value, combining the two methods can improve the differential diagnosis ability for breast lesions.

图1,2 浸润性导管癌超声声像图。图1示条索状高回声向中心汇聚,呈"汇聚征"(箭头所示);图2示2个相邻的病灶同时出现"汇聚征"(箭头所示)
表1 乳腺肿块ABVS技术冠状面"汇聚征"与病理结果比较[个(%)]
表2 乳腺良恶性肿块组剪切波速差异比较(m/s,±s
图3~9 乳腺良性纤维腺瘤声触诊组织成像定量检测图。图3示冠状面无汇聚征;图4示二维超声现实为边界清晰,形态尚规则乳腺肿块;图5示乳腺肿块声触诊组织成像定量速度图,病灶区显示为淡蓝色或浅蓝色(代表质地较软);图6为乳腺肿块声触诊组织成像定量的质量图,病灶区显示为均匀的绿色,表示弹性成像质量较好;图7,8示乳腺肿块的时间和位移模式图;图9示感兴趣区置于病灶内部进行剪切波速度值7个点位测量
图10~16 乳腺浸润性导管癌声触诊组织成像定量检测图。图10示形态不规则内伴钙化低回声结节;图11示冠状面表现为"汇聚征";图12示该乳腺肿块声触诊组织成像定量速度图,病灶区示以红、黄色为主的不均匀分布(代表质地较硬),周边乳腺组织显示为蓝色(代表质地较软);图13示乳腺肿块声触诊组织成像定量的质量图,病灶区显示为均匀的绿色,表示弹性成像质量较好;图14,15分别示乳腺肿块的时间和位移模式图;图16示感兴趣区置于病灶内部进行剪切波速度值7个点位测量
表3 乳腺恶性肿块的SWV值ROC曲线下面积
图17 乳腺恶性结节SWV最大值、最小值、平均值的ROC曲线
表4 乳腺肿块剪切波速度、ABVS冠状面"汇聚征"及联合各种方法的诊断价值(%)
[1]
石建伟,唐智柳,蔡美玉, 等. 2008—2012年我国女性乳腺癌流行状况的系统性综述 [J].中国妇幼保健, 2014, 29(10):1622-1626.
[2]
唐力,徐辉雄,李建卫, 等. 声触诊组织成像定量剪切波弹性成像技术鉴别诊断乳腺肿块良恶性的价值 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2015, 12(12):951-956.
[3]
Chen L, Chen Y, Diao XH, et al. Comparative study of automated breast 3D ultrasound and handheld B-mode ultrasound for differentiation of benign and malignant breast masses [J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2013, 39(10):1735-1742.
[4]
Goddi A1, Bonardi M, Alessi S. Breast elastography: a literaturereview [J]. J Ultrasound, 2012, 15(3):192-198.
[5]
Liu H, Zhao LX, Xu G, et a1. Diagnostic value of virtual touch tissue imagingquantification for benign and malignant breast lesions with different sizes [J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015, 8(8):13118-13126.
[6]
许晓静,包凌云,朱罗茜, 等. 自动乳腺全容积成像联合彩色多普勒在乳腺硬化性腺病中应用研究 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2016, 32(4):295-297.
[7]
谭艳娟,包凌云,黄安茜, 等. 乳腺恶性肿瘤冠状面汇聚征与临床病理学相关因素分析 [J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2015, 31(7):587- 589.
[8]
Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F, et a1. Elasticmoduli ofbreastand prostate tissues under compression [J]. Ultrasonic Imaging, 1998, 20(4):260-274.
[9]
Tozaki M, Isobe S, Sakamoto M. Combination of elastography and tissue quantification using the acoustic radiation force impulse (ARFI) technology for differential diagnosis of breast masses [J]. Jpn J Radiol, 2012, 30(8):659-670.
[10]
徐光,吴蓉,姚明华, 等. 声辐射力脉冲弹性成像技术结合三维超声检查鉴别诊断乳腺肿块良恶性的价值 [J/CD]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2013, 10(12):984-988.
[11]
王知力,孙璐,胡亚卓, 等. 乳腺病变剪切波弹性模量与胶原纤维的相关性 [J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2014, 22(10):721-724.
[12]
Trottmann M, Marcon J, D′Anastasi M, et al. The role of VTIQ as a new tissue strain analytics measurement technique in testicular lesions [J]. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc, 2014, 58(1):195-209.
[13]
李小龙,徐辉雄,伯小皖, 等. 声触诊组织成像和定量技术对BI-RADS 4类乳腺病灶良恶性的诊断价值 [J]. 影像诊断与介入放射学杂志, 2015, 24(4):290-293.
[14]
Golatta M, Schweitzer-Martin M, Harcosa A, et a1. Normal breast tissue stiffness measured by a new ultrasound technique: virtual touch tissue imaging quantification (VTIQ) [J]. Eur J Radiol, 2013, 82(11):e676-e679.
[15]
Tang L, Xu HX, Bo XW, et al. A novel two-dimensional quantitative shear wave elastography for differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions [J]. Int J Clin Exp Med, 2015, 8(7):10920-10928.
[16]
Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement [J]. Laneet, 1986, 1(8476):307-310.
[1] 王丹丹, 李雅婷, 徐超丽, 杨斌. 影响乳腺癌穿刺活检与术后病理分子分型差异的自动乳腺全容积成像特征[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(04): 337-341.
[2] 赵枫, 肖际东. PDCA循环法在自动乳腺全容积成像诊断乳腺疾病中的应用[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2022, 19(01): 51-54.
[3] 颜红菊, 黄安茜, 谭艳娟, 朱罗茜, 许晓静, 戴超超, 项爱斋, 刘坚, 包凌云. 超声与纤维乳管镜对病理性乳头溢液的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2021, 18(08): 800-805.
[4] 朱琳, 郑燕, 薛剑桥, 刘瑾瑾, 后利珠, 赵丹, 王伟, 董凤林. 常规超声联合超声造影对乳腺囊实性复合肿块良恶性的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(12): 1162-1167.
[5] 陈创华, 方建华, 徐陈柯, 王炜, 孔凡雷, 孙虹. 超声引导下穿刺活检在乳腺非肿块样病变诊断中的应用价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(11): 1142-1144.
[6] 张雨康, 何文, 张红霞, 广旸, 甘雨洋. 高频超声对乳腺脂肪坏死的诊断价值[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(10): 982-986.
[7] 马洁玲, 王心怡, 张楠, 秦王燕, 常洪晶, 廖盛日, 霍苓. S-Detect超声检查对乳腺病灶诊断价值的探索性研究[J]. 中华医学超声杂志(电子版), 2020, 17(08): 748-752.
[8] 王洁, 丁泊文, 尹健. 糖尿病性乳腺病52例临床分析[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2023, 17(05): 285-289.
[9] 刘荫华. 中国乳腺外科临床实践——共识与争议[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(04): 262-262.
[10] 邓韫洁, 陆慧敏, 黄梅, 黄佳榕. 糖尿病相关的乳房坏疽一例[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(02): 128-130.
[11] 刘晓雁, 徐飚, 林欢, 别凤杰, 陈前军. 腔镜技术在乳腺外科中的应用进展[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 229-234.
[12] 王冰, 盛健, 姚利, 戴希勇. 乳腺结核诊断方法的回顾性研究[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2021, 15(04): 223-228.
[13] 冯金燕, 万航宇, 罗静, 杨枫. 增强磁共振成像对乳腺微钙化灶的管理价值[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(06): 337-341.
[14] 肖敏, 李三荣, 周戌. 乳腺Erdheim-Chester病一例并文献复习[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志(电子版), 2020, 14(05): 322-324.
[15] 唐燕, 谷颖. 超声筛查乳腺恶性非肿块型病变的研究现状[J]. 中华妇幼临床医学杂志(电子版), 2022, 18(04): 379-386.
阅读次数
全文


摘要